Efficacy and safety of a mobile app intervention in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a prospective pilot study.

EULAR highlighted the essential role of digital health in increasing self-management and improving clinical outcomes in patients with arthritis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the digital health application (DHA) in patients with inflammatory arthritis. We assessed demographic parameters, treatment regimen, disease activity, and other patient-reported outcomes at baseline and after 4 weeks of DHA use added to standard care treatment. Of 17 patients, who completed the study, 7 (41.2%) patients were male, ranging from 19 to 63 (40.5 ± 12.2) years. No significant change in antirheumatic treatment was observed during the study. Statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) were noted for health-related quality of life (increase in Physical Component Summary of Short Form-36 (SF-36) by 23.6%) and disease activity (decrease of Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simple Disease Activity Index by 38.4% and 39.9%, respectively). Clinically significant improvement was demonstrated for SF-36 Total Score (+ 14.4%), disease activity (Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index- 5 to 15.9%), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire- 9 to 13.5%). None of the efficacy parameters showed negative trends. No adverse events were reported throughout the study. The usability level was high i.e., the mean mHealth Application Usability Questionnaire Score of 5.96 (max.: 7.0) demonstrated a high level of application usability. This suggests that using a personalized disease management program based on DHA significantly improves several measures of patient-reported outcomes and disease activity in patients with inflammatory arthritis in a timely manner. These findings highlight the potential of complementary digital therapy in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Bone turnover biomarkers, disease activity, and MRI changes of sacroiliac joints in patients with spondyloarthritis.

The lack of valid biomarkers in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) requires searching for additional options to increase sacroiliac joint (SIJ) evaluation effectiveness. We assessed the serum levels of bone turnover markers and their relationships with active and chronic changes in SIJs using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), indices, and laboratory parameters of disease activity in SpA patients. 102 patients with SpA and 15 healthy subjects were included. Testing of serum levels of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß1), Wnt3, sclerostin, and Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) was conducted. Active inflammatory lesions in SIJs were evaluated using Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI SIJ score, and chronic changes using the Danish scoring method. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Scores with CRP, and ESR were used to assess disease activity. Serum levels of Dkk-1, TGF-ß1, and sclerostin were significantly lower in SpA patients compared to healthy controls. The serum levels of Dkk-1 positively correlated with CRP. Dkk-1 had a significant negative correlation with Danish score. The sclerostin serum level had a weak negative correlation with the active inflammatory MRI SIJ lesions. There were positive correlations between TGF-ß1 and sclerostin with Dkk-1, and negative correlation between Wnt3 and sclerostin. Dkk-1 positively correlated with CRP and negatively with chronic SIJ changes by Danish score. Sclerostin negatively correlated with the active SIJ lesions by SPARCC. This suggests that Dkk-1 and sclerostin are the most promising candidates to reveal inflammation and bone turnover in patients with SpA.

Clinical presentation, imaging and response to interferon-alpha therapy in Erdheim-Chester disease: case-based review.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis associated with BRAFV600E mutations in more than 50% of cases and presenting with 95% with skeletal lesions. However, cutaneous, pulmonary, large vessels and central nervous system involvement can also occur. We report a case of a 25-year-old woman who was admitted in 2018 for exploration of diffuse bone pain and rashes on the face. Her current symptoms had started 14 months earlier and consisted of bone pain, affecting the legs. She had periodic low-grade fever, asthenia and xanthelasma-like papules appeared on face. At admission, physical examination showed bilateral and symmetrical long bone pain, especially in the knees and multiple xanthelasma-like papules around the eyelids, cheeks and chin. Laboratory tests revealed elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed multiple mixed bone lesions with a hyperintensive MR signal on PD FS and hypointense signal on T1of the femur and tibia. Bone scintigraphy indicated bilateral and symmetrical metaphyseal and diaphyseal increased uptake. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed infiltration of the perirenal fat. Biopsy of the skin revealed histiocytic infiltration, which was CD68-positive and CD100-positive, confirming the diagnosis of ECD. Patient was treated with interferon-α (IFN-α) plus methylprednisolone. After 6 months of treatment her clinical condition partly improved: a reduction of pain on visual analogue scale (VAS) scale, significant decrease of methylprednisolone dose and specific dynamics according to bone MR imaging data, however, no change in symptoms attributed to skin rash was noted. We also provide the literature review results of IFN-α treatment efficacy in Erdheim-Chester disease involving the skin and musculoskeletal system with MR imaging changes.

Fenebrutinib versus Placebo or Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II Trial (ANDES Study).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fenebrutinib, an oral and highly selective non-covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with RA and inadequate response to methotrexate (cohort 1, n=480) were randomized to fenebrutinib (50 mg once daily, 150 mg once daily, 200 mg twice daily), 40 mg adalimumab every other week, or placebo. Patients with RA and inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (cohort 2, n=98) received fenebrutinib (200 mg twice daily) or placebo. Both cohorts continued methotrexate therapy. RESULTS: In cohort 1, American College of Rheumatology scores (ACR50) at week 12 were similar for fenebrutinib 50 mg once daily and placebo, and higher for fenebrutinib 150 mg once daily (28%) and 200 mg twice daily (35%) than placebo (15%) (p=0.017; p=0.0003). Fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily and adalimumab (36%) were comparable (p=0.81). In cohort 2, more patients achieved ACR50 with fenebrutinib 200 mg twice daily (25%) than placebo (12%) (p=0.072). The most common adverse events for fenebrutinib included nausea, headache, anemia, and upper respiratory tract infections. Fenebrutinib had significant effects on myeloid and B cell biomarkers (CCL4 and rheumatoid factor). Fenebrutinib and adalimumab caused overlapping as well as distinct changes in B cell and myeloid biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Fenebrutinib demonstrated efficacy comparable to adalimumab in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate, and safety consistent with existing immunomodulatory therapies for RA. These data support targeting both B and myeloid cells via this novel mechanism for potential efficacy in the treatment of RA.