RESUMEN
Introducción: se han comunicado casos de reactivación de virus de la hepatitis B (VHB) en pacientes con virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) tratados con agentes antivirales directos (AAD). Objetivos y métodos: los objetivos del presente estudio son: a) conocer la prevalencia de la coinfección VHB/VHC en pacientes VHC tratados con AAD en la Comunidad de Madrid (CM) y determinar la incidencia y relevancia clínica de la reactivación del VHB; y b) conocer las tasas de cribado del VHB en pacientes VHC en nuestra comunidad. Se evaluaron 1.337 pacientes VHC consecutivos tratados con AAD en dos hospitales del sur de la CM desde enero de 2015 hasta junio de 2017. Resultados: nueve de los 1.337 (0,67%) presentaban HBsAg positivo y 356 (26,6%) presentaban algún marcador de infección VHB pasada. Dos de los cuatro (50%) pacientes HBsAg positivo sin tratamiento desarrollaron reactivación virológica VHB pero no bioquímica. De los 356 con patrón de infección VHB pasada, el 100% presentó transaminasas normales al finalizar el tratamiento y durante el seguimiento. La tasa de cribado VHB ascendió al 92,9% de la cohorte. Conclusiones: la prevalencia de infección VHB (HBsAg positivos) en pacientes con hepatitis crónica por VHC en la zona sur de la CM es baja. La reactivación del VHB en pacientes HBsAg positivo que reciben AAD es frecuente, pero sin relevancia clínica. En nuestro medio existe una alta tasa de cribado del VHB en pacientes con VHC candidatos a recibir AAD
Introduction: cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation have been reported in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with direct antiviral agents (DAA). Objectives and methods: the main objectives of the present study are: a) to determine the prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection in HCV patients treated with DAAs in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (CM) and also to determine the incidence and clinical relevance of HBV reactivation; and b) to determine the HBV screening rates in HCV patients in our region. For that purpose, 1,337 HCV patients were consecutively treated with DAAs in two hospitals located in South CM between January 2015 and June 2017. Results: nine of the 1,337 (0.67%) participants were HBsAg positive and 356 (26.6%) had previous HBV infection markers. Two of the four (50%) HBsAg positive patients with untreated HBV developed a virological reactivation, but not a biochemical reaction. Of the 356 patients with previous HBV infection markers, all had normal transaminases at the end of treatment and during follow-up. The HBV screening rate amounted to 92.9% of the cohort. Conclusions: the prevalence of HBV (HBsAg positive) infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C in the southern area of the CM is low. HBV reactivation in HBsAg positive patients treated with DAAs is common, although without clinical relevance. In our region, there is a high rate of HBV screening in patients with HCV that are likely treated with DAAs
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hepatitis B Crónica/epidemiología , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Activación Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Coinfección/epidemiología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation have been reported in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with direct antiviral agents (DAA). OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: the main objectives of the present study are: a) to determine the prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection in HCV patients treated with DAAs in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (CM) and also to determine the incidence and clinical relevance of HBV reactivation; and b) to determine the HBV screening rates in HCV patients in our region. For that purpose, 1,337 HCV patients were consecutively treated with DAAs in two hospitals located in South CM between January 2015 and June 2017. RESULTS: nine of the 1,337 (0.67%) participants were HBsAg positive and 356 (26.6%) had previous HBV infection markers. Two of the four (50%) HBsAg positive patients with untreated HBV developed a virological reactivation, but not a biochemical reaction. Of the 356 patients with previous HBV infection markers, all had normal transaminases at the end of treatment and during follow-up. The HBV screening rate amounted to 92.9% of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: the prevalence of HBV (HBsAg positive) infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C in the southern area of the CM is low. HBV reactivation in HBsAg positive patients treated with DAAs is common, although without clinical relevance. In our region, there is a high rate of HBV screening in patients with HCV that are likely treated with DAAs.