Usefulness of indocyanine green in the laparoscopic Palomo technique: a comparative study. / Utilidad del verde de indocianina en el procedimiento de Palomo laparoscópico: estudio comparativo.

OBJECTIVE: To find out whether the use of indocyanine green for lymphatic sparing in the laparoscopic Palomo technique reduces the incidence of postoperative hydrocele. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative cohort study of varicocele patients treated with the laparoscopic Palomo technique from 2008 to 2023 was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether fluorescence lymphography (intratesticular indocyanine green) had been performed or not. Epidemiological, surgical, and clinical data, as well as complications, were recorded. A hypothesis test was conducted using the SPSS software. RESULTS: 30 patients undergoing varicocele surgery through the laparoscopic Palomo technique were included. They were divided into two groups -lymphatic sparing (n= 13) vs. spermatic vessel ligation without sparing (n= 17). Mean age at surgery was 14 years. 5 cases of postoperative hydrocele were identified in the no lymphatic sparing group. 1 of them required surgery for hydrocele treatment. No hydrocele cases were noted in the lymphography group. The difference was statistically significant (p= 0.032). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of operating times or mean hospital stay. No recurrences, postoperative testicular atrophies, or indocyanine-green-related complications were recorded. Mean follow-up was 11.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: The use of indocyanine green for lymphatic sparing in the treatment of varicocele through the laparoscopic Palomo technique significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative hydrocele.

OBJETIVOS: Comprobar si el uso del verde de indocianina para la preservación linfática en la técnica de Palomo laparoscópico reduce la incidencia de hidrocele postoperatorio. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Se realizó un estudio comparativo de cohortes históricas incluyendo los pacientes tratados de varicocele mediante Palomo laparoscópico entre 2008 y 2023. Se dividieron en 2 grupos en función de la realización de linfografía con fluorescencia (verde de indocianina intratesticular). Se recogieron datos epidemiológicos, quirúrgicos, clínicos y complicaciones. Se realizó un análisis de contraste de hipótesis utilizando el programa SPSS. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 30 pacientes intervenidos de varicocele mediante la técnica de Palomo laparoscópico divididos en 2 grupos: en 13 se realizó preservación linfática y en 17 ligadura de vasos espermáticos sin preservación. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía fue de 14 años. Se identificaron 5 casos de hidrocele postoperatorio en el grupo sin preservación linfática. Uno requirió intervención quirúrgica para el tratamiento del hidrocele. No se identificó ningún caso de hidrocele en el grupo de la linfografía. La diferencia resultó estadísticamente significativa, p= 0,032. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el tiempo quirúrgico ni en la estancia media. No se objetivaron recidivas, atrofias testiculares postquirúrgicas ni complicaciones asociadas al uso del verde de indocianina. El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue 11,4 meses. CONCLUSIONES: El uso del verde de indocianina para la preservación linfática en el tratamiento del varicocele mediante Palomo laparoscópico reduce significativamente la incidencia de hidrocele postoperatorio.

Endourological treatment of ectopic ureterocele. Our experience in the last 15 years. / Tratamiento endourológico del ureterocele ectópico. Experiencia en los últimos 15 años.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the endourological treatment of ectopic ureterocele in children in a large series and with a long-term follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study of patients with ectopic ureterocele who had undergone surgery in our institution in the last 15 years was carried out. All patients were treated using an endourological approach, both for ureterocele and postoperative vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). RESULTS: 40 patients were treated -55% with left involvement and 5% with bilateral involvement. Mean age at diagnosis was 4.97 months, with diagnosis being established prenatally in 54.1% of cases. In all patients but one, endourological puncture of the ureterocele was conducted. Mean age at surgery was 6.96 months (0-1.11). Surgery was performed on an outpatient basis in 94.9% of patients. No perioperative complications were recorded. In the last 30 patients, preoperative voiding cystourethrography was not carried out. 72.5% of patients had postoperative VUR (44.8% into the upper pyelon, 10.3% into the lower pyelon, 17.2% into both, 6.9% into the contralateral system, and 20.7% into the bilateral system), but it was resolved with a single endoscopic procedure in 48.1% of cases (65% of patients were healed with two procedures). VUR was not endoscopically resolved in 3 patients who required ureteral re-implantation. 6 patients required heminephrectomy (n=3) or nephrectomy (n=3) as a result of functional impairment and infections. CONCLUSION: The endourological treatment of ectopic ureterocele is a little aggressive and little invasive technique that allows the obstruction to be resolved on an outpatient basis, which means bladder surgery -if required- can be performed outside the neonatal period.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento endourológico del ureterocele ectópico en niños en una serie amplia y con seguimiento a largo plazo. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo de los pacientes con ureterocele ectópico intervenidos en nuestro centro en los últimos 15 años. Todos los pacientes se tratan por vía endourológica, tanto el ureterocele como el reflujo vesicoureteral (RVU) postoperatorio. RESULTADOS: Se trataron 40 pacientes, 55% eran izquierdos y 5% bilaterales. La edad media al diagnóstico fue de 4,97 meses siendo de diagnóstico prenatal el 54,1%. En todos los pacientes menos uno se realizó una punción endourológica del ureterocele. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía era de 6,96 meses (0-1,11). La cirugía fue ambulante en un 94,9% de los pacientes. No se registraron complicaciones perioperatorias. En los últimos 30 pacientes no se realizó cistouretrografía miccional preoperatoria. Un 72,5% de los pacientes presentaron RVU postoperatorio (44,8% a pielón superior, 10,3% a pielón inferior, 17,2% a ambos, 6,9% al sistema contralateral y 20,7% bilateral), pero este se resolvió con un único procedimiento endoscópico en un 48,1% de los casos (curación del 65% de los pacientes con dos procedimientos). El RVU no se resolvió de forma endoscópica en 3 pacientes que requirieron un reimplante ureteral. Seis pacientes precisaron heminefrectomía (n= 3) o nefrectomía (n= 3) por anulación funcional e infecciones. CONCLUSION: El tratamiento endourológico del ureterocele ectópico es una técnica poco agresiva invasiva que consigue la resolución de la obstrucción de forma ambulante permitiendo diferir la cirugía vesical (si fuera necesaria) fuera del periodo neonatal.

Tratamiento endourológico del ureterocele ectópico. Experiencia en los últimos 15 años / Endourological treatment of ectopic ureterocele. Our experience in the last 15 years

Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento endourológico delureterocele ectópico en niños en una serie amplia y con seguimientoa largo plazo. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo de los pacientes con ureterocele ectópico intervenidos en nuestro centro en losúltimos 15 años. Todos los pacientes se tratan por vía endourológica,tanto el ureterocele como el reflujo vesicoureteral (RVU) postoperatorio. Resultados: Se trataron 40 pacientes, 55% eran izquierdos y 5%bilaterales. La edad media al diagnóstico fue de 4,97 meses siendo dediagnóstico prenatal el 54,1%. En todos los pacientes menos uno serealizó una punción endourológica del ureterocele. La edad media enel momento de la cirugía era de 6,96 meses (0-1,11). La cirugía fue ambulante en un 94,9% de los pacientes. No se registraron complicacionesperioperatorias. En los últimos 30 pacientes no se realizó cistouretrografía miccional preoperatoria. Un 72,5% de los pacientes presentaron RVUpostoperatorio (44,8% a pielón superior, 10,3% a pielón inferior, 17,2%a ambos, 6,9% al sistema contralateral y 20,7% bilateral), pero este seresolvió con un único procedimiento endoscópico en un 48,1% de loscasos (curación del 65% de los pacientes con dos procedimientos). ElRVU no se resolvió de forma endoscópica en 3 pacientes que requirieronun reimplante ureteral. Seis pacientes precisaron heminefrectomía (n= 3)o nefrectomía (n= 3) por anulación funcional e infecciones. Conclusión: El tratamiento endourológico del ureterocele ectópicoes una técnica poco agresiva invasiva que consigue la resolución de laobstrucción de forma ambulante permitiendo diferir la cirugía vesical(si fuera necesaria) fuera del periodo neonatal.(AU)

Objective: To assess the efficacy of the endourological treatmentof ectopic ureterocele in children in a large series and with a long-termfollow-up. Materials and methods: A retrospective, descriptive study ofpatients with ectopic ureterocele who had undergone surgery in ourinstitution in the last 15 years was carried out. All patients were treatedusing an endourological approach, both for ureterocele and postoperativevesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Results: 40 patients were treated – 55% with left involvement and5% with bilateral involvement. Mean age at diagnosis was 4.97 months,with diagnosis being established prenatally in 54.1% of cases. In allpatients but one, endourological puncture of the ureterocele was conducted. Mean age at surgery was 6.96 months (0-1.11). Surgery wasperformed on an outpatient basis in 94.9% of patients. No perioperativecomplications were recorded. In the last 30 patients, preoperative voidingcystourethrography was not carried out. 72.5% of patients had postoper-ative VUR (44.8% into the upper pyelon, 10.3% into the lower pyelon,17.2% into both, 6.9% into the contralateral system, and 20.7% into thebilateral system), but it was resolved with a single endoscopic procedurein 48.1% of cases (65% of patients were healed with two procedures).VUR was not endoscopically resolved in 3 patients who required ureteral remplantation. 6 patients required heminephrectomy (n=3) ornephrectomy (n=3) as a result of functional impairment and infections. Conclusion: The endourological treatment of ectopic ureterocele isa little aggressive and little invasive technique that allows the obstructionto be resolved on an outpatient basis, which means bladder surgery – ifrequired – can be performed outside the neonatal period.(AU)

Buried penis secondary to ectopic scrotum. / Pene oculto secundario a ectopia escrotal.

INTRODUCTION: Ectopic scrotum is a rare clinical entity, potentially associated with other congenital abnormalities. We present the case of a patient with buried penis secondary to ectopic scrotum. The surgical technique was described, and a literature review was carried out. CLINICAL CASE: 1-year-old patient with ectopic right hemiscrotum and the testes within the scrotal sac. A double Z-plasty was performed with two flaps - one above the penis, surrounding the ectopic scrotum, and the other one at the scrotum to modify the bifid scrotum. The upper flap was rotated downwards, which allowed ectopy to be repaired, and the lower flap was used to repair bifidity. No postoperative complications were recorded. Follow-time was 6 months, with good final cosmetic results. DISCUSSION: Ectopic scrotum is an infrequent congenital malformation. Cutaneous rotation flaps with Z-plasties are a valid treatment option, with good long-term cosmetic results.

INTRODUCCION: La ectopia escrotal constituye una entidad clínica rara, que puede asociar otras anomalías congénitas. Presentamos el caso de un paciente con un pene oculto secundario a una ectopia escrotal, con descripción de la técnica quirúrgica y revisión de la literatura. CASO CLINICO: Paciente de un año de vida que presentaba un hemiescroto derecho ectópico con testes en bolsa. Se diseñó una doble Z-plastia con realización de dos colgajos, uno suprapeneano rodeando el escroto ectópico y otro escrotal para modificar el escroto bífido. El colgajo superior se rotó hacia abajo corrigiendo la ectopia y el colgajo inferior corregió la bifidez. No se produjeron complicaciones posoperatorias. El tiempo de seguimiento fue de seis meses con buen aspecto estético final. COMENTARIOS: El escroto ectópico es una malformación congénita infrecuente. Los colgajos de rotación cutáneos con Z-plastias son una opción válida de tratamiento con buenos resultados estéticos a largo plazo.

Pene oculto secundario a ectopia escrotal / Buried penis secondary to ectopic scrotum

Introducción: La ectopia escrotal constituye una entidad clínicarara, que puede asociar otras anomalías congénitas.Presentamos el caso de un paciente con un pene oculto secundario auna ectopia escrotal, con descripción de la técnica quirúrgica y revisiónde la literatura. Caso clínico: Paciente de un año de vida que presentaba un he-miescroto derecho ectópico con testes en bolsa. Se diseñó una dobleZ-plastia con realización de dos colgajos, uno suprapeneano rodeandoel escroto ectópico y otro escrotal para modificar el escroto bífido.El colgajo superior se rotó hacia abajo corrigiendo la ectopia y elcolgajo inferior corregió la bifidez. No se produjeron complicacionesposoperatorias. El tiempo de seguimiento fue de seis meses con buenaspecto estético final.Comentarios: El escroto ectópico es una malformación congénitainfrecuente. Los colgajos de rotación cutáneos con Z-plastias son una op-ción válida de tratamiento con buenos resultados estéticos a largo plazo.(AU)

Introduction: Ectopic scrotum is a rare clinical entity, potentiallyassociated with other congenital abnormalities. We present the case ofa patient with buried penis secondary to ectopic scrotum. The surgicaltechnique was described, and a literature review was carried out. Clinical case: 1-year-old patient with ectopic right hemiscrotumand the testes within the scrotal sac. A double Z-plasty was performedwith two flaps – one above the penis, surrounding the ectopic scrotum,and the other one at the scrotum to modify the bifid scrotum. The up-per flap was rotated downwards, which allowed ectopy to be repaired,and the lower flap was used to repair bifidity. No postoperative com-plications were recorded. Follow-time was 6 months, with good finalcosmetic results. Discussion: Ectopic scrotum is an infrequent congenital malfor-mation. Cutaneous rotation flaps with Z-plasties are a valid treatmentoption, with good long-term cosmetic results.(AU)

Tratamiento endourológico del muñón ureteral sintomático posnefrectomía / Endourological treatment of symptomatic ureteral stump posnephrectomy

Introducción: El síndrome del muñón ureteral se define como una infección urinaria recurrente, dolor abdominal bajo y hematuria en pacientes con antecedentes de nefrectomía previa. Su incidencia es baja y su sintomatología, inespecífica. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo es presentar nuestros resultados con el tratamiento endoscópico de los restos ureterales sintomáticos. Material y métodos: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes que presentaban síndrome de resto ureteral tras nefrectomía y que han sido tratados en nuestro centro entre los años 2004 y 2015. Presentamos una serie de 10 pacientes. Los pacientes fueron tratados endoscópicamente con electrofulguración del uréter y de los bordes del meato afectado, con posterior inyección de material de relleno a nivel submucoso subureteral para favorecer la coaptación de las paredes del resto ureteral. Resultados: La media de edad al tratamiento fue de 2 años. El resto ureteral afectado fue derecho en 6 pacientes y en 4 fue el lado izquierdo. Siete meatos fueron ectópicos y 3, ortotópicos. El tiempo de seguimiento fue de 8 años. Tras el tratamiento endoscópico solo 2 pacientes recidivaron. Conclusión: El tratamiento endourológico del síndrome del muñón ureteral supone una opción simple, segura, rápida, ambulante y eficaz, tanto para restos ortotópicos como ectópicos. No compromete, si fuera necesaria, la posterior resección abierta del resto ureteral, por lo que creemos que debe considerarse como una alternativa válida para el tratamiento inicial de esta patología

Introduction: ureteral stump syndrome is defined as a recurrent urinary infection, low abdominal pain and haematuria in patients with a history of nephrectomy. Its incidence is low and the symptoms are non-specific. The aim of our paper was to present our results with endoscopic treatment of symptomatic ureteral remnants. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with ureteral remnant syndrome after nephrectomy treated in our centre between 2004 and 2015. We present a series of 10 patients. The patients were treated endoscopically with electrofulguration of the ureter and edges of the affected meatus, with subsequent injection of filler material into the suburetheral submucosa to aid in the coaptation of the ureteral remnant walls. Results: The mean age at treatment was 2 years. The right ureteral remnant was treated in 6 patients and the left in 4. Seven meatuses were ectopic and 3 orthotopic. Follow-up was 8 years. After endoscopic treatment only 2 patients relapsed. Conclusion: Endourological treatment of ureteral stump syndrome is a simple, safe, rapid and effective option that can be performed as an outpatient, for orthotopic and ectopic stumps. It does not compromise subsequent open resection of the ureteral remnant if required, and therefore we believe that it should be considered a valid alternative for the initial treatment of this disorder

Endourological treatment of symptomatic ureteral stump posnephrectomy. / Tratamiento endourológico del muñón ureteral sintomático posnefrectomía.

INTRODUCTION: ureteral stump syndrome is defined as a recurrent urinary infection, low abdominal pain and haematuria in patients with a history of nephrectomy. Its incidence is low and the symptoms are non-specific. The aim of our paper was to present our results with endoscopic treatment of symptomatic ureteral remnants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients with ureteral remnant syndrome after nephrectomy treated in our centre between 2004 and 2015. We present a series of 10 patients. The patients were treated endoscopically with electrofulguration of the ureter and edges of the affected meatus, with subsequent injection of filler material into the suburetheral submucosa to aid in the coaptation of the ureteral remnant walls. RESULTS: The mean age at treatment was 2 years. The right ureteral remnant was treated in 6 patients and the left in 4. Seven meatuses were ectopic and 3 orthotopic. Follow-up was 8 years. After endoscopic treatment only 2patients relapsed. CONCLUSION: Endourological treatment of ureteral stump syndrome is a simple, safe, rapid and effective option that can be performed as an outpatient, for orthotopic and ectopic stumps. It does not compromise subsequent open resection of the ureteral remnant if required, and therefore we believe that it should be considered a valid alternative for the initial treatment of this disorder.

Tratamiento endoscópico del reflujo uretrodeferencial en niños / Endoscopic treatment of urethrodeferential reflux in children

Introducción: El reflujo uretrodeferencial es una entidad infradiagnosticada, no existiendo consenso en su tratamiento. Nuestro objetivo es mostrar nuestra experiencia en el tratamiento mínimamente invasivo de esta dolencia mediante tratamiento endoscópico. Material y métodos: Presentamos 8 pacientes con orquitis supuradas de repetición por reflujo uretrodeferencial tratados de forma endoscópica en el período de 2008-2013. Todos presentaron orquitis unilaterales. El número mínimo de orquitis por paciente anterior a la intervención fue de 3. El tratamiento endoscópico consistía en una uretroscopia con localización de los orificios eyaculatorios y un estudio de contraste intraoperatorio para demostrar el reflujo uretrodeferencial. Posteriormente se inyectó ácido hialurónico/dextranómero subeyaculatorio en todos los casos. Resultados: El tiempo medio de la cirugía fue de 15 min, siendo un procedimiento ambulante en todos los pacientes. No hubo complicaciones postoperatorias. Los pacientes presentaron buena evolución clínica. Solo un caso requirió el uso de una segunda inyección de ácido hialurónico/dextranómero. El seguimiento de estos pacientes mostró la resolución completa de los cuadros de epididimitis y un buen desarrollo testicular, con un seguimiento mayor de 4 años en todos los casos. Conclusión: Proponemos esta forma de tratamiento como una alternativa poco invasiva, fácilmente reproducible y que ha presentado buenos resultados a largo plazo en nuestra pequeña serie de pacientes

Introduction: Urethrodeferential reflux is an underdiagnosed condition, and there is no consensus on its treatment. Our objective is to show our experience in the minimally invasive treatment of this disease using endoscopy. Material and methods: We present 8 patients with recurrent suppurative orchitis due to urethrodeferential reflux treated endoscopically during the period 2008-2013. All patients presented unilateral orchitis. The minimum number of episodes of orchitis per patient prior to the operation was 3. The endoscopic treatment consists of ureteroscopy, locating the ejaculatory orifices and conducting an intraoperative contrast study to demonstrate the urethrodeferential reflux. Subejaculatory dextranomer/hyaluronic acid was subsequently injected in all the cases. Results: The mean surgical time was 15min, and the procedure was outpatient for all patients. There were no postoperative complications, and the patients had good clinical progression. Only one case required a second injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid. The follow-up of these patients showed a complete resolution of the epididymitis and good testicular development, with a follow-up longer than 4 years in all cases. Conclusion: We propose this form of treatment as a minimally invasive, easily reproducible alternative that shows good long-term results in our small series of patients

Endoscopic treatment of urethrodeferential reflux in children. / Tratamiento endoscópico del reflujo uretrodeferencial en niños.

INTRODUCTION: Urethrodeferential reflux is an underdiagnosed condition, and there is no consensus on its treatment. Our objective is to show our experience in the minimally invasive treatment of this disease using endoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present 8 patients with recurrent suppurative orchitis due to urethrodeferential reflux treated endoscopically during the period 2008-2013. All patients presented unilateral orchitis. The minimum number of episodes of orchitis per patient prior to the operation was 3. The endoscopic treatment consists of ureteroscopy, locating the ejaculatory orifices and conducting an intraoperative contrast study to demonstrate the urethrodeferential reflux. Subejaculatory dextranomer/hyaluronic acid was subsequently injected in all the cases. RESULTS: The mean surgical time was 15min, and the procedure was outpatient for all patients. There were no postoperative complications, and the patients had good clinical progression. Only one case required a second injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid. The follow-up of these patients showed a complete resolution of the epididymitis and good testicular development, with a follow-up longer than 4 years in all cases. CONCLUSION: We propose this form of treatment as a minimally invasive, easily reproducible alternative that shows good long-term results in our small series of patients.