Approach to diagnosing and managing granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease.

Granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) is a lymphoproliferative and granulomatous pulmonary manifestation of primary immune deficiency diseases, notably common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), and is an important contributor of excess morbidity. As with all forms of ILD, the significance of utilizing a multidisciplinary team discussion to enhance diagnostic and treatment confidence of GLILD cannot be overstated. In this review, key clinical, radiological, and pathological features are integrated into a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate a consensus diagnosis. As the evidence for diagnosing and managing patients with GLILD is limited, the viewpoints discussed here are not meant to resolve current controversies. Instead, this review aims to provide a practical framework for diagnosing and evaluating suspected cases and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach when caring for GLILD patients.

Transcriptomic Profiling of Peripheral B Cells in Antibody Positive Sjogren's Patients Reveals Interferon Signature.

BACKGROUND: Sjögren's disease (SjD) is a common systemic autoimmune disease that affects mainly women. Key pathologic features include the infiltration of exocrine glands by lymphocytes and the activation of B lymphocytes with the production of autoantibodies. We aimed to analyze the transcriptome of circulating B cells from patients with SJD and healthy controls to decipher the B-cell-specific contribution to SJD. METHODS: RNA from peripheral blood B cells of five untreated female patients with SjD and positive ANA, positive anti-SSA (both Ro-52 and Ro-60), positive anti-SSB and positive rheumatoid-factor, and five healthy controls was subjected to whole-transcriptome sequencing. A false discovery rate of < 0.1 was applied to define differentially expressed genes (DEG). RESULTS: RNA-sequencing identified 56 up and 23 down DEG. Hierarchal clustering showed a clear separation between the two groups. Ingenuity pathway analysis revealed that these genes may play a role in interferon signaling, chronic mycobacterial infection, and transformation to myeloproliferative disorders. CONCLUSIONS: We found upregulated expression of type-I and type-II interferon (IFN)-induced genes, as well as genes that may contribute to other concomitant conditions, including infections and a higher risk of myeloproliferative disorders. This adds insight into the autoimmune process and suggests potential targets for future functional and prognostic studies.

Pamrevlumab for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: The ZEPHYRUS-1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Current treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis slow the rate of lung function decline, but may be associated with adverse events that affect medication adherence. In phase 2 trials, pamrevlumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits connective tissue growth factor activity) attenuated the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis without substantial adverse events. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of pamrevlumab for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Phase 3 randomized clinical trial including 356 patients aged 40 to 85 years with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who were not receiving antifibrotic treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone at enrollment. Patients were recruited from 117 sites in 9 countries between July 18, 2019, and July 29, 2022; the last follow-up encounter occurred on August 28, 2023. Interventions: Pamrevlumab (30 mg/kg administered intravenously every 3 weeks; n = 181) or placebo (n = 175) for 48 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was absolute change in forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline to week 48. There were 5 secondary outcomes (including time to disease progression, which was defined as a decline of ≥10% in predicted FVC or death). The exploratory outcomes included patient-reported symptoms. Adverse events were reported. Results: Among 356 patients (mean age, 70.5 years; 258 [72.5%] were men; 221 [62.1%] were White), 277 (77.8%) completed the trial. There was no significant between-group difference for absolute change in FVC from baseline to week 48 (least-squares mean, -260 mL [95% CI, -350 to -170 mL] in the pamrevlumab group vs -330 mL [95% CI, -430 to -230 mL] in the placebo group; mean between-group difference, 70 mL [95% CI, -60 to 190 mL], P = .29). There were no significant between-group differences in any of the secondary outcomes or in the patient-reported outcomes. In the pamrevlumab group, there were 160 patients (88.4%) with treatment-related adverse events and 51 patients (28.2%) with serious adverse events vs 151 (86.3%) and 60 (34.3%), respectively, in the placebo group. During the study, 23 patients died in each group (12.7% in the pamrevlumab group vs 13.1% in the placebo group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with pamrevlumab or placebo, there was no statistically significant between-group difference for the primary outcome of absolute change in FVC from baseline to week 48. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03955146.

A first look at the reliability, validity and responsiveness of L-PF-35 dyspnea domain scores in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea impairs quality of life (QOL) in patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP). The Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis questionnaire (L-PF) assesses symptoms, their impacts and PF-related QOL in patients with any form of PF. Its scores have not undergone validation analyses in an FHP cohort. METHODS: We used data from the Pirfenidone in FHP trial to examine reliability, validity and responsiveness of the L-PF-35 Dyspnea domain score (Dyspnea) and to estimate its meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) threshold for worsening. Lack of suitable anchors precluded conducting analyses for other L-PF-35 scores. RESULTS: At baseline, Dyspnea's internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient alpha) was 0.85; there were significant correlations with all four anchors (University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire scores r = 0.81, St. George's Activity domain score r = 0.82, percent predicted forced vital capacity r = 0.37, and percent predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide r = 0.37). Dyspnea was significantly different between anchor subgroups (e.g., lowest percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) vs. highest, 33.5 ± 18.5 vs. 11.1 ± 9.8, p = 0.01). There were significant correlations between changes in Dyspnea and changes in anchor scores at all trial time points. Longitudinal models further confirmed responsiveness. The MWPC threshold estimate for worsening was 6.6 points (range 5-8). CONCLUSION: The L-PF-35 Dyspnea domain appears to possess acceptable psychometric properties for assessing dyspnea in patients with FHP. Because instrument validation is never accomplished with one study, additional research is needed to build on the foundation these analyses provide. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The data for the analyses presented in this manuscript were generated in a trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov; the identifier was NCT02958917.

Rationale and design of the prognostic transcriptomic signature in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (PREDICT) study.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an immunologically mediated form of lung disease, resulting from inhalational exposure to a large variety of antigens. A subgroup of patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) develop symptomatic, functional and radiographic disease progression. Mortality occurs primarily from respiratory failure as a result of progressive and self-sustaining lung injury that often occurs despite immunosuppression and removal of the inciting antigen. The development and validation of a prognostic transcriptomic signature for FHP (PREDICT-HP) is an observational multicentre cohort study designed to explore a transcriptomic signature from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with FHP that is predictive of disease progression. This article describes the design and rationale of the PREDICT-HP study. This study will enrol ∼135 patients with FHP at approximately seven academic medical sites. Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of FHP are followed over 24 months and undergo physical examinations, self-administered questionnaires, chest computed tomography, pulmonary function tests, a 6-min walk test and blood testing for transcriptomic analyses. At each 6-month follow-up visit the study will assess the participants' clinical course and clinical events including hospitalisations and respiratory exacerbations. The PREDICT study has the potential to enhance our ability to predict disease progression and fundamentally advance our understanding of the pathobiology of FHP disease progression.