Neonatal Infection Due to SARS-CoV-2: An Epidemiological Study in Spain.

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continue to increase worldwide. Although some data from pediatric series are available, more evidence is required, especially in neonates, a group with specific characteristics that deserve special attention. This study aimed to describe general and clinical characteristics, management, and treatment of postnatal-acquired (community and nosocomial/hospital-acquired) COVID-19 neonatal cases in Spain. Methods: This was a national prospective epidemiological study that included cases from a National Registry supported by the Spanish Society of Neonatology. Neonates with postnatal SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in this study. General data and infection-related information (mode and source of transmission, age at diagnosis, clinical manifestations, need for hospitalization, admission unit, treatment administered, and complementary studies performed, hospital stay associated with the infection) were collected. Results: A total of 40 cases, 26 community-acquired and 14 nosocomial were registered. Ten were preterm newborns (2 community-acquired and 8 nosocomial COVID-19 cases). Mothers (in both groups) and healthcare workers (in nosocomial cases) were the main source of infection. Hospital admission was required in 22 community-acquired cases [18 admitted to the neonatal intermediate care unit (NIMCU) and 4 to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)]. Among nosocomial COVID-19 cases (n = 14), previously admitted for other reasons, 4 were admitted to the NIMCU and 10 to the NICU. Ten asymptomatic patients were registered (5 in each group). In the remaining cases, clinical manifestations were generally mild in both groups, including upper respiratory airways infection, febrile syndrome or acute gastroenteritis with good overall health. In both groups, most severe cases occurred in preterm neonates or neonates with concomitant pathologies. Most of the cases did not require respiratory support. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 4 patients in the community-acquired group and to 2 patients in the nosocomial group. Follow-up after hospital discharge was performed in most patients. Conclusions: This is the largest series of COVID-19 neonatal cases in Spain published to date. Although clinical manifestations were generally mild, prevention, treatment, and management in this group are essential.

[Ethics Committee experience during COVID-19 emergency. A brief report.] / Experiencia de un Comité de Ética de la Investigación durante la pandemia por COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The health crisis caused by COVID-19 required the prompt launch of research in order to generate scientific evidence pertaining to the new disease oriented to control its devastating effects and continuous spread. Therefore, it was essential to adapt the work flow of Research Ethics Committees, to prioritize and to accelerate the evaluation of projects related to this disease. METHODS: This work analyses the evaluation conducted by our Regional Ethics Committees during the initial period of the health emergency (between 13th March and 28th May 2020). RESULTS: 81 research projects were evaluated, 73 of them of regional scope (62 single-centre), 4 national and 4 international. 57 projects obtained a favourable opinion, 4 were withdrawn by the sponsors, 6 did not require ethics approval and 14 did not respond to the clarifications requested up to the date of the study's closure. CONCLUSIONS: The most important research procedures to be analysed in this context are those related to the methodology and informed consent process. It is also essential to address aspects related to the privacy of personal data, and to take into account the workload of the researchers. As an improvement proposal, we think that greater collaboration between the different research teams should be encourage to obtain more robust results.

OBJETIVO: La crisis sanitaria motivada por la COVID-19 hace necesaria la puesta en marcha, con celeridad, de investigaciones encaminadas a generar evidencias científicas que incidan en el control de sus devastadores efectos. Por ello, fue necesario realizar ajustes en la dinámica de trabajo de los Comités de Ética de la Investigación, así como priorizar y agilizar la evaluación de los proyectos relacionados con dicha enfermedad. Este trabajo pretendió analizar la actividad la actividad evaluadora del Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos de Galicia (CEIm-G) durante dicho período de emergencia sanitaria. METODOS: Se evaluaron 81 proyectos de investigación, 73 de ellos de ámbito autonómico (62 unicéntricos), 4 nacionales y 4 internacionales. RESULTADOS: En 57 proyectos el dictamen fue favorable, 4 fueron retirados por los promotores, en 6 no procedía dictamen y 14 no respondieron a las aclaraciones solicitadas hasta la fecha del cierre del estudio. CONCLUSIONES: Las causas más frecuentes de solicitud de aclaraciones están relacionadas con la metodología y, a continuación, con la hoja de información al paciente y el consentimiento informado. También es imprescindible abordar los aspectos relacionados con la intimidad de los datos personales y las muestras, e igualmente tener en cuenta la carga de trabajo de los investigadores. Como propuesta de mejora, consideramos que se debe incidir en una mayor coordinación entre los diferentes equipos de investigación para tratar de obtener resultados más robustos.

Oximetría esplácnica en neonatos pequeños para la edad gestacional en relación con el estudio doppler prenatal / Splanchnic oximetry in small for gestational age neonates in relation to prenatal doppler study

INTRODUCCIÓN: El estudio del doppler fetal permite identificar la etiología placentaria y clasificar su gravedad en aquellos neonatos pequeños para la edad gestacional. Existen estudios que relacionan estos datos doppler con alteraciones en el flujo intestinal del recién nacido, pero su relación con los datos de oximetría intestinal ha sido poco estudiada. OBJETIVO: Evaluar si existe relación entre los datos doppler prenatales y los datos de oximetría abdominal en los niños pequeños para su edad gestacional. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo observacional en neonatos > 32 semanas con un peso al nacer < P10. Se clasificó la gravedad de la insuficiencia placentaria según criterios de doppler prenatal. Se monitorizó la oximetría esplácnica durante los 3 primeros días de vida y se realizó un análisis comparativo de los datos oximétricos según la afectación doppler prenatal. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 53 pacientes. Se observaron diferencias significativas en la rSO2 media entre los pacientes con fallo placentario moderado o grave y aquellos con doppler prenatal normal o levemente alterado: 42 ± 10 vs. 71,3 ± 10 (p < 0,001). Estas diferencias se mantuvieron durante los 3 primeros días de vida. Se identificaron patrones tipo de oximetría esplácnica según el grado de insuficiencia placentaria. CONCLUSIONES: Existe correlación entre el doppler fetal y el patrón de oximetría esplácnica durante los primeros días de vida. Los neonatos con insuficiencia placentaria moderada o grave presentan unos registros de oximetría abdominal más alterados, por lo que podría ser una técnica útil para evaluar el grado de insuficiencia placentaria y el riesgo de intolerancia oral en los neonatos pequeños para la edad gestacional

INTRODUCTION: Among small for gestational age neonates, foetal Doppler enables the identification of placental insufficency aetiology and the classification of severity in small for gestational age neonates. There are studies that associate the Doppler data with alterations in the intestinal flow of the newborn, but its relationship with intestinal oximetry has been little studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is a relationship between prenatal Doppler data and abdominal oximetry in small for gestational age neonates MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study carried out on neonates >32 weeks with a birth weight < P10. The severity of placental insufficiency was classified according to prenatal Doppler criteria. Splanchnic oximetry was monitored during the first three days of life and a comparative analysis of the oximetry data was performed according to the prenatal Doppler alteration severity. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were evaluated. Significant differences were observed in the mean regional oximetry (rSO2) between patients with moderate or severe placental failure and those with normal or slightly altered prenatal Doppler: 42 ± 10 vs. 71.3 ± 10 (P < .001). These differences were maintained during the first 3 days of life. Standard patterns of splanchnic oximetry were identified depending on the degree of placental insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between the foetal Doppler and the splanchnic oximetry pattern during the first days of life. Neonates with moderate or severe placental insufficiency have more altered abdominal oximetry patterns, making it a useful technique to evaluate the degree of placental insufficiency and the risk of oral intolerance in small for gestational age neonates

[Splanchnic oximetry in small for gestational age neonates in relation to prenatal doppler study]. / Oximetría esplácnica en neonatos pequeños para la edad gestacional en relación con el estudio doppler prenatal.

INTRODUCTION: Among small for gestational age neonates, foetal Doppler enables the identification of placental insufficency aetiology and the classification of severity in small for gestational age neonates. There are studies that associate the Doppler data with alterations in the intestinal flow of the newborn, but its relationship with intestinal oximetry has been little studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is a relationship between prenatal Doppler data and abdominal oximetry in small for gestational age neonates MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study carried out on neonates>32 weeks with a birth weight

Experiencia de un comité de ética de la investigación durante la pandemia por COVID-19 / Ethics Committee experience during COVID-19 emergency. A brief report

OBJETIVO: La crisis sanitaria motivada por la COVID-19 hace necesaria la puesta en marcha, con celeridad, de investigaciones encaminadas a generar evidencias científicas que incidan en el control de sus devastadores efectos. Por ello, fue necesario realizar ajustes en la dinámica de trabajo de los Comités de Ética de la Investigación, así como priorizar y agilizar la evaluación de los proyectos relacionados con dicha enfermedad. Este trabajo pretendió analizar la actividad la actividad evaluadora del Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos de Galicia (CEIm-G) durante dicho período de emergencia sanitaria. MÉTODOS: Se evaluaron 81 proyectos de investigación, 73 de ellos de ámbito autonómico (62 unicéntricos), 4 nacionales y 4 internacionales. RESULTADOS: En 57 proyectos el dictamen fue favorable, 4 fueron retirados por los promotores, en 6 no procedía dictamen y 14 no respondieron a las aclaraciones solicitadas hasta la fecha del cierre del estudio. CONCLUSIONES: Las causas más frecuentes de solicitud de aclaraciones están relacionadas con la metodología y, a continuación, con la hoja de información al paciente y el consentimiento informado. También es imprescindible abordar los aspectos relacionados con la intimidad de los datos personales y las muestras, e igualmente tener en cuenta la carga de trabajo de los investigadores. Como propuesta de mejora, consideramos que se debe incidir en una mayor coordinación entre los diferentes equipos de investigación para tratar de obtener resultados más robustos

OBJECTIVE: The health crisis caused by COVID-19 required the prompt launch of research in order to generate scientific evidence pertaining to the new disease oriented to control its devastating effects and continuous spread. Therefore, it was essential to adapt the work flow of Research Ethics Committees, to prioritize and to accelerate the evaluation of projects related to this disease. METHODS: This work analyses the evaluation conducted by our Regional Ethics Committees during the initial period of the health emergency (between 13th March and 28th May 2020). RESULTS: 81 research projects were evaluated, 73 of them of regional scope (62 single-centre), 4 national and 4 international. 57 projects obtained a favourable opinion, 4 were withdrawn by the sponsors, 6 did not require ethics approval and 14 did not respond to the clarifications requested up to the date of the study's closure. CONCLUSIONS: The most important research procedures to be analysed in this context are those related to the methodology and informed consent process. It is also essential to address aspects related to the privacy of personal data, and to take into account the workload of the researchers. As an improvement proposal, we think that greater collaboration between the different research teams should be encourage to obtain more robust results

Uso de medicamentos en condiciones no aprobadas en cuidados intensivos neonatales / Use of off-label drugs in neonatal intensive care

Objetivo: Evaluar la prevalencia de prescripciones en condiciones no autorizadas (off-label y unlicensed) en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales (UCIN) y definir qué características de los neonatos se asocian a un mayor uso de fármacos en estas condiciones. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo en una UCIN nivel III-C durante un periodo de 6 meses. Se evaluó la condición de uso de cada fármaco, tomando como referencia su ficha técnica. Se utilizó un algoritmo secuencial para la clasificación de las prescripciones en: aprobadas, unlicensed u off-label (por edad, por indicación, por vía de administración, y por dosis). Resultados: Se incluyeron 84 pacientes y 564 prescripciones. Un total de 127 prescripciones fueron consideradas off-label y 45 unlicensed; lo cual supuso el 22,5% y el 8% del total, respectivamente. El 59,5% de los pacientes recibieron al menos un fármaco en una de estas condiciones, ascendiendo este porcentaje al 100% en los grandes prematuros y en los pacientes quirúrgicos (p < 0,001). Se encontró una correlación lineal positiva entre la estancia en UCIN y el número de prescripciones off-label (coeficiente de correlación 0,6 p < 0,001). Conclusiones: La prescripción de fármacos en condiciones no autorizadas es habitual en UCIN, siendo especialmente frecuente en los pacientes con mayor vulnerabilidad. Estos resultados ponen de manifiesto la necesidad de avanzar en la investigación y homogeneizar la información existente sobre los fármacos en neonatología, con el objetivo de realizar una prescripción eficaz y segura

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of non-approved prescriptions (off-label and unlicensed) in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), and to describe factors of the neonate associated with its use. Materials and methods: Observational prospective study in a level III NICU during a 6-month period. Every prescription was analysed using the summary of product characteristics as a reference. A sequential algorithm was used to create a classification of prescriptions based on current status: approved, unlicensed, off-label (by age, route of administration, dosage, or indication). Results: The study included 84 patients and 564 prescriptions. A total of 127 (22.5%) prescriptions were considered off-label, and 45 (8%) were considered unlicensed. More than half (59.5%) of the patients received at least one of these drugs, and this increases to 100% among very preterm neonates and surgical patients (P < .001). A positive linear correlation was found between duration of NICU stay and the number of off-label prescriptions (correlation coefficient 0.6; P < .001). Conclusions: Non-licensed drugs are frequently prescribed in NICU, especially in the most vulnerable patients. Our results show the need to move forward on clinical research in order to homogenise the existing data about neonatology drugs, with the aim of making an efficient and safe prescription

[Use of off-label drugs in neonatal intensive care]. / Uso de medicamentos en condiciones no aprobadas en cuidados intensivos neonatales.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of non-approved prescriptions (off-label and unlicensed) in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), and to describe factors of the neonate associated with its use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational prospective study in a level III NICU during a 6-month period. Every prescription was analysed using the summary of product characteristics as a reference. A sequential algorithm was used to create a classification of prescriptions based on current status: approved, unlicensed, off-label (by age, route of administration, dosage, or indication). RESULTS: The study included 84 patients and 564 prescriptions. A total of 127 (22.5%) prescriptions were considered off-label, and 45 (8%) were considered unlicensed. More than half (59.5%) of the patients received at least one of these drugs, and this increases to 100% among very preterm neonates and surgical patients (P<.001). A positive linear correlation was found between duration of NICU stay and the number of off-label prescriptions (correlation coefficient 0.6; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Non-licensed drugs are frequently prescribed in NICU, especially in the most vulnerable patients. Our results show the need to move forward on clinical research in order to homogenise the existing data about neonatology drugs, with the aim of making an efficient and safe prescription.

Cierre percutáneo del ductus arterioso persistente en el neonato prematuro / Percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants

No disponible

No disponible