RESUMEN
This guideline offers recommendations on diagnosis, treatment regimens and health promotion principles needed for the effective management of genital molluscum, including management of the initial presentation and recurrences. The Primary focus of the guideline is on infection which affects the genital area and has a sexual mode of transmission. This is an update to the guideline previously published in this journal in 2014.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Molusco Contagioso , Salud Sexual , Adulto , Genitales , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Molusco Contagioso/diagnóstico , Molusco Contagioso/terapiaAsunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Molusco Contagioso/tratamiento farmacológico , Virus del Molusco Contagioso/efectos de los fármacos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adolescente , Trazado de Contacto , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Virus del Molusco Contagioso/aislamiento & purificación , Salud Reproductiva/normas , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: UK policy documents advocate integrated approaches to sexual health service provision to ensure that everyone can access high-quality treatment. However, there is relatively little evidence to demonstrate any resultant benefits. The family planning and genitourinary medicine services in Lothian have been fully integrated and most care is now delivered from a purpose-built sexual health centre. We wished to study the views of staff on integrated sexual and reproductive care. METHODS: Staff completed anonymous questionnaires before and after integration, looking at four main aspects: the patient pathway, specific patient groups, their own professional status, and their working environment. The surveys used a mixture of five-point Likert-type scales and open-ended questions. RESULTS: Over 50% of staff completed the surveys on each occasion. Six months after the new building opened, staff attitudes about the integrated service were mixed. Staff reported more stress and less opportunity for specialisation but there was no change in their sense of professional status or development. There were concerns about how well the integrated service met the needs of specific patient groups, notably women. These concerns co-existed with a verdict that overall service quality was no worse following integration. CONCLUSIONS: Staff views should form an important part of service redesign and integration projects. Although the results from the Lothian surveys suggest a perceived worsening of some aspects of the service, further evaluation is needed to unpick the different problems that have appeared under the catch-all term of 'integration'.