Conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease: a guide.

PURPOSE: To review the literature on the topic, to suggest a common line of treatment applicable across a wide community of specialists, and to contribute in maintaining the high level of interest in this disease. METHODS: A comprehensive and exhaustive review of the literature was performed, identifying hundreds of articles on the topic. RESULTS: Peyronie's disease is a condition that has been recognized, studied, and treated for centuries; despite this, if one excludes surgery in cases in which the deformity is stable, no clear treatment (or line of treatment) is available for complete relief of signs and symptoms. Treatment options were divided into local, oral, and injection therapy, and a wide variety of drugs, remedies, and options were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy, vacuum therapy, penile traction therapy, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, hyaluronic acid, and collagenase of Clostridium histolyticum may be recommended only in specific contexts. Further studies on individual options or potential combinations are required.

Role of targeted biopsy, perilesional biopsy, random biopsy, and their combination in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by mpMRI/transrectal ultrasonography fusion biopsy in confirmatory biopsy during active surveillance program.

BACKGROUND: Based on the findings of different trials in biopsy naïve patients, target biopsy (TB) plus random biopsy (RB) during mpMRI-guided transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FB) are often also adopted for the biopsy performed during active surveillance (AS) programs. At the moment, a clear consensus on the extent and modalities of the procedure is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the increase in diagnostic accuracy achieved by perilesional biopsy (PL) and different RB schemes during FB performed in AS protocol. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We collected prospectively the data of 112 consecutive patients with low- or very-low-risk prostate cancer; positive mpMRI underwent biopsy at a single academic institution in the context of an AS protocol. INTERVENTION(S): mpMRI/transrectal US FB with Hitachi RVS system with 3 TB and concurrent transrectal 24-core RB. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The diagnostic yield of the different possible biopsy schemes (TB only; TB + 4 perilesional (PL) cores; TB + 12-core RB; TB + 24-core RB) was compared by the McNemar test. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were adopted to identify predictors of any cancer, Gleason grade group (GGG) ≥2 cancers, and the presence of GGG≥2 cancers in the larger schemes only. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The detection rate of GGG ≥2 cancers increased to 30%, 39%, and 49% by adding 4 PL cores, 14, and 24 RB cores, respectively, to TB cores (all p values <0.01). On the whole, TB alone, 14-core RB, and 24-core-RB identified 38%, 47%, and 56% of all the GGG ≥2 cancers. Such figures increased to 62% by adding to TB 4 PL cores, and to 80% by adding 14 RB cores. Most of the differences were observed in PI-RADS 4 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PL biopsy increased the detection rate of GGG ≥2 cancers as compared with TB alone. However, the combination of those cores missed a large percentage of the CS cancers identified with larger RB cores, including a 20% of CS cancers diagnosed only by the combination of TB plus 24-core RB.

Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pain Pelvic Syndrome and Male Infertility.

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is defined as urologic pain or discomfort in the pelvic region, associated with urinary symptoms and/or sexual dysfunction, lasting for at least 3 of the previous 6 months. The rate of symptoms related to prostatitis has a mean prevalence of 8-8.2%. CP/CPPS is most frequent in men younger than 50 years, among whom it is the most common urologic diagnosis. In the last decades, many studies have been published on CP/CPPS and its association with male infertility. The pathophysiologic relation between CP/CPPS and male infertility involves several aspects, which are not well studied yet. A reduction in semen parameters has been demonstrated in patients with CP/CPPS, and several mechanisms have been proposed to represent putative pathophysiological links between CP/CPPS and infertility, including male accessory gland inflammation, metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, HPV co-infection and autoimmunity. In light of this evidence, a multidisciplinary approach is advocated for patients with known CP/CPPS, and particular attention is needed for male patients of infertile couples in order to evaluate male accessory glands correctly. In addition, it is advisable that future studies dealing with the treatment of CP/CPPS take into consideration all the different pathophysiological aspects implicated.

Role of targeted biopsy, perilesional biopsy, and random biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis by mpMRI/transrectal ultrasonography fusion biopsy.

PURPOSE: It is still not clear the role of perilesional biopsy (PL) and the extension of the random biopsy (RB) scheme to be adopted during mpMRI-guided ultrasound fusion biopsy (FB). To evaluate the increase in diagnostic accuracy achieved by PL and different RB schemes over target biopsy (TB). METHODS: We collected prospectively 168 biopsy-naïve patients with positive mpMRI receiving FB and concurrent 24-core RB. The diagnostic yields of the different possible biopsy schemes (TB only; TB + 4 PL cores; TB + 12-core RB; TB + 24-core RB) were compared by the McNemar test. Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer (PCA) was defined according to the definition of the PROMIS trial. Regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of the presence of any cancer, csPCA. RESULTS: The detection rate of CS cancers increased to 35%, 45%, and 49% by adding 4 PL cores, 12, and 24 RB cores, respectively (all p < 0.02). Notably, the largest scheme including 3 TB and 24 RB cores identified a small but statistically significant 4% increase in detection rate of CS cancer, as compared with the second largest scheme. TB alone identified only 62% of the CS cancers. Such figure increased to 72% by adding 4 PL cores, and to 91% by adding 14 RB cores. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PL biopsy increased the detection rate of CS cancers as compared with TB alone. However, the combination of those cores missed about 30% of the CS cancers identified with larger RB cores, notably including a considerable 15% of cases located contralaterally to the index tumor.

Metabolic syndrome and risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that metabolic syndrome is associated with cancer pathogenesis. In particular regarding prostate cancer, observational studies from various settings report different results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a quantitative estimate of the association between metabolic syndrome in prostate cancer, in particular Gleason Score >6, accounting for different study designs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Systematic research of available literature in English language until 2020 was conducted through in Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library and NIH Registry of Clinical Trials. For each study, information regarding the study design, the population, the definition of metabolic syndrome, data relating to prostate cancer were collected, the association between MetS and outcome of interest was determined by calculating the generic inverse variance with random effects method. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In the final sample 19 studies were included with total of 114,329 patients, 29.4% met the criteria for metabolic syndrome. We report a significant association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer in cross-sectional studies (OR=1.30; 95% CI: 1.13-1.49) and for patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (OR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.23-1.99). Association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer combining all studies, in cohort studies and case-control studies was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Growing evidence support the association between metabolic syndrome and prostate cancer, bias derived from observational studies might conceal further findings.

A retrospective multicentric analysis on testicular torsion: is there still something to learn?

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Speedy diagnosis are mandatory in testicular torsion, nevertheless some cases of irreversible ischemia still occur. In this study we analysed the results of patients undergoing surgical exploration for acute scrotum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentric retrospective clinical evaluation was carried out on patients who underwent urgent scrotal exploration at 12 different departments in North-Eastern Italy. Data included complete anagraphic information, clinical presentation, numeric pain rating scale, previous testicular surgery, Doppler serial ultrasonography (US) evaluation and concordance with surgical findings, testicular mobility, surgical treatment, staged or concurrent treatment of the contralateral gonad. Statistical analysis was conducted both for descriptive and inferential statistics with SPSS v26. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-eight cases were collected between January 2010 and June 2019. The time between symptom onset and ER access time was within 6 h in majority of patients. However, 17.4% of subject presented after more than 12 h. In patients undergoing US, this showed signs of ischemia in 237 patients (77.2%) and normal vascularisation in 70 (22.8%) of whom 26 had signs of testicular torsion at surgical exploration. Overall, the US data were concordant with the surgical findings in 254 cases (82.7%). A significant association was found between time-to-evaluation and time-to-treatment and the need for orchiectomy (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Testicular torsion management is still challenging in terms of time-saving decision making. Scrotal US is helpful, but even in the contemporary its sensitivity is low era in a non-neglectable number of cases, therefore surgical exploration is warranted in acute scrotum when torsion cannot be ruled out, even when US shows vascularisation.

How to manage a partial detachment of the ureter during robotic radical prostatectomy?

The management of a ureteral orifice injury occurring during robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) represents a challenge for urologists. Several techniques have been proposed to treat an intraoperative injury, but intraoperative positioning of a DJ stent represents the most common treatment in cases of a partial injury of the ureteral orifice. We present a technique to ensure the successful outcome in cases of a partial detachment of the ureter during RARP. When the orifice is identified after the incision of the bladder neck and it appears very close to the anastomosis line setting up a partial detachment of the ureter, before implanting a DJ stent, one tip could be to perform a small incision of the anterior wall of the orifice to spatulate it and then proceeding to a short slip of the ureter: the eversion of the mucosa - thus creating a sort of "folded shirt cuff" - allows the fixation of the ureter to the bladder wall. We successfully performed this technique in two cases of RARP.