Long Stent Implantation on the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery at a Follow-Up of More Than Five Years.

BACKGROUND: Stent implantation represents the standard of care in coronary intervention. While a short stent implanted on a focal lesion located on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) seems a reasonable alternative to an internal mammary implant, the same for long stents is still debated. METHODS: We reported the long-term data of 531 consecutive patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) with long stents in two highly specialized centres. The main inclusion criteria were the implantation of stents longer than 30 mm on the LAD and a minimum follow-up (FU) of five years. The primary endpoint was mortality, and the secondary endpoints were any myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR and TLR, respectively), and stent thrombosis (ST) observed as definite, probable, or possible. RESULTS: In this selected population with characteristics of complex PCI (99.1%), the long-term follow-up (mean 92.18 ± 35.5 months) estimates of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and any myocardial infarction were 18.3%, 10.5%, and 9.3%, respectively. Both all-cause and cardiovascular deaths are significantly associated with three-vessel disease (HR 6.8; confidence of interval (CI) 95% 3.844-11.934; p < 0.001, and HR 4.7; CI 95% 2.265-9.835; p < 0.001, respectively). Target lesion (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) are associated with the presence of three-lesion disease on the LAD (HR 3.4; CI 95% 1.984-5.781; p < 0.001; HR 3.9 CI 95% 2.323-6.442; p < 0.001, respectively). Re-PCI for any cause occurred in 31.5% of patients and shows an increased risk for three-lesion stenting (HR 4.3; CI 95% 2.873-6.376; p < 0.001) and the treatment of bifurcation with two stents (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.051-2.414; p = 0.028). Stent thrombosis rate at the 5-year FU was 4.4% (1.3% definite; 0.9% probable; 2.1% possible), including a 1.7% rate of very-late thrombosis. The stent length superior to 40 mm was not associated with poor outcomes (all-cause death p = 0.349; cardiovascular death p = 0.855; MI p = 0.691; re-PCI p = 0.234; TLR p = 0.805; TVR p = 0.087; ST p = 0.189). CONCLUSION: At an FU of longer than five years, patients treated with stents longer than 30 mm in their LAD showed acceptable procedural results but poor outcomes.

Discrepancies in vessel sizing between angiography and intravascular ultrasound varies according to the vessel evaluated.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) of the coronary artery and stent size may be influenced by anatomical location in relation to both calibration point and the X-ray tube. The impact of this phenomenon on lesion assessment is undetermined. METHODS: In total, 427 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guidance were enrolled. The minimum stent diameter (MSD) was measured using QCA (MSDQCA) and IVUS (MSDIVUS) analysis. We used reference objects positioned at a different height from the X-ray source to validate our approach. RESULTS: A statistically positive moderate correlation was observed between MSDQCA and MSDIVUS (r=0.649, p=0.001). The mean MSDQCA and MSDIVUS were 3.04±0.49 mm and 2.68±0.47 mm respectively. The difference between MSDQCA and MSDIVUS of >0.75 mm was more frequently observed in the LCx rather than in the LAD (7.4% in the LAD vs. 24.3% in the LCx, p=0.001). The discrepancy between the MSDQCA and MSDIVUS for the LCx was larger than for the LAD, and tended to be larger than for the RCA (13.3% vs. 18.5%, p=0.05 and 18.5% vs. 14.5%, p=0.17). A discrepancy >20% was more frequently observed in the small (≤2.5 mm) than in the large MSDIVUS group (52.7% vs. 25.1%, p=0.001). This discrepancy was more common in the LCx than in the LAD or RCA (48.6% vs. 30.9% vs. 31.2%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of the MSDQCA is more likely to overestimate in the LCx than in the LAD, particularly when the MSDIVUS is <2.5 mm. Therefore, we should be less aggressive in oversizing balloons and stents based on QCA for the LCx or small vessel intervention.

Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, predictors, management, and clinical outcomes in patients with grade III coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Grade III coronary perforation is a rare but recognized complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. METHODS: From 24,465 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from May 1993 to December 2009, 56 patients had grade III coronary perforation. RESULTS: Most lesions were complex: 44.6% type B2, 51.8% type C, and 28.6% chronic total occlusions, and within a small vessel (≤ 2.5 mm) in 32.1%. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were administered in 17.9% of patients. The device causing perforation was intracoronary balloon in 50%: 53.6% compliant, 46.4% noncompliant; intracoronary guidewire in 17.9%; rotablation in 3.6%; and directional atherectomy in 3.6%. Following perforation, immediate treatment and success rates, respectively, were prolonged balloon inflation 58.9%, 54.5%; covered stent implantation 46.4%, 84.6%; coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and surgical repair 16.0%, 44.4%; and coil embolization 1.8%, 100%. Multiple methods were required in 39.3%. During the procedure (n = 56), 19.6% required cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 3.6% died. In-hospital (n = 54), 3.7% required CABG, 14.8% died. The combined procedural and in-hospital myocardial infarction rate was 42.9%, and major adverse cardiac event rate was 55.4%. At clinical follow-up (n = 46) (median: 38.1 months, range 7.6 to 122.8), 4.3% had a myocardial infarction, 4.3% required CABG, and 15.2% died. The target lesion revascularization rate was 13%, with target vessel revascularization in 19.6%, and major adverse cardiac events in 41.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Grade III coronary perforation is associated with complex lesions and high acute and long-term major adverse cardiac event rates.

Long-term follow-up of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for de novo lesions with correlation to the SYNTAX score.

BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis (ST) and restenosis are concerns after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Limited information exists concerning clinical and angiographic outcomes following multiple stent insertion. We therefore present the long-term outcome from drug-eluting stent (DES) insertion and correlate this with the Syntax score. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2002 and 2006, all patients that underwent multilesion PCI (defined as ≥4 DES) were included for analysis, and follow-up commenced from the point where the fourth stent was inserted. Three hundred and seventy-four patients were identified, comprising 1972 lesions; 99% had clinical (30±16 months), and 72% had angiographic follow-up. The mean number of stents implanted was 5.7±1.9 and with length of 137±50 mm and Syntax Score of 24±8. The Syntax score (SS) did not predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at long-term follow-up, which occurred in 33% in the low SS (<22), 34% intermediate SS (22-32) and 40% in the high SS (>33); P=ns. However, the number of stents implanted correlated with events [MACE: 12% (4 DES), 35% (4-6 DES), 61% (>6 DES)]. There were 11 (2.9%) definite and probable ST: four acute and subacute, three late, and four very late. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an acceptable occurrence of myocardial infarction, death, repeat revascularisation, and ST in patients with multivessel de novo lesions, which had better correlation with the number of DES inserted than the Syntax score.

Clinical and angiographic outcomes after percutaneous recanalization of chronic total saphenous vein graft occlusion using modern techniques.

Poor long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) have been reported. However, limited data are available evaluating the use of modern techniques in this group. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and long-term outcomes of PCI in SVG CTO with the routine use of embolic protection devices and drug-eluting stents. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of all consecutive patients undergoing PCI to SVG CTO from May 2002 to July 2009 at 2 centers. The indication for PCI was the presence of angina or silent ischemia with evidence of inducible ischemia after functional testing in the territory supplied by the SVG, despite optimal medical therapy. We identified 34 patients with SVG CTO. Of the 34 patients, 23 (68%) underwent successful SVG recanalization with stent implantation. An embolic protection device was used in 78% and 95% of stents implanted were drug-eluting stents. No in-hospital major adverse cardiac events occurred in the successful PCI group; one myocardial infarction occurred in the unsuccessful group. At follow-up (median 18.0 months, interquartile range 10.4 to 48.3), 1 case of myocardial infarction had occurred in the successful group. The in-stent restenosis rate was 68% (n = 13), of which 77% were focal, with target vessel revascularization in 61%. In conclusion, despite the relatively low procedural success rates, the clinical outcomes after successful PCI to SVG CTO with modern techniques were favorable. The repeat revascularization rates were high; however, graft patency was achievable in most after reintervention.

5-year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions the Milan experience.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate at 5 years the occurrence of cardiac death; cardiac death, and/or myocardial infarction (MI); cardiac death, MI, and/or stroke; target vessel revascularization; and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) versus coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in unprotected left main coronary artery lesions. BACKGROUND: Preliminary results at 1 year showed comparable occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in our center between PCI and CABG. METHODS: All consecutive patients with an unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis electively treated with DES implantation versus CABG in our center, between March 2002 and July 2004, were analyzed. A propensity analysis was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: We included 249 patients in the study: 107 were treated with PCI and DES implantation and 142 with CABG. At 5-year clinical follow-up, no difference was found between PCI and CABG in the occurrence of cardiac death (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.502; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.162 to 1.461; p = 0.24). The PCI group showed a trend toward a lower occurrence of the composite end point of cardiac death and MI (adjusted OR: 0.408; 95% CI: 0.146 to 1.061; p = 0.06). Percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a lower rate of the composite end point of death, MI, and/or stroke (OR: 0.399; 95% CI: 0.151 to 0.989; p = 0.04). Indeed, CABG was correlated with lower target vessel revascularization (adjusted OR: 4.411; 95% CI: 1.825 to 11.371; p = 0.0004). No difference was detected in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (adjusted OR: 1.578; 95% CI: 0.825 to 3.054; p = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: At 5-year clinical follow-up, there was still no difference in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events between elective PCI with DES implantation and CABG in unprotected left main coronary artery lesions in this single-center experience. There was an advantage of PCI in the composite end point of death, MI, and/or stroke, whereas a benefit in the need for reintervention was still found in CABG.

Results and follow-up after implantation of four or more sirolimus-eluting stents in the same patient.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of > or =4 sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; Cypher, Cordis, Johnson and Johnson) implantation. The safety of implantation of > or =4 SESs in the same patient and setting has not been established. Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that sirolimus administration with the use of multiple stents may diminish the platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel and may trigger drug-drug interactions. We identified 96 consecutive patients (96 procedures) who underwent implantation of > or =4 SESs in 365 lesions (438 stents) during the same procedure. All patients received aspirin indefinitely and clopidogrel or ticlopidine for at least 1 year postprocedure; 57% and 47% of the patients were on calcium channel blocker and statin therapy, respectively. All stents were successfully deployed and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 50% of the procedures. There were no in-hospital deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), urgent bypass surgery, or repeat percutaneous coronary intervention; 18 patients (19%) suffered non-Q-wave MI (defined as CK-MB elevation >3 times the upper limit of normal). At 30-day follow-up, there was one (1%) subacute thrombosis resulting in target lesion revascularization. At mean follow-up time of 15.4 +/- 6.2 months, the frequency of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac event rates were 12%, 16%, and 18%, respectively. No other notable clinical events that might have been attributed to the possible drug-drug interactions or discontinuation of concomitant antithrombotic, statin, or calcium channel blocker therapy were reported. Multiple (> or =4) SES implantation appears safe with no increase in major adverse cardiac events.

Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: immediate and mid-term results.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated clinical outcome after multivessel stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in unselected lesions. BACKGROUND: Safety and effectiveness of multivessel SES implantation is currently unknown. METHODS: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction [MI], and repeat revascularization) were analyzed at 30 days and at 6 months after multivessel SES implantation. RESULTS: In 155 consecutive patients, 573 SES were implanted in 3.3 +/- 1.3 lesions per patient. At 30 days, the cumulative MACE rate was 10.3%: 7.1% patients developed a non-Q-wave MI, 1.9% developed a Q-wave MI, 0.6% died for non-cardiac reasons, and 0.6% had a repeat revascularization. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all 112 eligible patients treated for 359 lesions at a mean time of 6.5 +/- 2.2 months. The cumulative MACE rate was 22.3%: 3 (2.7%) deaths (1 for cardiac reasons), 4 (3.6%) MIs, target lesion revascularization (TLR) in 16 (14.3%) patients with 24 (6.7%) lesions. Target vessel revascularization was required in 18 (16.1%) patients due to TLR of lesions treated with SES or to disease progression (1.8% of patients). Cox regression analysis revealed total stent length per patient as the most powerful independent predictor of MACE. Overall stent thrombosis occurred in three (1.9%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel SES implantation can be safely performed on patients with complex coronary artery disease. The need for revascularization increases because of the cumulative effect of TLR on patients with multiple lesions.

Coronary stent implantation throughout technical evolution: immediate and follow-up results.

Coronary stenting (stent implantation) has evolved over the last 5 years with changes in stent design, stent material and the implantation technique. The use of high-pressure balloon inflation (HP), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and appropriate antiplatelet therapy have contributed to the abolishment of the need for subsequent anticoagulation, allowing extended stent applications. We compared results in three groups of patients having stent implantation throughout the period of evolution: group A: no IVUS, no HP, with subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 434); group B: no IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 192); and group C: yes IVUS, yes HP, without subsequent anticoagulation treatment (n 3 588). The primary success rates were comparable in all groups. There was a clear change in indications for stenting in groups B and C compared with group A (elective stenting: group A 3 32%; group B 3 66%; group C 3 69%; P < 0.0001), in reference vessel size (group A 3 3.22 3 0.37 mm; group B 3 2.92 3 0.56 mm; group C 3 2.98 3 0.57 mm; P < 0.0001), and for presence of type B2 and C lesions (group A 3 57%; group B 3 72%; group C 3 74%; P < 0.001). The complication rate significantly decreased in group C (group A 3 3.6%; group B 3 4.1%; group C 3 1.2%; P < 0.001) and the mean patient hospital stay decreased to 2 days in groups B and C due to the abolition of the need for anticoagulant treatment. The angiographic restenosis rate increased in groups B and C (group A 3 20%; group B 3 34%; group C 3 32%; P < 0.001). The need for a repeat procedure increased as stenting of more complex lesions and smaller vessels was attempted: target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 16% of patients in group A (73/434), in 18% of group B (35/192) and in 22% of group C (129/588) (P 3 0.04 for A versus C). Major cardiac events (MACE) occurred in 142 patients in group A (33%), 60 patients in group B (31%) and in 181 patients in group C (30%). The evolving technique of coronary stenting has expanded the spectrum of indications and range of coronary vessels attempted, and decreased the complication rates and hospital stay. However, in less-favorable subsets, additional improvements are needed to affect the long-term outcome.