Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica's PES Program.

Payments for environmental services (PES) are often viewed as a way to simultaneously improve conservation outcomes and the wellbeing of rural households who receive the payments. However, evidence for such win-win outcomes has been elusive. We add to the growing literature on conservation program impacts by using primary household survey data to evaluate the socioeconomic impacts of participation in Costa Rica's PES program. Despite the substantial cash transfers to voluntary participants in this program, we do not detect any evidence of impacts on their wealth or self-reported well-being using a quasi-experimental design. These results are consistent with the common claim that voluntary PES do not harm participants, but they beg the question of why landowners participate if they do not benefit. Landowners in our sample voluntarily renewed their contracts after five years in the program and thus are unlikely to have underestimated their costs of participation. They apparently did not invest additional income from the program in farm inputs such as cattle or hired labor, since both decreased as a result of participation. Nor do we find evidence that participation encouraged moves off-farm. Instead, semi-structured interviews suggest that participants joined the program to secure their property rights and contribute to the public good of forest conservation. Thus, in order to understand the social impacts of PES, we need to look beyond simple economic rationales and material outcomes.

Pediatric trauma triage: review of 1,307 cases.

To assess patterns of pediatric trauma triage and patient transfer to the pediatric trauma centers, the records of 1,307 patients 14 years old or less who were admitted or died during resuscitation at eight Level II Trauma Centers from January 1987 through December 1988 were reviewed retrospectively. Cases were analyzed according to the following criteria: age, diagnosis, mechanism of injury, admitting service, pediatric trauma score (PTS), length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the hospital, and outcome. Forty-three patients were transferred to pediatric trauma centers based on local criteria. Of the remaining 1,264 patients kept at the Level II Trauma Centers, the average patient age was 8.34 year; PTS, 9.74; and length of stay, 4.46 days. Two hundred fifty-eight patients (19.7%) required ICU care for an average length of stay of 2.86 days. Twenty-four patients (1.8%) died; all 24 had a PTS less than or equal to 8. In comparing the data to the guidelines in Appendix J of the American College of Surgeons' Hospital and Prehospital Resources for Optimal Trauma Care of the Injured Patient for transfer to a Level I Pediatric Trauma Center, we found that children with a PTS greater than 8 and who either require ICU care and/or have altered states of consciousness can safely be treated in the adult ICU of a Level II Trauma Center.