The PREdictor of MAlnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis (PREMASS) Score: A Combined Index to Predict 12 Months Onset of Malnutrition in Systemic Sclerosis.

Objective: Malnutrition is a severe complication in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) and it is associated with significant mortality. Notwithstanding, there is no defined screening or clinical pathway for patients, which is hampering effective management and limiting the opportunity for early intervention. Here we aim to identify a combined index predictive of malnutrition at 12 months using clinical data and specific serum adipokines. Methods: This was an international, multicentre observational study involving 159 SSc patients in two independent discovery (n = 98) and validation (n = 61) cohorts. Besides routine clinical and serum data at baseline and 12 months, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) score and serum concentration of leptin and adiponectin were measured for each participant at baseline. The endpoint of malnutrition was defined according to European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) recommendation. Significant parameters from univariate analysis were tested in logistic regression analysis to identify the predictive index of malnutrition in the derivation cohort. Results: The onset of malnutrition at 12 months correlated with adiponectin, leptin and their ratio (A/L), MUST, clinical subset, disease duration, Scl70 and Forced Vital Capaciy (FVC). Logistic regression analysis defined the formula: -2.13 + (A/L*0.45) + (Scl70*0.28) as the best PREdictor of MAlnutrition in SSc (PREMASS) (AUC = 0.96; 95% CI 0.93, 0.99). PREMASS < -1.46 had a positive predictive value (PPV) > 62% and negative predictive value (NPV) > 97% for malnutrition at 12 months. Conclusion: PREMASS is a feasible index which has shown very good performance in two independent cohorts for predicting malnutrition at 12 months in SSc. The implementation of PREMASS could aid both in clinical management and clinical trial stratification/enrichment to target malnutrition in SSc.

Association between cortisol levels and pain threshold in systemic sclerosis and major depression.

Pain perception and threshold show complex interactions with the inflammatory, psychiatric and neuroendocrine stimuli. This study aims to test whether lower serum cortisol levels are associated with lower pain thresholds and higher degree of depression in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and major depression with atypical features (MD-AF) patients compared to controls. 180 female subjects (SSc = 60, MD-AF = 60, healthy controls = 60) participated in this observational, cross-sectional, parallel group study. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) was assessed in three anatomical sites: nail bed (NB), metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) and quadriceps muscle (QDR). Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale and morning serum cortisol levels were collected. In SSc patients, quality of life was measured through the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ-DI) and the scleroderma-specific visual analogue scales (scleroderma-VAS). Lower PPT scores (NB 4.42 ± 1.6; MCP 4.66 ± 1.4; QDR 4.79 ± 1.5) were observed in SSc patients compared to both MD-AF (NB 7.33 ± 2.2; MCP 6.01 ± 1.9; QDR 6.31 ± 1.6; p < 0.005) and controls (NB 9.57 ± 2; MCP 7.9 ± 2.1 and QDR 8.43 ± 2.1; p < 0.0001), while MD-AF patients had lower PPT scores compared to controls (p < 0.0001). SSc patients had also lower serum cortisol levels compared to MD-AF patients (8.78 vs 13.6 µg/dl; p < 0.05). A direct correlation was observed between serum cortisol and PPT scores both in SSc (r 2 for NB 0.29; for MCP 0.25; for QDR 0.27) and in MD-AF (r 2 for NB 0.34; for MCP 0.25; for QDR 0.47; p < 0.05), while depressive symptoms negatively correlated with serum cortisol (r 2 for NB 0.34; for MCP 0.17; for QDR 0.15) and in MD-AF (r 2 for NB 0.19; for MCP 0.31; for QDR 0.30; p < 0.05). Among SSc patients, those with serum cortisol levels below the normal range (n = 16) had higher BDI scores (15, 6-21 vs 9, 2-15; p < 0.005), lower PPTs (NB 4 ± 1.4 vs 4.9 ± 0.9; MCP 4.1 ± 0.8 vs 4.8 ± 0.9; QDR 4.1 ± 1.2 vs 5 ± 0.9; p < 0.005) and higher HAQ-DI (1.25, 0.25-2 vs 0.75, 0-1.25; p < 0.05) and scleroderma-VAS scores (VAS overall severity 7, 5.5-9.5 vs 4.5, 2.5-6; p < 0.05). The effect of cortisol serum levels upon pain mechanism, in chronic inflammatory conditions warrants longitudinal studies to detect treatable variations in pain thresholds, depressive symptoms and to improve quality of life.

Pain threshold and intensity in rheumatic patients: correlations with the Hamilton Depression Rating scale.

Individuals suffering from chronic pain are frequently affected by depression, which in turn increases the risk of developing chronic pain over time. This study aims to investigate the relationship between depression and pain intensity and threshold in a group of rheumatic patients compared to healthy subjects. One hundred twenty-four individuals of whom 50 were affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 23 by psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 23 by ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and 28 age-matched controls without chronic pain underwent quantitative sensory testing to assess pressure pain threshold with pressure algometry. Pain intensity was evaluated through the visual analogue scale (VAS) and depression through the Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAMD). A significant inverse correlation between HAMD values and pressure pain thresholds was found in the entire group of patients (p < 0.0001), in controls (p = 0.02), and also in RA (p = 0.002), PsA (p < 0.0002), and AS (p = 0.02) patients when analyzed separately, while no significant correlation was found between HAMD and VAS values or pressure pain thresholds and VAS. We found lower pain thresholds in RA and PsA patients while no difference has been evidenced in AS patients compared to healthy controls. HAMD scores were also significantly higher in rheumatic patients than in controls. The use of pressure algometry in the evaluation of chronic pain in patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis that display comorbid depression could represent an additional and integrative method to improve pain/depression overlap management or research.