Prevalence of Anti-Adeno-Associated Virus Immune Responses in International Cohorts of Healthy Donors.

Preexisting immunity against adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a major challenge facing AAV gene therapy, resulting in the exclusion of patients from clinical trials. Accordingly, proper assessment of anti-AAV immunity is necessary for understanding clinical data and for product development. Previous studies on anti-AAV prevalence lack method standardization, rendering the assessment of prevalence difficult. Addressing this need, we used clinical assays that were validated according to guidelines for a comprehensive characterization of anti-AAV1, -AAV2, -AAV5, and -AAV8 immunity in large international cohorts of healthy donors and patients with hemophilia B. Here, we report a higher than expected average prevalence for anti-AAV8 (∼40%) and anti-AAV5 (∼30%) neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), which is supported by strongly correlating anti-AAV IgG antibody titers. A similar anti-AAV8 NAb prevalence was observed in hemophilia B patients. In addition, a high co-prevalence of NAbs against other serotypes makes switching to gene therapy using another serotype difficult. As anti-AAV T cell responses are believed to influence transduction, we characterized anti-AAV T cell responses using interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) ELISpot assays, revealing a similar prevalence of IFN-γ responses (∼20%) against different serotypes that did not correlate with NAbs. These data, along with the long-term stability of NAbs, emphasize the need to develop strategies to circumvent anti-AAV immunity.

Detection of Biologically Relevant Low-Titer Neutralizing Antibodies Against Adeno-Associated Virus Require Sensitive In Vitro Assays.

Patients with preexisting anti-adeno-associated virus serotype 8 (AAV8) neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are currently excluded from AAV8 gene therapy trials. Therefore, the assessment of biologically relevant AAV8-NAb titers is critical for product development in gene therapy. However, standardized assays have not been routinely used to determine anti-AAV8-NAb titers, contributing to a wide range of reported anti-AAV8 prevalence rates. Using a clinical in vitro NAb assay in a separate study, a higher than expected anti-AAV8-NAb prevalence of about 50% was found in international cohorts. This comparative study has a translational character, confirming the biological relevance of anti-AAV8-antibody titers measured by this assay. The significance of low-titer anti-AAV8 NAbs is shown, along with the relevance of the in vitro assay cutoff (1:5) compared with other assays. Importantly, internally standardized reagents and purified AAV8 constructs containing 90% full capsids were used to reduce the effect of empty capsids. It was found that even very low anti-AAV8-NAb titers (<1:5) could efficiently hinder transduction in vivo, demonstrating the importance of sensitive NAb assays for clinical applications. The in vitro NAb assay was found to be more sensitive than an in vivo NAb assay and thus more suitable for patient screening. Additionally, the study showed that anti-AAV8-NAb titers <1:5 were very rare, further supporting the in vitro assay. However, assays using a lower cutoff may still be useful to explain potential variances in transgene expression. These findings support the relevance of the higher than expected prevalence of anti-AAV8 NAbs, highlighting the need for strategies to circumvent preexisting anti-AAV8 NAbs.