Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 61(8): e0043823, 2023 08 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395662

RESUMEN

Bacteria of the genus Brucella are facultative intracellular parasites that cause brucellosis, a severe animal and human disease. Recently, a group of taxonomists merged the brucellae with the primarily free-living, phylogenetically related Ochrobactrum spp. in the genus Brucella. This change, founded only on global genomic analysis and the fortuitous isolation of some opportunistic Ochrobactrum spp. from medically compromised patients, has been automatically included in culture collections and databases. We argue that clinical and environmental microbiologists should not accept this nomenclature, and we advise against its use because (i) it was presented without in-depth phylogenetic analyses and did not consider alternative taxonomic solutions; (ii) it was launched without the input of experts in brucellosis or Ochrobactrum; (iii) it applies a non-consensus genus concept that disregards taxonomically relevant differences in structure, physiology, population structure, core-pangenome assemblies, genome structure, genomic traits, clinical features, treatment, prevention, diagnosis, genus description rules, and, above all, pathogenicity; and (iv) placing these two bacterial groups in the same genus creates risks for veterinarians, medical doctors, clinical laboratories, health authorities, and legislators who deal with brucellosis, a disease that is particularly relevant in low- and middle-income countries. Based on all this information, we urge microbiologists, bacterial collections, genomic databases, journals, and public health boards to keep the Brucella and Ochrobactrum genera separate to avoid further bewilderment and harm.


Asunto(s)
Brucella , Ochrobactrum , Ochrobactrum/clasificación , Ochrobactrum/genética , Ochrobactrum/patogenicidad , Ochrobactrum/fisiología , Brucella/clasificación , Brucella/genética , Brucella/patogenicidad , Brucella/fisiología , Terminología como Asunto , Filogenia , Brucelosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Brucelosis/microbiología , Humanos , Infecciones Oportunistas/microbiología
2.
Vaccine ; 39(3): 617-625, 2021 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33328142

RESUMEN

Small ruminant brucellosis is caused by the Gram negative cocci-bacillus Brucella (B.) melitensis, the most virulent Brucella species for humans. In goats and sheep, middle to late-term gestation abortion, stillbirths and the delivery of weak infected offspring are the characteristic clinical signs of the disease. Vaccination with the currently available Rev. 1 vaccine is the best option to prevent and control the disease, although it is far from ideal. In this study, we investigate the safety of the B. melitensis 16MΔvjbR strain during a 15-month period beginning at vaccination of young goats, impregnation, delivery and lactation. Forty, 4 to 6 months old, healthy female crossbreed goats were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) and immunized subcutaneously with a single vaccine dose containing 1x109 CFU of B. melitensis 16MΔvjbR delivered in alginate microcapsules or non-encapsulated. Controls received empty capsules or the commercially available Rev.1 vaccine. Seven months post-vaccination, when animals were sexually mature, all goats were naturally bred using brucellosis-free males, and allowed to carry pregnancies to term. Blood samples to assess the humoral immune response were collected throughout the study. At two months post-delivery, all dams and their offspring were euthanized and a necropsy was performed to collect samples for bacteriology and histology. Interestingly, none of the animals that received the vaccine candidate regardless of the formulation exhibited any clinical signs associated with vaccination nor shed the vaccine strain through saliva, vagina or the milk. Gross and histopathologic changes in all nannies and offspring were unremarkable with no evidence of tissue colonization or vertical transmission to fetuses. Altogether, these data demonstrate that vaccination with the mutant strain 16MΔvjbR is safe for use in the non-pregnant primary host.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Brucelosis , Brucella melitensis , Brucelosis , Enfermedades de las Ovejas , Animales , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Femenino , Cabras , Humanos , Embarazo , Ovinos
3.
Microbiol Immunol ; 64(11): 730-736, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32965738

RESUMEN

Brucellosis is a major zoonotic disease, and Brucella melitensis is the species most often associated with human infection. Vaccination is the most efficient tool for controlling animal brucellosis, with a consequent decrease of incidence of human infections. Commercially available live attenuated vaccines provide some degree of protection, but retain residual pathogenicity to human and animals. In this study, Brucella ovis ∆abcBA (Bo∆abcBA), a live attenuated candidate vaccine strain, was tested in two formulations (encapsulated with alginate and alginate plus vitelline protein B [VpB]) to immunize mice against experimental challenge with B. melitensis strain 16M. One week after infection, livers and spleens of immunized mice had reduced numbers of the challenge strain B. melitensis 16M when compared with those of nonimmunized mice, with a reduction of approximately 1-log10 of B. melitensis 16M count in the spleens from immunized mice. Moreover, splenocytes stimulated with B. melitensis antigens in vitro secreted IFN-γ when mice had been immunized with Bo∆abcBA encapsulated with alginate plus VpB, but not with alginate alone. Body and liver weights were similar among groups, although spleens from mice immunized with Bo∆abcBA encapsulated with alginate were larger than those immunized with Bo∆abcBA encapsulated with alginate plus VpB or nonimmunized mice. This study demonstrated that two vaccine formulations containing Bo∆abcBA protected mice against experimental challenge with B. melitensis.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Brucelosis/inmunología , Brucella melitensis/inmunología , Brucella ovis/inmunología , Brucelosis/inmunología , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Animales , Citocinas , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Inmunización , Hígado/inmunología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Bazo/inmunología , Vacunación , Vacunas Atenuadas/inmunología
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 4(5): e673, 2010 May 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20454614

RESUMEN

Brucellosis is a widespread zoonotic disease that is also a potential agent of bioterrorism. Current serological assays to diagnose human brucellosis in clinical settings are based on detection of agglutinating anti-LPS antibodies. To better understand the universe of antibody responses that develop after B. melitensis infection, a protein microarray was fabricated containing 1,406 predicted B. melitensis proteins. The array was probed with sera from experimentally infected goats and naturally infected humans from an endemic region in Peru. The assay identified 18 antigens differentially recognized by infected and non-infected goats, and 13 serodiagnostic antigens that differentiate human patients proven to have acute brucellosis from syndromically similar patients. There were 31 cross-reactive antigens in healthy goats and 20 cross-reactive antigens in healthy humans. Only two of the serodiagnostic antigens and eight of the cross-reactive antigens overlap between humans and goats. Based on these results, a nitrocellulose line blot containing the human serodiagnostic antigens was fabricated and applied in a simple assay that validated the accuracy of the protein microarray results in the diagnosis of humans. These data demonstrate that an experimentally infected natural reservoir host produces a fundamentally different immune response than a naturally infected accidental human host.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/inmunología , Antígenos Bacterianos/inmunología , Brucella melitensis/inmunología , Brucelosis/inmunología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Cabras/inmunología , Animales , Reacciones Cruzadas , Enfermedades Endémicas/veterinaria , Cabras , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Perú , Análisis por Matrices de Proteínas
5.
Am J Vet Res ; 64(2): 153-61, 2003 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12602583

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare isolates of Rhodococcus equi on the basis of geographic source and virulence status by use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). SAMPLE POPULATION: 290 isolates of R equi (218 virulent isolates from foals and 72 avirulent isolates from feces, soil, and respiratory tract samples) obtained between 1985 and 2000 from horses and horse farms from 4 countries. PROCEDURE: DNA from isolates was digested with the restriction enzyme Asel and tested by use of PFGE. Products were analyzed for similarities in banding patterns by use of dendrograms. A similarity matrix was constructed for isolates, and the matrix was tested for nonrandom distributions of similarity values with respect to groupings of interest. RESULTS: There was little grouping of isolates on the basis of country, virulence status, or region within Texas. Isolates of R equi were generally < 80% similar, as determined by use of PFGE. Isolates from the same farm generally were rarely of the same strain. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Considerable chromosomal variability exists among isolates of R equiobtained from the same farm, sites withinTexas, or among countries from various continents. Only rarely will it be possible to link infections to a given site or region on the basis of analysis of isolates by use of PFGE of chromosomal DNA.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Actinomycetales/microbiología , Infecciones por Actinomycetales/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/microbiología , Rhodococcus equi/genética , Rhodococcus equi/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Actinomycetales/epidemiología , Animales , Argentina/epidemiología , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Evolución Molecular , Caballos/microbiología , Irlanda/epidemiología , Japón/epidemiología , Filogenia , Rhodococcus equi/patogenicidad , Texas/epidemiología , Virulencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA