RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Experiencing gender-based violence (GBV) is common among refugees. Intersecting systems of oppression can increase the risk of GBV and of suffering detrimental consequences, while concurrently creating barriers to meaningful support. Despite this, refugees with lived experience of GBV are rarely involved in the development, planning and adaptation of services and policies. METHODS: This article reports on a formative research process that aimed to involve public contributors (refugee victim-survivors of GBV) and relevant stakeholders in co-designing a service model aimed at improving psychosocial support in Sweden. Led by a partnership of public contributors and academic researchers, the research process consisted of iterative cycles of co-design workshops, complemented by scoping of existing literature. RESULTS: The co-design process resulted in a characterisation of the psychosocial service system needs, as perceived by the survivor co-researchers and stakeholders, and a two-level empowerment and support service model. The model included (i) a community-based intervention to promote help-seeking and (ii) psychosocial group support delivered in specialist clinics. Outcomes of the project included perceived benefits for those involved, service-led direct changes and acquisition of funding for continued research on the co-designed model. CONCLUSION: Improving psychosocial support for refugees in Sweden affected by GBV requires safe spaces to connect with peers and familiarise with available services, laws and rights in the society. Further, strengthened collaborations across sectors are necessary to meet the variety of needs. Co-design workshops were an effective way to initiate changes in the service delivery model for psychosocial support for refugees in Sweden affected by GBV. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTIONS: This is a participatory reflection on a participatory process. The survivor co-researchers contributed to designing and carrying out the PPI process and have co-authored this manuscript.
Asunto(s)
Violencia de Género , Refugiados , Humanos , Refugiados/psicología , Suecia , Sistemas de Apoyo Psicosocial , Femenino , Masculino , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the specific effect of insomnia on neuropsychological functioning in patients with very complex chronic pain. BACKGROUND: Individuals with insomnia disorder or chronic pain often experience cognitive deficits, with both conditions appearing to correlate with impairments in neuropsychological functions. As insomnia often occurs comorbid with chronic pain, distinguishing the differential effects of these two syndromes on an individual's neuropsychological functioning can be challenging. Comorbid depressive symptoms in these individuals, which may also affect cognitive function, may further obscure the associations between chronic pain, insomnia, and the neuropsychological profile. METHODS: The neuropsychological function of 22 individuals with very complex chronic pain was assessed using specialized tests examining aspects of memory and executive functioning. The severity of insomnia, depression, and anxiety was measured using questionnaires, and pain levels were assessed using a visual analog scale. Pain medications were transformed to the morphine-equivalent daily dose. RESULTS: Insomnia severity was found to predict memory function, accounting for 32.4% of the variance: A 1 SD increase in insomnia severity decreased memory function by 0.57 SD. The negative correlation between insomnia and memory was significant even after controlling for pain level, morphine-equivalent daily dose, and comorbid levels of anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Insomnia severity independently predicted memory function in patients with very complex chronic pain, even after controlling for other factors known to impair cognitive function. Insomnia may possibly explain some of the cognitive impairments related to chronic pain; thus, screening for, and treating, sleep disturbances may be a central aspect of chronic pain rehabilitation.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Memoria/etiología , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
Background and purpose This case of a 42 year old woman with lower extremity Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) after a twisting injury of the ankle, effectively treated with the addition of mirror therapy to a rehabilitation programme, prompted a literature review of both CRPS and mirror therapy. Mirror therapy is a newer adjunct to other forms of pain control and functional restoration for treatment of CRPS as well as other difficult clinical problems. This was a required group project as part of a university based course in chronic pain for healthcare workers. Materials and methods The PubMed database up to September 26,2012 was reviewed using four search word groups: "CRPS mirror therapy", "mirror CRPS", "reflex sympathetic dystrophy OR Complex Regional Pain Syndrome AND mirror" and "reflex sympathetic dystrophy OR Complex Regional Pain Syndrome AND mirror + RCT". Nine studies from PubMed met the criteria that this working group had chosen for inclusion in the analysis of mirror therapy as treatment. These references were supplemented by others on CRPS in order to generate an adequate review of both the syndrome CRPS and mirror therapy itself. Some references were specific for mirror therapy in the treatment of CRPS but others described mirror therapy for the treatment of phantom limb pain, brachial plexus avulsion pain, for physical rehabilitation of stroke related paresis and for rehabilitation after hand surgery. Results Criteria for the diagnosis of CRPS including the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria and the Budapest criteria are reviewed with an emphasis on the specificity and sensitivity of the various criteria for clinical and research purposes. The signs and symptoms of CRPS are a part of the criteria review. The main treatment strategy for CRPS is physical rehabilitation for return of function and mirror therapy is one of many possible strategies to aid in this goal. The patient in this case report had failed many of the adjunctive therapies and rehabilitation had been unsuccessful until the addition of mirror therapy. She then could progress with physical rehabilitation and return to a more normal life. Mirror therapy techniques are briefly described as part of a discussion of its success with relationship to signs and symptoms as well as to the duration of CRPS (and other syndromes). Some discussion of the theories of the central effects of both CRPS and phantom limb pain and how these are affected by mirror therapy is included. An analysis of the 9 most relevant articles plus a critique of each is present in table form for review. Conclusions There appears to be a clear indication for the use of mirror therapy to be included in the multidisciplinary treatment of CRPS types 1 and 2 with a positive effect on both pain and motor function. There is also evidence that mirror therapy can be helpful in other painful conditions such as post stroke pain and phantom limb pain. Implications CRPS is often overlooked as an explanation for obscure pain problems. Prompt diagnosis is essential for effective treatment. Mirror therapy is a newer technique, easy to perform and can be a useful adjunct to aid physical rehabilitation and decrease pain in this population. Much further prospective research on mirror therapy in CRPS is ongoing and is needed to systematize the technique, to clarify the effects and to define the place of this therapy in the multidisciplinary management of CRPS.