RESUMEN
Assessing Diagnostic PerformanceDiagnosis is an action and a goal in medicine. This article is the introduction to a series of review articles on varying facets of diagnosis. Clinical diagnosis is an exercise in classification; that is, placing the patient's condition in the correct diagnostic category. However, consideration must also be given to the performance objective, whether it is technical performance of a test, acquiring diagnostic information with respect to clinical management for an individual or a population's health outcomes, or cost-effectiveness and equity of care.
Asunto(s)
Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Medicina , Humanos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Ejercicio FísicoRESUMEN
This inaugural Lincoln Chen Lecture comments on five themes raised in the International Conference on the Future of Health Professional Education (University of Miami, November 2022), identifies challenges for the future of health professional education, and highlights the contributions and legacy of Lincoln Chen.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Humanos , Personal de Salud/educación , Salud GlobalRESUMEN
Background: Although transparency is crucial for building public trust, public health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic was often nontransparent. Methods: In a cross-sectional online study with COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant German residents (N = 763), we explored the impact of COVID-19 public health communication on the attitudes of vaccine-hesitant individuals toward vaccines as well as their perceptions of incomprehensible and incomplete information. We also investigated whether specific formats of public health messaging were perceived as more trustworthy. Results: Of the 763 participants, 90 (11.8%) said they had become more open-minded toward vaccines in general, 408 (53.5%) reported no change, and 265 (34.7%) said they had become more skeptical as a result of public health communication on COVID-19 vaccines. These subgroups differed in how incomprehensible they found public health communication and whether they thought information had been missing. Participants' ranking of trustworthy public health messaging did not provide clear-cut results: the fully transparent message, which reported the benefit and harms in terms of absolute risk, and the nontransparent message, which reported only the benefit in terms of relative risk were both considered equally trustworthy (p = 0.848). Discussion: Increased skepticism about vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic may have partly been fueled by subpar public health communication. Given the importance of public trust for coping with future health crises, public health communicators should ensure that their messaging is clear and transparent.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comunicación en Salud , Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , PercepciónRESUMEN
The education of health professionals substantially changed before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. A 2010 Lancet Commission examined the 100-year history of health-professional education, beginning with the 1910 Flexner report. Since the publication of the Lancet Commission, several transformative developments have happened, including in competency-based education, interprofessional education, and the large-scale application of information technology to education. Although the COVID-19 pandemic did not initiate these developments, it increased their implementation, and they are likely to have a long-term effect on health-professional education. They converge with other societal changes, such as globalisation of health care and increasing concerns of health disparities across the world, that were exacerbated by the pandemic. In this Health Policy, we list institutional and instructional reforms to assess what has happened to health-professional education since the publication of the Lancet Commission and how the COVID-19 pandemic altered the education process.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/educación , Atención a la SaludAsunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Práctica de Salud Pública , Eficacia de las Vacunas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Sistemas de Datos , Regulación Gubernamental , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , Administración en Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Administración en Salud Pública/normas , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricosAsunto(s)
Aprendizaje del Sistema de Salud/organización & administración , Investigación Biomédica , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Aprendizaje del Sistema de Salud/historia , Aprendizaje del Sistema de Salud/métodos , Informática Médica , National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine Division , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
COVID-19 has strained hospital capacity, detracted from patient care, and reduced hospital income. This article lays out a tested strategy that surgical and hospital leaders can use to overcome clinical and financial strain, emphasizing the experience at 2 leading North American medical centers. By classifying the time and resource needs of surgical patients and smoothing the flow of surgical admissions over all days of the week, hospitals can dramatically improve hospital efficiency, the quality of care and timely access to care for emergent and urgent surgeries. Through and beyond the time of COVID, smoothing the flow of surgical patients is a key means to restore hospital vitality and improve the care of all patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Administración Hospitalaria , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Hospitalización , HumanosAsunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Mortalidad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Administración en Salud Pública , Práctica de Salud Pública , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Ropa de Protección/provisión & distribución , Investigación en Sistemas de Salud Pública , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/provisión & distribución , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current legal efforts to document human rights violations typically include interviews in which survivors are asked to provide detailed descriptions of their traumatic experiences during a single meeting. Research on similar interview techniques used as part of a mental health treatment (eg, debriefing) has raised concerns that they might worsen mental health-more than doubling the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder in some studies. While controversy over the mental health impact of debriefing continues, debriefing treatments have been discontinued in most clinics nearly 2 decades ago. The purpose of this article is to promote the development and integration of preventative measures to limit potential mental health damage associated with legal endeavours to address human rights violations and international crimes. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Given the recent growth of the field of global mental health and its current capacity to provide feasible, acceptable, effective care in low-resource settings, we propose a research agenda to identify the mental health impact of current human rights legal practices and test a model of scalable medicolegal care that minimises risk by integrating mental health monitoring and applying up-to-date models of trauma treatment, including multiple meeting sessions, as indicated. CONCLUSIONS: As the fields of global health, human rights law, international criminal law and transitional justice increasingly overlap in their efforts to assist communities affected by grave violence, we propose that synchronising efforts may offer important opportunities to improve mental health for survivors.