The impact of PD Check-In on self-management skills for maintenance of speech after intensive treatment.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance of speech outcomes following speech-language therapy (SLT) in Parkinson's disease (PD) is an unmet expectation of people with PD (PWPD) and poorly defined in SLT practice. PD Check-In, a model for supported self-managed maintenance of speech following Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) LOUD was investigated. AIMS: To investigate the impact of the semi-structured component of PD Check-In on the adoption of self-management concepts and behaviours and the identification of facilitators, barriers and strategies for speech maintenance by PWPD over 24 months post-treatment. METHODS AND PROCEDURE: Following LSVT LOUD, 16 PWPD participated in individual PD Check-In semi-structured discussions with a SLT at 6 and 12 weeks, and 6, 12 and 24 months post treatment. A two-stage qualitative content analysis was applied: directed content analysis using categories from the theoretical framework of PD Check-In followed by inductive content analysis to identify subcategories. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Statements from PWPD indicated adoption of seven concepts of self-management across participants and across time. Six concepts from the theoretical framework of PD Check-In (partnerships, self-reflection, maintenance barriers and facilitators, revision of LSVT LOUD skill, goal setting and maintenance strategies), and one new category, participation, emerged from the analysis. Self-reflection, maintenance facilitators and barriers and participation were most prevalent in discussions. PWPD identified facilitators, barriers and strategies for maintenance across time points. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Statements from PWPD indicated a positive impact of SLT-supported self-management of speech using self-tailored strategies for sustainable maintenance according to their individual circumstances and needs. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject People with Parkinson's disease (PWPD) have expressed their need for speech-language therapy (SLT) services that are accessible for the duration of the condition and responsive to their expectation of maintaining speech following treatment. Outcomes for maintenance of the treatment effect following Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) LOUD are variable. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study presents the outcomes of five PD Check-In interventions delivered in semi-structured discussions between PWPD and a SLT over 24 months following LSVT LOUD for the development of self-management skills and behaviours. PWPD adopted self-management positively using self-tailored strategies for sustainable maintenance according to their individual circumstances and needs. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? PWPD responded positively to the individual development of self-management skills and behaviours over time. Individuality and flexible responsivity are features of PD Check-In which resonate with PWPD and speak to SLT supported self-managed maintenance of speech as a long-term model for PD.

Clinical outcomes of PD Check-In, a model for supported self-managed maintenance of speech in Parkinson's disease: A Phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: For many people with Parkinson's disease (PWPD), the long-term maintenance of speech following intensive treatment remains elusive. PD Check-In, a model for supported self-managed maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD® , was developed and evaluated. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of PD Check-In on vocal intensity and level of satisfaction of PWPD and their communication partners (CPs) over 24 months following LSVT LOUD. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A repeated-measures study design examined the impact of PD Check-In on the speech of 16 PWPD. Participants received LSVT LOUD followed by PD Check-In at 6 and 12 weeks, and 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. Outcome measures included acoustic measures of vocal intensity (sound pressure level-SPL) during sustained phonation, functional phrases, reading, and monologue, and satisfaction questionnaires for PWPD and their CPs. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: A significant treatment effect for time (p < 0.01) was identified for all SPL variables. Planned comparisons showed significant improvements for each variable pre- to post-LSVT LOUD. There was a significant maintenance effect for SPL maximum sustained phonation only, post-LSVT LOUD to 24 months. SPL remained significantly above baseline for functional phrases and maximum sustained phonation at 24 months. Participants' satisfaction with PD Check-In was high, at 93.75% for PWPD and 79.99% for CPs, at 24 months post-treatment. Long intervals between appointments led PWPD to feel less motivated about speech practice but more confident in self-management. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: For PWPD and CPs, maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD encompasses more than acoustic outcomes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject? Maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD has been shown to be variable in individual and group models. For PWPD and their CPs, a model for speech maintenance supports their expectation of sustained treatment effect over time and meets their changing needs for speech and language therapy services. Supported self-management is a model under investigation for long-term maintenance of speech. What this paper adds to existing knowledge? This study presents the impact of five individual PD Check-In interventions on the maintenance of vocal intensity (SPL) of 16 PWPD over 24 months following LSVT LOUD. PWPD and CPs reported a high level of satisfaction with PD Check-In independent of acoustic outcomes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Participant satisfaction with PD Check-In is derived from multiple factors and not limited to acoustic outcomes post-LSVT LOUD. Further investigation of the efficacy of PD Check-In to support the perceived maintenance of speech of PWPD and CPs is warranted.

The Impact of PD Check-In, a Model for Supported Self-Managed Maintenance of Speech on the Quality of Life of People with Parkinson's Disease: A Phase 1 Study.

Quality of life (QoL) for people with Parkinson's Disease (PD) is diminished by speech and communication changes. The impact of PD Check-In, an intervention for supported self-managed maintenance of speech following LSVT LOUD®, on QoL of people with PD was investigated. Sixteen people with PD and dysarthria completed LSVT LOUD followed by PD Check-Ins up until 24 months post-treatment. Self-rated QoL and voice handicap scales were used to determine the psychosocial and perceived impact of PD Check-In on the speech and voice of people with PD. The perceived impact of PD Check-In on speech and voice was also sought from 15 communication partners (CPs). A significant treatment effect for time was identified for the Dysarthria Impact Profile (DIP), Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Voice Handicap Index-Partner (VHI-P) (p < 0.05). There was no significant effect for time for the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Planned comparisons of timepoints for DIP, VHI, and VHI-P showed no significant differences (p > 0.01). Comparison of perceived voice handicap by people with PD and CPs revealed no significant differences (p > 0.01). The impact of PD Check-In on QoL of people with PD and CPs for 24 months post-LSVT-LOUD is unclear. Self-reported outcome measures alone do not fully capture changes in QoL in PD.

PD Check-In: The development and trial of a supported self-management program for people with Parkinson's disease following intensive speech intervention.

BACKGROUND: Debilitating speech and communication changes in Parkinson's disease (PD) lead to diminished quality of life for people with PD and their communication partners. Maintenance of the long-term effects of treatment such as LSVT LOUD® remains equivocal. Development of supported long-term maintenance programs is warranted. AIMS: This article describes the development and preliminary outcome data for PD Check-In, a supported self-management intervention for the maintenance of speech and social communication for people with PD following LSVT LOUD. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A narrative literature review of the principles of self-management and social cognitive theory of self-regulation was conducted to develop the core elements of PD Check-In. PD Check-In was conducted in person by a speech and language therapist (SLT) for three participants at 6 and 12 weeks, and at 6, 12 and 24 months following LSVT LOUD. Outcome measures included vocal intensity (SPL) during monologue and the dysarthria impact profile (DIP). PD Check-In utilized semi-structured discussion to develop, evaluate, and support the self-efficacy and skill of the person with PD in maintaining speech and social communication. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Six conceptual elements of PD Check-In were identified in the development phase: partnerships, self-reflection, maintenance issues, revision, goal-setting and maintenance strategies. Preliminary intervention data revealed monologue vocal intensity at 24 months post-LSVT LOUD was maintained above pre-treatment level, but below levels achieved post-treatment. The psychosocial impact of speech changes from pre-LSVT LOUD to 24 months post-treatment as measured by the DIP was variable. Qualitative statements reflected participant experiences underlying the clinical data. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: The theoretical and practical underpinnings of PD Check-In were defined. The impact of PD Check-In on three persons with PD was variable but positive. Further evaluation of the model is warranted. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject LSVT LOUD provides efficacious treatment for the speech disorder associated with PD. Long-term maintenance of speech post-treatment varies following self-managed and group therapy interventions. People with PD have an unmet expectation of long-term maintenance of speech and improved quality of life following intensive treatment. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study describes the development of a novel clinic-based approach to long-term maintenance of speech in PD based on the principles of self-management and self-efficacy. It provides preliminary data to demonstrate the method and its effects on three participants with varying speech difficulty, self-management skill development and psychosocial impact. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The positive impact of PD Check-In on the maintenance of monologue vocal intensity above baseline 24 months post-intensive treatment was independent of the variable impact on the quality of life of the participants. Further exploration of PD Check-In is warranted to determine the efficacy of this approach.