RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is a devastating traumatic neurologic injury with variable prognosis. Although outcomes such as mortality have been described, the time course of neurologic progression is poorly understood. We investigated the association between DAI neuroanatomic injury pattern and neurologic recovery timing. METHODS: A retrospective review of our institution's trauma registry identified patients diagnosed with DAI from 2017-2021. The neuroradiologist's review of a head computed tomography scan was used to score DAI severity. In-hospital neurologic examinations were reviewed, and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was calculated for all patients throughout the hospital stay. Categorical variables were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Nineteen DAI patients (grade 1 = 8; grade 2 = 1; grade 3 = 10) were included (mean age 31 years, 79% male). Mean Rotterdam computed tomography score, Injury Severity Scale, and admission GCS were comparable across DAI grades. Mean time in days to follow commands was shorter for those with grade 1 DAI (9.3) compared with grade 2 (17 days) or grade 3 (19 days) DAI (P = 0.02). Throughout hospitalization, patients with grade 1 DAI had higher motor (P = 0.006), eye (P = 0.001), and total GCS (P = 0.011) scores compared with those with grade 2 or 3 DAI. At the time of discharge, total GCS and the frequency of command following was similar across DAI grades. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with grade 1 DAI demonstrated the fastest short-term neurologic recovery, although final discharge neurologic examination was comparable across DAI grades. DAI classification can provide useful short-term prognostic information regarding in-hospital neurologic improvement.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Large (≥1 cm) acute traumatic subdural hematomas (aSDHs) are neurosurgical emergencies. Elderly patients with asymptomatic large aSDHs may benefit from conservative management. OBJECTIVE: To investigate inpatient mortality after conservative management of large aSDHs. METHODS: Single-center retrospective review of adult patients with traumatic brain injury from 2018 to 2021 revealed 45 large aSDHs that met inclusion criteria. Inpatient outcomes included mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Follow-up data included rate of surgery for chronic SDH progression. Patients with large aSDHs were 2:1 propensity score-matched to patients with small (<1 cm) aSDHs based on age, Injury Severity Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Rotterdam computed tomography scale. RESULTS: Median age (78 years), sex (male 52%), and race (Caucasian 91%) were similar between both groups. Inpatient outcomes including length of stay ( P = .32), mortality ( P = .37), and discharge home ( P = .28) were similar between those with small and large aSDHs. On multivariate logistic regression (odds ratio [95% CI]), increased in-hospital mortality was predicted by Injury Severity Scale (1.3 [1.0-1.6]), Rotterdam computed tomography scale 3 to 4 (99.5 [2.1-4754.0), parafalcine (28.3 [1.7-461.7]), tentorial location (196.7 [2.9-13 325.6]), or presence of an intracranial contusion (52.8 [4.0-690.1]). Patients with large aSDHs trended toward higher progression on follow-up computed tomography of the head (36% vs 16%; P = .225) and higher rates of chronic SDH surgery (25% vs 7%; P = .110). CONCLUSION: In conservatively managed patients with minimal symptoms and mass effect on computed tomography of the head, increasing SDH size did not contribute to worsened in-hospital mortality or length of stay. Patients with large aSDHs may undergo an initial course of nonoperative management if symptoms and the degree of mass effect are mild.
