Conservative Versus Operative Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Individuals­an Analysis of Insurance Data.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the frequency and results of conservative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in older individuals. METHODS: Billing data of the BARMER health insurance carrier for all patients of age 65 and above with proximal humerus fractures in the years 2005-2021 were retrospectively analyzed with multivariable Cox regression models, taking account of the patients' age, sex, and comorbidity profiles. The defined primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), major adverse events (MAE), thromboembolic events (TE), and complications of surgery or of trauma. Multivariable p values for the effect of treatment on all primary endpoints were jointly adjusted with the Bonferroni-Holm method. RESULTS: 54% of 81 909 patients were treated conservatively. Conservative treatment was more common in those who received their diagnosis as outpatients (79.5%, vs. 37.2% for inpatients). Operative treatment was associated with significantly longer overall survival (long-term HR 0.89, 95% confidence interval [0,86; 0,91]) and fewer MAE (0.90; [0.88; 0.92]) and TE (0.89; [0.87; 0.92]), but more complications due to surgery or trauma (1.66; [1,.4; 1.78]; all p < 0.001). 3.1% of the patients who had been initially treated conservatively underwent surgery within 6 months of their diagnosis. Risk factors for the failure of conservative treatment included alcohol abuse, obesity, cancer, diabetes mellitus, Parkinson disease, and osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: The conservative treatment of proximal humerus fracture is associated with a lower overall rate of complications due to surgery or trauma, but also with more MAE and TE and higher overall mortality. These findings underline the need for individualized and risk-adjusted treatment recommendations.

Telemedicine Plus Standard Care Versus Standard Care Only in Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.

Background: Patients suffering from incurable diseases are more likely to die in the hospital than at home. Specialized outpatient palliative care (PC) may be able to counteract this tendency. Similarly, potential benefits of telemedicine in health care were scientifically reported. The aim of this research was to compare patients receiving specialized outpatient PC plus telemedicine with those receiving standard specialized outpatient PC only. In this study, telemedicine is assumed to decrease the number of home visits and therefore should not be considered a mere add-on. Methods: This is a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Recruitment lasted between January 2020 and October 2021. Quality of care was evaluated using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) at day 0, 7, and 14 after randomization. Change from day 0 to 7 was defined as the primary outcome (noninferiority margin = 4 points). This study was conducted in an urban setting in collaboration with a university hospital and a local specialized outpatient PC service. Results: A total of 196 patients were screened with 34 patients included (18 telemedicine/16 standard care). The mean change in the total score of the IPOS from day 0 to 7 amounted to -1.8 ± 3.9 (telemedicine) versus 1.2 ± 5.7 (standard care). The telemedicine group was statistically not relevantly inferior to the standard care group (t-test for noninferiority, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Although, due to COVID-19, the sample size remained rather small, our findings indicate that telemedical approaches offer a promising and equally effective option to provide specialized outpatient PC. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT06054048.

Quality of Life and Pain after Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review.

Background and Objectives: The proximal humeral fracture (PHF) is one of the most common fractures in elderly patients. A PHF might influence the quality of life (QoL) on several different levels, especially in elderly patients, but it is unclear which treatment option results in a better QoL outcome. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the current literature for studies that have analyzed the QoL and pain of elderly patients treated either surgically or non-operatively for PHF. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed in the PubMed database from January to April 2023. Studies describing the QoL or the level of pain of patients older than 60 years with the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) score or the visual analogue scale (VAS) after the treatment of PHF, either non-operatively (non-OP), with open-reduction and internal fixation using a locking plate (LPF), or with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) were included. Twelve studies were analyzed descriptively and the individual risk of bias was assessed using the ROB2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: A total of 12 studies with 712 patients at baseline were included (78% female sex, mean age 75.2 years). The reported VAS scores at 12-month follow-up (FU) ranged from 0.7 to 2.5. The calculated overall mean VAS score across all studies showed a decreasing tendency for all treatments, with an increasing FU time up to 12 months after PHF. None of the studies reported any significant differences of the EQ-5D across the groups. The overall calculated EQ-5D indices showed an increasing trend after 6-8 weeks FU, but did not differ significantly between the three treatments. Conclusions: In conclusion, the current literature suggests that there are no clinically important differences between the QoL or pain in elderly patients with PHF after non-operative treatment or surgical treatment with LPF or RTSA. However, the number of studies and level of evidence is rather low and further trials are urgently needed.

Creating a Telemedicine Network of Specialists in Maternal-Fetal Medicine: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Background: Even before coronavirus disease 2019, integrating telemedicine into routine health care has become increasingly attractive. Evidence regarding the benefits of telemedicine in prenatal care is still inconclusive. As one of the largest sectors of preventive medicine with a relative paucity of specialists in maternal-fetal medicine (MFM), the implementation of telemedicine solutions into prenatal care is promising. Our objective aimed at establishing a telemedicine network of specialists in MFM for interprofessional exchange regarding high-risk pregnancies. Furthermore, the aims were to evaluate the providers' attitude toward the telemedicine solutions and to quantify the number of inpatient appointments that were avoided through interprofessional video consultations. Methods: This prospective trial was part of a larger telemedicine project funded by the European Regional Development Fund. MFM experts were brought together using the ELVI software. A questionnaire was designed for the evaluation of video consultations. The responses were analyzed by the exact McNemar-Bowker test to compare planned procedures before and after video consultation. Results: An interprofessional network of specialists in prenatal ultrasound was established with a total of 140 evaluations for statistical analysis. Interprofessional video communication was viewed favorably by providers. Overall, 47% (33/70) of the scheduled visits were avoided after video consultation. The providers' tendency to refrain from sending their patients to the University Hospital Münster was statistically noticeable (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Interprofessional exchange through video consultation holds great potential in the context of prenatal care. More prospective research is needed to clearly establish the most beneficial standard of care for both patients and providers. Clinical trial registration number: 2019-683-f-S.

Satisfaction with and Feasibility of Prenatal Counseling via Telemedicine: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Telemedicine has become increasingly important over the past decade. With the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic, demands for remote health care solutions have seen an unprecedented rise. However, many questions regarding the feasibility and benefits of telemedicine remain. The aim of our study was to evaluate both the technical feasibility and patient satisfaction with video consultations in a tertiary center for obstetric care. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center trial was part of the larger open Video Service project on telemedicine at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the University of Münster. Patients requiring prenatal or prepregnancy counseling were included. A questionnaire was designed for the evaluation of patient satisfaction and filled in by both patient and health care provider at the end of the video consultation. Results: Of 80 eligible cases, 75 video consultations were carried out and data from the questionnaire were collected. Overall patient satisfaction was high (95%, 71/75) although technical problems occurred in 37% (29/75) of the appointments. Health care providers' satisfaction was equally high and in 88% (66/75) of cases, remote consultations avoided an in-house visit without effect on health care quality. Conclusions: Remote consultations are feasible and yield high satisfaction rates even in a medical field as sensitive as perinatal medicine. Further research is necessary to determine the cost-effectiveness and effects on perinatal outcome. Health care systems should be offered clear guidance on medicolegal issues and funding of remote consultations to integrate telemedicine into routine health care.

Comparing efficacy and side effects of two systemic chemotherapy regimens for eye-preserving therapy in children with retinoblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Eye-preserving therapy in retinoblastoma comprises systemic chemotherapy, but studies analyzing the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens are scarce. METHODS: The efficacy and side effects of two different eye-preserving chemotherapy regimens containing either vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin (VEC) or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin (CyVEC) were compared in a prospective non-interventional observational study including children diagnosed with retinoblastoma between 2013 and 2019 in Germany and Austria. Event-free eye survival (EFES) and overall eye survival (OES) of all 164 eyes treated with both regimens and risk factors were investigated. RESULTS: The EFES after VEC (2-year EFES 72.3%) was higher than after CyVEC (2-year EFES 50.4%) (plogrank  < .001). The OES did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (plogrank  = .77; 2-year OES VEC: 82.1% vs. CyVEC: 84.8%). Advanced International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) group was prognostic for a lower EFES (plogrank  < .0001; 2-year EFES ICRB A/B/C 71.3% vs. ICRB D/E 43.0%) and OES (plogrank  < .0001; 2-year OES ICRB A/B/C 93.1% vs. ICRB D/E 61.5%). The multivariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis older than 12 months and ICRB A/B/C were associated with better EFES. No second malignancies or ototoxicities were reported after a follow-up of median 3.1 years after diagnosis of retinoblastoma (range 0.1-6.9 years). CONCLUSIONS: Despite omitting cyclophosphamide, the EFES was higher after VEC chemotherapy that contains higher doses of carboplatin compared to CyVEC. The major risk factor for enucleation was advanced ICRB tumor grouping. Randomized clinical trials on efficacy and side effects of eye-preserving chemotherapy are required to tailor treatment protocols for retinoblastoma patients.