Glucose circadian rhythm assessment in pregnant women for gestational diabetes screening.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common complication during pregnancy, and it is associated with short- and long-term health impairments. Even with increasing incidence rates worldwide, to date, GDM lacks an international standard diagnosis criterion. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate whether a chronobiological perspective may improve the identification of patients at risk for neonatal complications. METHODS: We analyzed a dataset with 92 recruited pregnant patients with Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) data obtained in a blinded study. The primary outcome consisted in evaluating whether the composite of adverse neonatal outcomes could be predicted by chronobiological variables derived from fitting glucose oscillation to a circadian rhythm. The secondary neonatal outcomes included preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure, hyperbilirubinemia, and hospital length of stay. The secondary maternal outcomes included weight gain during pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, induction of labor, cesarean delivery, and postpartum complications. 87 subjects had enough data to study for glucose circadian rhythmicity. RESULTS: We developed a 3-covariate model including two chronobiological metrics, the midline estimating statistic of rhythm (MESOR) and glucose M10 start-time, and age that was predictive of the primary outcome, and associated with maternal secondary outcomes (preeclampsia with severe features and weight gain during pregnancy), and newborn secondary outcomes (preterm delivery < 37 weeks, indicated preterm delivery, NICU admission, need for CPAP, and differences in length of hospital stay). CONCLUSIONS: Chronobiological parameters might contribute to a better identification of the adverse outcomes associated with GDM in both the mother and newborn.

Nulliparous with Class III Obesity at Term: Labor Induction or Cesarean Delivery Without Labor.

Objective To compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between labor induction versus CD without labor among nulliparous individuals with class III obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2). Study design A retrospective cohort study of all nulliparous singleton deliveries ≥ 37 weeks with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 at delivery between March 2020 and February 2022. We excluded individuals with spontaneous labor, fetal malformations, and stillbirths. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal mortality and morbidity, including infectious and hemorrhagic morbidity. The secondary outcome was a neonatal composite. A subgroup analysis evaluated patients with a body mass index ≥ 50 kg/m2. Another subgroup analysis compared outcomes between CD without labor and an indicated CD following induction. A multivariable logistic regression was applied. For adjustment, we used possible confounders identified in a univariate analysis. Results Among 8,623 consecutive deliveries during the study period, 308 (4%) met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 250 (81%) underwent labor induction, and 58 (19%) had a CD without labor. The most common indications for CD without labor were fetal malpresentation (26; 45%), suspected macrosomia (8; 14%), and previous myomectomy (5; 9%). Indicated CD occurred in 140 (56%) of the induced individuals, with the two leading indications being labor arrest (87; 62%) and non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing (51; 36%). The rates of composite maternal morbidity (aOR 2.14, 95% CI 0.64-7.13) and composite neonatal morbidity (aOR 3.62, 95% CI 0.42-31.19) did not differ following a CD without labor compared to labor induction. The subgroup analyses did not demonstrate different outcomes between groups. Conclusions Among nulliparous individuals with class III obesity at term who underwent induction, more than 50% had indicated CD; the rate of short term maternal and neonatal morbidity, however, did not differ between labor induction and CD without labor.

Intrapartum Care for People with Diabetes-Working towards Evidence-Based Management.

The consensus in the literature supports the need for careful monitoring and management of maternal blood glucose during labor to optimize neonatal outcomes. Guidelines generally recommend strict control of maternal blood glucose during labor, involving frequent checks, and the use of dextrose and insulin as needed. However, recent evidence has not consistently shown a strong association between strict control of blood glucose and a reduction in the rate of neonatal hypoglycemia. This raises questions about the extent to which intrapartum blood glucose control impacts neonatal hypoglycemia. This review aims to explore the literature on intrapartum maternal blood glucose management in individuals with pregestational or gestational diabetes, utilizing peer-reviewed journals and datasets, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinical guidelines. Observational studies, small sample sizes, variability in definitions of maternal hyperglycemia and neonatal hypoglycemia, and differences in measurement methods such as timing and thresholds for intervention limit the literature on this topic. Additionally, many studies may not fully account for confounding factors such as maternal body mass index, diet, and other comorbidities affecting blood glucose levels. These limitations underscore the need for a cautious interpretation of current findings and highlight the necessity for future research in this area. This review elaborates on the available data and summarizes evidence on managing labor in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. We also emphasize the need for further research to clarify the relationship between maternal blood glucose during labor and neonatal blood glucose. KEY POINTS: · The benefits of strict intrapartum blood glucose control are unclear.. · The optimal maternal blood glucose range to prevent neonatal hypoglycemia remains undefined.. · Additional research is necessary to understand the relationship between maternal and neonatal blood glucose..

Outcomes in Pregnancies Complicated with Preterm Hypertensive Disorders with and without Late Antenatal Corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether administration of a late preterm (34-36 weeks) course of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) is associated with improved short-term neonatal outcomes among pregnancies complicated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) who delivered in the late preterm period. STUDY DESIGN: A single tertiary center retrospective cohort study, including pregnant individuals with singleton fetuses who delivered between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks following an HDP diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were major fetal anomalies and treatment with ACS before 34 weeks. Cases were divided into two groups: exposed group, consisting of individuals treated with a late ACS course, and nonexposed group, receiving no ACS. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome, including intensive care unit admission, oxygen treatment, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, mechanical ventilation, respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea, or apnea of prematurity. Secondary neonatal outcomes included birth weight, Apgar score, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, surfactant use, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, sepsis, and neonatal death. Multivariable regression models were used to determine adjusted odds ratio (aOR)and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 7,624 preterm singleton deliveries during the study period, 438 (5.7%) were diagnosed with HDP and delivered between 34.0 and 36.6 weeks. Infants who received ACS were diagnosed more commonly with fetal growth restriction (16.0 vs. 5.6%, p < 0.01) and were delivered at an earlier gestational age (GA) (mean GA: 35.6 vs. 36.3 weeks, p < 0.01). The composite neonatal morbidity did not differ between the groups after adjustments (aOR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.47, 1.98). Neonatal hypoglycemia and hyperbilirubinemia were more common in the exposed group than in the nonexposed group (46.9 vs. 27.4%; aOR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.26, 4.08 and 64.2 vs. 46.5%; aOR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.16, 3.72 respectively). CONCLUSION: In people with HDP, a course of ACS given in the late preterm period did not improve neonatal morbidity. KEY POINTS: · In people with HDP, a late preterm ACS course did not improve neonatal morbidity.. · Respiratory morbidity rate was similar between infants who received late ACS and those who did not.. · Neonatal hypoglycemia and hyperbilirubinemia were more common in infants who received late ACS..

Permissive intrapartum glucose control: an equivalence randomized control trial (PERMIT).

BACKGROUND: There is limited high-quality data on the best practices for maternal blood glucose management during labor. OBJECTIVE: We compared permissive care (target maternal blood glucose 70-180 mg/dL) to usual care (blood glucose 70-110 mg/dL) among laboring individuals with diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a two-site equivalence randomized control trial for individuals with diabetes (pregestational or gestational) at ≥34 weeks in labor. Individuals were randomly allocated to usual care or permissive care. Maternal blood glucose was evaluated by capillary blood glucose monitoring in latent and active labor every 4 and 2 hours. Insulin drip was initiated if maternal blood glucose exceeded the upper bounds of the allocated target. The primary outcome was the first neonatal heel stick glucose within 2 hours of birth before feeding. We assumed a mean first neonatal blood glucose of 50±10 mg/dL. To ensure that the use of permissive care did not increase or decrease the first neonatal blood glucose >10 mg/dL (2-tailed: a=0.05, b=0.1), 96 total participants were required. We calculated adjusted relative risk and 95% confidence intervals in an intention-to-treat analysis. A preplanned Bayesian analysis was used to estimate the probability of equivalence with a neutral informative prior. RESULTS: Of deliveries with diabetes assessed for eligibility (from October 2022 to June 2023), 280 of 511 (54.8%) met eligibility criteria, and 96 of 280 (34.3%) agreed and were randomized. In the usual care group, 17% required an insulin drip compared with none in permissive care. There was equivalence in the primary outcome between usual and permissive care (57.9 vs 57.1 mg/dL; adjusted mean difference, -0.72 [95% confidence interval, -8.87 to 7.43]). Bayesian analysis indicated a 98% posterior probability of the mean difference not being >10 mg/dL. The rate of neonatal hypoglycemia was 25% in the usual care group and 29% in the permissive group (adjusted relative risk, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.17). There was no difference in other neonatal or maternal outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this randomized control trial, although almost 1 in 6 individuals with diabetes required an insulin drip with usual intrapartum maternal blood glucose care, permissive care was associated with equivalent neonatal blood glucose.

Trends and Outcomes among Pregnancy and Nonpregnancy-Related Hospitalizations with Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

OBJECTIVE: The study's primary objective was to evaluate adverse outcomes among reproductive-age hospitalizations with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), comparing those that are pregnancy-related versus nonpregnancy-related and evaluating temporal trends. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with DKA among reproductive-age women (15-49 years) in the United States (2016-2020). DKA in pregnancy hospitalizations was compared with DKA in nonpregnant hospitalizations. Adverse outcomes evaluated included mechanical ventilation, coma, seizures, renal failure, prolonged hospital stay, and in-hospital death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Annual percent change (APC) was used to calculate the change in DKA rate over time. RESULTS: Among 35,210,711 hospitalizations of reproductive-age women, 447,600 (1.2%) were hospitalized with DKA, and among them, 13,390 (3%) hospitalizations were pregnancy-related. The rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased over time (APC = 3.8%, 95% CI = 1.5-6.1). After multivariable adjustment, compared with pregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA, the rates of mechanical ventilation (aRR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.18-2.06), seizures (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.72-2.97), renal failure (aRR = 2.26, 95% CI = 2.05-2.50), coma (aRR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.68-3.83), and in-hospital death (aRR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.06-5.36) were higher among nonpregnancy-related hospitalizations with DKA. CONCLUSION: A nationally representative sample of hospitalizations indicates that over the 5-year period, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased among reproductive age women, and a higher risk of adverse outcomes was observed when compared with pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations. KEY POINTS: · Over 5 years, the rate of pregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations was stable.. · Over 5 years, the rate of nonpregnancy-related DKA hospitalizations increased.. · There is a higher risk of adverse outcomes with DKA outside of pregnancy..

Equivalence of single and standard doses of antenatal corticosteroids for late preterm neonatal outcomes: insights from a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: The recent paradigm shift of treating individuals at risk of late preterm birth with antenatal corticosteroids warrants an assessment of the effect of single dosage. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of neonates born in the late preterm period (34.0-36.6 weeks) after a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids vs placebo. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial. All individuals enrolled in the parent trial who received only a single dose of either antenatal corticosteroids or placebo and delivered within 24 hours were included. Primary outcome was a composite of respiratory support at 72 hours, including continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula ≥2 hours, oxygen with an inspired fraction of ≥30% for ≥4 hours, or mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Of the 2831 individuals in the parent trial, 1083 (38.3%) met inclusion criteria; of them, 539 (49.8%) received a single dose of antenatal corticosteroids and 544 (50.2%) a single placebo dose. The placebo and antenatal corticosteroids groups had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference in the rate of the primary respiratory outcome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.47) or in the rate of respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted risk ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.26) between those who received a single antenatal corticosteroids dose and placebo. An exploratory stratification by randomization-to-delivery intervals of 12-hour increments also showed no association with lower primary respiratory outcome rates. CONCLUSION: In individuals with late preterm birth pregnancies who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered before a second dose, there were no differences in neonatal respiratory morbidities compared with placebo. However, this study is not powered to detect treatment efficacy.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and late preterm birth: outcomes with and without antenatal corticosteroid exposure.

BACKGROUND: Unlike pregestational diabetes mellitus, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends antenatal corticosteroids in those with gestational diabetes mellitus at risk for preterm birth. However, this recommendation is based on limited data, only 10.6% of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids study sample had gestational diabetes mellitus. There is a paucity of data on the risk of neonatal respiratory and other morbidity in this population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine respiratory outcomes in parturients with gestational diabetes mellitus who received antenatal corticosteroids and delivered during the late preterm period vs those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based cohort study used the US Vital Statistics dataset between 2016 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were singleton, nonanomalous individuals who delivered between 34.0 to 36.6 weeks with gestational diabetes mellitus and known status of antepartum corticosteroid exposure. The primary outcome, a composite neonatal adverse outcome, included Apgar score <5 at 5 minutes, immediate assisted ventilation, assisted ventilation >6 hours, surfactant use, seizure, or neonatal mortality. The secondary outcome was a composite maternal adverse outcome, including maternal blood transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, and admission to the intensive care unit. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. Average annual percent change was calculated to assess changes in rates of corticosteroid exposure over the study period. RESULTS: Of 19 million births during the study period, 110,197 (0.6%) met the inclusion criteria, and among them, 23,028 (20.9%) individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus received antenatal corticosteroids. The rate of antenatal steroid exposure remained stable over the 5 years (APC=10.7; 95% confidence interval, -5.4 to 29.4). The composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly higher among those who received corticosteroids than among those who did not (137.1 vs 216.5 per 1000 live births; adjusted relative risk 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.28). Three components of the composite neonatal adverse outcome-immediate assisted ventilation, intubation >6 hours, and surfactant use-were significantly higher with exposure than without. In addition, the composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly higher among those who received corticosteroids (adjusted relative risk, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.52). Three components of the composite maternal adverse outcome-admission to intensive care unit, blood transfusion, and unplanned hysterectomy-were significantly higher among the exposed group. Subgroup analysis, among large for gestational age, by gestational age, and race and ethnicity, confirm the trend of increased likelihood of adverse outcomes with exposure to corticosteroid. CONCLUSION: Individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus and antenatal corticosteroid exposure, who delivered in the late preterm, were at higher risk of neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes than those unexposed to corticosteroid.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancy.

Diabetes mellitus in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Optimal glycemic control is associated with improved outcomes. Continuous glucose monitoring is a less invasive alternative to blood glucose measurements. Two types of continuous glucose monitoring are available in the market: real time and intermittently scanned. Continuous glucose monitoring is gaining popularity and is now recommended by some societies for glucose monitoring in pregnant women. In this review, we discuss the differences between the two types of continuous glucose monitoring, optimal treatment goals, and whether there is an improvement in maternal or neonatal outcomes.

First trimester anatomy ultrasound for patients with obesity: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Second-trimester ultrasound is the standard technique for fetal anatomy evaluation in the United States despite international guidelines and literature that suggest that first-trimester timing may be superior in patients with obesity. First-trimester imaging performs well in cohorts of participants with obesity. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the completion rate of a first-trimester fetal anatomy ultrasound scan with that of a second-trimester fetal anatomy ultrasound scan among pregnant people with a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial enrolled participants with a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 with a singleton gestation and who presented before 14+0/7 weeks of gestation. Participants were randomized to receive an ultrasound assessment of anatomy at either 12+0/7 to 13+6/7 weeks or at 18+0/7 to 22+6/7 weeks. The primary outcome was completion rate (percentage of scans that optimally imaged all the required fetal structures). Secondary outcomes included the necessity of a transvaginal approach, completion rates for each individual view, number of anomalies identified and missed in each group, scan duration, and patient perspectives. A 1-year pilot sample was analyzed using Bayesian methods for the primary outcome with a neutral prior and frequentist analyses for the remaining outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 128 participants were enrolled, and 1 withdrew consent; 62 subjects underwent a first-trimester ultrasound scan and 62 underwent a second-trimester ultrasound scan. A total of 2 participants did not attend the research visits, and 1 sought termination of pregnancy. In the first-trimester group, 66% (41/62) of ultrasound scans were completed in comparison with 53% (33/62) in the second-trimester ultrasound group (Bayesian relative risk, 1.20; 95% credible interval, 0.91-1.73). When compared with a second-trimester scan plus a follow-up ultrasound, a first-trimester ultrasound plus a second-trimester ultrasound was equally successful in completing the anatomy views (76%). First-trimester anatomy ultrasound scans required a transvaginal approach in 63% (39/62) of cases and had a longer duration than a second-trimester ultrasound scan. No anomalies were missed in either group. First-trimester ultrasound participants who responded to a survey described that they were very satisfied with the technique. CONCLUSION: In pregnant subjects with a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2, a single first-trimester anatomy ultrasound scan was more likely to obtain all the recommended anatomic views than a single second-trimester ultrasound scan. An evaluation of anatomy at 12+0/7 to 13+6/7 weeks' gestation plus an evaluation at 18+0/7 to 22+6/7 led to complete anatomic evaluation 4 weeks earlier than 2 second trimester scans. Assessment of ultrasound duration in a clinical setting is needed to ensure feasibility outside of a research setting.

Pregnancy-Associated Stroke and Outcomes Related to Timing and Hypertensive Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate temporal trends of stroke in the peripartum period and to assess the relationship between stroke and maternal adverse outcomes vis-à-vis timing and hypertension. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study using the National Inpatient Sample to identify hospitalizations with pregnancy-associated stroke in the United States (2016-2019). Temporal trends in pregnancy-associated stroke were examined according to timing of stroke (antepartum vs postpartum) and both prepregnancy and pregnancy hypertensive disorders (yes vs no). Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to examine the association among maternal adverse outcomes, timing of stroke, and hypertensive disorders. RESULTS: Among 15,977,644 pregnancy hospitalizations, 6,100 hospitalizations (38.2/100,000 hospitalizations) were with pregnancy-associated stroke. Of these, 3,635 (59.6%) had antepartum pregnancy-associated stroke and 2,465 (40.4%) had postpartum pregnancy-associated stroke; alternatively, 2,640 (43.3%) had hypertensive disorders, and 3,460 (56.7%) were without hypertensive disorders. From 2016 to 2019, the overall rate of pregnancy-associated stroke (37.5 to 40.8/100,000 pregnancy hospitalizations, P =.028), rate of postpartum pregnancy-associated stroke (14.6 to 17.6/100,000 pregnancy hospitalizations, P =.005), and rate of pregnancy-associated stroke with hypertensive disorders (14.9 to 17.2/100,000 pregnancy hospitalizations, P =.013) increased. Antepartum pregnancy-associated stroke and pregnancy-associated stroke without hypertensive disorders, however, remained stable. Despite higher risk of maternal morbidity in postpartum stroke hospitalizations, including mechanical ventilation and pneumonia, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between antepartum and postpartum stroke. Similarly, between pregnancy-associated stroke with hypertensive disorders and stroke without hypertensive disorders, an increased risk of mechanical ventilation, seizure, and prolonged hospital stay was seen for stroke with hypertensive disorders without an increase in mortality. CONCLUSION: A nationally representative sample of hospitalizations in the United States indicates an increasing trend in the rate of postpartum stroke. Almost half of hospitalizations with pregnancy-associated stroke have concomitant hypertensive disorders. Risk of adverse outcomes, but not mortality, is elevated in patients with stroke occurring in the postpartum period and stroke associated with hypertensive disorders.

Does Prediction of Neonatal Mortality by the Observed/Expected Lung-To-Head Ratio Change during Pregnancy in Fetuses with Left Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate prediction of neonatal mortality in fetuses with isolated left congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) when the observed/expected lung-to-head ratio (O/E LHR) was estimated at two different gestational time points during pregnancy. METHODS: Forty-four (44) fetuses with isolated left CDH were included. O/E LHR was estimated at the time of referral (first scan) and before delivery (last scan). The main outcome was neonatal death due to respiratory complications. RESULTS: There were 10/44 (22.7%) perinatal deaths. The areas under (AU) the ROC curves were: first scan, 0.76, best O/E LHR cut-off 35.5% with 76% sensitivity and 70% specificity; last scan, AU-ROC 0.79, best O/E LHR cut-off 35.2%, with 79.0% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Considering an O/E LHR cut-off ≤35% to define high-risk fetuses at any examination, prediction for perinatal mortality showed: 80% sensitivity, 73.5% specificity, 47.1% positive and 92.6% negative predictive values, and 3.02 (95% CI 1.59-5.73) positive and 0.27 (95% CI 0.08-0.96) negative likelihood ratios. Prediction was similar in the two evaluations as 16/21 (76.2%) of fetuses considered at risk had an O/E LHR ≤35% in the two examinations; in the remaining 5 cases, two were identified only in the first and three only in the last scan. CONCLUSION: The O/E LHR is a good predictor of perinatal death in fetuses with left isolated CDH. Approximately 80% of fetuses at risk of perinatal death can be identified with an O/E LHR ≤35%, and 90% of them will have similar O/E LHR values at the first and at the last ultrasound examinations prior to delivery. In general, 88.6% of all CDH fetuses have a similar severity classification based on the O/E LHR at the first diagnostic ultrasound or at the ultrasound examination prior to delivery.

Emerging concepts since the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy trial.

The recent publication of the Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy (CHAP) trial has already changed the management of pregnant people with mild chronic hypertension. However, similar to any new intervention or change in management, we have encountered confusion regarding the management and implementation of the "Treatment for mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy" trial findings. In this clinical opinion, we addressed the aspects relating to the implementation that cannot be gleaned from the manuscript but were part of the trial conduct. Furthermore, we discussed several clinical questions that may affect the management of a patient with chronic hypertension following the "Treatment for mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy" trial and provided suggestions based on our experience and opinion.

Continuous glucose monitoring in individuals undergoing gestational diabetes screening.

BACKGROUND: Among guidelines on gestational diabetes mellitus, there is an incongruity about the threshold of maternal hyperglycemia to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain the association between continuous glucose monitoring metrics and adverse outcomes among individuals undergoing gestational diabetes mellitus screening. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study (from June 2020 to January 2022) of individuals who underwent 2-step gestational diabetes mellitus screening at ≤30 weeks of gestation. The participants wore a blinded continuous glucose monitoring device (Dexcom G6 Pro; Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA) for 10 days starting when they took the 50-g glucose challenge test. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes (large for gestational age, shoulder dystocia or neonatal injury, respiratory distress, need for intravenous glucose treatment for hypoglycemia, or fetal or neonatal death). The secondary neonatal outcomes included preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hypoglycemia, mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure, hyperbilirubinemia, and hospital length of stay. The secondary maternal outcomes included weight gain during pregnancy, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, induction of labor, cesarean delivery, and postpartum complications. Time within the target range (63-140 mg/dL), time above the target range (>140 mg/dL) expressed as a percentage of all continuous glucose monitoring readings, and mean glucose level were analyzed. The Youden index was used to choose the threshold of ≥10% for the time above the target range and association with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Of 136 participants recruited, data were available from 92 individuals (67.6%). The 2-step method diagnosed gestational diabetes mellitus in 2 individuals (2.2%). Continuous glucose monitoring indicated that 17 individuals (18.5%) had time above the target range of ≥10%. Individuals with time above the target range of ≥10% had a significantly higher likelihood of composite adverse neonatal outcomes than individuals with time above the target range of <10% (63% vs 18%; P=.001). Furthermore, compared with neonates born to individuals with time above the target range of <10%, neonates born to individuals with time above the target range of ≥10% had an increased likelihood for hypoglycemia (14.5% vs 47%; P=.009) and had a longer length of stay (2 vs 4 days; P=.03). No difference in maternal outcomes was noted between the groups. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study of individuals undergoing gestational diabetes mellitus screening, a cutoff of the time above the target range of ≥10% using continuous glucose monitoring was associated with a higher rate of neonatal adverse outcomes. A randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring vs 2-step screening for gestational diabetes mellitus to lower the rate of adverse outcomes is underway (identification number: NCT05430204).

The significance of hindbrain herniation reversal following prenatal repair of neural tube defects.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether reversal of hindbrain herniation (HBH) on MRI following prenatal repair of neural tube defects (NTDs) is associated with reduced rates of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement or endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) within the 1st year of life. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from all patients who had prenatal open repair of a fetal NTD at a single tertiary care center between 2012 and 2020. Patients were offered surgery according to inclusion criteria from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, did not undergo postnatal MRI, or underwent postnatal MRI without a report assessing hindbrain status. Patients with HBH reversal were compared with those without HBH reversal. The primary outcome assessed was surgical CSF diversion (i.e., VP shunt or ETV) within the first 12 months of life. Secondary outcomes included CSF leakage, repair dehiscence, CSF diversion prior to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and composite neonatal morbidity. Demographic, prenatal sonographic, and operative characteristics as well as outcomes were assessed using standard univariate statistical methods. Multivariate logistic regression models were fit to assess for independent contributions to the primary and secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Following exclusions, 78 patients were available for analysis. Of these patients, 38 (48.7%) had HBH reversal and 40 (51.3%) had persistent HBH on postnatal MRI. Baseline demographic and preoperative ultrasound characteristics were similar between groups. The primary outcome of CSF diversion within the 1st year of life was similar between the two groups (42.1% vs 57.5%, p = 0.17). All secondary outcomes were also similar between groups. Patients who had occurrence of the primary outcome had greater presurgical lateral ventricle width than those who did not (16.1 vs 12.1 mm, p = 0.02) when HBH was reversed, but not when HBH was persistent (12.5 vs 10.7 mm, p = 0.49). In multivariate analysis, presurgical lateral ventricle width was associated with increased rates of CSF diversion before 12 months of life (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.35) and CSF diversion prior to NICU discharge (adjusted OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: HBH reversal was not associated with decreased rates of CSF diversion in this cohort. Predictive accuracy of the anticipated benefits of prenatal NTD repair may not be augmented by the observation of HBH reversal on MRI.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Time in Range: Association with Adverse Outcomes among People with Type 2 or Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has become available for women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy. The recommended time in range (TIR, blood glucose 70-140 mg/dL) and its correlation with adverse pregnancy outcomes in this group is unknown. Our aim was to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant people with T2DM or GDM with average CGM TIR values >70 versus ≤ 70%. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all individuals using CGM during pregnancy from January 2017 to June 2022. Individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus, or those missing CGM or delivery data were excluded. Primary composite neonatal outcome included any of the following: large for gestational age, NICU admission, need for intravenous glucose, respiratory support, or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included other maternal and neonatal outcomes. Regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: During the study period, 141 individuals with diabetes utilized CGM during pregnancy, with 65 (46%) meeting inclusion criteria. Of the study population, 28 (43%) had TIR ≤70% and 37 (57%) had TIR > 70%. Compared with those with TIR > 70%, the primary composite outcome occurred more frequently in neonates of individuals TIR ≤70% (71.4 vs. 37.8%, aOR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.6, 15.7). Furthermore, individuals with TIR ≤70% were more likely to have hypertensive disorders (42.9 vs. 16.2%, OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.3, 13.0), preterm delivery (54 vs. 27%, OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.1, 9.1): , and cesarean delivery (96.4 vs. 51.4%, OR: 4.6, 95% CI: 2.2, 15.1) compared with those with TIR >70%. CONCLUSION: Among people with T2DM or GDM who utilized CGM during pregnancy, 4 out 10 individuals had TIR ≤70% and, compared with those with TIR > 70%, they had a higher likelihood of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. KEY POINTS: · Time in range can be utilized as a metric for pregnant patients using continuous glucose monitor.. · Time in range >70% is achievable by 6 out of 10 patients.. · Time in range below goal is associated with adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes..

Oral combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril vs nifedipine for postpartum hypertension: a comparative-effectiveness pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics may be underutilized for postpartum hypertension because of their teratogenicity during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated whether combined oral hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produced superior short-term blood pressure control when compared with nifedipine among postpartum individuals with hypertension requiring pharmacologic treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a pilot randomized controlled trial (October 2021 to June 2022) that included individuals with chronic hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with 2 systolic blood pressure measurements ≥150 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure measurements ≥100 mm Hg within 72 hours after delivery. Participants were randomized to receive either combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy or nifedipine therapy after stratifying the participants by diagnosis (chronic hypertension vs hypertensive disorders of pregnancy). The primary outcome was stage 2 hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) determined using a home blood pressure monitor on days 7 to 10 after delivery or at readmission to the hospital for blood pressure control. The secondary outcomes included severe maternal morbidity (any of the following: intensive care unit admission; hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count syndrome; eclampsia; stroke; cardiomyopathy; or maternal death), need for intravenous medications after randomization, hospital length of stay, blood pressure during first clinic visit, medication compliance, and adverse events. A pilot trial with 70 individuals was planned given the limited available data on combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy use in postpartum care. We calculated relative risks and 95% credible intervals in an intention-to-treat analysis. Finally, we conducted a preplanned Bayesian analysis to estimate the probability of benefit or harm with a neutral informative prior. RESULTS: Of 111 eligible individuals, 70 (63%) agreed and were randomized (31 in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and 36 in the nifedipine group; 3 withdrew consent after randomization), and the characteristics were similar at baseline between the groups. The primary outcome was unavailable for 9 (12.8%) participants. The primary outcome occurred in 27% of participants in the hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril group and in 43% of the participants in the nifedipine group (posterior adjusted relative risk, 0.74; 95% credible interval, 0.40-1.31). Bayesian analysis indicated an 85% posterior probability of a reduction in the primary outcome with combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy relative to nifedipine treatment. No differences were noted in the secondary outcomes or adverse medication events. CONCLUSION: The results of the pilot trial suggest a high probability that combined hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril therapy produces superior short-term BP control when compared with nifedipine. These findings should be confirmed in a larger trial.

The Role of Cerclage in Subsequent Pregnancy following Previable Prelabor Rupture of Membranes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain the outcomes associated with a cervical cerclage among individuals with a history of previable prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM). STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2021. We included individuals with a history of previable (before 24 weeks) PROM and the subsequent viable pregnancy. Women with multifetal gestation, preterm birth (PTB) or cerclage in previous gestation, or abdominal cerclage after trachelectomy were excluded. Primary outcome was PTB rate (delivery <37 weeks). Recurrence of preterm PROM and adverse composite maternal and neonatal outcomes (CMO and CNO) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. CMO included any of the following: suspected chorioamnionitis, endometritis, red blood cell transfusion, uterine rupture, unplanned hysterectomy, or death. CNO included any of the following: previable PTB (<24 weeks of gestation), bronchopulmonary dysplasia, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, mechanical ventilation, seizures, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, or death. RESULTS: During the study period, 118 individuals had a history of previable PROM and a documented subsequent pregnancy, out of which 74 (62.7%) met inclusion criteria. Nineteen (25.7%) of eligible individuals underwent a cerclage for prior previable PROM and were compared with controls (n = 55, 74.3%). Women who underwent a cerclage had higher rates of PTB < 37 weeks (63.2 vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 14.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.97-49.35) and < 34 weeks (21.1 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.03; OR: 7.07, 95% CI: 1.18-42.39) compared with those without cerclage. Furthermore, recurrent preterm PROM and previable PTB rates were higher among patients who underwent cerclage. The survival curve further indicated that individuals with cerclage delivered earlier. CMO and CNO rates were similar in those with and without cerclage. CONCLUSION: Cerclage placement in individuals with prior previable PROM was associated with higher rates of recurrent preterm PROM and PTB. KEY POINTS: · The management of individuals in a subsequent pregnancy following previable PROM is a conundrum.. · Cerclage following previable PROM is associated with higher rates of recurrent preterm PROM and PTB.. · Composite maternal and neonatal outcome rates were similar in those with and without cerclage..

Factors associated with exclusive formula feeding among individuals with low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Better understanding of the factors associated with formula feeding during the hospital stay can help in identifying potential lactation problems and promote early intervention. Our aim was to ascertain factors associated with exclusive formula feeding in newborns of low-risk pregnancies. METHODS: A population-based, retrospective study using the United States vital statistics datasets (2014-2018) evaluating low-risk pregnancies with a nonanomalous singleton delivery from 37 to 41 weeks. People with hypertensive disorders, or diabetes, were excluded. Primary outcome was newborn feeding (breast vs exclusive formula feeding) during hospital stay. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 19 623 195 live births during the study period, 11 605 242 (59.1%) met inclusion criteria and among them, 1 929 526 (16.6%) were formula fed. Factors associated with formula feeding included: age < 20 years (aRR 1.31 [95% CI 1.31-1.32]), non-Hispanic Black (1.42, 1.41-1.42), high school education (1.69, 1.69-1.70) or less than high school education (1.94, 1.93, 1.95), Medicaid insurance (1.52, 1.51, 1.52), body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 (1.10, 1.09-1.10), BMI 25-29.9 (1.09, 1.09-1.09), BMI 30-34.9 (1.19, 1.19-1.20), BMI 35-39.9 (1.31, 1.30-1.31), BMI ≥ 40 (1.43, 1.42-1.44), multiparity (1.29, 1.29-1.30), lack of prenatal care (1.49, 1.48-1.50), smoking (1.75, 1.74-1.75), and gestational age (ranged from 37 weeks [1.44, 1.43-1.45] to 40 weeks [1.11, 1.11-1.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Using a large cohort of low-risk pregnancies, we identified several modifiable factors associated with newborn feeding (eg, prepregnancy BMI, access to prenatal care, and smoking cessation). Improving the breast feeding initiation rate should be a priority in our current practice to ensure equitable care for all neonates.