Exploring patient experiences with a telehealth approach for the PRO-ACTIVE trial intervention in head and neck cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Following the COVID-19 directive to cease non-essential services, a rapid shift was made in the delivery of Speech Language Pathology (SLP) dysphagia management in the 3-arm, randomized PRO-ACTIVE trial. To inform future programs, this study explored patients' experiences with telehealth when the planned in-person SLP intervention was moved to a telehealth modality. METHODS: A theory-guided qualitative descriptive approach was used. Willing participants who had received at least one telehealth swallowing therapy session participated in a one-time semi-structured interview. Interview transcripts were subjected to a standard qualitative content/theme analysis. Researchers reviewed all transcripts and used a multi-step analysis process to build a coding framework through consensus discussion. Summaries and key messages were generated for each code. RESULTS: Eleven participants recounted their telehealth experiences and reported feeling satisfied, comfortable and confident with the session(s). They identified that previous experience with teleconferencing, access to optimal technical equipment, clinician skill, and caregiver assistance facilitated their telehealth participation. Participants highlighted that telehealth was beneficial as it reduced commuting time, COVID-19 exposure and fatigue from travel; and also allowed caregiver participation particularly during COVID. In comparing their in-person SLP sessions to telehealth sessions, limitations were also identified, including: lack of previous experience with and/or poor access to technology, and less opportunity for personalization. Participants indicated that use of phone alone was less preferred than an audio/video platform. DISCUSSION: Patients reported that overall, telehealth sessions did not compromise their learning experience when compared to in-person sessions. Patients benefited from use of telehealth in several ways despite some limitations of the use of technology. Patient feedback about telehealth provides an important perspective that may be critical to inform best practices for care delivery.

The PRO-ACTIVE trial protocol: a randomized study comparing the effectiveness of PROphylACTic swallow InterVEntion for patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Swallowing therapy is commonly provided as a treatment to lessen the risk or severity of dysphagia secondary to radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC); however, best practice is not yet established. This trial will compare the effectiveness of prophylactic (high and low intensity) versus reactive interventions for swallowing in patients with HNC undergoing RT. METHODS: This multi-site, international randomized clinical trial (RCT) will include 952 adult patients receiving radiotherapy for HNC and who are at high risk for post-RT dysphagia. Participants will be randomized to receive one of three interventions for swallowing during RT: RE-ACTIVE, started promptly if/when dysphagia is identified; PRO-ACTIVE EAT, low intensity prophylactic intervention started before RT commences; or, PRO-ACTIVE EAT+EXERCISE, high intensity prophylactic intervention also started before RT commences. We hypothesize that the PRO-ACTIVE therapies are more effective than late RE-ACTIVE therapy; and, that the more intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT + EXERCISE) is superior to the low intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT). The primary endpoint of effectiveness is duration of feeding tube dependency one year post radiation therapy, selected as a pragmatic outcome valued equally by diverse stakeholders (e.g., patients, caregivers and clinicians). Secondary outcomes will include objective measures of swallow physiology and function, pneumonia and weight loss, along with various patient-reported swallowing-related outcomes, such as quality of life, symptom burden, and self-efficacy. DISCUSSION: Dysphagia is a common and potentially life-threatening chronic toxicity of radiotherapy, and a priority issue for HNC survivors. Yet, the optimal timing and intensity of swallowing therapy provided by a speech-language pathologist is not known. With no clearly preferred strategy, current practice is fraught with substantial variation. The pragmatic PRO-ACTIVE trial aims to specifically address the decisional dilemma of when swallowing therapy should begin (i.e., before or after a swallowing problem develops). The critical impact of this dilemma is heightened by the growing number of young HNC patients in healthcare systems that need to allocate resources most effectively. The results of the PRO-ACTIVE trial will address the global uncertainty regarding best practice for dysphagia management in HNC patients receiving radiotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered with the US Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the PRO-ACTIVE trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , under the identifier NCT03455608 ; First posted: Mar 6, 2018; Last verified: Jun 17, 2021. Protocol Version: 1.3 (January 27, 2020).

A mixed-methods cohort study to determine perceived patient benefit in providing custom breast prostheses.

BACKGROUND: Of all mastectomy patients, 90% will use an external prosthesis where the standard of care uses a stock prosthesis that is purchased "off the shelf." Our objectives were to determine patient demand for and perceived value of a custom breast prosthesis. The information obtained will influence future research and program direction. METHODS: We asked 65 women who had undergone lumpectomy or mastectomy to participate before exploring rehabilitation options. The quantitative outcome measures were the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 general and -BR23 breast cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires, and the Ambulatory Oncology Patients Satisfaction Tool. The QLQ results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results of the satisfaction tool were compared using the Fisher exact and chi-square tests. A descriptive qualitative approach-involving in-depth interviews exploring the experiences of the women-was used to establish the perceived value of the services to the patients. The analysis of the interview transcripts was conducted using a standardized content method to describe the experiences of the women. RESULTS: All the women had had previous experiences with a conventional prosthesis, and they reported that wearing a custom prosthesis was more satisfying for them. They reported comfort and ease in wearing it, coupled with a sense of feeling less like a victim. Comparison of the QLQ and patient satisfaction scores showed no significant difference between the women wearing the conventional prosthesis and those wearing the custom prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative data provide a strong case in support of the new device. Patient demand, perceived benefit, and experience wearing the prosthesis were documented. Suggestions for improvements in the device and in the program operations were gathered and will influence future development of this service.

Perspectives on living with ovarian cancer: older women's views.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe the perspectives of older women regarding their experiences living with ovarian cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective survey. SETTING: Canada. SAMPLE: 146 women, 61 years of age or older, diagnosed with ovarian cancer. METHODS: Questionnaire distributed by oncologists and nurses in 26 cancer clinics across Canada to eligible patients during a six-week period. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Patient problems experienced, help received for problems, impact of illness, quality of life, importance of and satisfaction with information received, and helpfulness of others. FINDINGS: Women experienced, on average, 5.2 problems since diagnosis. The most frequently identified problems were side effects (54%), fear of recurrence (45%), bowel difficulties (43%), and difficulty sleeping (36%). Of the women who experienced problems, the proportion who felt they received adequate help ranged from 36%-74%. Approximately half (57%) of these women reported a lifestyle change. A significant difference was observed in quality of life before and after the diagnosis of ovarian cancer (p = 0.0002). When asked about the desire to talk about their difficulties with cancer, only 54% indicated that they wanted to talk. Approximately one-quarter of the women were satisfied with the information they received regarding complementary (25%) and alternative (23%) therapies, and how to speak with other women living with ovarian cancer (28%). Thirty-five percent were satisfied with the information they received about self-help groups. CONCLUSION: Ovarian cancer has a significant impact on older women, and many perceive they are not receiving adequate assistance for problems they experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Oncology nurses should conduct comprehensive assessments of the needs of older women with ovarian cancer, refer those who require specialized counseling, and provide information desired by patients with ovarian cancer about available resources.

Patient-health care provider communication during chemotherapy treatment: the perspectives of women with breast cancer.

Recognition that communication plays a central role in the provision of quality patient care has led to learning more about interactions between patients and their health care providers. The present study examined interactions between women with breast cancer and their cancer care specialists from the patients' perspective during the time the women underwent chemotherapy treatment. In total 40 women from two regional cancer centers were interviewed about their communication experiences. Prevalent themes identified from analysis of the interview transcripts could be classified into two main categories. One category focused on the nature of the information exchange and included the themes of interaction modes and the power of information. The second category reflected relationship issues and included the themes of roles and responsibilities and connectedness. From their narratives, several patient, professional, and contextual factors could be identified that influenced women's perceptions about the quality of their communication experience.

Self-help groups: oncology nurses' perspectives.

During the past decade in North America, the number of self-help groups for cancer patients has grown dramatically. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes about self-help groups could influence their practice behaviours and the information they provide to cancer patients. However, little is known about oncology nurses' views regarding self-help groups. This study used a cross-sectional survey to gather information about knowledge, attitudes, and practice behaviours of Canadian oncology nurses regarding self-help groups. A total of 676 nurses completed the survey (response rate of 61.3%). The respondents had spent, on average, 21.6 years in nursing and 11.6 years in oncology nursing. Results indicated that a large majority of nurses knew about available self-help groups. Approximately one-fifth of the nurses are speaking frequently about self-help groups with patients (20.7%) and are initiating the conversation on a frequent basis (22.0%). Overall, oncology nurses rated self-help groups as helpful with regards to sharing common experiences (79.5%), sharing information (75.6%), bonding (74.0%), and feeling understood (72.0%). The most frequently identified concern regarding the groups was about misinformation being shared (37.9%), negative effects of associating with the very ill (22.1%), and promoting unconventional therapies (21.2%). Implications from the study suggest that oncology nurses would benefit from learning more about the nature of self-help groups and being able to talk with patients about the self-help experience.

Evaluation of a breast self-examination (BSE) program in a breast diagnostic clinic.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of a breast self-examination (BSE) teaching program on women's knowledge about BSE, proficiency in performing BSE, and motivation to perform BSE. The program was developed for delivery by nurses in a breast diagnostic clinic, a clinic designed to meet the need for expeditious management of breast disease, current information about breast cancer risk, surveillance, and counselling. A convenience sample of 68 women attending the clinic in a regional cancer centre participated in a pre- and five month post-teaching program evaluation. The Toronto Breast Self Examination Instrument was used as the evaluation tool. There were statistically significant changes following the teaching program in the areas of knowledge about the correct technique for performing BSE, proficiency performing BSE, and confidence about finding changes when performing BSE. No significant changes were observed in motivation to practise BSE, although group scores did improve following the education. Participants found the video presentation and the review of BSE information pamphlets by the nurse to be the most helpful components of the BSE teaching program.

Men's perspectives on the impact of prostate cancer: implications for oncology nurses.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To describe the perspectives of men with recurrent prostate cancer regarding their experiences with the disease, its impact, and the help they received and to compare these individuals to men without recurrent prostate cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Physicians' offices and prostate cancer self-help groups in Canada. SAMPLE: A convenience sample of 120 men with recurrent prostate cancer and 845 men without recurrent disease. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed following in-depth interviews with men living with prostate cancer. The men received survey packages from their physicians or through a self-help group, completed the instrument at home, and returned it in a prestamped addressed envelope. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Impact on lifestyle, satisfaction with communication, importance of information, satisfaction with information received, problems experienced, and assistance received for problems. FINDINGS: Significant differences related to a number of factors were found between the men with recurrent prostate cancer and those without recurrent disease. A large number of those with recurrent disease experienced problems with side effects, anger, and pain and received help for their pain; experienced a negative impact on leisure time and on mental health; experienced difficulty talking with healthcare professionals; and felt the need to talk with someone about their cancer. Many of the men with recurrent disease were dissatisfied with the information they received about their medical condition and possible side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Men with prostate cancer experience both physical and psychosocial difficulties. Many perceive that they are not receiving adequate help for these difficulties. Future research is needed to increase understanding of how men are managing the impact of prostate cancer and what types of interventions would be most useful. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Findings emphasize the need for nurses to be certain that they are conducting broad-based assessments of patients with prostate cancer throughout the illness experience. Nurses need to inform patients about services available to assist them, help patients understand the emotional responses to illness, and provide opportunities for patients to talk about the illness and its impact.

Women's perspectives regarding the impact of ovarian cancer: implications for nursing.

Ovarian cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Ovarian cancer and its treatment have a considerable effect on the quality of life of women diagnosed with the disease. Currently, little is known about the perspectives of women regarding their experiences of living with ovarian cancer or the impact of recurrent disease. This article presents data from a national study of Canadian women living with ovarian cancer and describes the impact of the disease and its treatment. In this study, 93 women had recurrent disease, and 170 had not experienced recurrent disease. Women in both groups were similar, ranging in age from 21 to 61 years. Two-thirds of the women were married, and all were white. A greater proportion of the women with recurrent disease reported bowel problems; fears of dying, pain, getting around; and feelings of self-blame. On the average, women with recurrent disease reported experiencing more problems since diagnosis than those without recurrent disease (p = 0.01). The proportion of women who perceived that they received adequate help for their problems ranged from 20% to 85%. Implications for oncology nurses regarding assessment, referral for assistance, and patient education are apparent from the study findings.

Cancer treatment-induced menopause: meaning for breast and gynecological cancer survivors.

Many cancer survivors are faced with irreversible changes resulting from cancer treatment. One such change some women face after cancer is treatment-induced menopause. Eight women (four with breast and four with gynecological cancers) were interviewed to explore the impact of treatment-induced menopause on their lives. Results indicated that participants' understanding and coping with menopause occurred within the larger context of the total cancer experience. For some of the women, menopause was not a significant problem; for others, the symptoms caused major distress and were a continuing reminder of the losses suffered due to cancer. Important concerns for all participants were: taking and keeping control, the desire to return to "normal" after cancer, and maintaining a coherent sense of self. Strong statements were also made about the power of knowing and the power of support in coping with treatment-induced menopause. Findings are discussed with implications for nursing practice.

Measuring patient outcomes in palliative care: a reliability and validity study of the Support Team Assessment Schedule.

This study reports the process and results of a psychometric evaluation of a clinical audit tool, the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS), used to measure outcomes of palliative care. The STAS was developed in London, UK to audit community palliative care services provided by a support team. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the STAS when introduced in a different setting and with different populations from those for which it had been designed. Evaluation of the STAS was completed using multidisciplinary team members, patients and families from a palliative care unit and an oncology unit of a large urban Canadian teaching hospital. The results from the reliability tests revealed a lack of consistency in the use of the tool by team members with simulated patients in clinical scenarios. The validity analysis highlighted the differences between patients, families and health care professionals' perceptions of the same clinical situation. This study provided a valuable perspective on using a previously developed clinical audit tool in different patient populations and clinical settings. Recommendations for future use of the tool are offered.

Utilization of professional supportive care services by women with breast cancer.

This paper reports on the results of a survey of utilization of professional supportive care services by women with breast cancer, and on patterns of differential service utilization by sub-groups of patients. Study participants were women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed 23-36 months prior to contact about the study, and randomly selected from the Ontario Cancer Registry. From among 1,119 eligible women sent survey questionnaires, 731 returned completed questionnaires (65%). A total of 31% of respondents reported accessing one or more of the following professionals: social worker, psychologist, psychiatrist, dietitian, physiotherapist. Among those who responded to a question about whether they would have liked specific services, 34% reported that there was at least one professional supportive care service they would have liked to use, but were unable to access. Factors shown to be related to greater utilization of services included: younger age, higher household income, employed or student status, private health insurance coverage, and having received chemotherapy. Overall, there was a surprisingly low utilization of professional specialized supportive care services among women with breast cancer. Policy implications include finding strategies to better inform cancer patients about existing services, and ensuring that a core set of services are available to all patients.

Early postsurgery experience of prostate cancer patients and spouses.

PURPOSE: The authors describe the experience of men with prostate cancer and their spouses in the early recovery period after surgery. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: As part of a longitudinal qualitative study, semistructured interviews were held with 34 patients who had prostate cancer and their spouses 8 to 10 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: Five components of experience emerged from the interviews: 1) hearing news about the extent of their cancer after surgery influenced how patients viewed their cancer experience and, in many cases, their recovery; 2) men placed great emphasis on recovering their physical capacity quickly; 3) couples connected with each other through working out care routines and managing periods of irritability; 4) couples described a range of responses to surgery side effects and complications; and 5) the meaning of cancer varied for couples, with most seeing the experience as a temporary disruption. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physicians, nurses, social workers, and other health professionals working with patients before and after prostatectomies may assist couples to prepare better for the early recovery period by being both sensitive to the men's need to recover physical capacity quickly while helping them to understand that recovery takes time. Accurate information about expected periods of irritability, side effects, and possible complications would diminish the likelihood of distress during this period.

Canadian women's perspectives on ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the perspectives of Canadian women living with ovarian cancer regarding their experiences with the disease. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of Canadian women with ovarian cancer. SETTING: Survey questionnaires were sent to physicians in 26 cancer programs that treat women with ovarian cancer and to ovarian cancer self-help groups for subsequent distribution to women. PARTICIPANTS: Women diagnosed with ovarian cancer and able to read English or French. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A variety of individual items in the survey related to information received, communication, physical and psychosocial symptoms, impact of illness and quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 315 women returned the survey. The average age of the respondents is 59 years. Each province and territory is represented in the sample. Over one-half of the women received a diagnosis of ovarian cancer within a month of seeking help for a concern and 85% had multiple treatment modalities. The majority of the women felt adequately informed (80%) and were satisfied with communication with their physicians (mean of 4.1 to 4.5 on a 5-point scale). A majority (62%) said that their lifestyle had changed as a result of their disease. Problems were experienced most frequently regarding side effects (58%), fear of recurrence (54%), sleeping difficulties (46%), bowel difficulties (44%), fear of dying (36%) and difficulty concentrating (32%). Many who experienced problems reported receiving inadequate help for them (16% to 49%). Quality of life was reported as significantly lower following the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study provides an important foundation for further investigation. There is a pressing need for research regarding the early identification of ovarian cancer and issues of support and coping. Care for women with ovarian cancer requires the expertise of a range of disciplines and community-based agencies working collaboratively as a team.

Family physicians' perspectives on ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the knowledge, practices and perspectives of Canadian family physicians regarding ovarian cancer. DESIGN: A mailed survey questionnaire was followed by a reminder card, a second mailing of the questionnaire and a final reminder card. SETTING: A national sample of family physicians was drawn randomly from the membership database of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge related to ovarian cancer. Practices related to the screening and detection of ovarian cancer. Attitudes towards screening for ovarian cancer. Perceived role in the care of women at risk of, or diagnosed with, ovarian cancer. Perceived educational needs of physicians. RESULTS: A total of 1079 completed questionnaires were returned, providing a response rate of 56.6%. Although most family physicians were aware of the basic facts about ovarian cancer, there were knowledge limitations related to risk factors, familial ovarian cancer syndromes and symptoms. Practices related to asymptomatic women were found to be mostly in accord with current guidelines and recognized the prevailing lack of evidence for the effectiveness of tests. Areas that were troublesome included the role of screening in high-risk women and knowledge about available tests. Most family physicians indicated that they have an important role to play in the care of women after they have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. They also expressed a high level of interest in obtaining additional information related to ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study clearly shows that there is a need for additional research to assist with the development of evidence-based guidelines for women at increased risk of ovarian cancer and for women at no known risk. Pending more definitive evidence, interim guidelines could provide assistance to physicians currently having to make decisions in a context of massive uncertainty. Canadian family physicians would be interested in and would benefit from continuing medical education (CME) initiatives concerning ovarian cancer.

Gynecologists' perspectives regarding ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To document the perspectives, practices and knowledge of Canadian gynecologists regarding ovarian cancer. DESIGN: A mailed survey questionnaire was followed by a reminder card and a second mailing of the questionnaire. SETTING: A sample of all gynecologists practising in Canada. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge related to ovarian cancer. Practices related to the screening and detection of ovarian cancer. Attitudes towards ovarian cancer. Perceived role in the care of women at risk of, or diagnosed with, ovarian cancer. Perceived educational needs of gynecologists regarding ovarian cancer. RESULTS: A total of 504 completed questionnaires were returned, providing a response rate of 46%. Most gynecologists indicated that they knew the basic facts about ovarian cancer and risk factors. Practices related to asymptomatic, low-risk women were found to be mostly in accord with current guidelines and the lack of evidence for the effectiveness of tests. Practices regarding women with suspected early or late-stage ovarian cancer varied, particularly with regard to referral to gynecologic oncologists. Many respondents indicated that they have an important role to play in the care of women after they have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or referred to another specialist. Respondents also expressed interest in obtaining additional information about ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is a need for the development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines regarding ovarian cancer. It also pinpoints areas where educational efforts could be directed.

Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses.

PURPOSE: In this article, the authors describe the experiences of men with prostate cancer and their spouses between diagnosis and surgery. DESCRIPTION: As part of a longitudinal qualitative study, semistructured interviews were held with 34 prostate cancer patients who were waiting for surgery. Separate interviews were held with their spouses. RESULTS: Six main components of experience were evident from the analysis of transcripts related to the presurgery period: 1) the news of a diagnosis of prostate cancer came initially as a shock for both partners, the impact of which lessened over time; 2) the new reality of illness necessitated readdressing the marital relationship, most often resulting in a sense of renewed connection and commitment; 3) the illness crisis precipitated a search for information to guide decisions about treatment; 4) there was a need for couples to decide who to inform about the cancer diagnosis and how much to say about it; 5) couples attempted to seek a semblance of normality in their lives, especially after treatment decisions had been made; and 6) despite attempts to minimize the potential impact of upcoming surgery, anxiety was typically experienced at least intermittently by one or both partners. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Physicians, nurses, social workers, and other health professionals need to facilitate attempts by the patient to gather and synthesize information. Cancer specialists can play a positive role in reducing distress in couples, and, thus, the attention of the specialists to communication issues is critical. The strain of waiting for surgery must be considered when treatment recommendations are made; watchful waiting protocols require further study from a psychological perspective. Clinicians need to be alert to the balance between being positive and carrying on as normal, and acknowledging and dealing with the distress that arises.

Nurses' perspectives on unconventional therapies.

Unconventional therapies have become increasingly popular with health care consumers in recent years. As patients seek information and attempt to make decisions about unconventional therapies, they often turn to nurses, asking the nurse's opinion about certain therapies. The nurse's attitudes and beliefs about unconventional therapies quite likely will influence the response to the patient's inquiries. This article represents the findings of interviews with 20 nurses regarding their perspectives on unconventional therapies. Without exception, all nurses who were interviewed emphasized that information regarding unconventional therapies needs to be available readily for both patients and health care professionals. Other themes identified in the interviews included the following: Various people use unconventional therapies; people seek unconventional therapies for a variety of reasons; communication about unconventional therapies needs to be open, and a place should be found for unconventional therapies. The interviewees saw a clearly defined role for nurses regarding unconventional therapies.

Survivors' perspectives on the impact of prostate cancer: implications for oncology nurses.

Providing effective care for individuals with prostate cancer is an important issue for oncology nurses. However, the paucity of empirical work regarding the impact of prostate cancer presents a limitation in designing and implementing appropriate nursing interventions. This article presents the findings from a national survey of 621 Canadian men living with prostate cancer regarding the impact of their disease and the availability of support. The most frequently identified problems included sexual function, side effects, fear of dying, incontinence, anger and pain. Approximately one-third of the respondents experienced a lifestyle change, but relatively few indicated experiencing a negative impact from the changes they experienced. The majority of respondents indicated they had been informed accurately about their treatment, but dissatisfaction was expressed regarding lack of information about emotional reactions, alternative therapies, how to speak with other prostate cancer patients and the availability of counselling and self-help groups. Clearly these results have implications for oncology nurses.

When mom's sick: changes in a mother's role and in the family after her diagnosis of cancer.

As social entities, individuals enact roles and carry out responsibilities. Roles are learned and influenced by many social forces. They give meaning and value to life and foster a sense of belonging and contribution. Roles can undergo profound transformation during and after a diagnosis of cancer. In most family situations, the role of mother is a significant caretaking role. However, little research has focused on understanding the alterations that can occur in the mother's role when a woman faces cancer. The purpose of this study was to explore, from a woman's perspective, the experience of being a mother living with life-threatening illness. In-depth interviews were held with 47 mothers diagnosed as having cancer. Their children ranged in age from 1 to 18 years. Content and theme analyses were performed on the transcribed texts. The findings describe the impact of the cancer on the women and their families and how they felt about any changes in their roles as mothers.