Metachronous hepatic resection for liver only pancreatic metastases.

BACKGROUND: The value of liver resection (LR) for metachronous pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) metastases remains controversial. However, in light of increasing safety of liver resections, surgery might be a valuable option for metastasized PDAC in selected patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study including patients undergoing hepatectomy for metachronous PDAC liver metastases between 2004 and 2015 to analyze postoperative outcome and overall survival. All patients were operated with curative intent. Patients with oligometastatic metachronous liver metastasis with definitive chemotherapy (n = 8) served as controls. RESULTS: Overall 25 patients in seven centers were included in this study. The median age at the time of LR was 63.8 years (56.9-69.9) and the median number of metastases in the liver was 1 (IQR 1-2). There were eight non-anatomical resections (32%), 15 anatomical minor (60%) and 2 major LR (8%). Postoperative complications occurred in eleven patients (eight Clavien-Dindo grade I complications (32%) and three grade IIIa complications (12%), respectively). The 30-day mortality was 0%. The median length of stay was 8.6 days (IQR 5-11). Median overall survival following LR was 36.8 months compared to 9.2 months in patients with metachronous liver metastasis with chemotherapy (p = 0007). DISCUSSION: Liver resection for metachronous PDAC metastasis is safe and feasible in selected patients. To address general applicability and to find factors for patient selection, larger trials are urgently warranted.

No alteration of Cyp3A4 activity after major hepatectomy in the early postoperative period - A prospective before-after study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of major liver resection (LR) on the detoxifying function of the remaining liver tissue as represented by CYP3A activity has yet to be assessed. Therefore, this study evaluates the changes in CYP3A activity between preoperative values and after liver resection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To determine CYP3A activity, midazolam (MDZ) was used as a marker substance, 3 µg were applied intravenously one day before surgery and on the 3rd day after surgery. Subsequently blood was withdrawn at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3, 4 and 6 h post application of the study drug. Plasma MDZ and 1-OH-MDZ concentration was assessed using a LC-MS/MS method. Volumetric analysis of the resected liver was done by syngo.CT liver analysis software (Siemens Healthineers) using preoperative multidetector computed tomography. RESULTS: N = 13 (8 male/5 female) patients were included in this study and received preoperative evaluation, 11 patients were studied also after liver resection. The mean age was 62 (±15.3) years with a mean BMI of 23.6 ± 4.8 kg/m2. No patient suffered from acute liver dysfunction postoperatively. None of the pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were significantly altered by liver resection. CYP3A activity over time was not significantly reduced by major liver resection. CONCLUSION: This study gives first time data on the impact of major liver resection on CYP3A activity. It was shown that MDZ clearance representing in vivo CYP3A activity is not altered by major liver resection. This suggests no dose adjustment of commonly applied drugs which are CYP3A substrates needs to be carried out.

Physical recovery after laparoscopic vs. open liver resection - A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: While the number of laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) is increasing worldwide, its impact on physical recovery remains unclear. We hypothesized that LLR is associated with better physical recovery than open liver resection (OLR). To address this question, we investigated the impact of laparoscopic liver resection compared to open liver resection on physical recovery in a prospective trial. METHODS: Twenty-one patients who underwent LR were included in this study (11 OLR (52.4%) and 10 LLR (47.6%), respectively). Physical recovery was measured by bicycle stress testing at months 1 and 6 after surgery and compared to preoperative stress testing. Standardized performance for bicycle stress testing was calculated based on age, sex, height and weight. Physical recovery was compared between groups as change of performance (%). RESULTS: Median age was 58 years (Inter Quartile Range (IQR): 44-68), and the main indications for LR were colorectal liver metastases (n = 10; 45%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6; 27%). The one-month change of performance level was -8% (IQR: -12-1) compared to the preoperative level with no significant difference between open and laparoscopic LR (LLR: -8% (-11 - 1); OLR: -6% (-12 - 4), p = 0.833). Furthermore, 6 months postoperatively, patients in both groups had not reached back their preoperative performance level (LLR: -5.7% (-8.4 - 18.6); OLR -4. 8% (-12.6 - 1.9), p = 0.833). CONCLUSION: In this study, we report an impaired physical recovery after LR that was not fully restored 6 months after surgery. There was no significant difference between open and laparoscopic LR in terms of bicycle stress testing. Limitations of the study include the limited sample size and differences, albeit non-statistically significant, in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. To rule out a possible role of age or underlying indication for liver resection on physical recovery, future randomized controlled trials need to be performed.