Outcomes of Simulation in Resident Imaging-Guided Breast Biopsy Training.

Introduction We evaluate diagnostic radiology residents' perceptions of an ultrasound-guided and stereotactic breast biopsy simulator used at an academic medical center. This simulator is low-cost and easily reproducible. We aim to understand if this simulator improves residents' self-reported confidence in performing breast biopsy procedures on live patients. Methods Twenty-eight diagnostic radiology residents were instructed in how to perform ultrasound-guided breast biopsies and stereotactic breast biopsies using real biopsy and imaging equipment, but with tissue models in lieu of live persons. The hands-on experience was preceded by a didactic lecture. The ultrasound-guided tissue model was created with blueberries that were inserted in tofu, and the stereotactic tissue model was created by placing crushed calcium carbonate tablets into cored eggplant. Residents were asked to fill out a survey before and after participating in the simulation, where they self-reported their confidence level at performing ultrasound-guided and stereotactic breast biopsies. Results Twenty-eight diagnostic radiology residents participated in the simulation. All residents completed the pre-simulation survey and of these residents, twenty-one completed the post-simulation survey. Prior to the simulation residents reported a median confidence level of 3.5 out of 10 in performing ultrasound-guided breast biopsies, and a median confidence level of 1.0 out of 10 in performing stereotactic-guided breast biopsies. After the simulation, residents reported a median confidence level of 7.0 out of 10 in performing ultrasound-guided breast biopsies, and a median confidence level of 3.0 out of 10 in performing stereotactic-guided breast biopsies. Increases in resident confidence level were statistically significant for both biopsy types (p < 0.01).  Conclusion Simulated biopsies can increase the confidence of diagnostic radiology residents that are learning to perform breast biopsies before they perform real biopsies on live patients. Providing simulation training and thereby improving resident confidence may help reduce physician error and patient harm due to poor biopsy techniques.

Patient Compliance in the Setting of BI-RADS Category 3: What Factors Impact Compliance With Short-Term Follow-Up Recommendations?

The study aims to define how imaging findings, patient demographics, patient-provider interactions, and health care practices may affect a woman's decision to follow-up in the setting of a BI-RADS Category 3. A total of 398 women from the University of Arizona Breast Imaging Center with a BI-RADS Category 3 assessment for mammography and/or ultrasound findings were evaluated between February 2012 and June 2014. Demographic information was analyzed for all patients, regardless of follow-up. Women who returned for follow-up within the recommended time period were given one survey at the time of their follow-up appointment, and women who returned for follow-up, but later than recommended, were given a separate survey to complete. Age, palpability of a lesion, and menopause status were related to follow-up. Self-rated general health was the only factor found to be associated with the decision to follow-up on time. The majority of patients who followed up on time reported that mailed reminder cards were the primary practice that prompted follow-up. Of patients who followed up later than recommended, the major reason was "no time." The findings suggest that additional counseling regarding the benefits of short-interval imaging follow-up might be advantageous for patients.

Academic radiology: the reasons to stay or leave.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To find major reasons why junior academic radiologists leave academia for private practice and to suggest future changes to motivate them to stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 2000 surveys were sent to every tenth member of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) who completed training within the past decade. Those in academic institutions and those who left within 5 years were asked to respond. RESULTS: 132 radiologists responded. Thirty-two percent of responders were in academic radiology. Of those in academic radiology, 71% plan to stay at the same institution, 7% are planning to move to another academic institution, 17% are considering private practice, and 5% are leaving for private practice. The main reasons to leave were low pay and lack of academic time. Sixty-eight percent of responders already left academia after an average of 3.28 years. Ninety-five percent feel the decision was good, and 65% would not go back. Forty-nine percent experienced more than 100% pay increase, 60% feel they work harder, and 62% feel quality of life is better. CONCLUSION: Significant changes should be made to motivate junior radiologists to stay in academia. Developing leaders in radiology is a must, and should be a top priority. Academic radiologists should not be expected to read private practice volumes and still have time to produce quality research and teaching. Clinical duties should be limited to 32 hours per week. At least 1 day a week should be protected academic time. Efforts should be made to decrease the discrepancy between incomes. Mentoring is important, allowing a smooth transition for junior faculty members to optimize academic progress and lead to promotion.

Musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: importance of radiography.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of radiography for interpretation of musculoskeletal (MSK) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. DESIGNS AND PATIENTS: In a 1-year period, 1,030 MSK MRI studies were performed in 1,002 patients in our institution. For each study, the interpreting radiologist completed a questionnaire regarding the availability and utility of radiographs, radiological reports and clinical information for the interpretation of the MRI study. RESULTS: Radiographs were essential, very important or added information in 61-75% of all MSK MRI cases. Radiographs were judged as essential for reading of MRI studies more often for trauma, infection/inflammation and tumors than for degenerative and miscellaneous/normal diagnoses (chi(2)=60.95, df=16, P<0.0001). The clinical information was rated as "essential" or "useful" significantly more often than not (chi(2)=93.07, df=16, P<0.0001). The clinical and MRI diagnoses were the same or partially concordant significantly more often for tumors than for trauma, infection/inflammation and degenerative conditions, while in the miscellaneous/normal group they were different in 64% of cases. When the diagnoses were different, there were more instances in which radiographs were not available. CONCLUSIONS: Radiographs are an important, and sometimes essential, initial complementary study for reading of MSK MRI examinations. It is highly recommended that radiographs are available when MSK MRI studies are interpreted.