Assessing Adherence to Clozapine: Practical Considerations.

BACKGROUND: The clinical assessment of adherence to clozapine may prove difficult. METHOD: We studied the incidence of nonadherence (plasma clozapine <0.01 mg L -1 ) in samples submitted to a clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service, 1993-2017. RESULTS: Clozapine was not detected in 2865 samples from men (2214 patients, 1.1% of all samples from men) and 1068 samples from women (822 patients, 1.0% of all samples from women). Information on the prescribed dose was supplied for 1623 of these samples from men and 492 of these samples from women. Prescribed doses ranged up to 1200 mg d -1 , although most were in the range 100 to 600 mg d -1 . Norclozapine was detected in 260 (9.1%) and 67 (6.3%) of the samples from men and from women, respectively, that did not contain clozapine. While an assay was requested to confirm either a patient history of nonadherence, or to establish that clozapine had been cleared from the circulation after overdosage, for example, in at least 38 instances, in the vast majority of cases the absence of clozapine from the sample was unexpected. IMPLICATIONS: While adherence to clozapine may be good in general, tolerance to its potentially fatal cardiovascular effects is easily lost. Moreover, in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, the risk of self-harm increases if the drug is not taken regularly. In addition to presently available TDM services, the advent of a clozapine immunoassay for laboratory use should make it easy to institute at least monthly clozapine TDM at minimal extra cost.

Fatal Unintentional Non-Fire Related Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: Data from Narrative Verdicts in England and Wales, 1998-2019.

Unintentional non-fire related (UNFR) carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning continues to cause fatalities. The narrative verdicts from coroners concerning fatal UNFR CO poisoning in England and Wales, 1998-2019, were collated by the Office for National Statistics. Search terms related to CO exposure were used to obtain information regarding the circumstances of death. Findings were grouped by the location of death, the source of CO, and the reason or behaviour underlying the exposure. There were 750 deaths (77% male). The annual number of deaths decreased over the period studied. Two thirds (68%) of the deaths occurred in the autumn or winter. From the records with information, 59% of deaths occurred within a dwelling (67% male). Males also predominated deaths within vehicles (91%) and garages or outbuildings (95%). From the deaths with information, domestic piped gas was the most common source of CO (36%) and the most frequent underlying factor was inadequate ventilation of exhaust gases (39%, 91% male). Despite the decrease in the annual number of deaths over the study period, there remains a clear need for measures that raise awareness of the dangers of CO poisoning, especially amongst men working alone in garages or outbuildings. Education campaigns and fitting and maintaining CO alarms in high-risk areas should be encouraged.

Analytical Detection of Novel Stimulants by Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry: Case Studies on Ethylphenidate and Mephedrone.

The advent of hundreds of new compounds aimed at the substance misuse market has posed new analytical challenges. A semi-quantitative liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) method has been developed to detect exposure to two novel stimulants, mephedrone and ethylphenidate, and selected metabolites. Centrifuged urine (50 µL) was diluted with LC eluent containing internal standards (mephedrone-d3, methylphenidate-d9 and ritalinic acid-d10; all 0.02 mg/L) (450 µL). Intra- and inter-assay accuracy and precision were within ±15% and <6%, respectively, for all analytes. The limit of detection was 0.01 mg/L for all analytes. Urine samples from mephedrone and ethylphenidate users were analyzed using immunoassay (amphetamine-group cloned enzyme donor immunoassay [CEDIA]) and LC-HRMS. Ethylphenidate, mephedrone and selected metabolites all had low cross-reactivity (<1%) with the immunoassay. The median (range) amphetamine-group CEDIA concentration in urine samples from mephedrone users (n = 11) was 0.30 (<0.041-3.04) mg/L, with only 1 sample giving a positive CEDIA result. The amphetamine-group CEDIA concentration in the urine sample from an ethylphenidate user was <0.041 mg/L. Improving the detection of novel compounds is of increasing importance to enable accurate diagnosis and treatment. Immunoassay methods used for drug screening may be inappropriate and lead to false-negative results. Conversely, detection of these compounds is possible through use of LC-HRMS and can provide information on the metabolites present after exposure to these drugs.

Detection of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues in biological samples using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl and analogues such as butyrylfentanyl, carfentanil, 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl, and furanylfentanyl may be either added to, or sold as, heroin. Fentanyl and carfentanil have approximately 100 and 10,000 times the potency of morphine, respectively, and there is thus a high risk of death with the use of these drugs. METHODS: We looked for fentanyl/fentanyl analogues using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) in selected biological samples obtained post-mortem February 2017-end January 2018. Suspicion of fentanyl poisoning arose from the circumstances of death, a history of heroin use, and the geographical area in which the deceased was discovered, supplemented by drugs intelligence data. RESULTS: Of the 84 deaths investigated, fentanyl and/or a fentanyl analogue were detected in 40 (48%). The fentanyls encountered were carfentanil (N = 17), fentanyl (9), carfentanil and fentanyl together (12), and fentanyl, carfentanil, 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl, and butyrylfentanyl together (2). The median (range) post-mortem blood fentanyl concentration was 2.66 (0.21-107) µg/L and the median (range) carfentanil concentration was 0.24 (0.03-1.66) µg/L. The most prevalent compounds present together with fentanyls were ethanol [N = 28, median (range) post-mortem blood concentration: 44 (<10-249) mg/dL)], benzoylecgonine [N = 22, 0.64 (<0.05-3.17) mg/L] and free morphine [N = 20, 0.05 (<0.05-0.34) mg/L]. Deaths in hospital excluded, median blood free morphine, and ethanol concentrations were significantly lower in deaths where fentanyl/fentanyl analogues were present, but there was much overlap with the blood concentrations of these analytes in the non-fentanyl related deaths. A routine drugs of abuse assay using LC-HRMS identified fentanyl with 100% sensitivity and carfentanil with 89% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Given their potency, misuse of fentanyl and its analogues is likely to cause severe toxicity. A simple LC-HRMS method detected all cases in which fentanyl was identified post-mortem and most of the cases in which carfentanil was detected.

Ultra-fast LC-MS/MS in therapeutic drug monitoring: Quantification of clozapine and norclozapine in human plasma.

A novel approach to high-throughput, targeted liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis has been developed. A single chromatographic system can be used for the analysis of a range of 20 drugs and metabolites with a total analysis time of 36 s (one 96-well plate of prepared samples per hour). To demonstrate the applicability of this approach to quantitative analysis, a method has been validated for the therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine and norclozapine following automated extraction from human plasma. Chromatographic retention times were 11.4 and 12.4 s for norclozapine and clozapine, respectively (for both analytes the chromatographic peak width was less than 1 s). Comparison with a conventional LC-MS/MS method (5 min analysis time) showed excellent agreement. This new approach offers analysis times more akin to flow-injection analysis, but is likely to be more widely applicable because of chromatographic resolution from residual matrix components and isobaric interferences.

The interpretation of hair analysis for drugs and drug metabolites.

INTRODUCTION: Head hair analysis for drugs and drug metabolites has been used widely with the aim of detecting exposure in the weeks or months prior to sample collection. However, inappropriate interpretation of results has likely led to serious miscarriages of justice, especially in child custody cases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to assess critically what can, and perhaps more importantly, what cannot be claimed as regards the interpretation of hair test results in a given set of circumstances in order to inform future testing. METHODS: We searched the PubMed database for papers published 2010-2016 using the terms "hair" and "drug" and "decontamination", the terms "hair" and "drug" and "contamination", the terms "hair" and "drug-facilitated crime", the terms "hair" and "ethyl glucuronide", and the terms "hair", "drug testing" and "analysis". Study of the reference lists of the 46 relevant papers identified 25 further relevant citations, giving a total of 71 citations. Hair samples: Drugs, drug metabolites and/or decomposition products may arise not only from deliberate drug administration, but also via deposition from a contaminated atmosphere if drug(s) have been smoked or otherwise vaporized in a confined area, transfer from contaminated surfaces via food/fingers, etc., and transfer from sweat and other secretions after a single large exposure, which could include anesthesia. Excretion in sweat of endogenous analytes such as γ-hydroxybutyric acid is a potential confounder if its use is to be investigated. Cosmetic procedures such as bleaching or heat treatment of hair may remove analytes prior to sample collection. Hair color and texture, the area of the head the sample is taken from, the growth rate of individual hairs, and how the sample has been stored, may also affect the interpretation of results. Toxicological analysis: Immunoassay results alone do not provide reliable evidence on which to base judicial decisions. Gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometric detection (GC- or LC-MS), if used with due caution, can give accurate analyte identification and high sensitivity, but many problems remain. Firstly, it is not possible to prepare assay calibrators or quality control material except by soaking "blank" hair in solutions of appropriate analytes, drying, and then subjecting the dried material to an analysis. The fact that solvents can be used to add analytes to hair points to the fact that analytes can arrive not only on, but also in hair from exogenous sources. A range of solvent-washing procedures have been advocated to "decontaminate" hair by removing adsorbed analytes, but these carry the risk of transporting adsorbed analytes into the medulla of the hair therefore confounding the whole procedure. This is especially true if segmental analysis is being undertaken in order to provide a "time course" of drug exposure. Proposed clinical applications of hair analysis: There have been a number of reports where drugs seemingly administered during the perpetration of a crime have been detected in head hair. However, detailed evaluation of these reports is difficult without full understanding of the possible effects of any "decontamination" procedures used and of other variables such as hair color or cosmetic hair treatment. Similarly, in child custody cases and where the aim is to demonstrate abstinence from drug or alcohol use, the issues of possible exogenous sources of analyte, and of the large variations in analyte concentrations reported in known users, continue to confound the interpretation of results in individual cases. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of results of head hair analysis must take into account all the available circumstantial and other evidence especially as regards the methodology employed and the possibility of surface contamination of the hair prior to collection.

Sodium valproate and clozapine induced neutropenia: A case control study using register data.

BACKGROUND: The use of clozapine is limited due to the occurrence of neutropenia, and the rare but life threatening adverse event of agranulocytosis. There is little epidemiological research into clinical factors that may impact on this risk. We conducted a case control study examining the clinical risk factors for neutropenia patients treated with clozapine. METHOD: A case-control study was conducted within a database of anonymised electronic clinical records. All patients who discontinued clozapine due to a neutropenic event were included as cases. Matched controls were selected from patients with a documented clozapine exposure at the time of the clozapine neutropenic event of the case patient, matched by duration of clozapine treatment. RESULTS: 136 cases and 136 controls were included. In multivariable analysis, the concurrent use of sodium valproate was associated with neutropenia (Odds Raito (OR) 2.28, 95%CI: 1.27-4.11, p=0.006). There was a dose-response effect, with greater associations for higher doses. Patients who discontinued clozapine due to neutropenia were more likely to be of black ethnicity (OR 2.99, p<0.001), were younger (t=5.86, df=267, p<0.001), and received lower doses of clozapine (t=-2.587, p=0.01) than those who did not develop neutropenia. CONCLUSION: We identified an association between the concurrent use of sodium valproate and an increased risk of clozapine associated neutropenia. These results, taken in combination with the results from previous case series, suggest that the risk of clozapine associated neutropenia could be reduced by avoiding concurrent valproate treatment.

Women Administered Standard Dose Imatinib for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Have Higher Dose-Adjusted Plasma Imatinib and Norimatinib Concentrations Than Men.

BACKGROUND: The standard dose of imatinib for the treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is 400 mg·d. A predose plasma imatinib concentration of >1 mg·L is associated with improved clinical response. This study aimed to assess the plasma imatinib and norimatinib concentrations attained in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia administered standard doses of imatinib adjusted for dose, age, sex, body weight, and response. METHODS: We evaluated data from a cohort of patients treated between 2008 and 2014 with respect to dose, age, sex, body weight, and response. RESULTS: The study comprised 438 samples from 93 patients (54 male, 39 female). The median imatinib dose was 400 mg·d in men and in women. The plasma imatinib concentration ranged 0.1-5.0 mg·L and was below 1 mg·L in 20% and 16% of samples from men and women, respectively. The mean dose normalized plasma imatinib and norimatinib concentrations were significantly higher in women in comparison with men. This was partially related to body weight. Mixed effects ordinal logistic regression showed no evidence of an association between sex and plasma imatinib (P = 0.13). However, there was evidence of an association between sex and plasma norimatinib, with higher norimatinib concentrations more likely in women than in men (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Imatinib therapeutic drug monitoring only provides information on dosage adequacy and on short-term adherence; longer-term adherence cannot be assessed. However, this analysis revealed that approximately 1 in 5 samples had a plasma imatinib concentration <1 mg·L, which was suggestive of inadequate dosage and/or poor adherence and posed a risk of treatment failure. Higher imatinib exposure in women may be a factor in the increased rate of long-term, stable, deep molecular response (undetectable breakpoint cluster-Abelson (BCR-ABL) transcript levels with a PCR sensitivity of 4.5 log, MR4.5) reported in women.

The Use of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Clozapine Rechallenge: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Clozapine is associated with hematological abnormalities, with neutropenia and agranulocytosis of most concern. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been used to support clozapine rechallenge after neutropenia with the aim of maintaining the neutrophil count. This study aims to explore the practice, use, safety, and efficacy of G-CSF in this context. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We conducted a systematic review to identify all studies investigating or describing G-CSF as a prophylaxis to enable continued clozapine treatment during a rechallenge. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We identified 32 reports of patients who received G-CSF either regularly (n = 23) or as required (n = 9) to support clozapine rechallenge after an episode of neutropenia necessitating discontinuation of clozapine. Seventy-five percent (n = 24) of published cases remained on clozapine with the use of continual prophylactic G-CSF or after single G-CSF administrations (n = 8). Seventy percent (n = 16) of patients in receipt of continual prophylactic G-CSF were successfully maintained on clozapine. However, 1 of the 3 episodes of rechallenge in those with a history of severe agranulocytosis (absolute neutrophil count <0.1 × 10/L) had a recurrence of agranulocytosis at week 9. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that G-CSF can sometimes be safely used to support the maintenance of normal neutrophil counts and clozapine use after neutropenia. Publication bias is an important limitation, however. Also, few reports clearly documented the presence or absence of an independent nonclozapine cause of the index neutropenia, which may have increased success rates. Furthermore, adverse events were not systematically recorded. Prospective studies are needed to determine safety because if agranulocytosis occurs on clozapine while supported by G-CSF, there is no obvious alternate rescue therapy to promote granulopoiesis. From the available data, it is not possible to recommend this course of action for someone with a true clozapine agranulocytosis.

Clozapine-Associated Agranulocytosis Treatment With Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Clozapine is associated with hematological abnormalities, notably neutropenia, which may progress to agranulocytosis. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have been used to reduce the frequency and duration of clozapine-associated neutropenia. This review aims to explore the use, efficacy, and tolerability of these cytokines in the treatment of clozapine-associated agranulocytosis. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We conducted a systematic review of published interventional and observational studies, case series, and case reports where G-CSF/GM-CSF was used to treat clozapine-associated agranulocytosis. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We identified 29 reports (40 patients). The median duration of neutrophil recovery time after stopping clozapine and starting cytokine treatment was 7 days (range, 2-13 days) for those with agranulocytosis (absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 × 10 cells/L). Ninety-four percent (n = 29) had no serious adverse reactions, and no deaths occurred. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that G-CSF/GM-CSF use is well tolerated and suggest that G-CSF can sometimes be safely used to reduce the duration of neutropenia associated with clozapine use. However, the interpretation of this outcome is difficult, given the likely publication bias for positive outcomes in case reports.

Measurement of Clozapine, Norclozapine, and Amisulpride in Plasma and in Oral Fluid Obtained Using 2 Different Sampling Systems.

BACKGROUND: There is a poor correlation between total concentrations of proton-accepting compounds (most basic drugs) in unstimulated oral fluid and in plasma. The aim of this study was to compare clozapine, norclozapine, and amisulpride concentrations in plasma and in oral fluid collected using commercially available collection devices [Thermo Fisher Scientific Oral-Eze and Greiner Bio-One (GBO)]. METHODS: Oral-Eze and GBO samples and plasma were collected in that order from patients prescribed clozapine. Analyte concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: There were 112 participants [96 men, aged (median, range) 47 (21-65) years and 16 women, aged 44 (21-65) years]: 74 participants provided 2 sets of samples and 7 provided 3 sets (overall 2 GBO samples not collected). Twenty-three patients were co-prescribed amisulpride, of whom 17 provided 2 sets of samples and 1 provided 3 sets. The median (range) oral fluid within the GBO samples was 52 (13%-86%). Nonadherence to clozapine was identified in all 3 samples in one instance. After correction for oral fluid content, analyte concentrations in the GBO and Oral-Eze samples were poorly correlated with plasma clozapine and norclozapine (R = 0.57-0.63) and plasma amisulpride (R = 0.65-0.72). Analyte concentrations in the 2 sets of oral fluid samples were likewise poorly correlated (R = 0.68-0.84). Mean (SD) plasma clozapine and norclozapine were 0.60 (0.46) and 0.25 (0.21) mg/L, respectively. Mean clozapine and norclozapine concentrations in the 2 sets of oral fluid samples were similar to those in plasma (0.9-1.8 times higher), that is, approximately 2- to 3-fold higher than those in unstimulated oral fluid. The mean (±SD) amisulpride concentrations (microgram per liter) in plasma (446 ± 297) and in the Oral-Eze samples (501 ± 461) were comparable and much higher than those in the GBO samples (233 ± 318). CONCLUSIONS: Oral fluid collected using either the GBO system or the Oral-Eze system cannot be used for quantitative clozapine and/or amisulpride therapeutic drug monitoring.

An assessment of the variation in the concentration of acetylcysteine in infusions for the treatment of paracetamol overdose.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous acetylcysteine is the treatment of choice for paracetamol poisoning. A previous UK study in 2001 found that 39% of measured acetylcysteine infusion concentrations differed by >20% from anticipated concentrations. In 2012, the UK Commission on Human Medicines made recommendations for the management of paracetamol overdose, including provision of weight-based acetylcysteine dosing tables. The aim of this study was to assess variation in acetylcysteine concentrations in administered infusions following the introduction of this guidance. METHODS: A 6-month single-centre prospective study was undertaken at a UK teaching hospital. After preparation, 5-ml samples were taken from the first, second and third/any subsequent acetylcysteine infusions. Acetylcysteine was measured in diluted (1:50) samples by high-performance liquid chromatography. Comparisons between measured and expected concentrations based on prescribed weight-based dose and volume were made for each infusion. RESULTS: Ninety samples were collected. There was a variation of ≤10% in measured compared to expected concentration for 45 (50%) infusions, of 10-20% for 27 (30%) infusions, 20.1-50% for 14 (16%) infusions and >50% for four (4%) infusions. There was a median (interquartile range) variation in measured compared to expected concentration of -3.6 mg ml-1 (-6.7 to -2.3) for the first infusion, +0.2 mg ml-1 (-0.9 to +0.4) for the second infusion and -0.3 mg ml-1 (-0.6 to +0.2) for third and fourth infusions. CONCLUSION: There has been a moderate improvement in the variation in acetylcysteine dose administered by infusion. Further work is required to understand the continuing variation and consideration should be given to simplification of acetylcysteine regimes to decrease the risk of administration errors.

Prevalence and Predictors of Clozapine-Associated Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Constipation is a frequently overlooked side effect of clozapine treatment that can prove fatal. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence and risk factors for clozapine-associated constipation. Two authors performed a systematic search of major electronic databases from January 1990 to March 2016 for articles reporting the prevalence of constipation in adults treated with clozapine. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted. A total of 32 studies were meta-analyzed, establishing a pooled prevalence of clozapine-associated constipation of 31.2% (95% CI: 25.6-37.4) (n = 2013). People taking clozapine were significantly more likely to be constipated versus other antipsychotics (OR 3.02 (CI: 1.91-4.77), p < 0.001, n = 11 studies). Meta-regression identified two significant study-level factors associated with constipation prevalence: significantly higher (p = 0.02) rates of constipation were observed for those treated in inpatient versus outpatient or mixed settings and for those studies in which constipation was a primary or secondary outcome measure (36.9%) compared to studies in which constipation was not a specified outcome measure (24.8%, p = 0.048). Clozapine-associated constipation is common and approximately three times more likely than with other antipsychotics. Screening and preventative strategies should be established and appropriate symptomatic treatment applied when required.

Triazole antifungals used for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease in adult haematology patients: Trough serum concentrations in relation to outcome.

Triazole antifungal drugs are widely used for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Efficacy may depend on attaining minimum effective plasma concentrations. The aim of this study was to ascertain the proportion of samples in which the recommended concentrations were achieved in patients given these drugs in relation to outcome. In-patients prescribed standard doses of fluconazole, itraconazole solution, posaconazole suspension, or oral voriconazole for at least one week were studied. Pre-dose serum triazole concentrations were measured using validated methods. There were 359 samples from 90 patients. The median (range) number of samples per patient was 3 (1-13), and the median (range) fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole (prophylaxis), posaconazole (treatment), and voriconazole serum concentrations were 5.64 (0.11-18), 0.57 (0-5.3), 0.31 (0.02-2.5), 0.65 (0.02-2.5), and 0.95 (0.10-5.4) mg/l, respectively. The number of samples in which the recommended pre-dose concentrations were achieved was 98 (54%), 9 (20%), 2 (18%), and 29 (49%) for itraconazole, posaconazole (>0.7 mg/l prophylaxis), posaconazole (treatment), and voriconazole, respectively. No significant differences were detected in the median triazole trough concentrations between patients with proven/probable IFD compared to those with no evidence of IFD. However, itraconazole was not detected in 10 samples (7 patients). The small number of patients who achieved the recommended trough posaconazole concentrations may explain the high rate of break-through IFD observed in patients prescribed this drug. Except for fluconazole, the number of patients prescribed standard doses of triazoles who achieved recommended trough triazole concentrations was low. The prospective use of serum triazole measurements assay may have improved outcomes with itraconazole, posaconazole, and with voriconazole.

Automated Analysis of Clozapine and Norclozapine in Human Plasma Using Novel Extraction Plate Technology and Flow-Injection Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of plasma clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine (norclozapine) for therapeutic drug monitoring purposes is well established. To minimize analysis times and facilitate rapid reporting of results, we have fully automated sample preparation using novel AC Extraction Plates and a Tecan Freedom EVO 100 liquid handling platform, and minimized extract analysis times using flow-injection tandem mass spectrometry (FIA-MS/MS). METHODS: Analytes and deuterium-labeled internal standards were extracted from plasma (100 µL) at pH 10.6 and extracts analyzed directly using tandem mass spectrometry [20 µL injection, 0.7 mL/min methanol carrier flow, analysis time (injection-to-injection) approximately 60 seconds]. RESULTS: Validation data showed excellent intraplate and interplate accuracy (95%-104% nominal concentrations). Interbatch precision (% RSD) at the limit of quantitation (0.01 mg/L) was 3.5% and 5.5% for clozapine and norclozapine, respectively. Matrix effects were observed for both clozapine and norclozapine, but were compensated for by the internal standards. Overall process efficiency was 56%-70% and 66%-77% for clozapine and norclozapine, respectively. Mean relative process efficiency was 98% and 99% for clozapine and norclozapine, respectively. Comparison of results from patient samples (n = 81) analyzed using (1) manual liquid-liquid extraction with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and (2) automated extraction with FIA-MS/MS gave y = 1.01x - 0.002, R(2) = 0.9943 and y = 1.01x + 0.009, R(2) = 0.9957 for clozapine and norclozapine, respectively. Bland-Altman plots revealed a [mean (95% limits of agreement) bias of 0.0074 (-0.04 to 0.06) mg/L and of 0.015 (-0.02 to 0.05) mg/L for clozapine and norclozapine, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: FIA-MS/MS used with automated extraction offers a rapid, simple, cost-effective alternative to manual liquid-liquid extraction and conventional LC analysis for clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring.

Sex differences in plasma clozapine and norclozapine concentrations in clinical practice and in relation to body mass index and plasma glucose concentrations: a retrospective survey.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is widely prescribed and, although effective, can cause weight gain and dysglycemia. The dysmetabolic effects of clozapine are thought to be more prevalent in women with this gender on average attaining 17 % higher plasma clozapine concentrations than men. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between dose, body mass index (BMI), plasma glucose concentration, and plasma clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine (norclozapine) concentrations in 100 individuals with a severe enduring mental illness. RESULTS: Mean (10th/90th percentile) plasma clozapine concentrations were higher for women [0.49 (0.27-0.79) mg/L] compared with men [0.44 (0.26-0.70) mg/L] (F = 2.2; p = 0.035). There was no significant gender difference in the prescribed clozapine dose. BMI was significantly higher in women [mean (95 % CI) = 34.5 (26.0-45.3)] for females compared with 32.5 (25.2-41.0) for males. Overall, BMI increased by 0.7 kg/m(2) over a mean follow-up period of 210 days. A lower proportion, 41 % of women had a fasting blood glucose ≤6.0 mmol/L (<6.0 mmol/L is defined by the International Diabetes Federation as normal glucose handling), compared with 88 % of men (χ (2) = 18.6, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that mean BMI and blood glucose concentrations are higher in women prescribed clozapine than in men. Women also tended to attain higher plasma clozapine concentrations than men. The higher BMI and blood glucose in women may relate to higher tissue exposure to clozapine, as a consequence of sex differences in drug metabolism.

Antipsychotic therapeutic drug monitoring: psychiatrists' attitudes and factors predicting likely future use.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore predictive factors for future use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and to further examine psychiatrists' current prescribing practices and perspectives regarding antipsychotic TDM using plasma concentrations. METHOD: A cross-sectional study for consultant psychiatrists using a postal questionnaire was conducted in north-west England. Data were combined with those of a previous London-based study and principal axis factor analysis was conducted to identify predictors of future use of TDM. RESULTS: Most of the 181 participants (82.9%, 95% confidence interval 76.7-87.7%) agreed that 'if TDM for antipsychotics were readily available, I would use it'. Factor analysis identified five factors from the original 35 items regarding TDM. Four of the factors significantly predicted likely future use of antipsychotic TDM and together explained 40% of the variance in a multivariate linear regression model. Likely future use increased with positive attitudes and expectations, and decreased with potential barriers, negative attitudes and negative expectations. Scientific perspectives of TDM and psychiatrist characteristics were not significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Most senior psychiatrists indicated that they would use antipsychotic TDM if available. However, psychiatrists' attitudes and expectations and the potential barriers need to be addressed, in addition to the scientific evidence, before widespread use of antipsychotic TDM is likely in clinical practice.