Power outages and pediatric unintentional injury hospitalizations in New York State.

Background: In the past decade, electrical power disruptions (outages) have increased in the United States, especially those attributable to weather events. These outages have a range of health impacts but are largely unstudied in children. Here, we investigated the association between outages and unintentional injury hospitalizations, a leading cause of childhood morbidity. Methods: The study setting was New York State (NYS) from 2017 to 2020. Outage exposure was defined as ≥10%, ≥20%, and ≥50% of customers from a power operating locality without power, ascertained from NYS Department of Public Service records and stratified by rural, urban non-New York City (NYC), and NYC regions. Outcome daily block group-level pediatric injury hospitalization data was from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). We leveraged a case-crossover study design with logistic conditional regression. Results: We identified 23,093 unintentional injury hospitalizations in children <18 years with complete block group and exposure data. Most hospitalizations occurred in urban regions (90%), whereas outages were more likely in rural than urban areas. In urban non-NYC regions, outages ≥4 hours were associated with 30% increased odds of all-cause unintentional injury hospitalizations when ≥50% of customers were without power. Analyses by injury subtype revealed increasing point estimates as the proportion of customers exposed increased. These results, however, had wide confidence intervals. Conclusions: Outage exposure differed significantly across rural, urban non-NYC, and NYC regions across New York. Especially at the highest outage threshold, we observed an increased risk of pediatric unintentional injury hospitalizations.

Trajectory analysis of rhinitis in a birth cohort from lower-income New York City neighborhoods.

BACKGROUND: Rhinitis is a prevalent, chronic nasal condition associated with asthma. However, its developmental trajectories remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the course of rhinitis from infancy to adolescence and the association between identified phenotypes, asthma-related symptoms, and physician-diagnosed asthma. METHODS: We collected rhinitis data from questionnaires repeated across 22 time points among 688 children from infancy to age 11 years and used latent class mixed modeling (LCMM) to identify phenotypes. Once children were between ages 5 and 12, a study physician determined asthma diagnosis. We collected information on the following asthma symptoms: any wheeze, exercise-induced wheeze, nighttime coughing, and emergency department visits. For each, we used LCMM to identify symptom phenotypes. Using logistic regression, we described the association between rhinitis phenotype and asthma diagnosis and each symptom overall and stratified by atopic predisposition and sex. RESULTS: LCMM identified 5 rhinitis trajectory groups: never/infrequent; transient; late onset, infrequent; late onset, frequent; and persistent. LCMM identified 2 trajectories for each symptom, classified as frequent and never/infrequent. Participants with persistent and late onset, frequent phenotypes were more likely to be diagnosed with asthma and to have the frequent phenotype for all symptoms (P < .01). We identified interaction between seroatopy and rhinitis phenotype for physician-diagnosed asthma (P = .04) and exercise-induced wheeze (P = .08). Severe seroatopy was more common among children with late onset, frequent and persistent rhinitis, with nearly 25% of these 2 groups exhibiting sensitivity to 4 or 5 of the 5 allergens tested. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, population-based birth cohort, persistent and late onset, frequent rhinitis phenotypes were associated with increased risk of asthma diagnosis and symptoms during adolescence.

The role of insurance status in the association between short-term temperature exposure and myocardial infarction hospitalizations in New York State.

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and its risk increases with extreme temperatures. Climate change causes variability in weather patterns, including extreme temperature events that disproportionately affect socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. Many studies on the health effects of extreme temperatures have considered community-level socioeconomic disadvantage. Objectives: To evaluate effect modification of the relationship between short-term ambient temperature and MI, by individual-level insurance status (insured vs. uninsured). Methods: We identified MI hospitalizations and insurance status across New York State (NYS) hospitals from 1995 to 2015 in the New York Department of Health Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database, using International Classification of Diseases codes. We linked short-term ambient temperature (averaging the 6 hours preceding the event [MI hospitalization]) or nonevent control period in patient residential zip codes. We employed a time-stratified case-crossover study design for both insured and uninsured strata, and then compared the group-specific rate ratios. Results: Over the study period, there were 1,095,051 primary MI admissions, 966,475 (88%) among insured patients. During extremely cold temperatures (<5.8 °C) insured patients experienced reduced rates of MI; this was not observed among the uninsured counterparts. At warmer temperatures starting at the 65th percentile (15.7 °C), uninsured patients had higher rates than insured patients (e.g., for a 6-hour pre-event average temperature increase from the median to the 75th percentile, the rate of MI increased was 2.0% [0.0%-4.0%] higher in uninsured group). Conclusions: Uninsured individuals may face disproportionate rates of MI hospitalization during extreme temperatures.

Methods in Public Health Environmental Justice Research: a Scoping Review from 2018 to 2021.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The volume of public health environmental justice (EJ) research produced by academic institutions increased through 2022. However, the methods used for evaluating EJ in exposure science and epidemiologic studies have not been catalogued. Here, we completed a scoping review of EJ studies published in 19 environmental science and epidemiologic journals from 2018 to 2021 to summarize research types, frameworks, and methods. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 402 articles that included populations with health disparities as a part of EJ research question and met other inclusion criteria. Most studies (60%) evaluated EJ questions related to socioeconomic status (SES) or race/ethnicity. EJ studies took place in 69 countries, led by the US (n = 246 [61%]). Only 50% of studies explicitly described a theoretical EJ framework in the background, methods, or discussion and just 10% explicitly stated a framework in all three sections. Among exposure studies, the most common area-level exposure was air pollution (40%), whereas chemicals predominated personal exposure studies (35%). Overall, the most common method used for exposure-only EJ analyses was main effect regression modeling (50%); for epidemiologic studies the most common method was effect modification (58%), where an analysis evaluated a health disparity variable as an effect modifier. Based on the results of this scoping review, current methods in public health EJ studies could be bolstered by integrating expertise from other fields (e.g., sociology), conducting community-based participatory research and intervention studies, and using more rigorous, theory-based, and solution-oriented statistical research methods.

Spatiotemporal distribution of power outages with climate events and social vulnerability in the USA.

Power outages threaten public health. While outages will likely increase with climate change, an aging electrical grid, and increased energy demand, little is known about their frequency and distribution within states. Here, we characterize 2018-2020 outages, finding an average of 520 million customer-hours total without power annually across 2447 US counties (73.7% of the US population). 17,484 8+ hour outages (a medically-relevant duration with potential health consequences) and 231,174 1+ hour outages took place, with greatest prevalence in Northeastern, Southern, and Appalachian counties. Arkansas, Louisiana, and Michigan counties experience a dual burden of frequent 8+ hour outages and high social vulnerability and prevalence of electricity-dependent durable medical equipment use. 62.1% of 8+ hour outages co-occur with extreme weather/climate events, particularly heavy precipitation, anomalous heat, and tropical cyclones. Results could support future large-scale epidemiology studies, inform equitable disaster preparedness and response, and prioritize geographic areas for resource allocation and interventions.

The 2021 Texas Power Crisis: distribution, duration, and disparities.

BACKGROUND: Precipitated by an unusual winter storm, the 2021 Texas Power Crisis lasted February 10 to 27 leaving millions of customers without power. Such large-scale outages can have severe health consequences, especially among vulnerable subpopulations such as those reliant on electricity to power medical equipment, but limited studies have evaluated sociodemographic disparities associated with outages. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the 2021 Texas Power Crisis in relation to distribution, duration, preparedness, and issues of environmental justice. METHODS: We used hourly Texas-wide county-level power outage data to estimate geographic clustering and association between outage exposure (distribution and duration) and six measures of racial, social, political, and/or medical vulnerability: Black and Hispanic populations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), Medicare electricity-dependent durable medical equipment (DME) usage, nursing homes, and hospitals. To examine individual-level experience and preparedness, we used a preexisting and non-representative internet survey. RESULTS: At the peak of the Texas Power Crisis, nearly 1/3 of customers statewide (N = 4,011,776 households/businesses) lost power. We identified multiple counties that faced a dual burden of racial/social/medical vulnerability and power outage exposure, after accounting for multiple comparisons. County-level spatial analyses indicated that counties where more Hispanic residents resided tended to endure more severe outages (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.40). We did not observe socioeconomic or medical disparities. With individual-level survey data among 1038 respondents, we found that Black respondents were more likely to report outages lasting 24+ hours and that younger individuals and those with lower educational attainment were less likely to be prepared for outages. SIGNIFICANCE: Power outages can be deadly, and medically vulnerable, socioeconomically vulnerable, and marginalized groups may be disproportionately impacted or less prepared. Climate and energy policy must equitably address power outages, future grid improvements, and disaster preparedness and management.