Applying elastic resistance bands for gait training: A simulation-based study to determine how band configuration affects gait biomechanics and muscle activation.

BACKGROUND: Wearable robotic exoskeletons and leg braces are desirable for gait rehabilitation because they can apply loads directly to an affected joint. Yet, they are not widely used in clinics because they are costly and complex to set up. Conversely, tethered devices, such as elastic resistance bands, are widely available in clinics, are low-cost, and are quick to set up. However, resistance bands will affect walking differently based on how they are configured to pull on the leg (e.g., pulling forward or backward). RESEARCH QUESTION: How can a resistance band be configured to alter muscle activation and gait biomechanics based on the segment it is attached to and the angle with which it attaches? METHODS: We used an open-source musculoskeletal modeling platform to emulate several configurations of an elastic band pulling on the ankle, calf, and thigh at various angles during non-pathological walking. We evaluated gait biomechanics and simulated muscle activation using computed muscle control (CMC) and identified a subset of four configurations with potential applications for gait training. Eight non-pathological participants then walked on a treadmill under these configurations to verify how these configurations altered muscle activation. RESULTS: We found that muscle activity greatly varied based on the location where the elastic band is attached and the angle with which the elastic band pulls on the leg. Notably, specific angles can be used to pull on the legs to elicit an increase or decrease in muscle activation. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insight into how tethered devices can be configured to provide assistance or resistance during gait training. This information can be applied when developing low-cost gait training solutions for addressing individuals' impairments.

Dynamic Response of the Thoracolumbar and Sacral Spine to Simulated Underbody Blast Loading in Whole Body Post Mortem Human Subject Tests.

Fourteen simulated underbody blast impact sled tests were performed using a horizontal deceleration sled with the aim of evaluating the dynamic response of the spine in under various conditions. Conditions were characterized by input (peak velocity and time-to-peak velocity for the seat and floor), seat type (rigid or padded) and the presence of personnel protective equipment (PPE). A 50% (T12) and 30% (T8) reduction in the thoracic spine response for the specimens outfitted with PPE was observed. Longer duration seat pulses (55 ms) resulted in a 68-78% reduction in the magnitude of spine responses and a reduction in the injuries at the pelvis, thoracic and lumbar regions when compared to shorter seat pulses (10 ms). The trend analysis for the peak Z (caudal to cranial) acceleration measured along the spine showed a quadratic fit (p < 0.05), rejecting the hypothesis that the magnitude of the acceleration would decrease linearly as the load traveled caudal to cranial through the spine during an Underbody Blast (UBB) event. A UBB event occurs when an explosion beneath a vehicle propels the vehicle and its occupants vertically. Further analysis revealed a relationship (p < 0.01) between peak sacrum acceleration and peak spine accelerations measured at all levels. This study provides an initial analysis of the relationship between input conditions and spine response in a simulated underbody blast environment.