RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Malaria is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Widespread resistance to pyrethroids threatens the gains achieved by vector control. To counter resistance to pyrethroids, third-generation indoor residual spraying (3GIRS) products have been developed. This study details the results of a multi-country cost and cost-effectiveness analysis of indoor residual spraying (IRS) programmes using Actellic®300CS, a 3GIRS product with pirimiphos-methyl, in sub-Saharan Africa in 2017 added to standard malaria control interventions including insecticide-treated bed nets versus standard malaria control interventions alone. METHODS: An economic evaluation of 3GIRS using Actellic®300CS in a broad range of sub-Saharan African settings was conducted using a variety of primary data collection and evidence synthesis methods. Four IRS programmes in Ghana, Mali, Uganda, and Zambia were included in the effectiveness analysis. Cost data come from six IRS programmes: one in each of the four countries where effect was measured plus Mozambique and a separate programme conducted by AngloGold Ashanti Malaria Control in Ghana. Financial and economic costs were quantified and valued. The main indicator for the cost was cost per person targeted. Country-specific case incidence rate ratios (IRRs), estimated by comparing IRS study districts to adjacent non-IRS study districts or facilities, were used to calculate cases averted in each study area. A deterministic analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted in each of the four countries for which effectiveness evaluations were available. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to generate plausibility bounds around the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates for adding IRS to other standard interventions in each study setting as well as jointly utilizing data on effect and cost across all settings. RESULTS: Overall, IRRs from each country indicated that adding IRS with Actellic®300CS to the local standard intervention package was protective compared to the standard intervention package alone (IRR 0.67, [95% CI 0.50-0.91]). Results indicate that Actellic®300CS is expected to be a cost-effective (> 60% probability of being cost-effective in all settings) or highly cost-effective intervention across a range of transmission settings in sub-Saharan Africa. DISCUSSION: Variations in the incremental costs and cost-effectiveness likely result from several sources including: variation in the sprayed wall surfaces and house size relative to household population, the underlying malaria burden in the communities sprayed, the effectiveness of 3GIRS in different settings, and insecticide price. Programmes should be aware that current recommendations to rotate can mean variation and uncertainty in budgets; programmes should consider this in their insecticide-resistance management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal combination of 3GIRS delivery with other malaria control interventions will be highly context specific. 3GIRS using Actellic®300CS is expected to deliver acceptable value for money in a broad range of sub-Saharan African malaria transmission settings.
Asunto(s)
Insecticidas , Malaria , Compuestos Organotiofosforados , Piretrinas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Malaria/epidemiología , Malí , Control de Mosquitos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prompt and effective malaria diagnosis and treatment is a cornerstone of malaria control. Case management guidelines recommend confirmatory testing of suspected malaria cases, then prescription of specific drugs for uncomplicated malaria and for severe malaria. This study aims to describe case management practices for children aged 1-59 months seeking treatment with current or recent fever from public and private, rural and urban health providers in Mali. METHODS: Data were collected at sites in Sikasso Region and Bamako. Health workers recorded key information from the consultation including malaria diagnostic testing and result, their final diagnosis, and all drugs prescribed. Children with signs of severe diseases were ineligible. Consultations were not independently observed. Appropriate case management was defined as both 1) tested for malaria using rapid diagnostic test or microscopy, and 2) receiving artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) and no other antimalarials if test-positive, or receiving no antimalarials if test-negative. RESULTS: Of 1602 participating children, 23.7% were appropriately managed, ranging from 5.3% at public rural facilities to 48.4% at community health worker sites. The most common reason for 'inappropriate' management was lack of malaria diagnostic testing (50.4% of children). Among children with confirmed malaria, 50.8% received a non-ACT antimalarial (commonly artesunate injection or artemether), either alone or in combination with ACT. Of 215 test-negative children, 44.2% received an antimalarial drug, most commonly ACT. Prescription of multiple drugs was common: 21.7% of all children received more than one type of antimalarial, while 51.9% received an antibiotic and antimalarial. Inappropriate case management increased in children with increasing axillary temperatures and those seeking care over weekends. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple limitations in management of febrile children under five were identified, including inconsistent use of confirmatory testing and apparent use of severe malaria drugs for uncomplicated malaria. While we cannot confirm the reasons for these shortcomings, there is a need to address the high use of non-ACT antimalarials in this context; to minimize potential for drug resistance, reduce unnecessary expense, and preserve life-saving treatment for severe malaria cases. These findings highlight the challenge of managing febrile illness in young children in a high transmission setting.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos , Artemisininas , Malaria , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Malaria/epidemiología , Malí/epidemiología , Sector PrivadoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) of Mali has had recent success decreasing malaria transmission using 3rd generation indoor residual spraying (IRS) products in areas with pyrethroid resistance, primarily in Ségou and Koulikoro Regions. In 2015, national survey data showed that Mopti Region had the highest under 5-year-old (u5) malaria prevalence at 54%-nearly twice the national average-despite having high access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC). Accordingly, in 2016 the NMCP and other stakeholders shifted IRS activities from Ségou to Mopti. Here, the results of a series of observational analyses utilizing routine malaria indicators to evaluate the impact of this switch are presented. METHODS: A set of retrospective, eco-observational time-series analyses were performed using monthly incidence rates of rapid diagnostic test (RDT)-confirmed malaria cases reported in the District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2) from January 2016 until February 2018. Comparisons of case incidence rates were made between health facility catchments from the same region that differed in IRS status (IRS vs. no-IRS) to describe the general impact of the 2016 and 2017 IRS campaigns, and a difference-in-differences approach comparing changes in incidence from year-to-year was used to describe the effect of suspending IRS operations in Ségou and introducing IRS operations in Mopti in 2017. RESULTS: Compared to communities with no IRS, cumulative case incidence rates in IRS communities were reduced 16% in Ségou Region during the 6 months following the 2016 campaign and 31% in Mopti Region during the 6 months following the 2017 campaign, likely averting a total of more than 22,000 cases of malaria that otherwise would have been expected during peak transmission months. Across all comparator health facilities (HFs) where there was no IRS in either year, peak malaria case incidence rates fell by an average of 22% (CI95 18-30%) from 2016 to 2017. At HFs in communities of Mopti where IRS was introduced in 2017, peak incidence fell by an average of 42% (CI95 31-63%) between these years, a significantly greater decrease (p = 0.040) almost double what was seen in the comparator HFCAs. The opposite effect was observed in Ségou Region, where peak incidence at those HFs where IRS was withdrawn after the 2016 campaign increased by an average of 106% (CI95 63-150%) from year to year, also a significant difference-in-differences compared to the comparator no-IRS HFs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Annual IRS campaigns continue to make dramatic contributions to the seasonal reduction of malaria transmission in communities across central Mali, where IRS campaigns were timed in advance of peak seasonal transmission and utilized a micro-encapsulated product with an active ingredient that was of a different class than the one found on the LLINs used throughout the region and to which local malaria vectors were shown to be susceptible. Strategies to help mitigate the resurgence of malaria cases that can be expected should be prioritized whenever the suspension of IRS activities in a particular region is considered.
Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/estadística & datos numéricos , Erradicación de la Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Residuos de Plaguicidas , Humanos , Incidencia , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malí/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ségou Region in central Mali is an area of high malaria burden with seasonal transmission. The region reports high access to and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), though the principal vector, Anopheles gambiae, is resistant to pyrethroids. From 2011 until 2016, several high-burden districts of Ségou also received indoor residual spraying (IRS), though in 2014 concerns about pyrethroid resistance prompted a shift in IRS products to a micro-encapsulated formulation of the organophosphate insecticide pirimiphos-methyl. Also in 2014, the region expanded a pilot programme to provide seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) to children aged 3-59 months in two districts. The timing of these decisions presented an opportunity to estimate the impact of both interventions, deployed individually and in combination, using quality-assured passive surveillance data. METHODS: A non-randomized, quasi-experimental time series approach was used to analyse monthly trends in malaria case incidence at the district level. Districts were stratified by intervention status: an SMC district, an IRS district, an IRS + SMC district, and control districts that received neither IRS nor SMC in 2014. The numbers of positive rapid diagnostic test (RDT +) results reported at community health facilities were aggregated and epidemiological curves showing the incidence of RDT-confirmed malaria cases per 10,000 person-months were plotted for the total all-ages and for the under 5 year old (u5) population. The cumulative incidence of RDT + malaria cases observed from September 2014 to February 2015 was calculated in each intervention district and compared to the cumulative incidence reported from the same period in the control districts. RESULTS: Cumulative peak-transmission all-ages incidence was lower in each of the intervention districts compared to the control districts: 16% lower in the SMC district; 28% lower in the IRS district; and 39% lower in the IRS + SMC district. The same trends were observed in the u5 population: incidence was 15% lower with SMC, 48% lower with IRS, and 53% lower with IRS + SMC. The SMC-only intervention had a more moderate effect on incidence reduction initially, which increased over time. The IRS-only intervention had a rapid, comparatively large impact initially that waned over time. The impact of the combined interventions was both rapid and longer lasting. CONCLUSION: Evaluating the impact of IRS with an organophosphate and SMC on reducing incidence rates of passive RDT-confirmed malaria cases in Ségou Region in 2014 suggests that combining the interventions had a greater effect than either intervention used individually in this high-burden region of central Mali with pyrethroid-resistant vectors and high rates of household access to LLINs.
Asunto(s)
Anopheles , Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Insecticidas , Malaria Falciparum/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Mosquitos Vectores , Compuestos Organotiofosforados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Malaria Falciparum/epidemiología , Malaria Falciparum/parasitología , Malí/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Residuos de Plaguicidas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: According to the World Health Organization, there were more than 228 million cases of malaria globally in 2018, with 93% of cases occurring in Africa; in Mali, a 13% increase in the number of cases was observed between 2015 and 2018; this study aimed to evaluate the impact of meteorological and environmental factors on the geo-epidemiology of malaria in the health district of Dire, Mali. Methods: Meteorological and environmental variables were synthesized using principal component analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, the relationship between malaria incidence and synthetic indicators was determined using a multivariate general additive model; hotspots were detected by SaTScan. Results: Malaria incidence showed high inter and intra-annual variability; the period of high transmission lasted from September to February; health areas characterized by proximity to the river, propensity for flooding and high agricultural yield were the most at risk, with an incidence rate ratio of 2.21 with confidence intervals (95% CI: 1.85-2.58); malaria incidence in Dire declined from 120 to 20 cases per 10,000 person-weeks between 2013 and 2017. Conclusion: The identification of areas and periods of high transmission can help improve malaria control strategies.
Asunto(s)
Malaria , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/transmisión , Malí/epidemiología , RíosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nationally-representative household surveys are the standard approach to monitor access to and treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) among children under 5 years (U5), however these indicators are dependent on caregivers' recall of the treatment received. METHODS: A prospective case-control study was performed in Mali to validate caregivers' recall of treatment received by U5s when seeking care for fever from rural and urban public health facilities, community health workers and urban private facilities. Clinician-recorded consultation details were the gold standard. Consenting caregivers were followed-up for interview at home within 2 weeks using standard questions from Demographic and Health Surveys and Malaria Indicator Surveys. RESULTS: Among 1602 caregivers, sensitivity of recalling that the child received a finger/heel prick was 91.5%, with specificity 85.7%. Caregivers' recall of a positive malaria test result had sensitivity 96.2% with specificity 59.7%. Irrespective of diagnostic test result, the sensitivity and specificity of caregivers' recalling a malaria diagnosis made by the health worker were 74.3% and 74.9%, respectively. Caregivers' recall of ACT being given had sensitivity of 43.2% and specificity 90.2%, while recall that any anti-malarial was given had sensitivity 59.0% and specificity 82.7%. Correcting caregivers' response of treatment received using a combination of a visual aid with photographs of common drugs for fever, prescription documents and retained packaging changed ACT recall sensitivity and specificity to 91.5% and 71.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that caregivers' responses during household surveys are valid when assessing if a child received a finger/heel prick during a consultation in the previous 2 weeks, and if the malaria test result was positive. Recall of ACT treatment received by U5s was poor when based on interview response only, but was substantially improved when incorporating visual aids, prescriptions and drug packaging review.
Asunto(s)
Antimaláricos/uso terapéutico , Cuidadores , Malaria/diagnóstico , Malaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Artemisininas/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada , Composición Familiar , Femenino , Fiebre/epidemiología , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Malí , Recuerdo Mental , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Servicios de Salud Rural , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Servicios Urbanos de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ségou Region in Central Mali is an area of high malaria burden with seasonal transmission, high access to and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), and resistance to pyrethroids and DDT well documented in Anopheles gambiae s.l. (the principal vector of malaria in Mali). Ségou has recently received indoor residual spraying (IRS) supported by Mali's collaboration with the US President's Malaria Initiative/Africa Indoor Residual Spraying programme. From 2012 to 2015, two different non-pyrethroid insecticides: bendiocarb in 2012 and 2013 and pirimiphos-methyl in 2014 and 2015, were used for IRS in two districts. This report summarizes the results of observational analyses carried out to assess the impact of these IRS campaigns on malaria incidence rates reported through local and district health systems before and after spraying. METHODS: A series of retrospective time series analyses were performed on 1,382,202 rapid diagnostic test-confirmed cases of malaria reported by district routine health systems in Ségou Region from January 2012 to January 2016. Malaria testing, treatment, surveillance and reporting activities remained consistent across districts and years during the study period, as did LLIN access and use estimates as well as An. gambiae s.l. insecticide resistance patterns. Districts were stratified by IRS implementation status and all-age monthly incidence rates were calculated and compared across strata from 2012 to 2014. In 2015 a regional but variable scale-up of seasonal malaria chemoprevention complicated the region-wide analysis; however IRS operations were suspended in Bla District that year so a difference in differences approach was used to compare 2014 to 2015 changes in malaria incidence at the health facility level in children under 5-years-old from Bla relative to changes observed in Barouéli, where IRS operations were consistent. RESULTS: During 2012-2014, rapid reductions in malaria incidence were observed during the 6 months following each IRS campaign, though most of the reduction in cases (70% of the total) was concentrated in the first 2 months after each campaign was completed. Compared to non-IRS districts, in which normal seasonal patterns of malaria incidence were observed, an estimated 286,745 total fewer cases of all-age malaria were observed in IRS districts. The total cost of IRS in Ségou was around 9.68 million USD, or roughly 33.75 USD per case averted. Further analysis suggests that the timing of the 2012-2014 IRS campaigns (spraying in July and August) was well positioned to maximize public health impact. Suspension of IRS in Bla District after the 2014 campaign resulted in a 70% increase in under-5-years-old malaria incidence rates from 2014 to 2015, significantly greater (p = 0.0003) than the change reported from Barouéli District, where incidence rates remained the same. CONCLUSIONS: From 2012 to 2015, the annual IRS campaigns in Ségou are associated with several hundred thousand fewer cases of malaria. This work supports the growing evidence that shows that IRS with non-pyrethroid insecticides is a wise public health investment in areas with documented pyrethroid resistance, high rates of LLIN coverage, and where house structures and population densities are appropriate. Additionally, this work highlights the utility of quality-assured and validated routine surveillance and well defined observational analyses to rapidly assess the impact of malaria control interventions in operational settings, helping to empower evidence-based decision making and to further grow the evidence base needed to better understand when and where to utilize new vector control tools as they become available.
Asunto(s)
Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Malaria/epidemiología , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Compuestos Organotiofosforados/administración & dosificación , Fenilcarbamatos/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Malí/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS: This study aimed to compare the management style of the Management Committee with government policies and to evaluate the user's satisfaction concerning the management of community health centers (CHCs) and the services these provide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in 8 CHCs in Mali from September to October 2009. A total of 160 householders and 24 CHC Management Committee members were interviewed using face to face interviews. RESULTS: The CHCs were led by local populations and their management style was in line with the ones set up by the government. People in the lowest socioeconomic conditions, elderly people, and people who attended the CHC meetings were the most satisfied. Management Committee members suggested that more support was needed from the government regarding funding and human resources allocation. CONCLUSION: Although a high level of satisfaction regarding the services provided was observed, users reported improvements could be made with the quality of care whereas managers suggested more funding and human ressources allocation from the government.
BUT: Cette étude visait d'abord à comparer le style de gestion du comité de gestion avec les règles du gouvernement et ensuite à évaluer la satisfaction des utilisateurs à la fois sur le mode de gestion des Centres de Santé Communautaire (CSCom) et les services fournis par ces structures. MATÉRIEL ET MÉTHODES: Une étude transversale descriptive et analytique a été conduite de Septembre à Octobre 2009 dans 8 CSCom. Elle a concerné 160 chefs de ménages et 24 membres des comités de gestion des CSCom. RÉSULTATS: Les CSCom visités étaient gérés par les populations locales et le style de gestion était conforme à celui élaboré par le gouvernement. Les personnes ayant les plus mauvaises conditions socio-économiques, les personnes âgées et les personnes qui ont assisté aux réunions concernant le centre de santé étaient les plus satisfaits. Les membres du comité de gestion ont suggéré un plus grand soutien du gouvernement concernant le financement et l'affectation des ressources humaines. CONCLUSION: Même si un niveau élevé de satisfaction concernant le service fourni a été observé, les utilisateurs ont signalé une certaine insuffisance dans la qualité des soins alors que les gestionnaires ont suggéré plus de financement et d'allocation des ressources humaines du gouvernement.
RESUMEN
But: Cette etude visait d'abord a comparer le style de gestion du comite de gestion avec les regles du gouvernement et ensuite a evaluer la satisfaction des utilisateurs a la fois sur le mode de gestion des Centres de Sante Communautaire (CSCom) et les services fournis par ces structures. Materiel et methodes : Une etude transversale descriptive et analytique a ete conduite de Septembre a Octobre 2009 dans 8 CSCom. Elle a concerne 160 chefs de menages et 24 membres des comites de gestion des CSCom. Resultats : Les CSCom visites etaient geres par les populations locales et le style de gestion etait conforme a celui elabore par le gouvernement. Les personnes ayant les plus mauvaises conditions socio-economiques; les personnes agees et les personnes qui ont assiste aux suggere un plus grand soutien du gouvernement concernant le financement et l'affectation des ressources humaines. Conclusion: Meme si un niveau eleve de satisfaction concernant le service fourni a ete observe; les utilisateurs ont signale une certaine insuffisance dans la qualite des soins alors que les gestionnaires ont suggere plus de financement et d'allocation des ressources humaines du gouvernement
Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
"Background: Community health centres (CHCs) are an important component of the health system in Mali and China. Despite patient support and commitment from the authorities; the management and the quality of care of these structures need to be improved. This research aimed to compare the management style of the relevant boards with users' satisfaction pertaining to CHC services in Mali and China. Method: Between September 2009-January 2010; a study was conducted in eight CHCs in Mali and in 16 CHCs in China. A total of 480 householders; [60 (Mali) and 320 (China)]; and 24 management committee members (Mali) and 48 management committee members (China) were interviewed. An in-depth interview technique was used on members of the management committee; while a structured interview was carried out to collect data during face-to-face contact with householders in their residences. In residences in which there were two or more households; the first willing householder was interviewed. Questions about the level of satisfaction were coded from 1-5 and ranged from ""excellent"" to ""very bad"" respectively. Results: The CHCs in China were managed by the government; whereas in Mali; they were overseen by the local population. The most satisfied people in both countries were those living in the poorest socioeconomic conditions; the elderly; and those who attended the healthcare meetings. Chinese households were more satisfied with the quality of the CHC services than those in Mali. The Chinese management boards proposed standardisation of rules and more funding; whereas those in Mali advocated that government provide more funding and human resources allocation. Conclusion: A high level of satisfaction regarding the CHC services was observed. However; users reported on deficits in the quality of care; whereas management suggested a need for greater resource allocation"
Asunto(s)
Estudio Comparativo , Atención a la Salud , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
"Background: Community health centres (CHCs) are an important component of the health system in Mali and China. Despite patient support and commitment from the authorities; the management and the quality of care of these structures need to be improved. This research aimed to compare the management style of the relevant boards with users' satisfaction pertaining to CHC services in Mali and China. Method: Between September 2009-January 2010; a study was conducted in eight CHCs in Mali and in 16 CHCs in China. A total of 480 householders; [60 (Mali) and 320 (China)]; and 24 management committee members (Mali) and 48 management committee members (China) were interviewed. An in-depth interview technique was used on members of the management committee; while a structured interview was carried out to ollect data during face-to-face contact with householders in their residences. In residences in which there were two or more households; the first willing householder was interviewed. Questions about the level of satisfaction were coded from 1-5 and ranged from ""excellent"" to ""very bad"" respectively. Results: The CHCs in China were managed by the government; whereas in Mali; they were overseen by the local population. The most satisfied people in both countries were those living in the poorest socioeconomic conditions; the elderly; and those who attended the healthcare meetings. Chinese households were more satisfied with the quality of the CHC services than those in Mali. The Chinese management boards proposed standardisation of rules and more funding; whereas those in Mali advocated that government provide more funding and human resources allocation. Conclusion: A high level of satisfaction regarding the CHC services was observed. However; users reported on deficits in the quality of care; whereas management suggested a need for greater resource allocation."
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Mecanismos de Evaluación de la Atención de Salud , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Organización y Administración , Atención Primaria de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Community health centers are an important component of the health system in Mali. Despite the adhesion of the populations and the commitment of the authorities, many things must be done to improve the quality of care provided in those structures. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to know the patients' utilization and perception of the curative care in the community health centers of Bamako and the physicians' satisfaction of their work condition and perspective in the community health sector. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine community health centers of Bamako in 2008. A total of 270 patients were interviewed through a face-to-face interview. Thirteen physicians took a self-administrated questionnaire relating to their material and financial conditions and their plan for the future. RESULTS: The sample was characterized by the low literacy (32.6%) and socio-economic level (15.9% of steady income).139 patients claimed the nearness as the reason of the choice of the health center whereas only 51 claimed the health staff skill. The women felt more satisfied than men (P=0.005) and illiterates felt more satisfied than bachelors and beyond (P=0.034). The patients claimed the reduction of waiting time, the improvement of information and the creation of news services. 30.80% of physicians were satisfied from their material and financial conditions, 38.46% were motivated and 76.92% planned to leave their health center. CONCLUSION: Although a high level of satisfaction regarding the provided service was observed, user reported some shortage in the quality of care and claimed a widening of CSCom capability.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Community health centers are an important component of the health system in Mali. Despite the adhesion of the populations and the commitment of the authorities many thing must be done to improve the quality of care provided in those structures. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to know on one hand the patients' utilization and perception of the curative care in the community health centers of the fifth commune of Bamako and on the other hand the physicians' satisfaction of their work condition and perspective in the community health sector. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted in nine community health centers of Bamako in 2008. A total of 270 patients were interviewed through a face to face interview. Thirteen physicians took a self administrated questionnaire. RESULTS: The sample was characterized by the low literacy (32.6%) and socio-economic level (15.9% of steady income). 139 patients evoked the nearness as the reason of health centers' choice whereas only 51 patients evoked the health staff skill. The womens felt more satisfied then men (p = 0.005) and illiterates felt more satisfied then bachelors & beyond (p = 0.034). The patients' claimed the reduction of waitiing time 54/270, the improvement of information and orientation system 51/270 and news services creation. 30.80% of physicians were satisfied from their material and financial conditions, 38.46% were motivated and 76.92% planed to leave their health center. CONCLUSION: Although a high level of satisfaction regarding the provided service was observed, user reported some shortage in the quality of care and claimed a widening of CSCom capability.