Liver Resection vs Nonsurgical Treatments for Patients With Early Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Importance: The 2022 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm currently discourages liver resection (LR) for patients with multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presenting with 2 or 3 nodules that are each 3 cm or smaller. Objective: To compare the efficacy of liver resection (LR), percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with multinodular HCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study is a retrospective analysis conducted using data from the HE.RC.O.LE.S register (n = 5331) for LR patients and the ITA.LI.CA database (n = 7056) for PRFA and TACE patients. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) method was applied to balance data and potential confounding factors between the 3 groups. Included were patients from multiple centers from 2008 to 2020; data were analyzed from January to December 2023. Interventions: LR, PRFA, or TACE. Main Outcomes and Measures: Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were calculated. Cox MAIC-weighted multivariable analysis and competing risk analysis were used to assess outcomes. Results: A total of 720 patients with early multinodular HCC were included, 543 males (75.4%), 177 females (24.6%), and 350 individuals older than 70 years (48.6%). There were 296 patients in the LR group, 240 who underwent PRFA, and 184 who underwent TACE. After MAIC, LR exhibited 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 89.11%, 70.98%, and 56.44%, respectively. PRFA showed rates of 94.01%, 65.20%, and 39.93%, while TACE displayed rates of 90.88%, 48.95%, and 29.24%. Multivariable Cox survival analysis in the weighted population showed a survival benefit over alternative treatments (PRFA vs LR: hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07-1.86; P = .01; TACE vs LR: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.29-2.68; P = .001). Competing risk analysis confirmed a lower risk of cancer-related death in LR compared with PRFA and TACE. Conclusions and Relevance: For patients with early multinodular HCC who are ineligible for transplant, LR should be prioritized as the primary therapeutic option, followed by PRFA and TACE when LR is not feasible. These findings provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making in this patient population.

Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal sparing liver resections for high tumour burden colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has proved effective in the treatment of oligometastatic disease (1 or 2 colorectal liver metastases CRLM) with similar long-term outcomes and improved short-term results compared to open liver resection (OLR). Feasibility of parenchymal sparing LLR for high tumour burden diseases is largely unknown. Aim of the study was to compare short and long-term results of LLR and OLR in patients with ≥ 3 CRLM. METHODS: Patients who underwent first LR of at least two different segments for ≥ 3 CRLM between 01/2012 and 12/2021 were analysed. Propensity score nearest-neighbour 1:1 matching was based on relevant prognostic factors. RESULTS: 277 out of 673 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria (47 LLR and 230 OLR). After match two balanced groups of 47 patients with a similar mean number of CRLM (5 in LLR vs 6.5 in OLR, p = 0.170) were analysed. The rate of major hepatectomy was similar between the two group (10.6% OLR vs. 12.8% LLR). Mortality (2.1% OLR vs 0 LLR) and overall morbidity rates (34% OLR vs 23.4% LLR) were comparable. Length of stay (LOS) was shorter in the LLR group (5 vs 9 days, p = 0.001). No differences were observed in median overall (41.1 months OLR vs median not reached LLR) and disease-free survival (18.3 OLR vs 27.9 months LLR). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic approach should be considered in selected patients scheduled to parenchymal sparing LR for high tumour burden disease as associated to shorter LOS and similar postoperative and long-term outcomes compared to the open approach.

Colorectal metastases with intrabiliary growth: incidence, treatment, and outcomes.

Intrabiliary growth (IG) is an unusual modality for colorectal metastases to spread. Relatively little is known about this condition because large series are lacking. The aim of the study was to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients with or without IG. From 01/2010 to 12/2020, 999 patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal metastases. Clinicopathological variables were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective-collected database of patients with or without IG. A propensity score matched (PSM) analysis to compare OS and DFS was performed. At first hepatectomy, 29 patients (2.9%) had IG: 7 isolated IG and 22 mixed-type (mass-forming lesion with IG). 4 patients presented IG at repeat hepatectomy for recurrence, of whom 3 had no biliary invasion at initial surgery. IG resulted to be more common in older patients (median age 70 in IG vs 60 years of no-IG, p = 0.004). Mean time from colorectal tumor was longer in IG (20.4 months) than no-IG (12.9 months), p = 0.038. Major hepatectomies (55.2% IG vs 29.7% no-IG, p = 0.003) and anatomic resections (89.7% vs 58.2%, p = 0.001) were more frequently required to treat IG. In 5 (17%) of IG, a resection of main bile duct was performed. Overall postoperative mortality and complications were similar in the two groups, while bile leak was 17.2% IG vs 5.6% no-IG (p = 0.024). Median margin width was comparable in IG (1.4 mm) and no-IG (2 mm). Five-year overall survival (IG 45.9% vs no-IG 44.5%) and Disease-Free Survival (IG 35.9% vs no-IG 36.6%) were similar in the two groups. According to PSM, 145 patients with no-IG were compared to 29 of IG group. After PSM, OS and DFS did not show any statistically significant difference. IG has similar oncological outcomes of resected colorectal metastases without IG, although it affects surgical management.

Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel for Tumors at the Hepatocaval Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence can be treated with parenchyma-sparing surgery, also with minimally invasive approach.1,2 The "Liver Tunnel" was described for tumors involving the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact or infiltrating the middle hepatic vein (MHV).3 A "Liver Tunnel" with laparoscopic approach is proposed. METHODS: A 48-year-old woman was referred for three synchronous colorectal liver metastases in the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact with the inferior vena cava and the MHV, in Sg8 ventral and in Sg6, after an urgent left laparoscopic hemicolectomy for an obstructing carcinoma. A laparoscopic Sg1 resection extended to Sg8 ventral were planned after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Estimated future liver remnant (FLR) was 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). In case of right hepatectomy extended to Sg1, estimated FLR was 25% (280 ml) of healthy liver. Fig. 1 3D reconstruction and intraoperative images of Liver Tunnel (A) and Sg6 resection (B). Total liver volume: 1110 ml. Total resected liver volume 270 ml: Liver Tunnel 93 ml; Sg6 177 ml. Liver volumes were measured with HA3D™ technology with Medics3D software (Medics3D, Turin, Italy) RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum is established, and four operative ports are placed. Sg1 is approached from the left, dividing the Glissonean pedicles and short hepatic veins. MHV is approached cranio-caudally from the dorsal side. The resection continues on the ventral side, according to our "Ultrasound Liver Map technique" with a cranio-caudal approach to the MHV.4 Sg8 ventral pedicles are divided and the resection completed with aid of indocyanine green negative staining. A Sg6 resection is then performed. Operative time was 480 min. Blood loss was 100 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on fourth postoperative day. The two parenchyma-sparing resections saved an estimated volume of 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). The estimated remnant liver volume after a right hepatectomy extended to Sg1 would have been only 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence involving Sg1 can be removed with the "Liver Tunnel," which can be performed with minimally invasive approach. The "Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel" pushes further the limit of minimally invasive parenchyma-sparing surgery for ill-located tumors with complex vascular relationship.

A novel patient-centered protocol to reduce hospital readmissions for dehydration after ileostomy.

Early hospital readmission for dehydration represents a relevant problem among patients with diverting or terminal ileostomy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new multidisciplinary individualized multistep protocol in terms of reduction of hospital readmission for dehydration. Since January 2016, our institution adopted a new protocol for patients with ileostomy. Protocol key points were: preoperative personalized education in stoma management; early recognition of dehydration symptoms; multidisciplinary counseling; patient autonomy in stoma management through post-operative recall schedule. The study compared a series of consecutive patients treated before (2014-2015) and after (2016-2017) the protocol application. The primary endpoint was hospital readmission rate after protocol use. The secondary endpoint was the identification of possible risk factors for readmission. The entire cohort was composed of 296 patients, 129 in the protocol group and 167 in the control one. The two groups were homogeneous for baseline characteristics. Hospital readmission rate within 30 days post-discharge for dehydration dropped from 9 to 3.9% after protocol application. Specifically, the number of avoided potential readmissions was 29/129 (22.4%). The number needed to treat (NNT) was 20. Univariate analysis identified three relevant variables: patient comorbidities, diuretics use as risk factors and protocol application as the protective one. The multivariate analysis confirmed patient comorbidity as the risk factor. Dehydration related to ileostomy is a potentially avoidable problem, by employing preventive strategies, especially in high-risk patients. Our new protocol could be a simple and cost-saving method, effective in preventing hospital readmissions.