Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 2 de 2
1.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) ; 85(3): 264-274, 2020.
Article En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31902552

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Since the 1960s, several studies have shown the effect of aging on esophageal motility, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the manometric results in older adult patients (=60 years of age) with an esophageal disorder and compare them with adults under 60 years of age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted that included a sample of 1,175 patients (936 older adults and 239 non-older adults). The patients were evaluated and compared with respect to (i) sex, (ii) main complaint for which esophageal manometry was indicated, (iii) comorbidities, (iv) current medications, (v) smoking, and (vi) manometry results. RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 19 to 92 years (women made up 76.5% of the older adults and 72.8% of the non-older adults). Normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and normal peristalsis were more frequent in the non-older patient group (91.1% vs. 84.8% and 87.4% vs. 76%, respectively). The manometry results for the non-older adults vs. the older adults, respectively, were: achalasia (2.9% vs. 5.9%); hypercontractile disorder (9.2% vs. 10.4%); hypocontractile disorder (38.5% vs. 47.6%); and normal values (49.4% vs. 36.1%). After excluding the variables that could change esophageal motility, the results revealed significant differences between the two study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal manometry demonstrated statistically significant differences between the older adult and non-older adult study population evaluated.


Esophageal Diseases/physiopathology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Manometry , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Dis Esophagus ; 26(5): 470-4, 2013 Jul.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22816880

The progression of certain primary esophageal motor disorders to achalasia has been documented; however, the true incidence of this decay is still elusive. This study aims to evaluate: (i) the incidence of the progression of diffuse esophageal spasm to achalasia, and (ii) predictive factors to this progression. Thirty-five patients (mean age 53 years, 80% females) with a manometric picture of diffuse esophageal spasm were followed for at least 1 year. Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease confirmed by pH monitoring or systemic diseases that may affect esophageal motility were excluded. Esophageal manometry was repeated in all patients. Five (14%) of the patients progressed to achalasia at a mean follow-up of 2.1 (range 1-4) years. Demographic characteristics were not predictive of transition to achalasia, while dysphagia (P= 0.005) as the main symptom and the wave amplitude of simultaneous waves less than 50 mmHg (P= 0.003) were statistically significant. In conclusion, the transition of diffuse esophageal spasm to achalasia is not frequent at a 2-year follow-up. Dysphagia and simultaneous waves with low amplitude are predictive factors for this degeneration.


Esophageal Achalasia/physiopathology , Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse/physiopathology , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Disease Progression , Esophageal Achalasia/complications , Esophageal Spasm, Diffuse/complications , Esophageal pH Monitoring , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heartburn/etiology , Humans , Male , Manometry , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors
...