The Economic Benefit of Remission for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), attaining remission or low disease activity (LDA), as recommended by the treat-to-target approach, has shown to yield improvement in symptoms and quality of life. However, limited evidence from real-world settings is available to support the premise that better disease control is associated with lower healthcare costs. This study fills in evidence gaps regarding the cost of care by RA disease activity (DA) states and by therapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study linked medical and prescription claims from Optum Clinformatics Data Mart to electronic health record data from Illumination Health over 1/1/2010-3/31/2020. Mean annual costs for payers and patients were examined, stratifying on DA state and baseline use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biologics, and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs. Subgroup analysis examining within-person change in costs pre- and post-initiation of new therapy was also performed. Descriptive statistics, means, and boot-strapped confidence intervals were analyzed by DA state and by RA therapy. Furthermore, multivariate negative binomial regression analysis adjusting for key baseline characteristics was conducted. RESULTS: Of 2339 eligible patients, 19% were in remission, 40% in LDA, 29% in moderate DA (MDA), and 12% in high DA (HDA) at baseline. Mean annual costs during follow-up were substantially less for patients in remission ($40,072) versus those in MDA ($56,536) and HDA ($59,217). For patients in remission, csDMARD use was associated with the lowest mean annual cost ($25,575), tsDMARD was highest ($75,512), and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) ($69,846) and non-TNFi ($57,507) were intermediate. Among new TNFi (n = 137) and non-TNFi initiators (n = 107), 31% and 26% attained LDA/remission, respectively, and the time to achieve remission/LDA was numerically shorter in TNFi vs. non-TNFi initiators. For those on biologics, mean annual within-person medical and inpatient costs were lower after achieving LDA/remission, although pharmacy costs were higher. CONCLUSIONS: Cost of care increased with increasing DA state, with patients in remission having the lowest costs. Optimizing DA has the potential for substantial savings in healthcare costs, although may be partially offset by the high cost of targeted RA therapies.

The rate, cost and outcomes of parathyroidectomy in the united states dialysis population from 2016-2018.

BACKGROUND: In end-stage kidney disease, patients may undergo parathyroidectomy if secondary hyperparathyroidism cannot be managed medically. This study was designed to estimate the parathyroidectomy rate in the United States (US) and to quantify changes in costs and other outcomes after parathyroidectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study using US Renal Data System data for 2015-2018. Parathyroidectomy rates were estimated for adult hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients alive at the beginning of 2016, 2017, and 2018 who were followed for a year or until parathyroidectomy, death, or transplant. Incremental differences in economic and clinical outcomes were compared before and after parathyroidectomy in adult hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients who received a parathyroidectomy in 2016 and 2017. RESULTS: The rate of parathyroidectomy per 1,000 person-years decreased from 6.5 (95% CI 6.2-6.8) in 2016 to 5.3 (95% CI 5.0-5.6) in 2018. The incremental increase in 12-month cost after versus before parathyroidectomy was $25,314 (95% CI $23,777-$27,078). By the second month after parathyroidectomy, 58% of patients had a corrected calcium level < 8.5 mg/dL. In the year after parathyroidectomy (versus before), hospitalizations increased by 1.4 per person-year (95% CI 1.3-1.5), hospital days increased by 12.1 per person-year (95% CI 11.2-13.0), dialysis visits decreased by 5.2 per person-year (95% CI 4.4-5.9), and office visits declined by 1.3 per person-year (95% CI 1.0-1.5). The incremental rate per 1,000 person years for hematoma/bleed was 224.4 (95% CI 152.5-303.1), for vocal cord paralysis was 124.6 (95% CI 59.1-232.1), and for seroma was 27.4 (95% CI 0.4-59.0). CONCLUSIONS: Parathyroidectomy was a relatively uncommon event in the hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis populations. The incremental cost of parathyroidectomy was mostly attributable to the cost of the parathyroidectomy hospitalization. Hypocalcemia occurred in over half of patients, and calcium and phosphate levels were reduced. Clinicians, payers, and patients should understand the potential clinical and economic outcomes when considering parathyroidectomy.

Etelcalcetide Versus Cinacalcet in Hemodialysis Patients in the United States: A Facility Calcimimetic Approach to Assess Real-World Effectiveness.

Rationale & Objective: Some US hemodialysis (HD) facilities switched from oral cinacalcet to intravenous etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy to control parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels after the introduction of etelcalcetide in 2017. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of etelcalcetide versus cinacalcet, evidence comparing real-world effectiveness is lacking. Study Design: Prospective cohort. Setting & Participants: Patients receiving HD enrolled in US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study facilities. Exposure: We classified HD facilities on the basis of whether >75% of calcimimetic users were prescribed etelcalcetide ("etelcalcetide-first") or cinacalcet ("cinacalcet-first") from March-August 2019. Outcomes: PTH, calcium, and phosphorus levels among calcimimetic users, all averaged in the 6 months after the exposure assessment period. Analytical Approach: We used adjusted linear regression to compare outcomes using 2 approaches: (1) cross-sectional comparison of etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities; (2) pre-post comparison of HD facilities that switched from cinacalcet-first to etelcalcetide-first using facilities that remained cinacalcet-first as a comparison group. Results: We identified 45 etelcalcetide-first and 67 cinacalcet-first HD facilities; etelcalcetide-first (vs cinacalcet-first) facilities were more likely to be from small or independent dialysis organizations (86% vs 22%) and had higher total calcimimetic use (43% vs 29%) and lower active vitamin D use (66% vs 82%). In the cross-sectional analysis comparing etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities, the adjusted mean difference in PTH levels was -115 pg/mL (95% CI, -196 to -34) and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL was lower (prevalence difference, -11.4%; 95% CI, -19.3% to -3.5%). Among facilities that switched to etelcalcetide-first, the mean PTH level decreased from 671 to 484 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL decreased from 39% to 21%. Among facilities that remained cinacalcet-first, the mean PTH level increased from 632 to 698 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL increased from 37% to 43%. The adjusted difference-in-difference between the switch to etelcalcetide-first and the continuation of cinacalcet-first was -169 pg/mL (-249 to -90 pg/mL) for the mean PTH and -14.4% (-22.0% to -6.8%) for a PTH level of >600 pg/mL. We also observed slightly lower serum calcium levels and minimal differences in serum phosphorus levels between the etelcalcetide-first and the cinacalcet-first facilities. Limitations: Residual confounding. Conclusions: We observed better PTH control in HD facilities that switched from using cinacalcet to etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy. Further research is needed to investigate how the greater real-world effectiveness of intravenous etelcalcetide (vs oral cinacalcet) may affect clinical outcomes.

Calcimimetic use in US hemodialysis facilities in first 2 years after the launch of etelcalcetide: A descriptive analysis of real-world clinical practice and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This study described control of parathyroid hormone (PTH), phosphorus, and corrected calcium in adults initiating calcimimetics in small dialysis organizations after the introduction of etelcalcetide. METHODS: This retrospective study using Visonex Clarity electronic health records between October 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019, identified adults ≥ 18 years of age receiving in-center hemodialysis as either a cinacalcet or etelcalcetide initiator based on their first calcimimetic use in 2018 (index date) with no prior calcimimetic use in the 3 months preindex date. Patients were stratified by PTH at index date and were followed for 15 months. Subcohorts of patients who were persistent on a single calcimimetic for 15 months and of patients who had their calcimimetic changed from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide were also analyzed. FINDINGS: A total of 677 patients initiated cinacalcet and 711 initiated etelcalcetide. Mean PTH (pg/ml), phosphorus, and corrected calcium (mg/dl) at baseline were 864, 5.9, and 9.3 for cinacalcet and 804, 5.9, and 9.4 for etelcalcetide, respectively. During follow-up, the proportion of initiators considered in-target (monthly average PTH < 600) increased from 48% to 62% with cinacalcet and from 56% to 86% with etelcalcetide in the baseline PTH 600 to < 800 subgroup; increased from 30% to 64% with cinacalcet and 31% to 59% with etelcalcetide among those with baseline PTH 800 to < 1000; and increased from 14% to 41% with cinacalcet and 12% to 58% with etelcalcetide among those with baseline PTH ≥1000. A similar pattern was observed for persistent users (n = 646). For patients changed from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide (n = 183), the proportion of patients considered in-target increased from 22% in the month prior to the treatment change to 51% in Month 6 postchange. DISCUSSION: Patients initiating calcimimetics at lower baseline PTH had better biochemical control than patients starting at higher PTH. Patients changed from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide had improvements in PTH control postchange.

Biologic and Targeted Synthetic DMARD Utilization in the United States: Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Rheumatoid Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with inadequate response or intolerance to first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), guidelines recommend switching to an agent of different mechanism of action or to another bDMARD. However, the reasons behind switching between bDMARD/targeted synthetic (ts)DMARD are not well documented in many studies. The objective of this study was to assess the rheumatologists' perceptions and behaviors towards choice of initial b/tsDMARD treatment and reasons for switching between bDMARDs/tsDMARDs, in the context of present treatment patterns. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data collected from the 12th Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Qualified rheumatologists involved in treatment decision-making for ≥ 10 patients a month completed patient record forms (PRFs). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with RA diagnosis and receiving bDMARD/tsDMARD were included. The outcomes assessed were proportion of patients receiving bDMARD/tsDMARD at molecule and class levels; rheumatologist-reported reasons for choice of therapy; proportion of patients who switched bDMARDs/tsDMARDs; and rheumatologist-reported reasons for switching therapies. RESULTS: Eighty-six rheumatologists completed PRFs for 1027 patients. Of these, 621 were receiving bDMARD/tsDMARD at data collection. The majority (73%) of patients received first-line bDMARD/tsDMARD, and at first-line, 68% received a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and 21% received a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi). The response option of strong overall efficacy was the primary reason for selecting first-line and second-line bDMARD/tsDMARD. A total of 163 patients had switched from first-line b/tsDMARD to second-line b/tsDMARD therapy. Of these, 44, 28, and 17% had switched from TNFi to another TNFi, TNFi to non-TNF biologic, and TNFi to JAKi, respectively. Lack of efficacy and worsening disease were the most frequent reasons for switching therapies. CONCLUSIONS: TNFis remain the most prescribed b/tsDMARD for first-line and second-line treatments. Strong overall efficacy was the primary reason for selecting therapy and loss of efficacy was the primary reason for switching therapy.

The value of new drugs for advanced prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The US Food and Drug Administration has recently approved a number of new cancer drugs. The clinical trials that serve as the basis for new cancer drug approvals may not reflect how the drugs will perform in routine practice and do not measure the impact of the drugs on spending. The authors sought to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and value of drugs recently approved for advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data, the authors identified fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who began treatment with a drug approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in 2007-2009, when only 1 drug was approved for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and in 2014-2016, when 5 additional drugs were approved. They calculated life expectancy and lifetime medical costs (ie, Medicare reimbursements) for each group. RESULTS: Between 2007-2009 and 2014-2016, life expectancy increased by 12.6 months. Lifetime medical costs increased by $87,000. The incremental cost per life-year gained was $83,000. CONCLUSION: The release of 5 new drugs coincided with increases in survival rates and spending. This study's estimates indicate that the new drugs collectively were cost-effective.

Clinical and economic burden of intravenous paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) taxane therapy for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has been associated with toxicities and demanding dosing schedules, which can limit treatment effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To assess treatment patterns, toxicities, and costs in women with mBC initiating IV paclitaxel or IV nab-paclitaxel. METHODS: Adult women diagnosed with BC from January 1, 2014, to September 30, 2018, were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and MarketScan Medicare Supplemental databases. Women had a metastatic disease diagnosis and newly initiated treatment with IV paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (first administration date was considered the index date), and continuous enrollment for at least 12 months prior to and at least 3 months following the index date. Treatment discontinuation, dose reductions, toxicities, and health care utilization and costs per patient per month (PPPM) were assessed over the full follow-up and the index line of IV paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel therapy (Index LOT). RESULTS: The sample included 8890 women aged 54.6 (±10.9) years, followed for 18.9 (±13.5) months. Most (82.0%) initiated IV paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel monotherapy; 83.1% had early discontinuation (<18 weeks of treatment) of the Index LOT. Among the 6943 women eligible for the dose-change analysis, 42.4% evidenced an IV paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel dose reduction ≥10% during the Index LOT. The most common toxicities during the Index LOT were gastrointestinal upset (30.5%), myelotoxicity (27.0%), infection (26.2%), general symptoms (25.9%), and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (22.7%). Over follow-up, 39.7% of women had an inpatient admission and 43.0% had an emergency department visit. The mean of all-cause total costs was $11,991 PPPM, while BC-related total costs were $5320 PPPM. CONCLUSIONS: Many mBC patients initiating IV paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel experienced dose reductions, toxicities, and/or early discontinuation of the Index LOT, which may limit treatment effectiveness. More tolerable treatments with reduced dosing complexity could improve mBC treatment and help contain costs.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in metastatic breast cancer patients initiating intravenous paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) taxanes for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) are associated with toxicities, such as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), which can detrimentally impact outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of CIPN on clinical and economic outcomes in women with mBC, initiating IV paclitaxel/ nab-paclitaxel. METHODS: Adult women in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Database with a mBC diagnosis, initiating IV paclitaxel or IV nab-paclitaxel (index date = first administration) from November 1, 2013, to September 30, 2018, who had no prior neuropathy diagnoses, and continuous enrollment 12 months prior to and ≥ 3 months following index were selected. Propensity score-matched CIPN and non-CIPN cohorts were defined, based on postindex CIPN diagnosis. Clinical characteristics and all-cause and breast cancer (BC)-related health care utilization and costs per patient per month (PPPM) were compared between matched CIPN and non-CIPN cohorts during follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 5870 women with mBC initiating IV paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel, 42.7% developed CIPN. The matched cohorts each included 1950 women. Patients with CIPN were more likely to have a dose reduction (46.1% vs 38.2%, P < .001) or develop depression, diabetes, insomnia, liver dysfunction, or arthritis compared with the non-CIPN cohort, P < .05. Patients with CIPN were more likely to have an inpatient admission (39.2% vs 34.9%, P < .01) or emergency department visit (46.7% vs 35.6%, P < .001), as well as all-cause and BC-related costs that were $1102 and $725 PPPM higher, respectively, than women without CIPN (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: CIPN was common in women, following IV paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel treatment and was associated with dose reductions, the development of comorbidities, and elevated health care costs. Therapies for mBC that offer increased tolerability are needed to help improve patient outcomes and control costs.

Cost of home vs clinic administration of paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the costs associated with home administration of oral paclitaxel and encequidar (novel P-glycoprotein pump inhibitor allowing oral paclitaxel bioavailability) compared with clinic/office administration of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and protein-bound paclitaxel in US patients with metastatic breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Economic analysis. METHODS: A cost calculator was constructed from a payer's perspective including all costs related to administration of the chemotherapies, including drug administration, premedications and concomitant medications, oncologist office visits, laboratory testing, and administration-related adverse events. Total administration cost per patient per month (PPPM) and 6-month costs per patient were estimated for oral paclitaxel and encequidar, 175 mg/m2 IV paclitaxel, and protein-bound paclitaxel. Three scenarios for oral paclitaxel and encequidar, a weekly IV paclitaxel scenario (80-100 mg/m2), and univariate sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Home administration of oral paclitaxel and encequidar was associated with a total administration cost of $523 PPPM, 64.4% lower than once-every-3-weeks IV paclitaxel (175 mg/m2; $1469 PPPM) and 63.8% lower than protein-bound paclitaxel (260 mg/m2; $1445 PPPM). Difference in costs was driven largely by higher administration and premedication costs associated with IV therapies. Scenario analyses showed that increased clinical experience with home administration of oral paclitaxel and encequidar was associated with reduction in cost of care associated with its administration over time. For the weekly IV (80-100 mg/m2) paclitaxel scenario, the total administration cost was $2510 PPPM (4.8 times higher than for oral paclitaxel and encequidar). Univariate sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model findings were robust. CONCLUSIONS: Home administration of oral paclitaxel and encequidar was associated with lower administration costs compared with once-every-3-weeks IV paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and protein-bound paclitaxel, resulting in potential cost savings for payers.

DNA damage repair gene mutation testing and genetic counseling in men with/without prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Background: Ongoing clinical trials are investigating PARP inhibitors to target the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway in prostate cancer. DDR mutation screening will guide treatment strategy and assess eligibility for clinical trials. Materials & methods: This systematic review estimated the rate of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling among men with or at risk of prostate cancer. Results: From 6856 records, one study fulfilled the inclusion criteria and described men undiagnosed with prostate cancer with a family history of BRCA1/2 mutation who received DDR mutation testing. Conclusion: With only one study included in this first systematic review of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling in men with or at risk of prostate cancer, more research is warranted.

Treatment patterns of lipid-lowering therapies and possible statin intolerance among statin users with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes mellitus (DM) in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: To assess treatment patterns of statin and/or ezetimibe and possible statin intolerance among patients initiating statin or statin plus ezetimibe and with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes mellitus (DM) in Taiwan. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using Taiwan's 2005 to 2013 National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) was conducted. Patients with history of clinical ASCVD or DM (without previous clinical ASCVD) and initiating statin or statin plus ezetimibe therapy during 2006 to 2012 were identified. The treatment initiation date was defined as index date. Treatment patterns (including discontinuation, reinitiation, subtraction, switching, and augmentation), adherence (medication possession ratio [MPR]), persistence (gap no greater than 60 d) of statin and/or ezetimibe, and possible statin intolerance during 12-month follow-up from the index date were examined. RESULTS: Among patients initiating statin or statin plus ezetimibe, 11 092 patients with history of clinical ASCVD and 31 100 patients with DM but without clinical ASCVD were analysed. The discontinuation, reinitiation, and switching rates among patients with clinical ASCVD were 54.0%, 11.3%, and 25.7% during 12-month follow-up period, respectively. Among patients with DM, the rates were 57.5%, 14.2%, and 28.5%. The MPRs of statin among clinical ASCVD and DM cohorts were 0.62 and 0.60, respectively. As for ezetimibe, the MPRs were 0.56 and 0.59. Persistence to statin treatment was 46.1% among ASCVD patients and 42.6% among DM patients. Among the ASCVD and DM cohorts, possible statin intolerance was observed among 19.9% and 21.4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Large number of patients with either ASCVD or DM discontinued lipid-lowering therapies with suboptimal adherence and persistence among Taiwanese population. There is a large unmet medical need to provide safe and more effective therapies, which can be used in combination with statins or alone, to reduce the risk of CV events and improve outcomes in high-risk patients.

Prevalence and incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Korea: a nationwide population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of death in Korea. According to a report of published by Statistics Korea in 2014, cerebrovascular disease and cardiovascular disease were the major/leading causes of mortality. However, it is more difficult to identify prevalence and incidence of a disease than the mortality owing to the lack of national-level statistics. Few studies have examined the prevalence and incidence of ASCVD and its risk factors since 2012. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of ASCVD and its risk factors in Korea using national claims data. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the national claims data of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. Patients aged ≥18 years with ASCVD (defined as myocardial infarction, angina, coronary revascularization, peripheral artery disease, ischemic stroke, and transient ischemic attack) were identified between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015. Patients at high risk for ASCVD (defined as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia without ASCVD during the baseline period) were identified between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2015. We estimated the prevalence, cumulative incidence, and incidence density. These were further stratified by age and sex. The respective denominators for prevalence and incidence were the census population and the at-risk population (defined as the population without respective disease 1 year prior to the respective disease identification). RESULTS: Among the included Korean adult patients, the overall prevalence of clinical ASCVD per 1000 individuals was 98.25 in 2014 and 101.11 in 2015. The respective cumulative incidence and incidence density rates of ASCVD per 1000 individuals were 65.30 and 68.03 in 2014, and 67.05 and 69.94 in 2015, respectively. Peripheral artery disease seemed to drive the increase in the total prevalence and incidence of ASCVD. The prevalence and incidence of ASCVD continued to increase with age until 79 years. CONCLUSIONS: This national population-based study confirmed the high prevalence and incidence of ASCVD and its risk factors in the adult population of South Korea. We suggest that more intensive treatment and prevention are needed to prevent ASCVD.

Relation of Cardiovascular Events and Deaths to Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level Among Statin-Treated Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

This study describes subsequent cardiovascular events and deaths by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) receiving moderate- to high-intensity statins. Olmsted County, Minnesota residents with index ASCVD (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack) occurring between 2005 and 2012 were identified, and those with a prescription for a moderate- or high-intensity statin and an LDL-C measurement in the 90 days after index were included. Cox regression models were used to examine associations between LDL-C, modeled as a time-dependent variable, and a composite outcome of subsequent cardiovascular events or all-cause death. Among 1,854 patients with ASCVD (mean [SD] age 66.0 [13.3] years, 63.6% male), a total of 1,241 events were observed from index ASCVD through follow-up (median of 5.9 years). The rate (95% confidence interval) per 100 person-years was 11.26 (10.64 to 11.91). Starting follow-up 90 days after index ASCVD event, the rates per 100 person-years were 10.51 (9.57 to 11.52), 9.57 (8.66 to 10.55), and 11.40 (9.96 to 12.98) for LDL-C <70, 70-<100 and ≥100 mg/dl, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, and previous diagnoses of ASCVD, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, the hazard ratio for cardiovascular event and/or death was significantly higher for patients with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dl than those with LDL-C <70 mg/dl (1.31 [1.08 to 1.59]). In conclusion, in patients with ASCVD, subsequent cardiovascular events occur at a high rate and the rates are highest in patients with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dl suggesting unmet treatment needs even in patients receiving moderate- to high-intensity statins.

Cardiovascular event rates in a high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk population: estimates from Swedish population-based register data.

AIMS: This study aimed to estimate the rate of cardiovascular (CV) events in the real world in patients at high risk of recurrent CV events similar to the FOURIER trial population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using Swedish national registers from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2015. Patients in the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevalent cohort met the FOURIER-like inclusion criteria, including treatment with high/moderate-intensity statins, on 1 July 2006. Additionally, two cohorts defined by diagnosis of incident ischaemic stroke (IS) and incident myocardial infarction (MI), meeting the FOURIER-like inclusion criteria were followed from date of diagnosis. Event rates were calculated for the hard major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) composite: MI, IS, and CV death; and the ASCVD composite: MI, IS, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, and CV death. Approximately half of patients experienced a CV event (ASCVD composite) during follow-up. The MACE composite rates/100 person-years were 6.3, 11.9, and 12.3 in the ASCVD prevalent (n = 54 992), MI incident (n = 45 895), and IS incident (n = 36 134) cohorts, respectively. The ASCVD composite rates/100 person-years were 7.0, 21.7, and 12.9 in the ASCVD prevalent, MI incident, and IS incident cohorts, respectively. The multiple-event MACE composite rates/100 person-years were 8.5 (ASCVD prevalent cohort), 15.4 (MI incident cohort), and 14.4 (IS incident cohort). CONCLUSION: In this real-world setting, CV event rates were high in all studied cohorts. In particular, the MACE composite rates were two to three times higher than in the FOURIER clinical trial, indicating a substantial disease burden despite treatment with moderate or high-intensity statins.

Impact of voxelotor (GBT440) on unconjugated bilirubin and jaundice in sickle cell disease.

For many patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), jaundice is a significant clinical disease manifestation that impacts on patient well-being. We report a case of a patient with SCD and chronic jaundice treated with voxelotor (GBT440), a novel small molecule hemoglobin oxygen affinity modulator and potential disease-modifying therapy for SCD. The case patient is a 27-year-old Black male with a long history of SCD with clinical jaundice and scleral icterus. After starting voxelotor, the patient reported that his jaundice cleared within one week, and that he felt much better with more energy, and was relieved after his eyes cleared. Voxelotor reduced bilirubin and unconjugated bilirubin (by up to 76%), and hemoglobin improved from 9.9 g/dL at baseline to 11.1 g/dL at 90 days. Jaundice impacts many adults with SCD, significantly impacting self-image. Voxelotor treatment reduced bilirubin levels and improved jaundice, resulting in an improved sense of well-being in our case patient.

Utilization Patterns of Lipid-lowering Therapies in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease or Diabetes: A Population-based Study in South Korea.

PURPOSE: We aimed to study the utilization patterns of lipid-lowering treatment (LLT), including treatment modification, adherence, and possible statin intolerance, in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or diabetes using national claims data in South Korea. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service claims database. Patients aged ≥18 years with >1 outpatient pharmacy claim for a statin and/or ezetimibe dated January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2014, were identified and categorized into the following cohorts: patients with ASCVD, and patients with diabetes mellitus without ASCVD. LLT modification, adherence to index LLT, and possible statin intolerance were explored during the 12 months after the date of first prescription for a statin and/or ezetimibe. FINDINGS: Among 1,399,872 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 807,547 (57.7%) were patients with ASCVD and 592,325 (42.3%) were patients with diabetes without ASCVD. About half of the patients had no modification in their index treatment (46.2% in the ASCVD cohort and 48.9% in the diabetes cohort), and the most common modification was permanent discontinuation (19.6% in the ASCVD cohort and 21.4% in the diabetes cohort). The mean medication possession ratios were 0.77 in the ASCVD cohort and 0.73 in the diabetes cohort and showed a decreasing trend during the 12-month follow-up period. Among patients who initiated a statin and/or ezetimibe, possible statin intolerance was observed in 53,921 patients (6.7%) in the ASCVD cohort and 42,172 patients (7.1%) in the diabetes cohort. IMPLICATIONS: In South Korea, a high rate of permanent discontinuation of statin therapy in patients with ASCVD or diabetes places these patients at high risk for cardiovascular events in the future. A decreasing trend of adherence to LLT implies that more intensive education and management are required to improve therapeutic effect and reduce the risk for ASCVD. The high rate of possible statin intolerance highlights an unmet need in the prevention and management of ASCVD in South Korea.

Real-world outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease initiating long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy.

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials have shown long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy to be efficacious in improving lung function and dyspnea, while reducing exacerbations; however, less is known regarding the effectiveness in routine clinical practice. This study examined treatment patterns, rescue medication use, healthcare resource utilization and costs, and exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who initiated long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy in real-world settings. METHODS: This retrospective study used US claims data from adult patients with COPD initiating long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy between 1 January 2008 and 31 January 2015. Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment 12 months prior to (baseline period) and 12 months following therapy initiation (follow-up period). Outcomes, including treatment patterns, rescue medication use, exacerbations, and healthcare utilization and costs, were measured until the earliest of treatment augmentation or discontinuation, death, health plan disenrollment, or the end of the study period. Results were analyzed descriptively for all measures. Baseline and follow-up measures of all-cause and COPD-related healthcare costs and exacerbations [per patient per month (PPPM)] were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS: Among 27,394 patients with a mean follow up of 6.3 months, 18.2% augmented, 74.2% discontinued, and 7.6% continued long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy. Rescue medication use was prevalent during the follow-up period, with an average of 1.0 short-acting ß agonist (SABA) fills/month and 0.8 short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA) fills/month, among patients with at least one fill for the medication of interest. PPPM mean number of exacerbations was more than triple (0.17 versus 0.05, p < 0.001) and PPPM exacerbation-related costs were more than double over the follow-up period compared with baseline ($1070 versus $485). COPD-related costs accounted for 50% of all-cause costs during the follow-up period and were significantly higher compared with baseline ($1206 versus $592, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating long-acting mono bronchodilator therapy had high rates of medication discontinuation or augmentation. Patients used more rescue medications and experienced significantly more COPD exacerbations with higher healthcare costs compared with baseline. Further research is warranted to determine whether more aggressive initial therapy would result in symptom improvement.

Treatment patterns and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment among patients receiving high- or moderate-intensity statins.

BACKGROUND: European clinical guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal of < 70 mg/dL. Statin use varies and past studies suggest low rates of real-world goal attainment. This study describes LDL-C goal attainment among atherosclerotic CV disease (ASCVD) patients with various utilization patterns of moderate- or high-intensity statins in routine care. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical records data from the QuintilesIMS® Disease Analyzer (> 2 million individuals annually) to identify ASCVD (coronary atherosclerosis, stable/unstable angina, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, aneurysm, peripheral artery disease) patients on moderate-/high-intensity statin in Germany. Proportion of patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL was determined using the lowest LDL-C value for each patient (index) in 2012, 2013, and 2014, while on statin. Treatment patterns were assessed for patients with at least 1 year of post-index follow-up. Results were stratified by year and treatment pattern [no change, switch, dose up-/down-titration, discontinuation (≥ 90 day gap)]. RESULTS: In > 14,000 patients assessed in each year (mean age 71 years, 35% female, 8-12% taking high-intensity statins), approximately 80% had LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. Treatment patterns were assessed for most (88-93%) patients. Approximately 79-81% of patients made no change to statin regimens, 1% switched statins, 14-16% discontinued; 1% of moderate-intensity patients up-titrated, and 3% of all patients down-titrated. LDL-C goal attainment in these treatment pattern groups was 20, 16-24, 17, 11-14, and 17-19%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of ASCVD patients had LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL while on moderate-/high-intensity statins. Despite low LDL-C goal attainment, few patients changed their treatment regimens.

Treatment Patterns, Statin Intolerance, and Subsequent Cardiovascular Events Among Japanese Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk Initiating Statin Therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study examined treatment patterns, possible statin intolerance, and incidence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) in 2 cohorts of patients with high cardiovascular risk (i.e., patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD] and patients with diabetes mellitus).Methods and Results:A retrospective cohort study examined adults initiating either a statin or ezetimibe from 1 January 2006 to 31 May 2014 in the Japan Medical Data Center database. The first observed statin or ezetimibe prescription defined the index date. Patients had ≥12 months of pre- and post-index date plan enrollment. Two high-risk cohorts, the ASCVD cohort and diabetes cohort, were created based on diagnoses observed during the 12 months' pre-index date. Treatment patterns, possible statin intolerance, and incidence of CVEs were reported. In the ASCVD cohort (n=5,302), 32.9% discontinued therapy, 7.7% switched to a non-index statin or non-statin lipid-lowering therapy, and 11.2% augmented index therapy in the 12 months' post-index date; only 0.3% were using high-intensity statins and 10% had possible statin intolerance. Also, 8.1% had any new CVE during the follow-up period. Treatment patterns and incidence of CVEs among the diabetes cohort were similar to those of the ASCVD cohort. CONCLUSIONS: High cardiovascular risk Japanese patients had frequent treatment modifications, although use of high-intensity statin doses was rare. These patterns may indicate that alternative therapies for lipid lowering are needed.

Characterizing patients with asthma who received Global Initiative for Asthma steps 4-5 therapy and managed in a specialty care setting.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma is recognized in the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guidelines as a major unmet need in the management of asthma. OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to describe the clinical burden of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) steps 4-5 asthma for patients treated by specialists in the U.S. community setting. METHODS: Patients, ages ≥12 years, with asthma who received GINA step 4 or 5 treatment and were treated at a large U.S. allergy practice network between January 1, 2010, and April 30, 2016, were retrospectively identified by using electronic health records. Clinical outcomes included lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second of expiration [FEV1] and FEV1% predicted), symptom control (Asthma Control Test [ACT]), the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) value (FeNO ≥25 ppb indicates airway inflammation), and asthma medication use. The change in outcomes from baseline to 12 and 24 months after the index date was calculated. RESULTS: Of 120,116 patients with asthma, 12,922 (10.8%) had severe asthma, 68% (n = 8751) while on step 4 therapy. The mean baseline prebronchodilation FEV1% predicted was 79.7%, and the mean baseline ACT score was 17.0. With uncontrolled asthma defined as an ACT score of ≤19 and/or an FEV1 value of <80% predicted and/or oral corticosteroid use of ≥2 bursts, 52.5% and 57.7% of patients on step 4 and step 5 therapy, respectively, had uncontrolled asthma at baseline. Of a subset of patients, 40.9% had an eosinophil count of ≥300 cells/mm3 and 44% had an FeNO concentration of ≥25 ppb. Small increases in the FEV1 value were observed from baseline to 12 months (n = 4022) and 24 months (n = 2326) postindex (0.07 and 0.04 L, respectively). CONCLUSION: A considerable proportion of patients had uncontrolled asthma while on current GINA steps 4-5 treatment, which indicated that additional therapies may be required to reduce the clinical burden of severe asthma.