Relationships, Current Issues, Safety and Efficacy of Oral Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

A relationship between malignancy and impaired hemostasis has been proven, and balancing clotting and bleeding risks can be challenging. Half of cancer patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) do not receive any oral anticoagulation (OAC). Using PubMed on the relationship between cancer and AF and their association with hemostasis, targeting studies comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct OAC (DOAC) strategies in AF cancer patients, three RCTs (>3000 patients) and eight observational studies (>250,000 patients) comparing different OACs were retrieved. The VKA prescribed was always warfarin. Dabigatran was the only DOAC not analyzed in the RCTs but the most used in non-randomized studies, whereas edoxaban-treated patients were the majority in the RCTs. Overall, the DOAC patients showed similar or lower rates of efficacy (thromboembolic) and safety (bleeding) outcomes compared to the VKA patients. DOACs are subject to fewer interactions with antineoplastic agents. DOACs may be preferable to VKAs as a thromboembolic prophylaxis in cancer patients with non-valvular AF.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation Cancer Patients.

(1) Introduction: Cancer and atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasingly coexisting medical challenges. These two conditions share an increased thrombotic and bleeding risk. Although optimal regimens of the most suitable anti-thrombotic therapy are now affirmed in the general population, cancer patients are still particularly understudied on the matter; (2) Aims And Methodology: This metanalysis (11 studies (incl. 266,865 patients)) aims at evaluating the ischemic-hemorrhagic risk profile of oncologic patients with AF treated with oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists vs. direct oral anticoagulants); (3) Results: In the oncological population, DOACs confer a benefit in terms of the reduction in ischemic, hemorrhagic and venous thromboembolic events. However, ischemic prevention has a non-insignificant bleeding risk, lower than Warfarin but significant and higher than the non-oncological patients; (4) Conclusions: Anticoagulation with DOACs provides a higher safety profile with respect to VKAs in terms of stroke reduction and a relative bleeding reduction risk. Further studies are needed to better assess the optimal anticoagulation strategy in cancer patients with AF.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding ACURATE neo2: Postprocedural Hemodynamic and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The first-generation ACURATE neo transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Boston Scientific) was associated with a non-negligible occurrence of moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation (AR) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement. To overcome this issue, the ACURATE neo2 iteration, which incorporates a taller outer skirt aimed at reducing the occurrence of paravalvular AR, has recently been developed. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the ACURATE neo2 (Boston Scientific) THV in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. METHODS: ITAL-neo was an observational, retrospective, multicenter registry enrolling consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis, treated with first- and second-generation ACURATE neo THVs, via transfemoral and trans-subclavian access, in 13 Italian centers. One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to account for baseline characteristics unbalance. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of moderate or greater paravalvular AR on predischarge echocardiographic assessment. Secondary endpoints included postprocedural technical success and 90-day device success and safety. RESULTS: Among 900 patients included in the registry, 220 received the ACURATE neo2 THV, whereas 680 were treated with the first-generation device. A total of 410 patients were compared after 1:1 propensity score matching. The ACURATE neo2 THV was associated with a 3-fold lower frequency of postprocedural moderate or greater paravalvular AR (11.2% vs 3.5%; P < 0.001). No other hemodynamic differences were observed. Postprocedural technical success was similar between the 2 cohorts. Fewer adverse events were observed in patients treated with the ACURATE neo2 at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the ACURATE neo2 was associated with a significant lower frequency of moderate or greater paravalvular AR compared with the earlier generation ACURATE neo device, with encouraging short-term safety and efficacy.

[Staged rotational atherectomy in a patient with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a case report and review of the literature]. / Aterectomia rotazionale e strategia "Rota-staged PCI" in un paziente con infarto miocardico acuto e sopraslivellamento del tratto ST: caso clinico e revisione della letteratura.

Rotational atherectomy represents an option to improve the treatment of calcified/undilatable coronary stenoses, but its use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial. We report the case of a patient with an occlusive and calcified coronary stenosis and its management not previously described. A 67-year-old man with STEMI was referred to our cath-lab. Coronary angiography showed a complex calcified and thrombotic occlusion of the right coronary artery. Vessel patency was obtained with balloon dilation, achieving clinical stability. The patient started dual antiplatelet therapy and was scheduled for a staged procedure using rotational atherectomy ("Rota-staged PCI"), performed 6 days later reaching optimal angiographic and clinical results. Our purpose was to manage this STEMI patient with an occluded and heavily calcified coronary artery in two times: a primary coronary angioplasty to quickly reopen the artery and an early staged PCI using rotational atherectomy to optimize the intervention (coronary dilation and stent deployment) minimizing the risk of stent underexpansion or acute complications.

[Pharmacological strategy pre- and post-percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome on oral anticoagulation therapy]. / Strategie farmacologiche pre- e post-angioplastica coronarica nel contesto delle sindromi coronariche acute nei pazienti in terapia anticoagulante orale.

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who undergo an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary stent implantation, the association of dual antiplatelet therapy with an oral anticoagulant (also known as triple antithrombotic therapy, TAT) increases the risk for major and fatal bleeding. Recently, several trials have evaluated alternative therapeutic regimens to TAT, such as dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) comprising a direct oral anticoagulant and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. In the context of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, these regimens have generally been associated with a reduction in bleeding that was not accompanied by a substantial increase in ischemic events. However, the net benefit of DAT is more controversial in the case of patients at higher thrombotic risk, such as patients with ACS. This review, based on the available literature, describes the best peri-procedural and post-procedural antithrombotic strategies for patients with AF and ACS.

Mechanisms of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with atrial fibrillation, prior stenting and long-standing chronic coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic coronary syndromes beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a matter of debate. For these patients, guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone, but the risk of thrombotic complications remains a concern. The aim of this study was to characterize the incidence, presentation and use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with AF, prior stenting > 12 months and new ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: Consecutive patients were selected from an institutional registry over a 3-year period if they matched the following criteria: 1) STEMI undergoing primary PCI; 2) AF; 3) chronic coronary syndrome with prior stenting > 12 months. RESULTS: Among 852 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, the prevalence of AF was 4.1%, and 6 (0.9%) patients met all the inclusion criteria. Substantial heterogeneity in antithrombotic treatment for these patients was noted (e.g., OAC alone, OAC plus a single antiplatelet agent, no antithrombotic therapy). In 50% of patients, the STEMI episode was linked to a previously stented lesion or documented plaque. CONCLUSIONS: This case review illustrates the wide heterogeneity in antithrombotic pharmacotherapy among AF patients presenting with STEMI > 12 months after PCI. The underlying reason for STEMI is only partly related to disease progression or stent-related events. This finding suggests that multiple mechanisms of recurrence may be advocated, and are not only limited to antithrombotic therapy but may be explained by the natural history of coronary artery disease in remote vessels.