MR elastography identifies regions of extracellular matrix reorganization associated with shorter survival in glioblastoma patients.

Background: Biomechanical tissue properties of glioblastoma tumors are heterogeneous, but the molecular mechanisms involved and the biological implications are poorly understood. Here, we combine magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) measurement of tissue stiffness with RNA sequencing of tissue biopsies to explore the molecular characteristics of the stiffness signal. Methods: MRE was performed preoperatively in 13 patients with glioblastoma. Navigated biopsies were harvested during surgery and classified as "stiff" or "soft" according to MRE stiffness measurements (|G*|norm). Twenty-two biopsies from eight patients were analyzed by RNA sequencing. Results: The mean whole-tumor stiffness was lower than normal-appearing white matter. The surgeon's stiffness evaluation did not correlate with the MRE measurements, which suggests that these measures assess different physiological properties. Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed genes between "stiff" and "soft" biopsies showed that genes involved in extracellular matrix reorganization and cellular adhesion were overexpressed in "stiff" biopsies. Supervised dimensionality reduction identified a gene expression signal separating "stiff" and "soft" biopsies. Using the NIH Genomic Data Portal, 265 glioblastoma patients were divided into those with (n = 63) and without (n = 202) this gene expression signal. The median survival time of patients with tumors expressing the gene signal associated with "stiff" biopsies was 100 days shorter than that of patients not expressing it (360 versus 460 days, hazard ratio: 1.45, P < .05). Conclusion: MRE imaging of glioblastoma can provide noninvasive information on intratumoral heterogeneity. Regions of increased stiffness were associated with extracellular matrix reorganization. An expression signal associated with "stiff" biopsies correlated with shorter survival of glioblastoma patients.

Decreased tissue stiffness in glioblastoma by MR elastography is associated with increased cerebral blood flow.

PURPOSE: Understanding how mechanical properties relate to functional changes in glioblastomas may help explain different treatment response between patients. The aim of this study was to map differences in biomechanical and functional properties between tumor and healthy tissue, to assess any relationship between them and to study their spatial distribution. METHODS: Ten patients with glioblastoma and 17 healthy subjects were scanned using MR Elastography, perfusion and diffusion MRI. Stiffness and viscosity measurements G' and G'', cerebral blood flow (CBF), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured in patients' contrast-enhancing tumor, necrosis, edema, and gray and white matter, and in gray and white matter for healthy subjects. A regression analysis was used to predict CBF as a function of ADC, FA, G' and G''. RESULTS: Median G' and G'' in contrast-enhancing tumor were 13% and 37% lower than in normal-appearing white matter (P < 0.01), and 8% and 6% lower in necrosis than in contrast-enhancing tumor, respectively (P < 0.05). Tumors showed both inter-patient and intra-patient heterogeneity. Measurements approached values in normal-appearing tissue when moving outward from the tumor core, but abnormal tissue properties were still present in regions of normal-appearing tissue. Using both a linear and a random-forest model, prediction of CBF was improved by adding MRE measurements to the model (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of MRE measurements in statistical models helped predict perfusion, with stiffer tissue associated with lower perfusion values.

Robustness of MR Elastography in the Healthy Brain: Repeatability, Reliability, and Effect of Different Reconstruction Methods.

BACKGROUND: Changes in brain stiffness can be an important biomarker for neurological disease. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) quantifies tissue stiffness, but the results vary between acquisition and reconstruction methods. PURPOSE: To measure MRE repeatability and estimate the effect of different reconstruction methods and varying data quality on estimated brain stiffness. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS: Fifteen healthy subjects. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T MRI, gradient-echo elastography sequence with a 50 Hz vibration frequency. ASSESSMENT: Imaging was performed twice in each subject. Images were reconstructed using a curl-based and a finite-element-model (FEM)-based method. Stiffness was measured in the whole brain, in white matter, and in four cortical and four deep gray matter regions. Repeatability coefficients (RC), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated. MRE data quality was quantified by the ratio between shear waves and compressional waves. STATISTICAL TESTS: Median values with range are presented. Reconstruction methods were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Spearman's rank correlation was calculated between MRE data quality and stiffness. Holm-Bonferroni corrections were employed to adjust for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: In the whole brain, CV was 4.3% and 3.8% for the curl and the FEM reconstruction, respectively, with 4.0-12.8% for subregions. Whole-brain ICC was 0.60-0.74, ranging from 0.20 to 0.89 in different regions. RC for the whole brain was 0.14 kPa and 0.17 kPa for the curl and FEM methods, respectively. FEM reconstruction resulted in 39% higher stiffness than the curl reconstruction (P < 0.05). MRE data quality, defined as shear-compression wave ratio, was higher in peripheral regions than in central regions of the brain (P < 0.05). No significant correlations were observed between MRE data quality and stiffness estimates. DATA CONCLUSION: MRE of the human brain is a robust technique in terms of repeatability. Caution is warranted when comparing stiffness values obtained with different techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.

Off-label intrathecal use of gadobutrol: safety study and comparison of administration protocols.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents have been used off-label for diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and lately also for assessment of the glymphatic system and meningeal lymphatic drainage. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the short- and long-term safety profile of intrathecal MRI contrast agents. METHODS: In this prospective study, we compared the safety profile of different administration protocols of intrathecal gadobutrol (GadovistTM; 1.0 mmol/ml). Gadobutrol was administered intrathecal in a dose of 0.5 mmol, with or without iodixanol (VisipaqueTM 270 mg I/ml; 3 ml). In addition, a subgroup was given intrathecal gadobutrol in a dose of 0.25 mmol. Adverse events were assessed at 1 to 3 days, 4 weeks, and after 12 months. RESULTS: Among the 149 patients, no serious adverse events were seen in patients without history of prior adverse events. The combination of gadobutrol with iodixanol did not increase the occurrence of non-serious adverse events after days 1-3. Intrathecal gadobutrol in a dose of 0.25 mmol caused less severity of nausea, as compared with the dose of 0.5 mmol. The clinical diagnosis was the major determinant for occurrence of non-serious adverse events after intrathecal gadobutrol. CONCLUSION: This prospective study showed that intrathecal administration of gadobutrol in a dose of 0.5 mmol is safe. Non-serious adverse events were to a lesser degree affected by the administration protocols, though preliminary data are given that side effects of intrathecal gadobutrol are dose-dependent.