Low-Frequency Ventilation May Facilitate Weaning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Although extracorporeal membrane ventilation offers the possibility for low-frequency ventilation, protocols commonly used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) vary largely. Whether strict adherence to low-frequency ventilation offers benefit on important outcome measures is poorly understood. Background/Objectives: This pilot clinical study investigated the efficacy of low-frequency ventilation on ventilator-free days (VFDs) in patients suffering from ARDS who were treated with ECMO therapy. Methods: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, 44 (70% male) successive ARDS patients treated with ECMO (aged 56 ± 12 years, SAPS III 64 (SD ± 14)) were randomly assigned 1:1 to the control group (conventional ventilation) or the treatment group (low-frequency ventilation during first 72 h on ECMO: respiratory rate 4-5/min; PEEP 14-16 cm H2O; plateau pressure 23-25 cm H2O, tidal volume: <4 mL/kg). The primary endpoint was VFDs at day 28 after starting ECMO treatment. The major secondary endpoint was ICU mortality, 28-day mortality and 90-day mortality. Results: Twenty-three (52%) patients were successfully weaned from ECMO and were discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). Twelve patients in the treatment group and five patients in the control group showed more than one VFD at day 28 of ECMO treatment. VFDs were 3.0 (SD ± 5.5) days in the control group and 5.4 (SD ± 6) days in the treatment group (p = 0.117). Until day 28 of ECMO initiation, patients in the treatment group could be successfully weaned off of the ventilator more often (OR of 0.164 of 0 VFDs at day 28 after ECMO start; 95% CI 0.036-0.758; p = 0.021). ICU mortality did not differ significantly (36% in treatment group and 59% in control group; p = 0.227). Conclusions: Low-frequency ventilation is comparable to conventional protective ventilation in patients with ARDS who have been treated with ECMO. However, low-frequency ventilation may support weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation in patients suffering from ARDS and treated with ECMO therapy.

Desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia and postoperative recovery in older adults undergoing minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgery - A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded, clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The effect of volatile anesthetics on postoperative recovery in older adults is still not entirely clear. Thus, we evaluated the effect of desflurane versus sevoflurane anesthesia on speed of postoperative recovery in older adults eligible for same-day discharge. We further evaluated the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), bispectral index (BIS) values, and S100B concentrations. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: 190 patients ≥65 years of age and scheduled for minor- to moderate-risk noncardiac surgeries. INTERVENTIONS: Goal-directed administration of desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia with an intraoperative goal of BIS 50 ± 5. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the time to anesthesia recovery, which was defined as the time between arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and reaching criteria for discharge from PACU, based on modified Aldrete score ≥ 12 points. Modified Aldrete scores were assessed at PACU arrival and thereafter in five-minute intervals. PONV was evaluated during PACU stay and the first three postoperative days, BIS values were recorded during PACU stay, and S100B values were measured before and after surgery, and on the second postoperative day. MAIN RESULTS: 95 patients were randomized to receive desflurane, and 95 patients to receive sevoflurane. We did not observe a significant difference in median duration of postoperative recovery between the groups (desflurane: 0 min [0;0]; sevoflurane: 0 min [0;0]; p = 0.245). 77 patients (81.1%) in the desflurane group and 84 patients (88.4%) in the sevoflurane group already had Aldrete scores ≥12 points upon arrival at PACU (p = 0.277). There was also no significant difference in the incidences of PONV (p = 0.606), postoperative BIS values (p = 0.197), and postoperative maximum S100B concentrations (p = 0.821) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite previous reports, we did not observe significant faster recovery times after desflurane anesthesia. Both volatile anesthetics may be appropriate for same-day discharge in older adults.

Hemodynamic effects of intraoperative 30% versus 80% oxygen concentrations: an exploratory analysis.

Background: Supplemental oxygen leads to an increase in peripheral vascular resistance which finally increases systemic blood pressure in healthy subjects and patients with coronary artery disease, heart failure, undergoing heart surgery, and with sepsis. However, it is unknown whether this effect can also be observed in anesthetized patients having surgery. Thus, we evaluated in this exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial the effect of 80% versus 30% oxygen on intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate. Methods: We present data from a previous study including 258 patients, who were randomized to a perioperative inspiratory FiO2 of 0.8 (128 patients) versus 0.3 (130 patients) for major abdominal surgery. Continuous arterial blood pressure values were recorded every three seconds and were exported from the electronic anesthesia record system. We calculated time-weighted average (TWA) and Average Real Variability (ARV) of mean arterial blood pressure and of heart rate. Results: There was no significant difference in TWA of mean arterial pressure between the 80% (80 mmHg [76, 85]) and 30% (81 mmHg [77, 86]) oxygen group (effect estimate -0.16 mmHg, CI -1.83 to 1.51; p = 0.85). There was also no significant difference in TWA of heart rate between the 80 and 30% oxygen group (median TWA of heart rate in the 80% oxygen group: 65 beats.min-1 [58, 72], and in the 30% oxygen group: 64 beats.min-1 [58; 70]; effect estimate: 0.12 beats.min-1, CI -2.55 to 2.8, p = 0.94). Also for ARV values, no significant differences between groups could be detected. Conclusion: In contrast to previous results, we did not observe a significant increase in blood pressure or a significant decrease in heart rate in patients, who received 80% oxygen as compared to patients, who received 30% oxygen during surgery and for the first two postoperative hours. Thus, hemodynamic effects of supplemental oxygen might play a negligible role in anesthetized patients. Clinical Trail Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03366857?term=vienna&cond=oxygen&draw=2&rank=1.

Effect of Supplemental Oxygen on von Willebrand Factor Activity and Ristocetin Cofactor Activity in Patients at Risk for Cardiovascular Complications Undergoing Moderate-to High-Risk Major Noncardiac Surgery-A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Increased von Willebrand Factor (vWF) activity mediates platelet adhesion and might be a contributor to the development of thrombotic complications after surgery. Although in vitro studies have shown that hyperoxia induces endovascular damage, the effect of perioperative supplemental oxygen as a possible trigger for increased vWF activity has not been investigated yet. We tested our primary hypothesis that the perioperative administration of 80% oxygen concentration increases postoperative vWF activity as compared to 30% oxygen concentration in patients at risk of cardiovascular complications undergoing major noncardiac surgery. A total of 260 patients were randomly assigned to receive 80% versus 30% oxygen throughout surgery and for two hours postoperatively. We assessed vWF activity and Ristocetin cofactor activity in all patients shortly before the induction of anesthesia, within two hours after surgery and on the first and third postoperative day. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. We found no significant difference in vWF activity in the overall perioperative time course between both randomization groups. We observed significantly increased vWF activity in the overall study population throughout the postoperative time course. Perioperative supplemental oxygen showed no significant effect on postoperative vWF and Ristocetin cofactor activity in cardiac risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. In conclusion, we found no significant influence of supplemental oxygen in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery on postoperative vWF activity and Ristocetin cofactor activity.

Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Postoperative Copeptin Concentrations in Cardiac-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery-A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Noncardiac surgery is associated with hemodynamic perturbations, fluid shifts and hypoxic events, causing stress responses. Copeptin is used to assess endogenous stress and predict myocardial injury. Myocardial injury is common after noncardiac surgery, and is often caused by myocardial oxygen demand-and-supply mismatch. In this secondary analysis, we included 173 patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 80% or 30% oxygen throughout surgery and the first two postoperative hours. We evaluated the effect of supplemental oxygen on postoperative Copeptin concentrations. Copeptin concentrations were measured preoperatively, within two hours after surgery, on the first and third postoperative days. In total, 85 patients received 0.8 FiO2, and 88 patients received 0.3 FiO2. There was no significant difference in postoperative Copeptin concentrations between both study groups (p = 0.446). Copeptin increased significantly within two hours after surgery, compared with baseline in the overall study population (estimated effect: −241.7 pmol·L−1; 95% CI −264.4, −219.1; p < 0.001). Supplemental oxygen did not significantly attenuate postoperative Copeptin release. Copeptin concentrations showed a more immediate postoperative increase compared with previously established biomarkers. Nevertheless, Copeptin concentrations did not surpass Troponin T in early determination of patients at risk for developing myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery.

Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Plasma Catecholamine Concentrations after Major Abdominal Surgery-Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Perioperative stress is associated with increased sympathetic activity that leads to increases in heart rate and blood pressure, which are associated with the development of perioperative myocardial ischemia. In healthy volunteers, it was shown that the administration of supplemental oxygen attenuated sympathetic nerve activity and subsequently led to lower plasma catecholamine concentrations. We therefore tested the hypothesis that perioperative supplemental oxygen attenuates sympathetic nerve in patients at risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing major abdominal surgery. We randomly assigned 81 patients to receive either 80% or 30% inspired oxygen concentration throughout surgery and the first two postoperative hours. We assessed noradrenaline, adrenaline, and dopamine plasma concentrations before the induction of anesthesia, two hours after surgery and on the third postoperative day. There was no significant difference in postoperative noradrenaline (effect estimated: -41.5 ng·L-1, 95%CI -134.3, 51.2; p = 0.38), adrenaline (effect estimated: 11.2 ng·L-1, 95%CI -7.6, 30.1; p = 0.24), and dopamine (effect estimated: -1.61 ng·L-1, 95%CI -7.2, 3.9; p = 0.57) concentrations between both groups. Based on our results, it seems unlikely that supplemental oxygen influences endogenous catecholamine release in the perioperative setting.

Effect of perioperative levosimendan administration on postoperative N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration in patients with increased cardiovascular risk factors undergoing non-cardiac surgery: protocol for the double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled IMPROVE trial.

INTRODUCTION: Elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) after non-cardiac surgery is a strong predictor for cardiovascular complications and reflects increased myocardial strain. NT-pro-BNP concentrations significantly rise after non-cardiac surgery within the first 3 days. Levosimendan is a potent inotropic drug that increases calcium sensitivity to cardiac myocytes, which results in improved cardiac contractility that last for approximately 7 days. Thus, we will test the effect of a pre-emptive perioperative administration of levosimendan on postoperative NT-pro-BNP concentration as compared with the administration of a placebo in patients undergoing moderate-risk to high-risk major abdominal surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a double-blinded prospective randomised trial at the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (and potentially a second centre in Germany), including 230 patients at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive a single dose of 12.5 mg levosimendan versus placebo after induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome will be the postoperative maximum NT-pro-BNP concentration between both group within the first three postoperative days. Our secondary outcomes will be the incidence of myocardial ischaemia, myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery and a composite of myocardial infarction and death within 30 days and 1 year after surgery between both groups. Our further secondary outcome will be stratification of NT-pro-BNP values according to previously thresholds to predict mortality of myocardial infarction after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna on 14 July 2020 (EK 2187/2019). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients a day before surgery. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04329624.

Perioperative supplemental oxygen and oxidative stress in patients undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery - A subanalysis of randomized clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the development and aggravation of cardiovascular diseases. The influence of intraoperative inspired oxygen concentrations on oxidative stress is still not entirely known. Therefore, we evaluated in this sub-study if supplemental oxygen affects the oxidation-reduction potential in patients at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing moderate- to high-risk major abdominal surgery. DESIGN: Sub-study of a prospective parallel-arm double-blinded single-center superiority randomized trial. SETTING: Operating room and postoperative recovery area. INTERVENTION: Administration of 0.8 FiO2 versus 0.3 FiO2 throughout surgery and for the first two postoperative hours. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the static oxidation-reduction potential (sORP) and the oxidation-reduction potential capacity (cORP) between both groups. The secondary outcome was the trend of sORP and cORP in the overall study population. We assessed sORP and cORP before induction of anesthesia, 2 h after induction of anesthesia, within 2 h after surgery and on the first and third postoperative day. MAIN RESULTS: 258 patients were analyzed. 128 patients were randomly assigned to the 80% oxygen group and 130 patients were randomly assigned to the 30% oxygen group. Postoperative sORP values did not differ significantly between the 80% and 30% oxygen group (effect estimate: -1.162 mV,95% CI: -2.584 to 0.260; p = 0.109). On average, we observed a change in sORP of 5.288 mV (95% CI:4.633 to 5.913, p < 0.001) per day. cORP values did not differ significantly between the 80% and 30% oxygen group (effect estimate: -0.015µC, (95%CI: -0.062 to 0.032; p = 0.524). On average, we observed a change in cORP values of -0.170µC (95%CI: -0.194 to -0.147, p < 0.001) per day. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous reports, we could not find any evidence of an association between intraoperative supplemental oxygen and perioperative oxidative stress assessed by sORP and cORP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03366857https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03366857?term=vienna&cond=oxygen&draw=2&rank=1.

Effect of Oral Sodium Bicarbonate Treatment on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Metabolic Acidosis.

Background: Sodium bicarbonate supplementation is a mainstay in the treatment of metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recent studies showed reduction of progression of CKD and reduced all-cause mortality. However, additional sodium loading could worsen arterial hypertension, a well-known contributor to progression of CKD. This patient-relevant and economically negative side effect is under-studied in prospective studies up until now. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of sodium bicarbonate treatment on arterial blood pressure at baseline and after 8 weeks. Methods: The SoBic study is an ongoing randomized controlled trial, in which patients with CKD receive either a high dose of oral sodium bicarbonate or a rescue treatment, if necessary. We used standardized office blood pressure and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24h-ABPM). Regression models were adjusted for estimated glomerular filtration rate and change of antihypertensives. Results: 47 subjects were enrolled and the mean age was 57 (±14.6) years and 18 (38%) were female. In 43 randomized subjects with sufficiently performed 24h-ABPM neither systolic 24h-ABPM (2.522; 95%CI: -2.364, 7.408; mmHg) nor diastolic 24h-ABPM (0.868; 95%CI: -2.411, 4.147; mmHg) was affected by study group allocation. When looking at the effect of individual sodium bicarbonate dose on 24h-ABPM, the fully adjusted model suggested an increase of 0.047 (95%CI: -0.026, 0.119) mmHg by each mg/kg per day increase of sodium bicarbonate dose. Conclusion: Sodium bicarbonate supplementation over 8 weeks did not significantly increase blood pressure measured by 24h-ABPM in CKD patients. Trial Registration: EUDRACT Number: 2012-001824-36; 12/07/2012 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu).

Perioperative supplemental oxygen and NT-proBNP concentrations after major abdominal surgery - A prospective randomized clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Supplemental oxygen is a simple method to improve arterial oxygen saturation and might therefore improve myocardial oxygenation. Thus, we tested whether intraoperative supplemental oxygen reduces the risk of impaired cardiac function diagnosed with NT-proBNP and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) diagnosed with high-sensitivity Troponin T. DESIGN: Parallel-arm double-blinded single-centre superiority randomized trial. SETTING: Operating room and postoperative recovery area. PATIENTS: 260 patients over the age of 45 years at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing major abdominal surgery. INTERVENTION: Administration of 80% versus 30% oxygen throughout surgery and for the first two postoperative hours. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the postoperative maximum NT-proBNP concentration in both groups, which was assessed within 2 h after surgery, and on the first and third postoperative day. The secondary outcome was the incidence of MINS in both groups. MAIN RESULTS: 128 patients received 80% oxygen and 130 received 30% oxygen throughout surgery and for the first two postoperative hours. There was no significant difference in the median postoperative maximum NT-proBNP concentration between the 80% and the 30% oxygen group (989 pg.mL-1 [IQR 499; 2005] and 810 pg.mL-1 [IQR 409; 2386], effect estimate: 159 pg.mL-1, 95%CI -123, 431, p = 0.704). There was no difference in the incidence of MINS between both groups. (p = 0.703). CONCLUSIONS: There was no beneficial effect of perioperative supplemental oxygen administration on postoperative NT-proBNP concentration and MINS. It seems likely that supplemental oxygen has no effect on the release of NT-proBNP in patients at-risk for cardiovascular complications undergoing major abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03366857. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=NCT+03366857&term=&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=.

Oral Sodium Bicarbonate Supplementation Does Not Affect Serum Calcification Propensity in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Chronic Metabolic Acidosis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and metabolic acidosis might accelerate vascular calcification. The T50 calcification inhibition test (T50-test) is a global functional test analyzing the overall propensity of calcification in serum, and low T50-time is associated with progressive aortic stiffening and with all-cause mortality in non-dialysis CKD, dialysis, and transplant patients. Low serum bicarbonate is associated with a short T50-time and alkali supplementation could be a simple modifier of calcification propensity. The aim of this study was to investigate the short-term effect of oral sodium bicarbonate supplementation on T50-time in CKD patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The SoBic-study is an ongoing randomized-controlled trial in CKD-G3 and G4 patients with chronic metabolic acidosis (serum HCO3- ≤21 mmol/L), in which patients are randomized to either achieve serum HCO3- levels of 24 ± 1 mmol/L (intervention group) or 20 ± 1 mmol/L (rescue group). The effect of bicarbonate treatment on T50-time was assessed. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 35 (14 female) patients aged 57 (±15) years, and 18 were randomized to the intervention group. The mean T50-time was 275 (± 64) min. After 4 weeks, the mean change of T50-time was 4 (±69) min in the intervention group and 18 min (±56) in the rescue group (ß = -25; 95% CI: -71 to 22; p = 0.298). Moreover, change of serum bicarbonate in individual patients was not associated with change in T50-time, analyzed by regression analysis. Change of serum phosphate had a significant impact on change of T50-time (ß = -145; 95% CI: -237 to -52). CONCLUSION: Oral sodium bicarbonate supplementation showed no effect on T50-time in acidotic CKD patients.

Effect of oral sodium bicarbonate supplementation on progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with chronic metabolic acidosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (SoBic-Study).

BACKGROUND: Overt chronic metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease develops after a drop of glomerular filtration rate to less than approximately 25 mL/min/1.73 m2. The pathogenic mechanism seems to be a lack of tubular bicarbonate production, which in healthy individuals neutralizes the acid net production. As shown in several animal and human studies the acidotic milieu alters bone and vitamin D metabolism, induces muscle wasting, and impairs albumin synthesis, aside from a direct alteration of renal tissue by increasing angiotensin II, aldosteron and endothelin kidney levels. Subsequent studies testing various therapeutic approaches in very selected study populations showed that oral supplementation of the lacking bicarbonate halts progression of decline of renal function. However, due to methodological limitations of these studies further investigations are of urgent need to ensure the validity of this therapeutic concept. METHODS/DESIGN: The SoBic-study is a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label clinical phase IV study performed at the nephrological outpatient service of the Medical University of Vienna. Two-hundred patients classified to CKD stage 3 or 4 with two separate measurements of HCO3- of <21 mmol/L will be 1:1 randomized to either receive a high dose of oral sodium bicarbonate with a serum target HCO3- level of 24±1 mmol/L or receive a rescue therapy of sodium bicarbonate with a serum target level of 20±1 mmol/L. The follow up will be for two years. The primary outcome is the effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on renal function measured by means of estimated glomerular filtration rates (4-variable-MDRD-equation) after two years. Secondary outcomes are change in markers of bone metabolism between groups, death rates between groups, and the number of subjects proceeding to renal replacement therapy across groups. Adverse events, such as worsening of arterial hypertension due to the additional sodium consumption, will be accurately monitored. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that sufficiently balanced acid-base homeostasis leads to a reduction of decline of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. The concept of an exogenous bicarbonate supplementation to substitute the lacking endogenous bicarbonate has existed for a long time, but has never been investigated sufficiently to state clear treatment guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDRACT Number: 2012-001824-36.