Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema in patients undergoing 3 years of prospective surveillance with intervention.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate risk factors (treatment-related, comorbidities, and lifestyle) for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) within the context of a Prospective Surveillance and Early Intervention (PSEI) model of care for subclinical BCRL. METHODS: The parent randomized clinical trial assigned patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer to PSEI with either bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) or tape measurement (TM). Surgical, systemic and radiation treatments, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors were recorded. Detection of subclinical BCRL (change from baseline of either BIS L-Dex ≥6.5 or tape volume ≥ 5% and < 10%) triggered an intervention with compression therapy. Volume change from baseline ≥10% indicated progression to chronic lymphedema and need for complex decongestive physiotherapy. In this secondary analysis, multinomial logistic regressions including main and interaction effects of the study group and risk factors were used to test for factor associations with outcomes (no lymphedema, subclinical lymphedema, progression to chronic lymphedema after intervention, progression to chronic lymphedema without intervention). Post hoc tests of significant interaction effects were conducted using Bonferroni-corrected alphas of .008; otherwise, an alpha of .05 was used for statistical significance. RESULTS: The sample (n = 918; TM = 457; BIS = 461) was female with a median age of 58.4 years. Factors associated with BCRL risk included axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (p < .001), taxane-based chemotherapy (p < .001), regional nodal irradiation (RNI) (p ≤ .001), body mass index >30 (p = .002), and rurality (p = .037). Mastectomy, age, hypertension, diabetes, seroma, smoking, and air travel were not associated with BCRL risk. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of 3 years of PSEI for subclinical lymphedema, variables of ALND, taxane-based chemotherapy, RNI, body mass index >30, and rurality increased risk.

Incidental findings on single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: the proposed Westmead SPECT/CT incidental findings classification.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of incidental radiological findings detected on SPECT/CT performed as part of pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and development of a modified classification to workup these lesions. METHODS: A retrospective audit was performed of all SPECT/CT performed in combination with lymphoscintigrams in breast cancer patients presenting with clinically node negative axillae and operated on by breast surgeons at the Westmead Breast Cancer Institute over a 12-month period. RESULTS: Four hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study. In 149 patients (35.6%), there was a total of 205 incidental findings. The most common findings were, pulmonary abnormalities (38.5%), abdominal findings (27.8%), thyroid nodules (14.6%), cardiac abnormalities (10.7%) and others (8.3%). Using our proposed Westmead SPECT/CT incidental findings (WSIF) classification, 7.8% were known, 17.6% were major findings, 48.3% were minor findings, 15.1% were minimal findings and 11.2% were equivocal findings. 17.6% (n = 36) underwent further workup and investigation and 3.4% of patients (n = 5) required therapeutic intervention, including chemotherapy for primary lung cancer(n = 1) and surgeries (thoracotomy, n = 1; thyroidectomy, n = 2; colonoscopy, n = 1). 93.8% (n = 393) had at least one SLN mapped, most commonly located in Level 1 of the axilla. CONCLUSION: The incidental findings on SPECT/CT in combination with lymphoscintigraphy is within the range of previous studies (27.3-59.5%). A small proportion of patients required significant major interventions (3.4%). We propose that all incidental findings should be assessed according to our WSIF classification to aid in triaging need for further investigation and management.

Veritas in Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Is Associated with Higher Complications Compared with TiLOOP.

Biologic and synthetic meshes are used in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for coverage of the lower pole of the implant. This study aimed to compare outcomes of Veritas with TiLOOP bra (TiLOOP group [TG]). METHODS: Retrospective study of skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomies in patients who underwent an implant-based reconstruction using either Veritas or TiLOOP bra between January 2014 and December 2016 was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-six reconstructions (22 unilateral, 7 bilateral) using the Veritas mesh and 179 breast reconstructions (61 unilateral, 59 bilateral) using TiLOOP bra were identified. The Veritas group (VG) showed a higher rate of postoperative complications compared with the TG (VG = 54% versus TG = 14%, P < 0.01%), including higher rates of seroma, nonintegration of mesh (VG = 51.4% versus TG = 1.6%, P < 0.01), implant rotation (VG = 16.2% versus TG = 1.6%, P < 0.01), infection (VG = 18.9% versus TG = 2.1%, P < 0.01), and wound breakdown (VG = 10.8% versus TG = 0.5%, P < 0.01). The VG also had a higher rate of major interventions (VG = 35.1% versus TG = 7.8%, P < 0.01) and minor interventions (VG = 18.9% versus TG = 2.2%, P < 0.01) compared with TG, including a higher rate of implant loss and unplanned return to theater. CONCLUSIONS: Veritas mesh was associated with a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications compared with TiLOOP bra. Our data strongly question the safety profile of Veritas in implant-based breast reconstruction. Further studies in this area are warranted.

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node assessment in breast cancer: a comparison of rapid diagnostic method based on CK19 mRNA expression and imprint cytology.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer is a routine technique for staging the axilla. The two most common methods of intraoperative histopathological assessment, imprint cytology and frozen section, are hampered by poor sensitivity and lack standardized methodology. The one-step nuclei acid amplification (OSNA) assay is a rapid quantification of cytokeratin 19 mRNA. This prospective study compared an existing intraoperative imprint cytology protocol with the OSNA system. METHODS: Of the 110 prospectively recruited patients, 98 met the inclusion criteria with a total of 170 lymph nodes. Intraoperative sentinel nodes were serially sectioned and imprints made of each cut surface for cytological assessment. Alternate slices were submitted for OSNA while the remaining slices were for final histopathological evaluation with six hematoxylin and eosin levels and one AE1/AE3 immunoperoxidase stain of each slice. RESULTS: On histopathological analysis, 24.5% of patients (16.5% of nodes) had sentinel node metastases and 3.1% (2.4%) had isolated tumour cells. With isolated tumour cells cases taken as negative, the sensitivity of imprint cytology and OSNA compared with histopathology were 66.7% on patient basis (71.4% on per-node basis) and 95.8% (89.3%), respectively. One of 22 patients with macrometastases and two of three micrometastases were designated negative while five false-positive nodes were identified with OSNA, likely due to tissue allocation bias. CONCLUSION: The OSNA assay is highly sensitive in comparison with imprint cytology and may be used effectively in the intraoperative setting. Clinical follow-up studies are warranted to further assess its use in routine practice.

Factors affecting the preoperative and postoperative extracellular fluid in the arm on the side of breast cancer: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To explore what factors affect volume of extracellular fluid (ECF) in the arm on the side of surgery pre- and postoperatively and to determine the value of knowing preoperative ECF volume for diagnosis of lymphedema postoperatively. METHODS AND RESULTS: Women (N=516) with early breast cancer were assessed preoperatively and within 4 weeks postoperatively. Baseline measures included inter-arm ECF ratio, side of cancer, number of nodes involved, and other individual characteristics. Postoperative assessment included inter-limb ECF ratio and details from surgery. The postoperative ECF ratio was categorized as to whether it exceeded previously established thresholds, and the change in ECF was categorized as to whether it exceeded 0.1. Linear regression identified which factors explained the variance for preoperative ECF ratio and the change in ratio. Chi square analysis compared whether women categorized using thresholds were the same as those whose ratio increased >0.1 postoperatively. Postoperative ECF ratio was significantly higher than the preoperative ratio (p<0.001). Women whose ECF ratio exceeded previously established thresholds were not the same as those whose ratio increased >0.1 postoperatively (p<0.001). Only the side of surgery explained the preoperative ECF measure; extent of surgery and actual weight explained the change in ECF ratio. CONCLUSION: The ECF ratio preoperatively is not affected by nodal involvement. The change in ECF ratio is affected by the extent of surgery and body mass. Change from preoperative ECF ratio did identify more women at risk for lymphedema than reliance postoperatively on thresholds, supporting preoperative measures.

Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis to report pooled estimates for underestimation of invasive breast cancer (where core-needle biopsy [CNB] shows ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] and excision histologic examination shows invasive breast cancer) and to identify preoperative variables that predict invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and were included if they provided data on DCIS underestimates (overall and according to preoperative variables). Study-specific and pooled percentages for DCIS underestimates were calculated. By using meta-regression (random effects logistic modeling) the association between each study-level preoperative variable and understaged invasive breast cancer was investigated. RESULTS: Fifty-two studies that included 7350 cases of DCIS with findings at excision histologic examination as the reference standard met the eligibility criteria and were included. There were 1736 underestimates (invasive breast cancer at excision); the random-effects pooled estimate was 25.9% (95% confidence interval: 22.5%, 29.5%). Preoperative variables that showed significant univariate association with higher underestimation included the use of a 14-gauge automated device (vs 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, P = .006), high-grade lesion at CNB (vs non-high grade lesion, P < .001), lesion size larger than 20 mm at imaging (vs lesions ≤ 20 mm, P < .001), Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) score of 4 or 5 (vs BI-RADS score of 3, P for trend = .005), mammographic mass (vs calcification only, P < .001), and palpability (P < .001). CONCLUSION: About one in four DCIS diagnoses at CNB represent understaged invasive breast cancer. Preoperative variables significantly associated with understaging include biopsy device and guidance method, size, grade, mammographic features, and palpability.

Internal mammary sentinel nodes: ignore, irradiate or operate?

INTRODUCTION: This study describes the results of internal mammary chain (IMC) biopsy, identifying factors that predict 'hot spots' and nodal metastases for patients in whom mapped IMC nodes were routinely dissected. METHODS: The nodal basin and status of every axillary and IMC site identified by lymphoscintigraphy were examined. Binary logistic regression analysed the relationship of several patients and tumour factors with IMC hot spots and metastases. RESULTS: Ninety of 490 patients (18.4%) had IMC sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified by lymphatic mapping and dissected, and 20 of these (22.2%) were found to have metastases. Mapping to the IMC was most likely for women aged under 35 years (29.4%) (p=0.117), women aged 35-44 (22.6%) (p=0.034) or those with medial (23.7%) or central tumour location (22.2%) (p=0.014; p=0.062, respectively). Predictors of IMC positivity included age <35 years (p=0.063), grade 3 histology (p=0.018) and lymphatic vascular invasion (LVI) (p=0.032). Although IMC positivity was more likely with positive axillary nodes, this trend was not significant. CONCLUSION: We identified several factors (age <35 years, tumour grade and LVI) that independently predict IMC SLN identification and positivity for patients with stage I or II breast cancer. Where IMC hot spots are not dissected, we predict IMC positivity of 50% or more for young women (<35 years) or women with high grade or LVI positive tumours, and these women may benefit from more intensive chemotherapy and radiotherapy to the IMC.

Thrombotic complications of venous aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Venous aneurysms are rare vascular anomalies that have been reported to occur throughout the body. We report a unique variation, namely a thrombosed subclavian vein aneurysm. METHODS: A review of the records of patients with documented venous aneurysms presenting to the St George Hospital and their associated imaging was made. A literature search for articles pertaining to venous aneurysms was performed. RESULTS: Four cases of venous aneurysms were identified; one subclavian vein, one inferior vena cava and two popliteal. The clinical course of these cases is detailed, along with a review of the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Venous aneurysms are infrequent findings and indicate that the patient is at significant risk of thrombosis. Popliteal vein aneurysms should be treated surgically.