Delineating the Mosaic Trisomy 15 Phenotype Using a Serendipitous Mechanism as a Clue.

Parental balanced translocation is one of the traditional indications for invasive prenatal diagnosis. Usually, the diagnostic process is straightforward. Sometimes, however, results are not entirely clear and may reveal unexpected biological processes. We performed chorionic villi sampling for a paternal 8;15 reciprocal translocation in the sixth pregnancy of a Caucasian woman. Cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi, after both short- and long-term cultures, revealed the presence of the same rearrangement found in the father as well as a trisomy 15. Surprisingly, the trisomy, which was initially expected to derive from aberrant segregation during paternal meiosis, resulted instead from maternal nondisjunction. Although a sonogram of the fetus appeared to be normal, follow-up amniocentesis demonstrated a low-level mosaic trisomy 15 in cells extracted from the amniotic fluid, while 10% of cells from fetal tissues sampled after termination of the pregnancy were also found to be trisomic. Fetal autopsy showed dysmorphic features, confirming the diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 15 and enabled deeper insight into the prenatal phenotype of this rare condition.

SNPs and real-time quantitative PCR method for constitutional allelic copy number determination, the VPREB1 marker case.

BACKGROUND: 22q11.2 microdeletion is responsible for the DiGeorge Syndrome, characterized by heart defects, psychiatric disorders, endocrine and immune alterations and a 1 in 4000 live birth prevalence. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) approaches for allelic copy number determination have recently been investigated in 22q11.2 microdeletions detection. The qPCR method was performed for 22q11.2 microdeletions detection as a first-level screening approach in a genetically unknown series of patients with congenital heart defects. A technical issue related to the VPREB1 qPCR marker was pointed out. METHODS: A set of 100 unrelated Italian patients with congenital heart defects were tested for 22q11.2 microdeletions by a qPCR method using six different markers. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization technique (FISH) was used for confirmation. RESULTS: qPCR identified six patients harbouring the 22q11.2 microdeletion, confirmed by FISH. The VPREB1 gene marker presented with a pattern consistent with hemideletion in one 3 Mb deleted patient, suggestive for a long distal deletion, and in additional five non-deleted patients. The long distal 22q11.2 deletion was not confirmed by Comparative Genomic Hybridization. Indeed, the VPREB1 gene marker generated false positive results in association with the rs1320 G/A SNP, a polymorphism localized within the VPREB1 marker reverse primer sequence. Patients heterozygous for rs1320 SNP, showed a qPCR profile consistent with the presence of a hemideletion. CONCLUSIONS: Though the qPCR technique showed advantages as a screening approach in terms of cost and time, the VPREB1 marker case revealed that single nucleotide polymorphisms can interfere with qPCR data generating erroneous allelic copy number interpretations.

Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial infections: the role of a rapid and low-cost characterization for the establishment of a surveillance system.

Continuous surveillance on resistance patterns and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus represent simple and low-cost techniques to understand and evaluate the effectiveness of infection control and antimicrobial prescribing measures. In this study we analyzed the antibiotic susceptibility and trends for S. aureus strains collected from bacteraemia cases in a five year period. Between 2004 and 2008 we noted a progressive decrease in the number of S. aureus isolates compared to all pathogens from clinical specimens and S. aureus bloodstream infections (BSI) reflected a similar trend. In particular we analyzed 185 isolates from blood cultures: 89 isolates were MSSA and 96 isolates were MRSA. Molecular SCCmec typing of these strains showed an absolute prevalence of types I and II, whereas five spa types from 96 isolates were obtained. Resistance pattern analysis allowed us to place MRSA strains into 12 antibiotypes and the major antibiotype was resistant to penicillin, gentamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin and ciprofloxacin. The predominant antibiotype among the MSSA isolates was resistant only to penicillin. In addition, 19.1% of MSSA are susceptible to all antibiotics tested. We also found a close association between antibiotyping 1 and genotyping t002/SCCmecI of MRSA strains, suggesting a nosocomial scenario dominated by a few particular clones.