Real-world outcomes associated with afatinib use in patients with solid tumors harboring NRG1 gene fusions.

OBJECTIVES: Neuregulin-1 (NRG1) fusions may drive oncogenesis via constitutive activation of ErbB signaling. Hence, NRG1 fusion-driven tumors may be susceptible to ErbB-targeted therapy. Afatinib (irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) has demonstrated activity in individual patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors. This study collected real-world data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter, non-comparative cohort study, physicians in the US-based Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network collected data from medical records of patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors who received afatinib (afatinib cohort) or other systemic therapies (non-afatinib cohort) in any therapy line. Objectives included demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes (overall response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]). RESULTS: Patients (N = 110) with a variety of solid tumor types were included; 72 received afatinib, 38 other therapies. In the afatinib cohort, 70.8 % of patients received afatinib as second-line treatment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was 2-4 in 69.4 % at baseline. In the non-afatinib cohort, 94.7 % of patients received systemic therapy as first-line treatment and ECOG PS was 2-4 in 31.6 % at baseline. In the afatinib cohort, ORR was 37.5 % overall (43.8 % when received as first-line therapy); median PFS and OS were 5.5 and 7.2 months, respectively. In the non-afatinib cohort, ORR was 76.3 %; median PFS and OS were 12.9 and 22.6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study provides real-world data on the characteristics of patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors treated with afatinib or other therapies; durable responses were observed in both groups. However, there were imbalances between the cohorts, and the study was not designed to compare outcomes. Further prospective/retrospective trials are required.

How to treat multiple myeloma - a representative multicentre treatment survey.

BACKGROUND: The present survey was undertaken to gain insights in the changes of disease management of multiple myeloma (MM) over time and the implementation of new guidelines into daily practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Diagnosis and treatment of MM were evaluated based on a 3-month representative multicentre survey including 386 patients from 35 centres in Germany in 2008. The results were compared to similar surveys in 2004 and 2006. RESULTS: At the time of first diagnosis, most patients (62.5%) were already in stage III (Durie-Salmon). The presence of deletion 13q was determined in 22% of patients only. However, determination of other prognostic factors has become increasingly well established. These include the levels of ß2-microglobulin and serum albumin, each of which was determined in more than 2/3 of patients. Overall, 35% of patients were considered for high-dose chemotherapy. As a consequence of the development of innovative substances, there are remarkable shifts in first line, second line, and third line therapy with an increase in the use of bortezomib at all levels of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding diagnostic measures, deviations from recommended guidelines became evident. Also, high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support was considered in a minority of patients only. Novel substances, however, were rapidly integrated into the treatment of MM.