Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
CNS Oncol ; 13(1): 2345579, 2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722227

RESUMEN

Background: Treatment for refractory or relapsed primary CNS lymphoma (r/r PCNSL) is challenging. Salvage whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is an option but has a short duration of disease control, so additional treatment modalities are warranted. Case: A 75-year-old female with r/r PCNSL who had multiple progressions after multiple lines of treatment underwent salvage WBRT. The patient received ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as maintenance therapy for 18 months following WBRT with the intention of increasing survival duration after salvage WBRT. She survived 81 months from diagnosis, including 57 months after completion of WBRT. Conclusion: This case presentation describes the experience of using ibrutinib as maintenance therapy in treating r/r PCNSL after salvage WBRT.


Treatment for refractory or relapsed primary CNS lymphoma (r/r PCNSL) is difficult. Salvage whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is one treatment choice, but the effects do not last very long. Therefore, additional treatment regimens are needed. The authors report a 75-year-old female with r/r PCNSL who had several progressions after multiple lines of treatment and underwent salvage WBRT. Following WBRT, the patient received ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, as maintenance therapy for 18 months to increase the duration of survival after salvage WBRT. She survived 81 months from diagnosis, including 57 months after completion of WBRT. This case reflects the experience of using ibrutinib as maintenance therapy in treating r/r PCNSL after salvage WBRT.


Asunto(s)
Adenina , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Piperidinas , Pirazoles , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Adenina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Anciano , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/terapia , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Terapia Recuperativa , Inducción de Remisión , Linfoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma/terapia , Linfoma/radioterapia
2.
J Adv Pract Oncol ; 13(8): 775-789, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36727021

RESUMEN

Background and Purpose: Clinical guidelines suggest that prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be given to newly diagnosed seizure-naive brain tumor patients for up to 1 week after craniotomy. Yet, data suggest that prophylactic AEDs are used up to 12 months after surgery. A quality improvement project was implemented to improve adherence to evidence-based prophylactic AED guidelines. Methods: A quasi-experimental, pre- and post-test intervention design was used to assess the effect of a multiphase intervention on guideline adherence and prophylactic anticonvulsant prescription rates. The 16-week intervention consisted of provider education sessions, provider alerts, documentation templates, and a weekly audit and feedback. Participants included four providers and newly diagnosed seizure-naive brain tumor patients. Measures included guideline adherence rates and AED prescription rates extracted from chart review, and a provider attitude and knowledge survey. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and Chi-square tests. Results: Guideline adherence increased significantly (p < .01) from 4 months before implementation (15.8%) to 1 year before implementation (27.8%) and then to 93.3% after implementation. Provider knowledge showed clinically meaningful decreases in the likelihood to prescribe prophylactic AEDs (-.5 point) and increased understanding of prophylactic AED side effects (+0.5 point), although these were not statistically significant (p = .083). Finally, prophylactic AED prescription rates decreased by 2.2% (p = .119) compared with 4 months and 1 year before implementation (2.6%; p = .072). Conclusion: This project highlights the important role of provider education, provider alerts, a documentation template, and audit and feedback in improving guideline adherence rate. Findings suggest that the combination intervention and weekly audit and feedback strategy can improve guideline adherence to prophylactic anticonvulsant use in seizure-naive newly diagnosed brain tumor patients. Implications: By following prophylactic AED guideline recommendations, clinicians can avoid the potential side effects of anticonvulsant-induced cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric issues that can impair patients' quality of life.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...