Comparison of geometrical uncertainties in the radiotherapy for various treatment sites with two different immobilization marking methods.

OBJECTIVE: The skin marking method (SMM) and bow-form-ruler marking method (BFRM) are two commonly used patient marking methods in mainland China. This study aims to evaluate SMM and BFRM by comparing the inter-fraction setup errors from using these two methods together with vacuum cushion immobilization in patients underwent radiotherapy for different treatment sites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients diagnosed with pelvic, abdominal and thoracic malignant tumors (with 6 patients per treatment site) were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients were immobilized with vacuum cushion. Each patient was marked by both SMM and BFRM before computed tomography (CT) simulation. Target location was verified by cone beam CT images with displacements assessed prior to each sampled treatment session. The localization errors in three translational and three rotational directions were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Images from 108 fractions in 18 patients produced 324 translational and 324 rotational comparisons for SMM and BFRM. The setup errors of all treatment sites showed no difference in two marking methods in any directions (p > 0.05). In subgroups of treatment site analysis, SMM significantly lessened the lateral and yaw setup errors compared to BFRM in the pelvic sites (0.39±1.85 mm vs -1.28±1.13 mm, p < 0.01 and -0.19±0.59° vs -0.61±0.59°, p < 0.05). However, in the abdominal subgroup, BFRM was superior to SMM for reduced vertical errors (0.17±2.73 mm vs 2.28±3.16 mm, p < 0.05). For the underweight or obese patients (with Body Mass Index, BMI < 18.5 or BMI≥24), SMM resulted in less yaw errors compared to BFRM (-0.05±0.38° vs -0.43±0.48°, p < 0.05). No significant difference between SMM and BFRM in setup errors of normal weighted patients (18.5≤BMI < 24) was observed for all three studied treatment sites. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows no significant difference in patient setup errors for various treatment sites between SMM and BFRM in general. SMM may be suitable for the pelvic tumor and patients with BMI < 18.5 or BMI≥24, while BFRM is recommended for the abdominal tumor sites.

[Preparation and antitumor immunity of long circulating nano-liposome encapsulated tumor specific antigen].

AIM: To prepare Nano-Liposome encapsulated MAGE3/HSP70(NL M3H) and study its character and antitumor immunity in mouse. METHODS: NL M3H was prepared by the thin film-dispersion ultrasonic. The shape and size of NL M3H were detected by electron microscope. The encapsulation rate, drug-carrying capacity, stability and the releasing character were tested by Sephedex-G100 gel filtration. The mouse was immunized by NL M3H, and the antitumor immunity was detected by ELISPOT and LDH release assay. RESULTS: The mean size of NL M3H was lower than 100 nm. The encapsulation rate was 38%.The drug content was 0.038 g/L. NL M3H has good stability after stored in 4 degrees C for 6 months. The releasing profile showed that 74 percent of proteins was released during the first 24 hours in saline. The results of ELISPOT and LDH release assay showed that NL M3H generated tumor specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte(CTL)to damage tumor cell. CONCLUSION: NL M3H has novel characters, it can generate specific CTL to kill tumor cell, and can be used as new kind of vaccine against tumor.

[Property of liposomal fusion induced by acid-sensitive polymer].

The fusion between liposome-liposome, liposome-biomembarnes induced by acid-sensitive polymers has been systematically investigated. The polymer-liposomes were constructed by post-insertion method with the poly (2-ethylacrylic acid) (PEAA) alkylamide derivatives. The liposomal fusion was studied by use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer assay, particle size, fluorescent-photometer. The results indicated that the poly (2-ethylacrylic acid)-liposomes has very strong acidic induced fusion capability. Under acidic conditions, acid-sensitive polymer liposomes fused each other, the fusion closely related to the molecular weight of acid sensitivity polymer on the surface of liposomes. The acidic fusion of polymer-liposomes was dependent upon the lipids composition, the degree of fusion was reversely related to the cholesterol contents. Acid-en ci-nsitive polymer liposomes fused with erythrocyte ghosts. The liposomal fusion induced by acid-sensitive polymer associated with the increase of membrane permeability. The good acid-sensitivity of PEAA has been further demonstrated by membrane fusion in current experiments, and the liposomes prepared with lipid anchored-poly (2-ethylacrylic acid) were developeds s a potential pH sensitive delivery system.