RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The association between care needs level (CNL) at hospitalisation and postdischarge outcomes in older patients with acute heart failure (aHF) has been insufficiently investigated. METHODS: This population-based cohort study was conducted using health insurance claims and CNL data of the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence study. Patients aged ≥65 years, discharged after hospitalisation for aHF between April 2014 and March 2022, were identified. CNLs at hospitalisation were classified as no care needs (NCN), support level (SL) and CNL1, CNL2-3 and CNL4-5 based on total estimated daily care time as defined by national standard criteria, and varied on an ordinal scale between SL&CNL1 (low level) to CNL4-5 (fully dependent). The primary outcomes were changes in CNL and death 1 year after discharge, assessed by CNL at hospitalisation using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of the 17 724 patients included, 7540 (42.5%), 4818 (27.2%), 3267 (18.4%) and 2099 (11.8%) had NCN, SL&CNL1, CNL2-3 and CNL4-5, respectively, at hospitalisation. One year after discharge, 4808 (27.1%), 3243 (18.3%), 2968 (16.7%), 2505 (14.1%) and 4200 (23.7%) patients had NCN, SL&CNL1, CNL2-3, CNL4-5 and death, respectively. Almost all patients' CNLs worsened after discharge. Compared to patients with NCN at hospitalisation, patients with SL&CNL1, CNL2-3 and CNL4-5 had an increased risk of all-cause death 1 year after discharge (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.19 [1.09-1.31], 1.88 [1.71-2.06] and 2.56 [2.31-2.84], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with aHF and high CNL at hospitalisation had a high risk of all-cause mortality in the year following discharge.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Japón/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Aguda , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , LongevidadRESUMEN
Background: Previous studies have shown a possible association between statin use and a decreased risk of dementia, but the association has not been sufficiently established, especially in the super-aging society of Japan. Objective: This study aimed to determine the association between statin use and the risk of dementia among Japanese participants aged> =65 years old. Methods: Data from the Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence (LIFE) Study were utilized, including medical and long-term care (LTC) claim data from 17 municipalities between April 2014 and December 2020. A nested case-control study was conducted with one case matched to five controls based on age, sex, municipality, and year of cohort entry. We used a conditional logistic regression model to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results: This study included 57,302 cases and 283,525 controls, with 59.7% of the participants being woman. After adjusting for potential confounders, statin use was associated with a lower risk of dementia (OR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.68-0.73) and Alzheimer's disease (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.63-0.69). Compared with non-users, the ORs of dementia were as follows: 1.42 (1.34-1.50) for 1-30 total standardized daily dose (TSDD), 0.91 (0.85-0.98) for 31-90 TSDD, 0.63 (0.58-0.69) for 91-180 TSDD, and 0.33 (0.31-0.36) for >180 TSDD in dose-analysis. Conclusions: Statin use is associated with a reduced risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease among older Japanese adults. A low cumulative statin dose is associated with an increased risk of dementia, whereas a high cumulative statin dose is a protective factor against dementia.
Asunto(s)
Demencia , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Japón/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Demencia/epidemiología , Demencia/prevención & control , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rebamipide has been widely co-prescribed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in Japan for decades. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rebamipide in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in new users of NSAIDs without risk factors of NSAID-induced ulcers other than age. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using medical claims data of 1.66 million inhabitants of 17 municipalities participating in Japan's Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence study. The cohort entry (t0) corresponded to a new user of NSAIDs for osteoarthritis or low back pain. Patients with risk factors of NSAID-induced ulcers other than age were excluded. Cases were defined as patients who underwent gastroscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (occurrence date was defined as index date). A maximum of 10 controls were selected from non-cases at the index date of each case by matching sex, age, follow-up time, and type and dosage of NSAIDs. Exposure to rebamipide was defined as prescription status from t0 to index date: Non-user (rebamipide was not co-prescribed during the follow-up period), Continuous-user (rebamipide was co-prescribed from t0 with the same number of tablets as NSAIDs), and Irregular-user (neither Non-user nor Continuous-user). Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate each category's odds ratio compared to non-users. FINDINGS: Of 67,561 individuals who met the inclusion criteria, 215 cases and 1,516 controls were selected. Compared with that of Non-users, the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were 0.65 (0.44-0.96) for Continuous-users and 2.57 (1.73-3.81) for Irregular-users. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous co-prescription of rebamipide significantly reduced the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in an Asian cohort of new users of NSAIDs with osteoarthritis or low back pain without risk factors other than age.
Asunto(s)
Alanina , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Quinolonas , Humanos , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Quinolonas/efectos adversos , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Quinolonas/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/efectos adversos , Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Japón/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Evaluating the selective pressure of antimicrobials on bacteria is important for promoting antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). The aim of this study was to assess the selective pressure of antimicrobials by evaluating their use (carbapenem [CBP] and CBP-sparing therapy) over time and the detection status of CBP-resistant organisms using multicenter data. METHODS: Among the facilities whose data were registered in the Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology from 2017 to 2020, those that had data on the use of CBP and CBP-sparing therapy (fluoroquinolones [FQs], cefmetazole [CMZ], piperacillin-tazobactam [PIP/TAZ], ampicillin-sulbactam [ABPC/SBT], ceftriaxone/cefotaxime [CTRX/CTX], CAZ (ceftazidime), cefepime [CFPM], and aminoglycosides [AGs]) as well as on CBP-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and CBP-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) detection were included. Alcohol-based hand rubbing (ABHR) usage was also analyzed. Regression analyses, including multivariable regression analysis, were performed to evaluate trends. The association of antimicrobial use density (AUD) with CRE and CRPA detection rates was evaluated. RESULTS: In 28 facilities nationwide, CBP, FQ, CAZ, AG, and PIP/TAZ use decreased over the 3-year period, whereas the use of CMZ, ABPC/SBT, CTRX/CTX, CFPM, and ABHR as well as the rates of CRE and CRPA detection increased. The average AUD did not significantly correlate with CRE and CRPA detection rates. The multivariable regression analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between each AUD or ABHR and CRE or CRPA detection. CONCLUSION: CBP and ABHR use showed a decreasing and an increasing trend, respectively, while CRPA and CRE detection rates exhibited a gradual increase. The considerably low CRE and CRPA detection rates suggest that slight differences in numbers may have been observed as excessive trend changes. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate selective pressure while considering the characteristics of ASP and the mechanisms underlying resistance.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Japón/epidemiología , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificaciónRESUMEN
There is insufficient evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) can reduce pneumonia by inducing a dry cough that confers a protective effect on the airway. To increase the evidence base on the clinical use of ACEIs for pneumonia prevention, this retrospective cohort study aimed to comparatively examine the risk of pneumonia-related hospitalization between ACEI initiators and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) initiators using claims data from two Japanese municipalities. We identified persons who were newly prescribed any ACEI or ARB as their first antihypertensive agent between April 2016 and March 2020. The Fine-Gray method was applied to a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) of ACEI use (reference: ARB use) for pneumonia-related hospitalization, with death treated as a competing risk. Sex, age, comorbidities, medications, and pneumococcal immunization were included as covariates. The analysis was conducted on 1421 ACEI initiators and 9040 ARB initiators, and the adjusted subdistribution HR of ACEI use was estimated to be 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.65; P = 0.22). ACEI initiation did not demonstrate any significant preventive effect against pneumonia-related hospitalization relative to ARB initiation. There remains a lack of strong evidence on the protective effects of ACEIs, and further research is needed to ascertain the benefits of their use in preventing pneumonia. We conducted a large-scale retrospective cohort study using real-world healthcare data from a Japanese population. In this study, ACEI initiation did not indicate a significant preventive effect against pneumonia-related hospitalization.
RESUMEN
The association between statin use and the risk of Parkinson's disease remains inconclusive, particularly in Japan's super-ageing society. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between statin use and the risk of Parkinson's disease among Japanese participants aged ≥65 years. We used data from the Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence Study, which included medical and long-term care claim data from April 2014 to December 2020 across 17 municipalities. Using a nested case-control design, we matched one case to five controls based on age, sex, municipality and cohort entry year. A conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Among the 56 186 participants (9397 cases and 46 789 controls), 53.6% were women. The inverse association between statin use and Parkinson's disease risk was significant after adjusting for multiple variables (odds ratio: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.66). Compared with non-users, the dose analysis revealed varying odds ratios: 1.30 (1.12-1.52) for 1-30 total standard daily doses, 0.77 (0.64-0.92) for 31-90 total standard daily doses, 0.62 (0.52-0.75) for 91-180 total standard daily doses and 0.30 (0.25-0.35) for >180 total standard daily doses. Statin use among older Japanese adults was associated with a decreased risk of Parkinson's disease. Notably, lower cumulative statin doses were associated with an elevated risk of Parkinson's disease, whereas higher cumulative doses exhibited protective effects against Parkinson's disease development.
RESUMEN
Although previous studies have shown no increased mortality risk after the primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, reports on booster doses are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate mortality risk after the mRNA vaccine boosters in addition to the primary series. This nested case-control study included two age-specific cohorts (18-64 and ≥65 years as of February 1, 2021) in two municipalities. All deaths were identified and matched five controls for each case at each date of death (index date) with risk set sampling according to municipality, age, and sex. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mRNA vaccines (first to fifth doses) were estimated by comparing with no vaccination within 21 and 42 days before the index date using a conditional logistic regression model. The 18-64-years cohort comprised 431 cases (mean age, 57.0 years; men, 58.2%) and 2,155 controls (mean age, 56.0; men, 58.2%), whereas the ≥65-years cohort comprised 12,166 cases (84.0; 50.2%) and 60,830 controls (84.0, 50.2%). The aORs (95% CI) in 0-21 days after the third and fourth doses in the 18-64-years cohort were 0.62 (0.24, 1.62) and 0.38 (0.08, 1.84), respectively. The aORs (95% CI) after the third to fifth doses in the ≥65 years cohort were 0.36 (0.31, 0.43), 0.30 (0.25, 0.37), and 0.26 (0.20, 0.33), respectively. In conclusion, booster doses of mRNA vaccines do not increase mortality risk. These findings could help subsequent vaccine campaigns and alleviate vaccine hesitancy.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de ARNm , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/mortalidad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Adulto Joven , Japón/epidemiología , Adolescente , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Secondary healthcare data use has been increasing in the dental research field. The validity of the number of remaining teeth assessed from Japanese dental claims data has been reported in several studies, but has not been tested in the general population in Japan. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of the number of remaining teeth assessed from Japanese dental claims data and assess its predictability against subsequent health deterioration. METHODS: We used the claims data of residents of a municipality that implemented oral health screening programs. Using the number of teeth in the screening records as the reference standard, we assessed the validity of the claims-based number of teeth by calculating the mean differences. In addition, we assessed the association between the claims-based number of teeth and pneumococcal disease (PD) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) in adults aged ≥65 years using Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Of the 10,154 participants, the mean number of teeth assessed from the claims data was 20.9, that in the screening records was 20.5, and their mean difference was 0.5. During the 3-year follow-up, PD or AD onset was observed in 10.4% (3,212/30,838) and 5.3% (1,589/30,207) of participants, respectively. Compared with participants with ≥20 teeth, those with 1-9 teeth had a 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-1.43) or 1.19 (95% CI: 1.04-1.36) times higher risk of developing PD or AD, respectively. CONCLUSION: High validity of the claims-based number of teeth was observed. In addition, the claims-based number of teeth was associated with the risk of PD and AD.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Diente , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Pérdida de Diente/epidemiología , Longevidad , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Salud Bucal , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of scabies and its outbreaks in Japanese households, residential care facilities (RCFs), and hospitals using claims data. Methods: This descriptive epidemiological study was conducted using claims data from eight municipalities in Japan. Scabies cases were identified using a combination of recorded diagnoses and administered medications. The study period was from April 2015 to March 2019. Outbreaks were defined as ≥2 cases of scabies occurring within a calendar month at a single household, RCF, or hospital. Results: We identified 857 scabies cases for analysis. The annual prevalence of scabies ranged from 40 to 67 per 100,000 beneficiaries. The annual attack rate of scabies was found to be highest in RCFs (21 per 1000 RCFs), followed by hospitals (11 per 1000 hospitals) and households (0.25 per 1000 households). The annual outbreak attack rate was also highest in RCFs (4.0 per 1000 RCFs), followed by hospitals (1.6 per 1000 hospitals) and household (0.027 per household). The patterns of outbreaks varied widely among the RCFs. Conclusions: The study showcases the potential of claims data for detecting infectious disease outbreaks, which could provide valuable insight for the future management and prevention of scabies. Infection control of scabies in RCFs is crucial in aging societies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The influence of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on dental care utilization may have differed according to individual characteristics or type of dental care provision. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in dental care utilization and per-attendance costs by age group and type of dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. METHODS: This time-series study used healthcare insurance claims data from 01/07/2019 to 09/27/2021 (143 weeks) from nine municipalities in Japan. Dental care utilization rate per week and average dental care cost per attendance by age groups (0-19y/20-64y/65-74y/≥ 75y) and types of dental care (outpatient/visiting) were used as outcome variables. COVID-19 pandemic waves in Japan were used as predictors: 1st (03/23/2020-05/17/2020), 2nd (06/22/2020-09/27/2020), 3rd (10/26/2020-02/21/2021), 4th (02/22/2021-06/07/2021), and 5th (07/05/2021-09/13/2021) waves. Fixed effect models were employed to estimate the proportional changes. RESULTS: In the fixed effect model, we observed large declines in dental care utilization during the 1st (17.0-22.0%) and 2nd waves (3.0-13.0%) compared to the non-pandemic wave period in all age groups. In contrast, the average dental care cost per attendance increased in all age groups by 5.2-8.6% during the 1st wave. CONCLUSIONS: During the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, dental care utilization decreased in all age groups, whereas the average dental care cost per attendance increased. The COVID-19 pandemic may have changed the dental care provision pattern towards less frequent and more concentrated dental care to avoid the risk of infection.
RESUMEN
This retrospective cohort study examined the incidence of post-COVID psychiatric disorders in older adults according to hospitalization status and SARS-CoV-2 variant period in Japan. Claims data, COVID-19 case-related information, and vaccination records were obtained from three Japanese municipalities. We identified individuals aged ≥65 years who had COVID-19 or other respiratory tract infection (RTI) between March 2021 and December 2022. Participants were categorized into non-hospitalized and hospitalized patients, and the study period was divided into the Alpha (March to May 2021), Delta (June to December 2021), Omicron BA.1/BA.2 (January to June 2022), and Omicron BA.5 (July to December 2022) periods. Modified Poisson regression analyses were performed to estimate the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the occurrence of psychiatric disorders (organic mental disorders, psychotic disorders, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and insomnia) three months after COVID-19 (reference: other RTI). For overall psychiatric disorders, we analyzed 19,489 non-hospitalized patients (COVID-19: 6,728, Other RTI: 12,761) and 2925 hospitalized patients (COVID-19: 1,036, Other RTI: 1889). When compared with other RTI cases, COVID-19 cases had significantly lower IRRs for overall psychiatric disorders in both non-hospitalized (IRR: 0.59, P < 0.001) and hospitalized cases (IRR: 0. 83, P = 0.045) during the Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period, but only in non-hospitalized cases (IRR: 0.45, P < 0.001) during the Omicron BA.5 period. The incidences of the individual post-COVID psychiatric disorders varied according to disorder type, hospitalization status, and SARS-CoV-2 variant period. These findings provide a foundation for further research to explore these variations and improve the provision of psychiatric care in future epidemics.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalización , Trastornos Mentales , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Incidencia , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Japón/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Background: The prevalence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasing in Japan due to population aging. The association between sensory impairment and incident AD remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of sensory impairment on incident AD. Methods: We analyzed residents of five municipalities participating in the Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence (LIFE) Study. The participants comprised individuals who had newly applied for long-term care needs certification between 2017 and 2022 and had no cognitive impairment upon application or AD diagnosis within the preceding six months. Participants were classified according to sensory impairment status: visual impairment (VI), hearing impairment (HI), neither sensory impairment (NSI), and dual sensory impairment (DSI). The month succeeding the certification application was set as the index month, and the interval from that month until AD onset was assessed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to calculate the risk of AD onset according to sensory impairment status while adjusting for sex, age, dependence level, self-reliance level, and comorbidities. Results: Among 14,186 participants, we identified 1,194 (8.4%) who developed AD over a median follow-up period of 22.6 months. VI and HI only were not associated with incident AD. However, DSI conferred a significantly higher risk (HR: 1.6, CI: 1.1-2.2, pâ=â0.008) of AD onset than NSI. Conclusions: Individuals with concurrent DSI have a higher risk of developing AD than those with single or NSI. Preventing and treating sensory impairment may not only improve functional outcomes, but could also help to reduce the future risk of AD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Pérdida Auditiva , Humanos , Longevidad , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Visión/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva/complicaciones , EnvejecimientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although COVID-19 no longer constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, vaccination remains an important tool for reducing disease burden and mitigating future outbreaks. However, little is known about the impact of vaccination on medical expenditures and hospitalization duration after breakthrough infection. This study aimed to examine this impact during the Delta wave in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted using medical care claims data, vaccination records, and COVID-19-related information. COVID-19 cases in three municipalities were categorized into two age groups: 20-64 years and ≥65 years. For each group, we constructed linear regression models with a generalized estimating equation. We calculated the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of COVID-19 vaccination for total medical expenditures and hospitalization duration after adjusting for sex, comorbidities, and municipality. RESULTS: We analyzed 618 cases aged 20-64 years (mean age: 38.4 years, women: 45.1%) and 208 cases aged ≥65 years (76.4 years, 53.8%). The RRs (95% CIs) of vaccination for total medical expenditures were 0.53 (0.44-0.64) in the 20-64 years age group and 0.51 (0.39-0.66) in the ≥65 years age group. Next, the RRs (95% CIs) of vaccination for hospitalization duration were 0.59 (0.42-0.83) in the 20-64 years age group and 0.69 (0.49-0.98) in the ≥65 years age group. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with lower total medical expenditures and hospitalization duration after breakthrough infection, with a more pronounced effect in older persons.
Asunto(s)
Infección Irruptiva , COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Factores de Edad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Gastos en Salud , Hospitalización , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunación , Eficacia de las Vacunas , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The associations between COVID-19 vaccination and post-COVID psychiatric disorders are unclear. Furthermore, it is uncertain if these associations differ depending on the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant at the time of infection. This retrospective cohort study aimed to clarify the associations between COVID-19 vaccination and incident psychiatric disorders after breakthrough infection according to the different variant periods in Japan. METHODS: Medical claims data, COVID-19 case-related information, and vaccination records were collected from three Japanese municipalities. The study population comprised public insurance enrollees aged ≥65 years who developed COVID-19 between June 2021 and December 2022. The study exposure was each participant's vaccination status 14 days before infection, and the outcomes were the occurrence of psychiatric disorders within three months of infection. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of vaccination for the occurrence of psychiatric disorders. Analyses were conducted for the Delta period (June to December 2021), Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period (January to June 2022), and Omicron BA.5 period (July to December 2022). RESULTS: We analyzed 270 participants (vaccinated: 149) in the Delta period, 2,963 participants (vaccinated: 2,699) in the Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period, and 7,723 participants (vaccinated: 7,159) in the Omicron BA.5 period. During the Delta period, vaccinated participants had significantly lower odds for psychotic disorders (OR: 0.23, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.88, P = 0.032) than unvaccinated participants. During the Omicron BA.5 period, vaccinated participants had significantly lower odds for organic mental disorders (OR: 0.54, 95 % CI: 0.30-0.95, P = 0.033), psychotic disorders (OR: 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.19-0.53, P < 0.001), mood disorders (OR: 0.53, 95 % CI: 0.29-0.99, P = 0.046), and insomnia (OR: 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.32-0.72, P < 0.001) than unvaccinated participants. There were no significant differences in psychiatric disorders between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups during the Omicron BA.1/BA.2 period. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate that the associations between COVID-19 vaccination and post-COVID psychiatric disorders vary among the different variant periods. Future studies on these associations should be conducted with consideration to the prevalent circulating variants.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of physical activity (PA) and PPSV23 vaccination on pneumonia-related hospitalizations. This study examined the association between regular PA and pneumonia-related hospitalization according to PPSV23 vaccination status in older adults. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using health checkup data, medical care claims data, and vaccination records from two Japanese municipalities. Residents aged ≥65 years who had undergone a health checkup between April 2016 and March 2021 were categorized into a PPSV23 vaccinated or unvaccinated cohort. Each cohort was further divided into a PA group and no PA group. The hazard ratio (HR) of PA for pneumonia-related hospitalization was calculated for each cohort while adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, and metabolic syndrome. RESULTS: The vaccinated cohort comprised 16,295 participants (no PA: 5,139, PA: 11,156), and the unvaccinated cohort comprised 7,998 participants (no PA: 2,671, PA: 5,327). In the vaccinated cohort, the PA group had a significantly lower hazard for pneumonia-related hospitalization than the no PA group (adjusted HR: 0.58, P = 0.004). However, PA was not associated with pneumonia-related hospitalization in the unvaccinated cohort (adjusted HR: 0.70, P = 0.270). CONCLUSIONS: PA can reduce the risk of pneumonia-related hospitalization in vaccinated persons. Interventions that increase both vaccination rates and PA habits may help to reduce these hospitalizations in older adults.
Asunto(s)
Neumonía Neumocócica , Humanos , Anciano , Neumonía Neumocócica/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Vacunación , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Hypertension is the leading cardiovascular risk factor worldwide. However, in Japan, only 30% of patients have their blood pressure controlled under 140/90âmmHg, and nonadherence to antihypertensives is thought to be a reason for the poor control of hypertension. We therefore sought to assess the adherence to hypertension treatment and to evaluate factors influencing patients' adherence in a large, representative sample of the Japanese population. To this end, we analyzed claims data from the LIFE Study database, which includes 112 506 Japanese adults with newly diagnosed hypertension. Medication adherence was measured for a year postdiagnosis using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. Factors associated with adherence to antihypertensives were also assessed. Among the total 112 506 hypertensive patients, the nonadherence rate (PDC ≤ 80%) for antihypertensives during the first year after initiation of the treatment was 26.2%. Younger age [31-35âyears: odds ratio (OR), 0.15; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.12-0.19 compared with 71-74-year-old patients], male gender, monotherapy, and diuretics use [OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.82-0.91 compared with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs)] were associated with poor adherence in the present study. Cancer comorbidity (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91 compared with no comorbidity), prescription at a hospital, and living in a medium-sized to regional city were also associated with poor adherence. Our present findings showing the current status of adherence to antihypertensive medications and its associated factors using claims data in Japan should help to improve adherence to antihypertensives and blood pressure control.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos , Hipertensión , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Japón/epidemiología , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bivalent COVID-19 vaccines have been implemented worldwide since the booster vaccination campaigns of autumn of 2022, but little is known about their effectiveness. Thus, this study holistically evaluated the effectiveness of bivalent vaccines against infection in older adults in Japan. METHODS: We adopted the test-negative design using COVID-19 test data of individuals, aged ≥ 65 years, residing in three municipalities in Japan, who underwent tests in medical institutions between October 1 and December 30, 2022. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds of testing positive according to vaccination status. Vaccine effectiveness was defined as (1 - odds ratio) × 100%. RESULTS: A total of 3,908 positive and 16,090 negative results were included in the analyses. Receiving a bivalent dose in addition to ≥ 2 monovalent doses was 33.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.8, 44.3%) more effective than receiving no vaccination, and 18.2% (95% CI: 9.4, 26.0%) more effective than receiving ≥ 2 monovalent doses but not receiving a bivalent vaccination. In addition, the effectiveness peaked at 14-20 days after administration and then gradually declined over time. Furthermore, a bivalent booster dose provided 18.6% (95% CI: 9.9, 26.5%) additional protection among those vaccinated with ≥ 2 monovalent doses, in the absence of a previous infection history. However, we did not find sufficient evidence of effectiveness of bivalent vaccines among previously infected older adults. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalent vaccines are effective against COVID-19 infections among older adults without a history of infection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Japón/epidemiología , Eficacia de las Vacunas , ARN Mensajero , Vacunas CombinadasRESUMEN
Background: Post-authorization safety studies (PASSs) of vaccines are important. PASSs enable the evaluation of association between vaccination and adverse events following immunization through common study designs. Clinical trials during vaccine development typically include a few thousand to 10,000 participants while a PASS might aim to detect a few adverse events per 100,000 vaccine recipients. While all available data may be utilized, prior consideration of power analyses are nonetheless crucial for interpretation in cases where statistically significant differences are not found. Methods: This research primarily examined cohort study design and self-controlled case series (SCCS) design, estimating the power of a PASS under plausible conditions. Results: Both the cohort study and SCCS designs necessitated large sample sizes or high event counts to guarantee adequate power. The SCCS design is particularly suited to evaluating rare adverse events. However, extremely rare events may not yield sufficient occurrences, thereby resulting in low power. Although the SCCS design can more efficiently control for time-invariant confounding in principle, it solely estimates relative measures. A cohort study design might be preferred if confounding can be adequately managed as it also estimates absolute measures. It may be an easy decision to use all the data at hand for either design. We found it necessary to estimate the sample size and number of events to be used in the study based on a priori information and anticipated results.
Asunto(s)
Inmunización , Vacunación , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Inmunización/efectos adversos , Proyectos de Investigación , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess whether the United States-developed Claims-based Frailty Index (CFI) can be implemented in Japanese older adults using claims data. METHODS: We used the monthly claims data and certification of long-term care (LTC) insurance data of residents from 12 municipalities from April 2014 to March 2019. The 12 months from first recording was defined as the "baseline period," and the time thereafter as the "follow-up period". Participants aged ≥65 years were included, and those with no certified LTC insurance or who died at baseline were excluded. New certification of LTC insurance and all-cause mortality during the follow-up period were defined as outcome events. CFI categorization consisted of three steps including: 1) using 12 months deficit-accumulation approach that assigned different weights to each of the 52 items; 2) the accumulated score to derive the CFI; and 3) categorizing the CFI as "robust" (<0.15), "prefrail" (0.15-0.24), and "frail" (≥0.25). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the association between CFI and outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: There were 519,941 participants in total. After adjusting for covariates, the severe CFI category had a high risk of certification of LTC insurance (prefrail: HR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.27-1.39 and frail: HR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.53-1.68) and all-cause mortality (prefrail: HR 1.44; 95% CI, 1.29-1.60 and frail: HR 1.84; 95% CI, 1.66-2.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CFI can be implemented in Japanese claims data to predict the certification of LTC insurance and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil , Fragilidad , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios de Cohortes , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Japón/epidemiología , Evaluación GeriátricaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To address the lack of an active vaccine safety surveillance system in Japan, the Vaccine Effectiveness, Networking, and Universal Safety (VENUS) study was initiated in 2021 as a pilot system using existing health insurance claims data and vaccination records. METHODS: This study evaluated the value of the VENUS study by assessing the incidence of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following vaccination with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) design. RESULTS: Incidence rate ratios for ITP during 28-day and 42-day risk periods were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-6.4), and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.081-4.2), respectively. Neither was statistically significant. Incidence rate ratios could not be estimated for GBS due to the limited sample size. CONCLUSION: The VENUS study can provide valuable insights to facilitate the establishment of an advanced vaccine monitoring system in Japan.