Imaging Identification of Rapidly Progressing Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Simple Eligibility Criterion for Tolvaptan.

BACKGROUND: Tolvaptan was approved for the treatment of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). However, the official indication of "rapidly progressive disease" is described differently in the clinical guidelines. We aim to define "rapidly progressive disease" by risk of ESRD, which is evaluated using estimated height-adjusted total kidney volume (HtTKV) growth rate. METHODS: The risk of ESRD was retrospectively analyzed in 617 initially non-ESRD adults with ADPKD and observed with standard of care between 2007 and 2018. The estimated annual growth rate of the HtTKV, termed as eHTKV-α (%/year), is derived from the following equation: [HtTKV at age t] = K(1 + eHTKV-α/100)t, where K = 150 mL/m is used in Mayo Imaging Classification and K = 130 mL/m is proposed for individually stable eHTKV-α value from baseline. The accuracy of eHTKV-α to predict ESRD for censored ages was analyzed using time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC). The cutoff point of initially measured eHTKV-α to predict ESRD was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's proportional hazards models. Performance characteristics of the cutoff point for censored ages were calculated using time-dependent ROC and validated by the bootstrap method. RESULTS: The area under the time-dependent ROC of eHTKV-α to predict ESRD at age 65 was 0.89 ± 0.04 (K = 130). The mean renal survival was less than 70 years at eHTKV-α ≥4.0%/year (K = 130). Mean renal survival was approximately 12 years shorter, and hazard ratio of ESRD was more than 5-time higher at this cutoff point than at lower point. Time-dependent sensitivity for age 65 and cutoff point of 4.0%/year (K = 130) was 93.4 ± 0.3%. Between cutoff points ≥4.0%/year (K = 130) and ≥3.5%/year (K = 150), there was no significant difference in performance characteristics and accuracy to predict ESRD. CONCLUSION: eHTKV-α well predicts ESRD. Initially, measured eHTKV-α ≥4.0%/year (K = 130) defines high-risk ESRD. Without additional conditions, a single eHTKV-α cutoff point identifies subjects that are most likely to benefit from tolvaptan.

Implant Characteristics of Quadripolar and Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Several studies have reported that the left ventricular (LV) lead implant success rate ranges between 88.0% and 92.4%. Coronary venous anatomy differs among patients thus, necessitating multiple types of leads. To date, the implant success rate among Japanese patients utilizing a pre-specified family LV leads (including bipolar and quadripolar) is not well known. The Attain Success Japan Study enrolled patients indicated for a de novo or an upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy implant. Patients were followed for 3 months, and the implant success rates with Medtronic Attain family LV leads as well as the incidence of complications related to the LV lead were evaluated.Three hundred 53 patients were enrolled from 29 sites in Japan; 346 patients had LV lead implant attempts. The LV lead was successfully implanted in 336 patients (97.1%). Bipolar and quadripolar LV lead implants were successful in 97.2% and 99.2% of patients, respectively (P = 0.43). Four complications (1.2%) related to the LV leads were reported; all of which occurred in patients receiving bipolar LV leads. The quadripolar LV leads were more frequently implanted in the apical segment compared with bipolar leads (21.6% versus 3.8%, P < 0.01). This study demonstrated a high implant success rate and a low LV lead-related complication rate, regardless of bipolar, or quadripolar in a Japanese cohort of patients.

Non-Inferiority of Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent.

BACKGROUND: The Resolute Integrity coronary drug-eluting stent (DES), the next evolution of the Resolute DES, is designed with thinner stent struts and continuous sinusoidal technology to further enhance performance. This study evaluated the performance of the Resolute Integrity DES compared with the historical performance of Xience V. Methods and Results: We assessed the safety, efficacy, and deliverability of Resolute Integrity compared with the Xience DES, the prespecified historical control, in PROPEL, a large, real-world prospective, single-arm, open-label study. A total of 1,204 subjects were enrolled in PROPEL and treated with the Resolute Integrity DES at 76 sites in Japan. Lesion and procedural success rates were 100% and 99%, respectively. Patients were equally complex in the Resolute Integrity and Xience cohorts. At 1 year in the clinical-only cohort, the primary endpoint target lesion failure was 4.3% (34/800) in the Resolute Integrity cohort compared with 8.5% (97/1,142) in the Xience historical controls (P<0.001 for non-inferiority). Target vessel failure, major adverse cardiac events, target vessel myocardial infarction, and the composite cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction were all lower with Resolute Integrity compared with Xience, including in "high risk" patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the large, prospective, multicenter PROPEL trial, the performance of the Resolute Integrity DES was non-inferior to that of the benchmark Xience DES used as a historical comparator.

Accurate Depth of Radiofrequency-Induced Lesions in Renal Sympathetic Denervation Based on a Fine Histological Sectioning Approach in a Porcine Model.

BACKGROUND: Ablation lesion depth caused by radiofrequency-based renal denervation (RDN) was limited to <4 mm in previous animal studies, suggesting that radiofrequency-RDN cannot ablate a substantial percentage of renal sympathetic nerves. We aimed to define the true lesion depth achieved with radiofrequency-RDN using a fine sectioning method and to investigate biophysical parameters that could predict lesion depth. METHODS AND RESULTS: Radiofrequency was delivered to 87 sites in 14 renal arteries from 9 farm pigs at various ablation settings: 2, 4, 6, and 9 W for 60 seconds and 6 W for 120 seconds. Electric impedance and electrode temperature were recorded during ablation. At 7 days, 2470 histological sections were obtained from the treated arteries. Maximum lesion depth increased at 2 to 6 W, peaking at 6.53 (95% confidence interval, 4.27-8.78) mm under the 6 W/60 s condition. It was not augmented by greater power (9 W) or longer duration (120 seconds). There were statistically significant tendencies at 6 and 9 W, with higher injury scores in the media, nerves, arterioles, and fat. Maximum lesion depth was positively correlated with impedance reduction and peak electrode temperature (Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.59 and 0.53, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lesion depth was 6.5 mm for radiofrequency-RDN at 6 W/60 s. The impedance reduction and peak electrode temperature during ablation were closely associated with lesion depth. Hence, these biophysical parameters could provide prompt feedback during radiofrequency-RDN procedures in the clinical setting.

Potential errors resulting from sex and age difference in assessing family history of coronary heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronary heart disease occurs nearly exponentially with age and differently between men and women. Therefore, difference in sex and age of family members yields errors in assessing the family history as a risk factor. The influence of sex and age on the positivity of family history was assessed numerically. METHODS: Through questionnaires filled in by the parents of 2316 high school students, information was obtained on the past history of coronary heart disease among students' parents, grandparents, uncles, and aunts. The sex- and age-specific proportion of a positive history was calculated from the past history among the 24,071 family members. The influence of sex and age on a positive history was estimated as odds ratios by logistic regression analysis of the past history. RESULTS: The odds ratios obtained for sex and age difference were 1.61 (95% confidence interval: 1.42-1.83) and 1.07 (95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.07), respectively. This indicated that a positive history was 1.61 times higher among male members than among female members of the same age, and that a positive history increased by (1.07)y, where y was age difference by year. CONCLUSIONS: Potential errors resulting from disregarding the sex and age of family members can be substantial, judging from the above numerical figures. Some measures to control for the sex and age of family members are required in assessing family history of coronary heart disease.