Optimizing collection of adverse event data in cancer clinical trials supporting supplemental indications.

PURPOSE: Although much is known about the safety of an anticancer agent at the time of initial marketing approval, sponsors customarily collect comprehensive safety data for studies that support supplemental indications. This adds significant cost and complexity to the study but may not provide useful new information. The main purpose of this analysis was to assess the amount of safety and concomitant medication data collected to determine a more optimal approach in the collection of these data when used in support of supplemental applications. METHODS: Following a prospectively developed statistical analysis plan, we reanalyzed safety data from eight previously completed prospective randomized trials. RESULTS: A total of 107,884 adverse events and 136,608 concomitant medication records were reviewed for the analysis. Of these, four grade 1 to 2 and nine grade 3 and higher events were identified as drug effects that were not included in the previously established safety profiles and could potentially have been missed using subsampling. These events were frequently detected in subsamples of 400 patients or larger. Furthermore, none of the concomitant medication records contributed to labeling changes for the supplemental indications. CONCLUSION: Our study found that applying the optimized methodologic approach, described herein, has a high probability of detecting new drug safety signals. Focusing data collection on signals that cause physicians to modify or discontinue treatment ensures that safety issues of the highest concern for patients and regulators are captured and has significant potential to relieve strain on the clinical trials system.

A randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of intermittent 3-, 4-, and 5-day cycles of intravenous recombinant human interleukin-2 combined with antiretroviral therapy (ART) versus ART alone in HIV-seropositive patients with 100-300 CD4+ T cells.

The effect of length of therapy on the safety and efficacy profile of continuous intravenous (CIV) interleukin-2 (IL-2) in combination with antiretroviral therapy (ART) was evaluated in 81 HIV-seropositive patients with CD4(+) T-cell counts of 100-300/mm(3). Patients were randomized to CIV IL-2 (12 mIU/day) for 3, 4, or 5 days plus ART every 8 weeks for six cycles, or to ART alone. The mean percent increase in CD4(+) T-cell counts was 24.5% for IL-2 recipients compared with a mean percent decrease of 30.5% for control patients (P = 0.005). Increasing duration of CIV IL-2 therapy resulted in improved CD4(+) T-cell response. The most frequent clinical adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were predominantly of grade 1 or 2 severity. However, grade 3 or 4 events were reported in 57%, 60%, and 84% of the 3-, 4-, and 5-day CIV IL-2 patients, respectively. Serious adverse events, mainly due to the requirement of hospitalization, occurred in 20% of IL-2 recipients, compared with 10% of control patients. Viral load during the course of the study was not different among the treatment groups. IL-2 therapy in cycles of 5 days resulted in an optimal increase in CD4(+) T-cell counts and is the preferred cycle length for IL-2 therapy geared toward increasing CD4(+) T-cell numbers.