Effectiveness and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Adolescent Patients with Chronic Migraine.

Chronic migraine (CM) significantly affects underage individuals. The study objectives are (1) to analyze the effectiveness and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) in adolescents with CM; (2) to review the literature on BTX-A use in the pediatric population. This prospective observational study included patients under 18 years old with CM treated with BTX-A (PREEMPT protocol) as compassionate use. Demographic, efficacy (monthly headache days-MHD; monthly migraine days-MMD; acute medication days/month-AMDM) and side effect data were collected. A ≥ 50% reduction in MHD was considered as a response. Effectiveness and safety were analyzed at 6 and 12 months. A systematic review of the use of BTX-A in children/adolescents was conducted in July 2023. In total, 20 patients were included (median age 15 years [14.75-17], 70% (14/20) females). The median basal frequencies were 28.8 [20-28] MHD, 18 [10-28] MMD and 10 [7.5-21.2] AMDM. Compared with baseline, at 6 months (n = 20), 11 patients (55%) were responders, with a median reduction in MHD of -20 days/month (p = 0.001). At 12 months (n = 14), eight patients (57.1%) were responders, with a median reduction in MHD of -17.5 days/month (p = 0.002). No adverse effects were reported. The literature search showed similar results. Our data supports the concept that BTX-A is effective, well tolerated, and safe in adolescents with CM resistant to oral preventatives.

Mechanosensitive receptors in migraine: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder with pain profile, suggesting exaggerated mechanosensation. Mechanosensitive receptors of different families, which specifically respond to various mechanical stimuli, have gathered increasing attention due to their potential role in migraine related nociception. Understanding these mechanisms is of principal importance for improved therapeutic strategies. This systematic review comprehensively examines the involvement of mechanosensitive mechanisms in migraine pain pathways. METHODS: A systematic search across the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline was conducted on 8th August 2023 for the period from 2000 to 2023, according to PRISMA guidelines. The review was constructed following a meticulous evaluation by two authors who independently applied rigorous inclusion criteria and quality assessments to the selected studies, upon which all authors collectively wrote the review. RESULTS: We identified 36 relevant studies with our analysis. Additionally, 3 more studies were selected by literature search. The 39 papers included in this systematic review cover the role of the putative mechanosensitive Piezo and K2P, as well as ASICs, NMDA, and TRP family of channels in the migraine pain cascade. The outcome of the available knowledge, including mainly preclinical animal models of migraine and few clinical studies, underscores the intricate relationship between mechanosensitive receptors and migraine pain symptoms. The review presents the mechanisms of activation of mechanosensitive receptors that may be involved in the generation of nociceptive signals and migraine associated clinical symptoms. The gender differences of targeting these receptors as potential therapeutic interventions are also acknowledged as well as the challenges related to respective drug development. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this analysis identified key molecular players and uncovered significant gaps in our understanding of mechanotransduction in migraine. This review offers a foundation for filling these gaps and suggests novel therapeutic options for migraine treatments based on achievements in the emerging field of mechano-neurobiology.

Risk assessment of long-term epilepsy after de novo status epilepticus with clinical and electroencephalographic biomarkers: The AFTER score.

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing epilepsy after de novo status epilepticus (SE) is nonnegligible. The individualized management of patients with high risk of subsequent epilepsy could improve long-term quality of life and cognitive impairment. We aimed to ascertain potential biomarkers of subsequent epilepsy and to construct a scoring system possessing predictive value for the diagnosis of post-SE epilepsy during follow-up. METHODS: The study data were obtained from a prospective registry of all SE episodes occurring in patients over 16 years attended in our tertiary center from February 2011 to April 2022. Clinical data, electroencephalography findings, treatment, and long-term clinical data were prospectively recorded. We selected SE patients at risk of developing epilepsy (acute symptomatic and cryptogenic etiologies with no previous history of epilepsy) and analyzed the risk of developing subsequent epilepsy. RESULTS: We included 230 patients. Median age was 65 years ± 16.9 SD and 112/230 (48.7 %) were women. One-hundred ninety-eight patients (86.1 %) had an acute symptomatic SE, whereas 32 patients (13.9 %) presented with a cryptogenic SE. A total of 55 patients (23.9 %) developed an unprovoked remote seizure and were diagnosed with epilepsy. After adjusting for identifiable confounders in a multivariable Cox regression analysis cryptogenic etiology (HR 2.24 [1.13-4.46], p = 0.022), first-line treatment initiation ≥1 h (HR 2.12 [1.03-4.36], p = 0.041], RDA/LPD/GPD EEG patterns (HR 1.88 [1.07-3.32], p = 0.028), and super-refractoriness (HR 2.90 [1.40-5.99], p = 0.004) emerged as independent predictors of post-SE epilepsy. Based on these findings, we constructed the AFTER score (1 point for each item) with a robust capability to predict post-SE epilepsy at 5 years (AUC 74.3 %, 95 %CI 64.3-84.3 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The AFTER score is a robust predictor of the development of epilepsy after new onset SE using clinical and electroencephalographic biomarkers (such as etiology, time to first-line treatment initiation, EEG pattern and super-refractoriness). Prospective studies are warranted to validate the score in other populations.

Headache in COVID-19 and Long COVID: to Know Facts for Clinical Practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Headache is one of the most frequent symptoms of the acute and post-acute phase of COVID-19. Specific epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors, pathophysiology, and treatment have been reported in these two scenarios. With this narrative review of the literature, we aim to provide updated knowledge on headache in the COVID-19 setting and give clinicians a practical approach on this topic to guide them in their clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Headache mechanisms in COVID-19 are still poorly understood. Strong evidence is also lacking on how to best treat and manage these patients, especially those with persistent and disabling headache after COVID-19. Data are also scarce on the characteristics of headache in COVID-19 caused by the new SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron) variants and how these may influence the acute and persistent symptoms of COVID-19. Patients with pre-existing primary headache disorders remain a particularly concerning population due to their biological predisposition in suffering from headaches and the potential risk of worsening in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although there is an exponential growth of scientific evidence, studies are often controversial and focused on the first wave of the pandemic, making COVID-19 headache still a challenging matter for clinicians. New research is therefore needed.

Prediction of long-term unprovoked seizures after status epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: Possible long-term consequences of status epilepticus (SE) include cognitive and behavioral impairment and the development of chronic epilepsy. However, these aspects have not been systematically studied in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate long-term seizure recurrence after SE and the potential risk factors for their development. METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospective registry of all SE episodes occurring in adult patients who attended our center from February 2011 to April 2022. Clinical data, electroencephalographic findings, treatment, and long-term data were prospectively recorded. We performed a cross-sectional study of consecutive SE patients without previous epilepsy diagnosis, and analyzed the development of unprovoked remote seizures. RESULTS: A total of 849 patients were registered in the database. After excluding in-hospital mortality (198/849, 23.3%) and patients with prior epilepsy history (291/849, 44.7%), 360 patients (42.4%) with a first SE episode were included. The median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 56-79), and 176 patients (48.9%) were women. The median time to first-line treatment initiation was 2 h (IQR = .7-7.4), and it was correlated with SE duration (R = .375, p < .001). One hundred nine patients (30.3%) presented unprovoked seizures during a median follow-up of 1.8 years (IQR = .5-4.3). After adjusting for identifiable confounders in a multivariable Cox regression analysis, progressive symptomatic etiology (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-3.33, p = .011), time to first-line treatment initiation > 1.5 h (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.25-2.87, p = .003), and superrefractory SE (HR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.26-4.33, p = .007) were independently associated with a greater risk of unprovoked seizure recurrence. In contrast, older patients (HR = .99, 95% CI = .97-.99, p = .021) and an acute symptomatic etiology (HR = .44, 95% CI .28-.68, p < .001) were at lower risk of unprovoked seizure recurrence. SIGNIFICANCE: The etiology of SE, the delay in initiating SE treatment, and the presence of superrefractoriness have been identified as potentials factors associated with unprovoked remote seizures following a new onset SE. Therefore, prompt and appropriate management should be applied to avoid seizure recurrence.