RESUMEN
This study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STB) by age and gender in Cantabria, Spain, from January 2019 to March 2022, using interrupted time series analysis. Post-lockdown, STB declined in males (-42 %, p = 0.01) and females (-25 %, p = 0.58), with a gradual increase in both genders. The reduction was most pronounced in older adults (-39 %, p = 0.56), followed by middle-aged (-26 %, p = 0.36) and younger groups (-8.3 %, p = 0.25). Subsequent upward trends in STB were more pronounced in younger (p = 0.15) and older age groups (p = 0.25), likely due to prolonged isolation and economic hardship.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Ideación Suicida , Humanos , España/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Factores Sexuales , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/psicología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with schizophrenia exhibit a reduced life expectancy mainly due to medical-related pathologies which might have been initiated due to stressful events during fetal development. Indeed, intra-uterus growth patterns predict anthropometric measures in adulthood, describing risk factors for schizophrenia and metabolic disorders. We aim to evaluate anthropometric values in two cohorts of antipsychotic-naïve first-episode episode psychosis (FEP) and correlated them with surrogate markers of the fetal environment such as birth weight (BW) and season of birth. METHODS: BW, season of birth, and anthropometric values from 2 cohorts of FEP patients (Barcelona and Santander) were evaluated. In cohort B, 91 patients, and 110 controls while in cohort S, 644 and 235 were included respectively. RESULTS: Patients were shorter, slimmer, and with lower BMI compared with controls. In both cohorts, patients, and female patients born in winter displayed the shortest height. Regarding BW, height was significantly associated with the interaction of diagnosis and BW in the whole sample and the male subsample. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm reduced anthropometric features in FEP at onset while suggesting the influence of winter birth and BW, highlighting the role of early life events in the later outcome of FEP with sex differences.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , Antropometría , Peso al NacerRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Individuals with psychosis present a greater prevalence of chronic lung diseases, including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). These chronic respiratory diseases are preceded by early lung function alterations; such as preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) or normal spirometry but low diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). However, there is no previous evidence on these lung function alterations in psychosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk of having spirometry and DLCO alterations in subjects with psychosis compared with a control group. METHODS: Cross-sectional study on a cohort of 170 individuals including 96 subjects with psychosis and 74 sex-age-and smoking habit matched healthy controls. All subjects were under 60 years-old, and without COPD or asthma. Respiratory function was evaluated through spirometry. Clinical characteristics and DLCO values were recorded. RESULTS: Patients with psychosis showed lower spirometry results, both in terms of absolute and percentage of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1). Absolute and percentage levels of diffusion were also lower in patients with psychosis. The percentage of individuals with DLCO<80% was higher among patients with psychosis (75% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). And the prevalence of PRISm was higher among patients with psychosis (10.4% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that psychosis was an independent predictor of DLCO<80% (OR 5.67, CI95% 1.86-17.27). CONCLUSION: Patients with psychosis and females had early alterations in lung function. These results suggest that early screening for lung disease should be encouraged in psychosis.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Pulmón , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Espirometría , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Capacidad Vital , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking has been described as the main cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and this habit is clearly more frequent among individuals with psychosis than in the general population, with rates reaching up to 60%. However, little attention has been focused on the association of COPD and psychosis. We aimed to explore the risk of presenting early lung function alterations in a group of individuals with psychosis. METHODS: Following an observational cross-sectional design we studied a cohort of individuals with established psychosis (N=128), and compared them with a sex, age, and smoking habit matched control group (N=79). We evaluated respiratory symptoms by means of mMRC, CAT and Dyspnea-12 scales. And lung function through spirometry tests. RESULTS: Individuals with psychosis presented more respiratory symptoms than controls. Similarly, we observed significant differences in the lung function tests between these two groups, where individuals with psychosis presented worse results in most of the spirometry mean values (FEV1 or forced expiratory volume in the first one second: 3.29L vs. 3.75L, p<0.001; forced vital capacity or FVC: 4.25L vs. 4.72L, p=0.002; and FEV1/FVC ratio: 0.78 vs. 0.80, p=0.052). Patients also presented worse values of lung diffusion, with lower diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) than controls (6.95 vs. 8.54mmol/min/kPa, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The individuals with psychosis in our study presented greater respiratory symptoms and poorer lung function measured through spirometry. These signs have been described as early signs of COPD.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cognitive reserve (CR) has been associated with the development and prognosis of psychosis. Different proxies have been used to estimate CR among individuals. A composite score of these proxies could elucidate the role of CR at illness onset on the variability of clinical and neurocognitive outcomes. METHODS: Premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ), years of education and premorbid adjustment were explored as proxies of CR in a large sample (N = 424) of first-episode psychosis (FEP) non-affective patients. Clusters of patients were identified and compared based on premorbid, clinical and neurocognitive variables at baseline. Additionally, the clusters were compared at 3-year (N = 362) and 10-year (N = 150) follow-ups. RESULTS: The FEP patients were grouped into five CR clusters: C1 (low premorbid IQ, low education and poor premorbid) 14%; C2 (low premorbid IQ, low education and good premorbid adjustment) 29%; C3 (normal premorbid IQ, low education and poor premorbid adjustment) 17%; C4 (normal premorbid IQ, medium education and good premorbid adjustment) 25%; and C5 (normal premorbid IQ, higher education and good premorbid adjustment) 15%. In general, positive and negative symptoms were more severe in the FEP patients with the lowest CR at baseline and follow-up assessments, while those with high CR presented and maintained higher levels of cognitive functioning. CONCLUSIONS: CR could be considered a key factor at illness onset and a moderator of outcomes in FEP patients. A high CR could function as a protective factor against cognitive impairment and severe symptomatology. Clinical interventions focused on increasing CR and documenting long-term benefits are interesting and desirable.
Asunto(s)
Reserva Cognitiva , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cognición , EscolaridadRESUMEN
Background: COVID-19 pandemic has affected the mental health of the general population, and in particular of health professionals. Primary care personnel are at greater risk due to being highly exposed to the disease and working regularly in direct contact with patients suffering COVID-19. However, there is not sufficient evidence on the long-term psychological impact these professionals may suffer. We aimed to explore the long-term psychological impact of COVID-19 on primary care professionals. Methods: We applied a two-phase design; a self-reported psychopathology screening (PHQ-9, GAD-7, ISI and IES-R) in phase-1, and a specialised psychiatric evaluation (MINI, HDRS and STAI) in phase-2 to confirm phase-1 results. Evaluations were carried at the beginning of the pandemic (May-June 2020) (n = 410) and one year later (n = 339). Chi-square, ANOVA and logistic regression tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: Primary care professionals presented high rates of depression, anxiety and psychological distress, measured by PHQ-9, GAD-7 and IES-R respectively, during the pandemic. Depressive symptoms' severity (PHQ-9: 7.5 vs 8.4, p = 0.013) increased after one year of COVID-19 pandemic. After one year nearly 40% of subjects presented depression. Being women, having suffered COVID-19 or a relative with COVID-19, and being a front-line professional were risk factors for presenting depression and anxiety. Conclusion: Primary Care professionals in Cantabria present a poor mental health during COVID-19 pandemic, which has even worsened at long-term, presenting a greater psychopathology severity one year after. Thus, it is critical implementing prevention and early-treatment programmes to help these essential professionals to cope with the pandemic.
Antecedentes: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha afectado la salud mental de la población general, y en particular de los sanitarios. El personal de atención primaria tiene mayor riesgo por estar más expuesto a la enfermedad y trabajar regularmente en contacto directo con pacientes que padecen COVID-19. Sin embargo, no existe suficiente evidencia sobre el impacto psicológico a largo plazo que pueden sufrir estos profesionales. Nuestro objetivo fue explorar el impacto psicológico a largo plazo de COVID-19 en los profesionales de atención primaria. Métodos: Se aplicó un diseño en dos fases; un cribado de psicopatología a través de cuestionarios autoaplicados (PHQ-9, GAD-7, ISI e IES-R) en la fase 1, y una evaluación psiquiátrica especializada (MINI, HDRS y STAI) en la fase 2 para confirmar los resultados de la fase 1. Las evaluaciones se realizaron al inicio de la pandemia (mayo-junio de 2020) (n = 410) y un año después (n = 339). Se utilizaron pruebas de X 2, ANOVA y regresión logística para los análisis estadísticos. Resultados: Los profesionales de atención primaria presentaron índices elevados de depresión, ansiedad y malestar psicológico, medidos por PHQ-9, GAD-7 e IES-R, respectivamente, durante la pandemia. La severidad de los síntomas depresivos (PHQ-9: 7,5 vs 8,4; p = 0,013) aumentó tras un año de pandemia COVID-19. Después de un año, casi 40% de los sujetos presentaron depresión. El sexo femenino, haber padecido COVID-19 o tener un familiar con COVID-19 y ser profesional de primera línea fueron factores de riesgo para presentar depresión y ansiedad. Conclusiones: Los profesionales de Atención Primaria en Cantabria presentaron una mala salud mental durante la pandemia de COVID-19, la cual además empeoró a largo plazo, presentando una mayor gravedad los síntomas un año después. Por lo tanto, es fundamental implementar programas de prevención y tratamiento temprano para ayudar a estos profesionales esenciales a hacer frente a la pandemia.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Pandemias/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Longitudinales , España/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Atención Primaria de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Aripiprazole is an antipsychotic with a partial agonism of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. This differential mechanism implies a rigorous appraisal of the appropriate therapeutic strategies in certain situations. To answer currently unsolved clinical questions about the use of oral and long-acting injectable (LAI) aripiprazole, we present here an expert consensus from 12 Spanish psychiatrists and a pharmacologist with extensive experience in the use of this antipsychotic. METHODS: Through one face-to-face session and online collaboration, we reached consensus and established practical recommendations based on scientific evidence and clinical experience. We classified the available scientific literature according to SIGN system and attributed a level of evidence to each reviewed article. RESULTS: The recommendations were divided according to (i) chronological dimension (based on previous treatments, including patients naïve or not to antipsychotic treatment and maintenance regimen), and (ii) dimension related to therapeutic options, comprising switches to aripiprazole and the most used combinations with this antipsychotic. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend considering aripiprazole as first treatment option in the early stages of schizophrenia and in patients with affective symptoms and contemplating a switch to aripiprazole LAI in all candidate patients. Importantly, switches from other antipsychotics should consider previous antipsychotic history and exposure to aripiprazole. KEYPOINTSAripiprazole can be considered as first treatment option in early stages of schizophrenia and in patients with significant affective symptoms.Aripiprazole LAI shows better adherence than oral aripiprazole and could be considered in all candidate patients.Before switching to aripiprazole, detailed information about previous antipsychotic history should be gathered.Switch to aripiprazole should be managed differently for aripiprazole naïve and non-naïve patients.Rigorous and controlled studies on antipsychotics in real clinical practice should be carried out.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Psiquiatría , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Aripiprazol , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Dopamina/uso terapéutico , Preparaciones de Acción RetardadaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Latest studies in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP) have shown alterations in cardiovascular, immune and endocrinological systems. These findings could indicate a systemic onset alteration in the metabolic disease as opposed to justifying these findings exclusively by antipsychotics' side effects and long-term lifestyle consequences. In any case, this population is considered at higher risk for developing cardiometabolic disorders than their age-matched peers. METHODS: This is a prospective longitudinal study. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) prevalence between 244 subjects with FEP and 166 controls at 3 years was compared. Additionally, we explored whether baseline differences in any of the MetS components according to Adult Treatment Panel III definition and prescribed antipsychotic could help to predict the MetS development at 3 years. RESULTS: Patients with FEP present a similar baseline prevalence of MetS (6.6% vs 5.4%, p=0.320), according to ATP-III criteria. but with a higher prevalence of metabolic alterations than controls before the start of antipsychotic treatment. At 3-years follow-up the MetS prevalence had increased from 6.6% to 18.3% in the FEP group, while only from 5.4% to 8.1% in the control group. The multivariate model showed that, before antipsychotic exposure, a baseline altered waist circumference WC (OR=1.1, p=0.011), triglycerides (OR=1.1, p=0.043) and high-density lipoprotein HDL (OR=0.9, p=0.008) significantly predicted the presence of MetS at 3-years. We propose a predictive model of MetS at 3 years in 244 drug-naïve FEP patients. CONCLUSION: We found that altered WC, HDL and triglycerides at baseline predicted the presence of full MetS after 3-years of initiating antipsychotic treatment. Our findings support the need for interventions to improve factors related to the physical health of FEP individuals.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Síndrome Metabólico , Trastornos Psicóticos , Adulto , Humanos , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Triglicéridos/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic choice for the acute phase of a first episode of psychosis (FEP) is of the utmost importance since it may influence long-term outcome. However, head-to-head comparisons between second-generation antipsychotics remain scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness in the short term of aripiprazole and risperidone after FEP outbreak. METHODS: From February 2011 to October 2018, a prospective, randomized, open-label study was undertaken. Two hundred-sixty-six first-episode drug-naïve patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (n = 136) or risperidone (n = 130) and followed-up for 12 weeks. The primary effectiveness measure was all-cause treatment discontinuation. In addition, an analysis based on intention-to-treat principle was conducted to assess clinical efficacy. RESULTS: The overall dropout rate at 12 weeks was small (6.39%). Effectiveness measures were similar between treatment arms as treatment discontinuation rates (χâ2 = 0,409; P = .522), and mean time to all-cause discontinuation (log rank χâ2 = -1.009; P = .316) showed no statistically significant differences. Despite no statistically significant differences between groups regarding clinical efficacy, aripiprazole required higher chlorpromazine equivalent dosage (χâ2 = 2.160; P = .032) and extended mean time (W = 8183.5; P = .008) to reach clinical response. Sex-related adverse events and rigidity were more frequent in the risperidone group, whereas sialorrhea was on the aripiprazole group. CONCLUSIONS: No differences regarding effectiveness were found between aripiprazole and risperidone for the short-phase treatment of FEP. Despite the importance of efficacy during this phase, differences in side effect profiles and patient's preferences are essential factors that may lead clinical decisions for these patients. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT02532491. Effectiveness of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in First Episode Psychosis Patients: 1-year Follow-up (PAFIP3_1Y).
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Aripiprazol/efectos adversos , Risperidona/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few investigations have been carried out on metabolic syndrome in antipsychotic- naïve patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: Our primary objective was to compare the prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III in 2001 (NCEP-ATP III), between a Spanish cohort of 303 drug-naïve patients with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) without any previous cardiovascular condition, and 153 healthy individuals. RESULTS: Participants included 303 patients with FEP (M:F 53:46) and 153 control subjects (M:F 56:43). The mean and standard deviation ages were 31(9.38) and 29 (7.57) years in the study and control groups respectively (F = 4.09; p = 0.93). We found that the prevalence of MetS in drug-naïve patients with FEP (5.6 %) was similar to the prevalence of MetS in age-sex matched controls (5.12 %). However, 60.7 % of patients with FEP met at least one of the five MetS components, while among the control subjects only 36.5 % met at least one component. Additionally, we found that other factors not included among the operational definition of MetS, but still important in cardiovascular risk, were also altered. CONCLUSION: FEP patients have a greater risk of presenting at least one altered MetS component than healthy controls which could indicate the need of development of screening methods detecting cardiovascular risk. Likewise, gender differences in metabolic components such as waist circumference, which is a predictor of cardiovascular events have been found. Similarly, research should focus on metabolic risk predictors that include not only MetS, but also specific parameters for the early psychosis population.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Síndrome Metabólico , Trastornos Psicóticos , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Síndrome Metabólico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Circunferencia de la CinturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiometabolic disorders are largely responsible for excess mortality in schizophrenia. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasingly relevant in the development of metabolic risk factors that have been associated with antipsychotic treatment. We aimed to assess the incidence of NAFLD and metabolic disturbances during the first 3 years of antipsychotic treatment in patients with first episode of psychosis (FEP), and compare it with the incidence in a control group. METHODS: Data were obtained from patients with psychosis (n = 160) and healthy controls (n = 66) included in the Cantabria's clinical and research program on FEP (PAFIP) from 2012 to 2018. Fatty Liver Index (FLI) was used to estimate the amount of fat in the liver. FLI has been validated for the diagnosis of NAFLD against different standards such as liver ultrasound and biopsy. FLI and metabolic parameters were registered at baseline, 3 months and then yearly for 3 years. RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up (3-years), 21.9 % of patients with psychosis developed a FLI ≥ 60, suggestive of liver steatosis, compared to only a 3 % of subjects within the control group (X2 = 12.120; p < 0.001). In the FEP patients group, developing a FLI ≥ 60 was statistically associated with significant increments in metabolic parameters, and with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) (X2 = 16.151; p < 0.001) and high blood pressure (X2 = 10.654; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Having a first episode of non-affective psychosis was significantly associated with developing liver steatosis (FLI ≥ 60) in the first three years after initiating antipsychotic treatment. The results highlight the importance of early screening the emergence of NAFLD in schizophrenia patients.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Trastornos Psicóticos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Aripiprazole and risperidone are 2 of the most used second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) worldwide. Previous evidence shows a similar effect of these SGAs on weight and metabolic changes in the short term. However, a longer period is necessary for a better assessment of the SGA´s metabolic profile. We aimed to compare the long-term (1-year) metabolic profile of these 2 antipsychotics on a sample of drug-naïve first episode-psychosis (FEP) patients. METHODS: A total 188 drug-naïve patients, suffering from a first episode of non-affective psychosis (FEP), were randomly assigned to treatment with either aripiprazole or risperidone. Weight and glycemic/lipid parameters were recorded at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: We observed significant weight increments in both groups (9.2 kg for aripiprazole and 10.5 kg for risperidone) after 1 year of treatment. Despite this, weight and body mass index changes did not significantly differ between treatment groups (P > .05). Similarly, both treatment groups presented similar metabolic clinical impact with a comparable increase in the proportion of participants meeting criteria for metabolic disorders such as obesity or hypercholesterolemia, but not for metabolic syndrome (Δ9.2% vs Δ4.3%) or hypertriglyceridemia (Δ21.9% vs Δ8.0%), where aripiprazole showed worse outcomes than risperidone. CONCLUSION: This study shows that aripiprazole and risperidone share a similar long-term metabolic profile. After 1 year of antipsychotic treatment, drug-naïve FEP patients in both treatment groups presented a significant increase in weight and metabolic changes, leading to a greater prevalence of metabolic disorders.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Psicosis Inducidas por Sustancias , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Aripiprazol/efectos adversos , Risperidona/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Metaboloma , Lípidos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Background: Selecting the most effective treatment represents a critical challenge with the potential of modifying the long-term prognosis of individuals suffering a first break of psychosis. Head-to-head clinical trials comparing effectiveness among antipsychotic drugs in individuals with a first-episode of non-affective psychosis (FEP) are scarce.MethodsThe rationale and design of a 3 phases clinical trial (PAFIP-3, NCT02305823) comparing the effectiveness of aripiprazole and risperidone, and to additionally assess the benefits of an early use of clozapine in primary treatment-resistant patients is reported. The design encompasses of 5 work packages (medication algorithm, cognitive functioning, psychoeducation/vocational functioning, imaging and biological markers) addressing critical issues and needs of first episode psychosis individuals and their cares. The primary outcome measure was treatment effectiveness assessed by all-cause treatment discontinuation rate.Results266 individuals have been included in the randomization study phase I (risperidone vs. aripiprazole). At 3 months, the retention rate was of 94% (249/266), 48(19.3%) patients have gone through phase II (olanzapine treatment), and 7(2.8%) entered the clozapine phase (phase III).DiscussionThe PAFIP 3 clinical trial may provide relevant information about clinical guidelines to optimally treat patients with a first episode of non-affective psychosis and the benefits and risks of an early use of clozapine in treatment resistant patients. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Aripiprazol/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Risperidona/uso terapéutico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Selecting the most effective treatment represents a critical challenge with the potential of modifying the long-term prognosis of individuals suffering a first break of psychosis. Head-to-head clinical trials comparing effectiveness among antipsychotic drugs in individuals with a first-episode of non-affective psychosis (FEP) are scarce. METHODS: The rationale and design of a 3 phases clinical trial (PAFIP-3, NCT02305823) comparing the effectiveness of aripiprazole and risperidone, and to additionally assess the benefits of an early use of clozapine in primary treatment-resistant patients is reported. The design encompasses of 5 work packages (medication algorithm, cognitive functioning, psychoeducation/vocational functioning, imaging and biological markers) addressing critical issues and needs of first episode psychosis individuals and their cares. The primary outcome measure was treatment effectiveness assessed by all-cause treatment discontinuation rate. RESULTS: 266 individuals have been included in the randomization study phase I (risperidone vs. aripiprazole). At 3 months, the retention rate was of 94% (249/266), 48(19.3%) patients have gone through phase II (olanzapine treatment), and 7(2.8%) entered the clozapine phase (phase III). DISCUSSION: The PAFIP 3 clinical trial may provide relevant information about clinical guidelines to optimally treat patients with a first episode of non-affective psychosis and the benefits and risks of an early use of clozapine in treatment resistant patients. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02305823.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Psicóticos , Risperidona , Aripiprazol/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Risperidona/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 10-year stability of schizophrenia diagnosis in a cohort of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and the factors associated with it. METHODS: Changes in diagnosis of 209 FEP patients were described during 10 years of follow-up. Related factors with maintenance or change of schizophrenia diagnosis were evaluated in prospective and retrospective approaches through binary logistic regressions, ROC and survival curves. RESULTS: Out of the 209 patients, 126 were diagnosed of schizophrenia 6 months after their inclusion in the clinical program. Prospective analyses showed that eight of those 126 schizophrenia patients had changed to a different diagnosis after 10 years, and predictors of change were better childhood premorbid adjustment, less severity of clinical global impression at baseline, and diagnosis of comorbid personality disorder during follow-up. Retrospectively, out of the 154 patients with schizophrenia in the 10-year assessment, 36 had a different diagnosis at baseline, and those factors related to a different prior diagnosis than schizophrenia were better socioeconomic status and shorter duration of untreated psychosis (DUP). A survival analysis on the timing of schizophrenia diagnosis showed that male gender and longer DUP were predictors of earlier definite diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic stability of schizophrenia in our FEP sample is high, especially prospective stability, and the group of patients with diagnostic change corresponded to a milder psychopathological profile before and at the onset of disease. Moreover, we observed a cautious attitude in the diagnosis of schizophrenia in patients with shorter DUP who had schizophrenia diagnosis after 10 years.