Safety Evaluation of Unibody Endografts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The unibody bifurcated aortic endograft (AFX/AFX2) has emerged as a treatment option for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of the unibody endograft. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Studies assessing the unibody endograft for AAA repair between 2014 and 2023 were included. The defined primary outcomes were the incidences of type I, II, and III endoleaks. The secondary outcomes were access site problems, aneurysm-related mortality, aneurysm rupture, all-cause mortality, aneurysm sac growth, limb occlusion, stent graft migration, and technical success rate. RESULTS: Fourteen studies including 12 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 10 studies with 12,690 patients that reported the measured outcomes, and excluded 4 studies that did not. Type II endoleaks had the highest incidence of 12% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-20%), followed by type III endoleaks with an incidence of 3% (95% CI: 1-5%). The incidence of type I endoleaks was 1% (95% CI: 0-2%). A subgroup analysis by follow-up duration showed that type II endoleak incidence was higher after 1 to 2 years of follow-up than 3 to 4 years of follow-up. The incidence of aneurysmal mortality was 2% (95% CI: 0-7%), limb occlusion was 1% (95% CI: 0-1%), stent graft migration was 1% (95% CI: 0-2%), aneurysmal rupture was 6% (95% CI: 2-11%), access site problems were 7% (95% CI: 2-13%), aneurysm sac growth was 2% (95% CI: 0-4%), all-cause mortality was 21% (95% CI: 4-38%), and technical success rate was 100% (95% CI: 98-100%). CONCLUSIONS: The unibody endograft is a safe and minimally invasive approach for AAA repair. However, potential complications necessitate close patient follow-up after the intervention.

The risk of bone fractures in dementia patients receiving acetylcholinesterase inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

Aim: The authors aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to determine if acetylcholinesterase inhibitors may pose a direct threat, increasing the incidence of fractures in dementia patients. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched. Inclusion criteria were any original studies that demonstrated the link between acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and the incidence of fracture in patients with dementia. RevMan(5.4) was used. Results: Seven observational studies were included. The total number of patients included in the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors group is 274 332 and 290 347 in the control group. The pooled analysis showed that the risk of bone fracture was not statistically different between dementia patients who received acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and those who did not receive them (odds ratio=1.44, CI 0.95, 2.19, P=0.09). Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant difference between dementia patients who took acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and those who didn't take acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in those more than or equal to 80 years old and those less than 80 years old (P=0.44) and (P=0.34) respectively. However, our results showed a statistically significant association between dementia patients who received acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and decreased fracture risk in those receiving the treatment for more than or less than 2 years (risk ratio=0.48, CI= 0.45, 0.51, P<0.00001) and (risk ratio=0.84, CI 0.70, 0.99, P=0.04), respectively. Conclusion: Our study revealed no role for acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in increasing the risk of fracture compared with controls. Hence, based on our analysis, they might have a protective role against fracture when used for long periods considering their positive action on bone growth and development. Therefore, Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors could be considered a safe option for improving cognitive functions in elderly demented patients without carrying any additional risks.

Kaposi varicelliform eruption: an unusual presentation caused by varicella zoster virus in a healthy adult patient - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Kaposi Varicelliform Eruptions (KVE), also known as eczema herpeticum, is a rare and potentially life-threatening dermatological condition primarily attributed to herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection, with less frequent involvement of Coxsackie A16, vaccinia, Varicella Zoster, and smallpox viruses. Typically associated with pre-existing skin diseases, especially atopic dermatitis, KVE predominantly affects children but can manifest in healthy adults. Characterized by painful clusters of vesicles and sores on the skin and mucous membranes, it often masquerades as other dermatological disorders. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used for pain relief and inflammation, though their potential role as KVE triggers remains uncertain. CASE REPORT: Here, we present a case of an 18-year-old female with KVE attributed to Varicella Zoster virus (VZV) and successfully treated with oral acyclovir within a week, underscoring the significance of early recognition and intervention. KVE can manifest with systemic symptoms like fever, fatigue, and lymphadenopathy and may involve multiple organ systems, necessitating possible antibiotic use for complications. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the importance of prompt KVE identification and consideration of antiviral therapy to enhance patient outcomes. Further research is warranted to elucidate predisposing factors for this rare condition.

Effect of early metoprolol before PCI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

AIM: This meta-analysis aims to look at the impact of early intravenous Metoprolol in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on infarct size, as measured by cardio magnetic resonance (CMR) and left ventricular ejection fraction. METHODS: We searched the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science. We included only randomized control trials that reported the use of early intravenous Metoprolol in STEMI before PCI on infarct size, as measured by CMR and left ventricular ejection fraction. RevMan software 5.4 was used for performing the analysis. RESULTS: Following a literature search, 340 publications were found. Finally, 18 studies were included for the systematic review, and 8 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis after the full-text screening. At 6 months, the pooled effect revealed a statistically significant association between Metoprolol and increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) compared to controls (mean difference [MD] = 3.57, [95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.22-4.92], p < .00001), as well as decreased infarcted myocardium(g) compared to controls (MD = -3.84, [95% [CI] = -5.75 to -1.93], p < .0001). At 1 week, the pooled effect revealed a statistically significant association between Metoprolol and increased LVEF (%) compared to controls (MD = 2.98, [95% CI = 1.26-4.69], p = .0007), as well as decreased infarcted myocardium(%) compared to controls (MD = -3.21, [95% CI = -5.24 to -1.18], p = .002). CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in myocardial infarction and increase in LVEF (%) was linked to receiving Metoprolol at 1 week and 6-month follow-up.