RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The use of piezoelectric instrumentation is increasingly recognized as an alternative to traditional bone-cutting techniques across a wide array of surgeries. Here, we provide an overview of the technique, including device principles, benefits, and drawbacks. We also review its use in craniofacial surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Piezoelectric surgery is a minimally invasive bone-cutting system with lower risk of damage to surrounding soft tissue structures. Indications for its use are rapidly expanding across multiple fields, including craniofacial surgery. To date, piezosurgical techniques have been most widely adopted and studied in the contexts of rhinoplasty, orthognathic surgery, and cranioplasty in craniosynostosis. Piezosurgery can facilitate more precise and consistent osteotomies while decreasing morbidities associated with traditional osteotomy techniques. Primary limitations include cost and concerns regarding increased operative times secondary to operator learning curves and decreased cutting efficiency. SUMMARY: Piezoelectric surgery represents an alternative to traditional bone-cutting modalities to improve precision, consistency, and safety of osteotomies. Further research is needed to better understand the efficacy of the technique as well as potential for additional applications.
Asunto(s)
Osteotomía , Piezocirugía , Humanos , Piezocirugía/instrumentación , Piezocirugía/métodos , Osteotomía/instrumentación , Osteotomía/métodos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Rinoplastia/instrumentación , Craneosinostosis/cirugía , Cráneo/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Understanding effective ergonomic interventions is crucial for enhancing occupational health and career longevity. There is a paucity of clear ergonomics guidelines in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS), placing practitioners at high risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) and their consequences. RECENT FINDINGS: There is mounting evidence that FPRS specialists are at increased risk of WMSDs as compared with the public and other surgical specialties. Numerous studies have demonstrated that implementation of ergonomics principles in surgery decreases WMSDs. Furthermore, WMSDs are reported as early as the first year of surgical residency, marking the importance of early intervention. SUMMARY: Fatigue and physical injuries among surgeons occur more often than expected, particularly during complex, extended procedures that necessitate maintaining a constant posture. FPRS procedure often place surgeons into procrustean positions. Thus, integrating ergonomic practices into the practice of FPRS is essential for reducing WMSDs.
Asunto(s)
Ergonomía , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Cirugía Plástica , Cara/cirugíaRESUMEN
This article reviews special considerations in complex nasal defects including treatment of adjacent subunit defects, timing of repair with radiation, reconstruction in patients with prior repairs or recurrent disease, and the role of prosthetics. The role of technological advances including virtual surgical planning, 3 dimensional printing, biocompatible materials, and tissue engineering is discussed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Nasales , Nariz , Humanos , Nariz/cirugía , Neoplasias Nasales/cirugía , Impresión TridimensionalRESUMEN
Study Design: Cadaveric investigation. Objective: Rigid internal fixation (RIF) using plates and screws is often not feasible in low and middle-income countries due to limited resources. Interosseous wiring to achieve semi-rigid fixation is often used, but lacks biomechanical force data. Herein we aim to quantitatively compare interosseous wiring to RIF. Methods: Cadaveric mandibles were fractured at the parasymphysis and angle. Fixation was achieved using interosseous wiring in both single wire loop and figure-of-eight formations, as well as plate and screw fixation (n = 5 for each fixation type at each fracture site). A force gauge was used to measure the number of Newtons (N) required to achieve diastasis and complete failure at the fixation site. Results: For angle fractures, the mean force required for initial diastasis was 4.1, 5.9, and 10.9 N for single wire, figure-of-eight wiring, and plating respectively (P < .001). Complete failure was achieved with 152.9, 168.9, and 237.6 N of force for the three methods, respectively (P < .001). Complete failure was achieved for parasymphyseal fractures with 197.7, 263.0, and 262.8 N of force for single wire, figure-of-eight wiring, and plating respectively (P = .002). Forces to achieve initial diastasis for parasymphyseal fractures were not statistically significant among the three fixation methods (P = .29). Conclusions: Figure-of-eight interosseous wiring resists comparable forces across mandibular fractures compared to the gold standard of plating. In resource-limited settings when plates and screws are not available, this technique can be considered to achieve semi-rigid fixation of mandibular fractures.
RESUMEN
The nose has several important functions including inspiration, humidification of air, and filtering of allergens. The nose also has a major role in facial harmony as the central focal point. Patients will present to the rhinoplasty surgeon in an effort to fix the inability to breathe through the nose or correct a perceived nasal deformity in the shape of the nose. Choosing the optimal techniques to effectively change the nose requires a thorough understanding of nasal anatomy and nasal mechanics. Ultimately, a complete nasal evaluation is essential in identifying what corresponds to a patient's complaints and how those issues can be addressed surgically or perhaps nonsurgically. When the nose is divided into subunits, and a systematic nasal analysis is performed, one can be confident that all components of the nasal skeleton have been assessed.
Asunto(s)
Nariz , Rinoplastia , Humanos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Nariz/anatomía & histología , Nariz/anomalías , Nariz/cirugía , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Advancements in digital cameras and the advent of smartphones have magnified the importance of clinical photography in facial plastic surgery. Here, we aim to examine the effect of different camera types, focal lengths, and distances from subjects on facial distortion. METHODS: Twelve subjects underwent a series of frontal photographs using a smartphone camera and a full-frame digital single-lens reflex camera. Photos were captured at six distances from the subject. Seven focal lengths were used at each distance for the full-frame camera. Measurements of facial landmarks were made for each photo, with those made at 60 inches using the full-frame camera considered the gold standard and used for comparison. RESULTS: Distortion of facial features using the full-frame camera occurred when photos were captured 8 inches away using short focal lengths. A 12%-19% increase in vertical stretching of the midface occurred when using focal lengths of 24, 35, and 50 mm (p < 0.05 for all). The same features were distorted when a smartphone camera was used at 8 inches (18% increase, p < 0.01) and 12 inches (12% increase, p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Distortion of midfacial features using both smartphones and full-frame cameras occurs with short, 'selfie' distances between the camera and subject. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 134:1234-1238, 2024.
Asunto(s)
Cara , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Cara/diagnóstico por imagen , Teléfono Inteligente , Fotograbar , Examen FísicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The workforce of neurotology has changed with increasing numbers of accredited programs and diverse representation among trainees over the past several decades. This study aims to describe the characteristics, density, and geographic variation of the current neurotology workforce in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery portal and online search. METHODS: The study cohort included physicians certified in Neurotology by the American Board of Otolaryngology as of 2021 (n = 372). Physician characteristics including years of practice, gender, practice setting, and location were collected. Geographic variation analysis was performed by the state, county, and hospital referral region. Associations between the number of neurotologists per population and socioeconomic characteristics were assessed using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 372 neurotologists, 65% practiced in academic settings and 13% were female. The percentage of female neurotologists increased from 0% among neurotologists with ≥30 years of practice to 23% among <10 years of practice. There were no differences in a practice setting by gender. The geographical analysis demonstrated that the average number of neurotologists was 1.1 per 1 million Americans. In a multivariable model, the density of neurotologists was significantly higher within counties with the highest quartiles of college education (ß = .6 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.3-0.8]) and income (ß = .3 [95% CI: 0.1-0.6]). CONCLUSION: The number of board-certified neurotologists has gradually increased and there have been trends toward greater gender diversity. The geographical distribution of neurotology practice was concentrated in counties with higher socioeconomic status as expected given the referral-based nature of the subspecialty. There should be efforts to reach out to low socioeconomic communities to ensure equivalent access to neurotological care.
Asunto(s)
Otoneurología , Otolaringología , Médicos , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
Background: Facial filler is an effective nonsurgical treatment option for improving facial symmetry in patients with facial paralysis (FP). Objective: To compare the effects of filler among patients with FP that is self-perceived as major or minor asymmetry, by measuring psychosocial distress. Methods: In this prospective cohort study of patients with FP undergoing filler at a tertiary academic center, patients were classified as having minor or major self-perceived asymmetry using a visual analog scale (VAS). FACE-Q Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress was administered before and after filler. Descriptive statistics and a random-effects generalized linear model assessed the relationship between perceived facial asymmetry and change in psychosocial distress. Results: A total of 28 patients participated. Twenty-five (89%) patients were female with median age of 54 (interquartile range [IQR]: 49-66). Median VAS score was 2 (IQR: 1-3.5, 0 = completely asymmetric, 10 = no asymmetry). Psychosocial distress improved in all patients after filler. In multivariable modeling, patients with major asymmetry experienced 2.45 (confidence interval: 0.46-4.44, p = 0.016) points more improvement in psychosocial distress than patients with minor asymmetry. Age, gender, and FP duration were not associated with change in psychosocial distress. Conclusion: Facial filler treatment was seen to improve psychosocial distress in patients with FP, especially by those with more self-perceived deficit.
RESUMEN
Objective: To determine demographic and socioeconomic variables associated with whether surgery is performed for patients with facial paralysis (FP). Background: Management of FP may include elective surgery dependent on patient goals of care and physician experience. Methods: The 2016 State Inpatient Database and State Ambulatory Surgery Services Database for six states were queried to identify patients with FP. These patients were then stratified based on receiving surgery for FP. Demographic and socioeconomic information was collected. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of undergoing FP surgery, as well as the hospital setting in which surgery was performed. Results: Of 20,218 patients with FP, 515 underwent surgery. Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo surgery (p < 0.001), as were patients with Medicaid or self-pay insurance (p < 0.001). Those living in rural areas were also less likely to receive surgery (p = 0.001). Individuals receiving surgery in the inpatient setting were more likely to have private insurance, whereas those in the ambulatory setting were more likely to have Medicare (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Several variables are correlated with whether FP is managed surgically, including insurance status, race, and type of residential area.
Asunto(s)
Parálisis Facial , Medicare , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Parálisis Facial/cirugía , Medicaid , DemografíaAsunto(s)
Anomalías Linfáticas , Escleroterapia , Humanos , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Rwanda , Anomalías Linfáticas/terapia , CuelloRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the same surgical procedure performed in ambulatory and inpatient settings to determine the demographics associated with this selection, the differences in 30-day revisit rates, and the total 30-day cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Ambulatory and inpatient centers in Florida, New York, and Maryland. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database, and the State Inpatient Database were used to identify patients undergoing commonly performed otolaryngologic procedures in 2016. The State Emergency Department Database and State Inpatient Database were used to identify 30-day revisits. RESULTS: A total of 55,311 patients underwent an otolaryngologic procedure: 51,136 (92.4%) ambulatory and 4175 (7.6%) inpatient. Adjusted odds of receiving care in the ambulatory setting was significantly lower for Black patients (odds ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.85]; P = .001) and nonspecified other races (odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.95]; P = .001) as compared with White patients. Women had 1.16-higher adjusted odds of undergoing a procedure in the ambulatory setting (95% CI, 1.05-1.29; P = .005). Insurance status and income were associated with location of care in the subcategorization of head and neck surgery. Adjusted inpatient procedure costs were significantly more than ambulatory (median, $59,112 vs $14,899); 30-day adjusted costs were $71,333.07 (95% CI, $56,223.99-$86,42.15; P < .001) more expensive for inpatient procedures vs ambulatory; and the adjusted 30-day odds of revisit were 2.23 times greater (95% CI, 1.44-3.44; P < .001) for ambulatory surgery across all procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist in the use of ambulatory settings to provide otolaryngologic surgery. Additional research is required to ensure equitable triaging of surgical care setting.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Pacientes Internos , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Costos de la Atención en SaludRESUMEN
Objectives This article examines a national cohort of patients with nasopharyngeal adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) for incidence, skull base invasion, overall survival, and treatment paradigms. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective national population-based study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program data of patients with ACC of the nasopharynx (NACC) and skull base between 2004 and 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included 5-year overall survival and odds of radiation treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 15.0 (STATACorp). p -Values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Of the 2,385 cases of ACC, 70 cases were classified as NACC. Twenty-one percent (15) involved invasion of the skull base or posterior pharyngeal wall, and 42% (30) were either stage 3 or stage 4. The 5-year overall survival for patients with NACC without skull base invasion was 67% which dropped to 40% with invasion into the skull base. Radiation was used as the primary form of therapy for 62% of NACC and 73% of NACC invading into skull base. Odds of receiving radiation therapy and 5-year survival were not affected by socioeconomic status or density of providers. Conclusion NACC is rare in incidence and was most commonly treated with radiation therapy when advanced in stage. Prognosis was dependent on invasion through posterior pharyngeal wall and skull base. Provider density and socioeconomic status did not affect odds of radiation or overall survival for NACC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nonflaccid facial palsy is a debilitating entity characterized by hypertonicity, synkinesis, and hypomobility. Patients with nonflaccid facial palsy often have smile asymmetry and restriction because of disruption of normal vector forces on the modiolus. Excision of the depressor anguli oris can lead to improved oral commissure excursion, smile angle, dental show, and symmetry. METHODS: All depressor anguli oris resection cases between January 8, 2018, and December 26, 2019, were reviewed. Patients with postoperative photographs were included in this cohort study. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were analyzed using the Emotrics software program, and changes in oral commissure excursion, smile angle, and dental show were tracked. Clinician-graded facial palsy assessments and patient-reported outcome measures were compared preoperatively and postoperatively using the Electronic Facial Paralysis Assessment and Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale, respectively. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included in this study; 79 percent of patients underwent isolated depressor anguli oris resection. Depressor anguli oris resection led to a statistically significant increase in oral commissure median excursion, smile angle, and dental show [3.02 mm (p = 0.015), 1.70 degrees (p = 0.002), and 2.36 mm (p < 0.001), respectively]. Median Electronic Facial Paralysis Assessment and Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale instrument scores also improved [6.0 (p = 0.001) and 7.5 (p = 0.013), respectively]. Depressor anguli oris resection also led to more symmetric smiles. No correlation was seen between duration of follow-up and change in metrics. CONCLUSION: Depressor anguli oris resection is a minimal-risk procedure that frequently results in improved smile dynamics, smile symmetry, and quality of life in patients with nonflaccid facial palsy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Asunto(s)
Músculos Faciales/cirugía , Parálisis Facial/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Sonrisa , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Labio , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Although upper lateral cartilages are commonly released from the dorsum of the septum during spreader graft placement in septorhinoplasty (SRP), there has been a focus on maintaining integrity of connections in the middle vault. Avoiding release of upper lateral cartilages in certain patient groups may represent an early step in this paradigm shift. We aim to assess satisfaction with nasal appearance and correction of nasal obstruction in patients who underwent SRP with spreader graft placement without upper lateral cartilage release and compared it to the traditional upper lateral cartilage release cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: A total of 559 patients who underwent SRP with spreader graft placement with upper lateral cartilage release and 30 patients who underwent SRP with spreader graft placement without release between 2012 and 2020 were administered the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), FACE-Q Satisfaction with Nose, and FACE-Q Social Functioning scales pre- and postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative NOSE FACE-Q, and negative inspiratory force (NIF) scores and changes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Results demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement at follow-up for both groups. There was no significant difference between groups in mean improvement of NOSE, FACE-Q, and NIF scores at time of last follow-up. CONCLUSION: SRP with spreader graft placement with and without upper lateral cartilage release provide clinically and statistically significant improvement, and no significant difference in functional outcome. This suggests that upper lateral cartilages do not need to be released to achieve functional improvement and that surgeons should consider whether release is necessary to achieve goals of surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1189-1195, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Nasal , Rinoplastia , Cartílago/trasplante , Humanos , Cartílagos Nasales/cirugía , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Tabique Nasal/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Dermal filler (DF) is a widely used nonsurgical option for facial rejuvenation with a rapidly expanding market. Physician payments by DF industry leaders have yet to be characterized. We sought to investigate trends in physician-industry payments by DF companies over 6 years. Differences in payments based on physician specialty and time were characterized. STUDY DESIGN: Database review. METHODS: The Open Payments Database was queried from 2013 to 2018. Payments made by the three largest DF companies by market share to otolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, and dermatologists were analyzed. Total dollars paid, number of payments made, type of payments made, and total number of specialists paid were recorded. One-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Otolaryngologists, plastic surgeons, and dermatologists received average annual payments of $0.36 million, $6.3 million, and $6.6 million respectively (P < .001). An average of 330 otolaryngologists, 2,128 plastic surgeons, and 5,980 dermatologists were paid annually (P < .001). Accredited speaking arrangements, consulting fees, and royalty/licensing fees comprised the majority of dollars paid to physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Average physician payment by DF companies exceeds $12 million annually, with otolaryngologists receiving significantly less compared to plastic surgeons and dermatologists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 132:301-306, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Rellenos Dérmicos/economía , Sector de Atención de Salud/economía , Otolaringología/economía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Medicina , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nasal obstruction is a common problem, with significant impact on quality of life. Accurate diagnosis may be challenging because of the complex and dynamic nature of the involved anatomy. Computational fluid dynamics modeling has the ability to identify specific anatomical defects, allowing for a targeted surgical approach. The goal of the current study is to better understand nasal obstruction as it pertains to disease-specific quality of life by way of a novel computational fluid dynamics model of nasal airflow. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with nasal obstruction underwent computational fluid dynamics modeling based on computed tomographic imaging. Nasal resistance was compared to demographic data and baseline subjective nasal patency based on Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation scores. RESULTS: Mean Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation score among all patients was 72.6. Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation score demonstrated a significant association with nasal resistance in patients with static obstruction (p = 0.03). There was a positive correlation between Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation score and nasal resistance in patients with static bilateral nasal obstruction (R2 = 0.32) and poor correlation in patients with dynamic bilateral obstruction caused by nasal valve collapse (R2 = 0.02). Patients with moderate and severe bilateral symptoms had significantly higher nasal resistance compared to those with unilateral symptoms (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal obstruction is a multifactorial condition in most patients. This study shows correlation between simulated nasal resistance and Nasal Obstructive Symptom Evaluation score in a select group of patients. There is currently no standardized diagnostic algorithm or gold standard objective measure of nasal airflow; however, computational fluid dynamics may better inform treatment planning and surgical techniques on an individual basis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, V.
Asunto(s)
Hidrodinámica , Modelos Biológicos , Obstrucción Nasal/diagnóstico , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal/complicaciones , Obstrucción Nasal/fisiopatología , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales , Nariz/diagnóstico por imagen , Nariz/fisiopatología , Nariz/cirugía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Sleep medicine is a multidisciplinary field that includes otolaryngology. After 2011, sleep medicine board eligibility required completion of a dedicated sleep medicine fellowship. The objective of our study is to describe the characteristics and geographic distribution of the dual board-certified sleep otolaryngology workforce and to assess the impact of the 2011 change. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of sleep-certified otolaryngologists registered with the American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery in 2019 was performed to characterize the sleep otolaryngology workforce. County and regional analysis of provider density was conducted by comparing provider characteristics with county-level data from the United States Census Bureau. RESULTS: There were 275 active dual board-certified sleep otolaryngologists, or approximately 1 for every 1.12 million Americans. 77.8% were in private practice and 2.9% had American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology membership. Eighty-eight percent were male, with females more likely than males to be in an academic setting (36.4% for females compared to 20.2% for males; P = .045). The South Atlantic and South Central regions had the highest number of sleep board-certified otolaryngologists per capita. Before 2011, an average of 75.7 otolaryngologists took the sleep board exam per 2-year cycle, compared to 14.3 otolaryngologists after 2011 (P = .029). CONCLUSION: There are few dual board-certified sleep otolaryngologists across the country, which may affect care for patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Increased resident exposure and otolaryngology training in sleep medicine can strengthen the otolaryngology contribution to the multidisciplinary care of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2712-E2717, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Certificación , Demografía , Otolaringología/educación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Sueño , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Consejos de Especialidades , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Facial trauma can have long-lasting consequences on an individual's physical, mental, and social well-being. The authors sought to assess the long-term outcomes of patients with facial injuries. METHODS: This is a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients with face abbreviated injury scores ≥1 within the Functional Outcomes and Recovery after Trauma Emergencies registry. The Functional Outcomes and Recovery after Trauma Emergencies registry collects patient-reported outcomes data for patients with moderate-severe trauma 6 to 12âmonths after injury. Outcomes variables included general and trauma-specific quality of life, functional limitations, screening for post-traumatic stress disorder, and postdischarge healthcare utilization. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients with facial trauma were included: 69.1% had an isolated face and/or head injury and 30.9% had a face and/or head injuries as a part of polytrauma injury. After discharge, 11.7% of patients visited the emergency room, and 13.3% were re-admitted to the hospital. Additionally, 36% of patients suffered from functional limitations and 17% of patients developed post-traumatic stress disorder. A total of 34.3% patients reported that their injury scars bothered them, and 49.4% reported that their injuries were hard to deal with emotionally. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who sustain facial trauma suffer significant long-term health-related quality of life consequences stemming from their injuries.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Faciales , Heridas y Lesiones , Cuidados Posteriores , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate opioid prescribing patterns among American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS) members in the Medicare population. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of AAFPRS members in the Medicare Part D Prescriber dataset. Results: From 2014 to 2016, there was a significant decrease in the number of days of opioids supplied per beneficiary (5.9 vs. 4.9 days, p < 0.005), as well as the opioid prescription cost per beneficiary ($14.52 vs. $11.79, p = 0.005). The highest prescription rate was found in the Midwest (20.5%) and lowest in the Northeast (14.0%), however, the difference between geographic regions was not significant (p = 0.11). There was a significant decrease in the number of total opioid days supplied per beneficiary in the South (p = 0.001), Midwest (p = 0.05), and West regions (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in opioid prescription rate (p = 0.89) or total opioid days supplied per beneficiary (p = 0.26) when states were stratified by age-adjusted opioid-specific death rate. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a national trend toward fewer opioid days supplied and less opioid cost per Medicare beneficiary among AAFPRS members between 2014 and 2016.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Medicare Part D , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Cirujanos/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Cara/cirugía , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Epidemia de Opioides/prevención & control , Epidemia de Opioides/tendencias , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The degree of markup between provider charges and Medicare prices reflects the potential balance bill for out-of-network commercially insured patients. Using publicly available Medicare data, we performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of markup ratios (MRs; ie, the ratio of submitted charges to Medicare-allowed prices) for services commonly performed by otolaryngologists in 2017. Median MRs were as follows: 2.9 (interquartile range, 2.0-4.3) in facility settings (eg, hospital) and 2.1 (interquartile range, 1.7-2.9) in nonfacility settings (eg, physician office). Among the 10 highest-markup procedures performed by otolaryngologists in facility and nonfacility settings, there was no consistent increase in median MRs between 2012 and 2017 (compound annual growth rates, -4.6% for labyrinthotomy to 24.6% for ultrasound-guided biopsy). Median MRs for these procedures were not consistently lower in states with surprise billing protection laws. These findings may reflect the comparatively low potential to "balance bill" patients for elective otolaryngologic services and the limitations of state-level protections against surprise billing.