Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 229(Supplement_2): S207-S212, 2024 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38019754

RESUMEN

This report summarizes risk assessment interviews and follow-up with health care personnel (HCP) after exposure to patients with mpox disease during 17 May to 8 July 2022. HCP-case interactions were assessed using a standard questionnaire to categorize the risk associated with patient encounters. We assessed 150 interactions among 142 HCP and 30 cases. Four (2.7%) interactions were defined as high risk, 5 (3.3%) intermediate, 107 (71.3%) low, and 31 (20.7%) no risk. High and intermediate exposures were offered postexposure prophylaxis; 4 accepted. No documented mpox transmission after exposure was identified. These findings suggest transmission risk in health care settings during routine patient care is low.


Asunto(s)
Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Mpox , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Chicago , Personal de Salud , Illinois , Medición de Riesgo , Brotes de Enfermedades , Atención a la Salud
2.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 29(11): 2257-2265, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877555

RESUMEN

Understanding if persons with HIV (PWH) have a higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection may help tailor future COVID-19 public health guidance. To determine whether HIV infection was associated with increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, we followed adult residents of Chicago, Illinois, USA, with SARS-CoV-2 longitudinally from their first reported infection through May 31, 2022. We matched SARS-CoV-2 laboratory data and COVID-19 vaccine administration data to Chicago's Enhanced HIV/AIDS Reporting System. Among 453,587 Chicago residents with SARS-CoV-2, a total of 5% experienced a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, including 192/2,886 (7%) PWH and 23,642/450,701 (5%) persons without HIV. We observed higher SARS-CoV-2 reinfection incidence rates among PWH (66 [95% CI 57-77] cases/1,000 person-years) than PWOH (50 [95% CI 49-51] cases/1,000 person-years). PWH had a higher adjusted rate of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection (1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.68) than those without HIV. PWH should follow the recommended COVID-19 vaccine schedule, including booster doses.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , Adulto , Humanos , Chicago/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Reinfección/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Illinois/epidemiología
3.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 47(3): 350-359, 2021 05 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428460

RESUMEN

Background: In 2016, Massachusetts passed the first-in-the-nation law limiting opioid naïve adults and all minors to a 7-day supply of opioids when prescribed in the outpatient setting.Objective: We hypothesized this policy would be associated with declines in the percent of opioid prescriptions with more than a 7-day supply among opioid naïve adults and minors for select prescriber groups.Methods: Interrupted time series analyses were conducted using measures from the Massachusetts Prescription Monitoring Program database for 2015 through 2017 (n = 13,672,325 opioid prescriptions; 54% to females). Outcomes were the monthly percent of opioid prescriptions greater than 7 days' supply in opioid naïve adults and in minors among select prescriber groups. Model estimates of the pre-policy trend, the average changes in the level pre/post-implementation, and the trend changes post-implementation were assessed.Results: Pre-policy trends showed significant monthly declines in the percent of opioid prescriptions greater than 7 days' supply for all prescriber groups. Policy implementation was associated with significant reduction in the level for opioid naïve adults among surgeons (-2.92%, p < .01), dentists (-0.23%, p < .01), and general medical providers (-2.22%, p = .04), and for minors among all-included prescribers (-2.97%, p < .01) and surgeons (-3.8%, p < .01). Post-implementation changes in trends were not significant except among opioid naïve adults for dentists (0.02%, p = .04).Conclusion: Within a context of significant reductions occurring in opioid prescriptions greater than 7 days' supply during this period, the Massachusetts policy was associated with further declines for opioid naïve adults and minors among select prescriber groups.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/provisión & distribución , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Masculino , Massachusetts , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...