RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Ultra high-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) has been demonstrated to allow easy visualization and quantification of median and digital nerve fascicles; however, there is a lack of normative data for other upper limb nerves. The purpose of this study was to use UHFUS to establish normative reference values and ranges for fascicle count and density within selected upper extremity nerves. METHODS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers underwent sonographic examination of the ulnar, superficial branch of the radial, and radial nerves on one upper limb using UHFUS with a 48 MHz linear transducer. The number of fascicles in each peripheral nerve and fascicle density were assessed. RESULTS: The mean fascicle number and fascicle density for each of the measured nerves was ulnar nerve at the wrist 11.7 and 2.0, ulnar nerve at the elbow 9.2 and 1.1, superficial branch of the radial nerve 7.3 and 2.5, and radial nerve at the spiral groove 4.2 and 0.8. A single significant association was observed between CSA and fascicle number in the ulnar nerve at the wrist (p = .023, r = 0.66). Neither fascicle number nor density could be predicted by age, sex, height, weight, or body mass index. DISCUSSION: UHFUS may help to establish a baseline of normative data on upper limb nerves that are not frequently biopsied due to their mixed motor and sensory functions and has the potential for increased understanding of nerve fascicular anatomy to improve diagnostic accuracy of focal nerve lesions, particularly those with selective fascicular involvement.
RESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Most published studies on the clinical utility of genetic testing for neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) focus on disease-specific cohorts and/or involve multiple centers. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical utility and diagnostic yield of genetic testing at a single, large neuromuscular center. Unlike previous studies, this study is unique in that it includes a broad array of patients at a single, large neuromuscular center, providing real-world data that may assist both neuromuscular specialists as well as general neurologists in decision-making regarding the need for genetic testing in patients with suspected NMDs. Methods: Genetic testing results were reviewed for all patients who underwent testing through a single genetic testing company for NMDs in this single laboratory at a large neuromuscular center from 2015 to 2020. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to determine whether genetic testing results conferred a specific NMD diagnosis, including cases where a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) was identified. Results: Genetic testing was pursued for 192 patients. A positive result, defined as a pathogenic mutation, a VUS, or both, was found in 77.1%. A definitive diagnosis was conferred in 35.9%. The most common testing indication was suspected neuropathy (53.3%), and the indication with the highest diagnostic yield was suspected myopathy (48.7%). Discussion: This study provides further evidence of the clinical utility of genetic testing for NMDs in a real-world setting with over one-third of patients tested receiving a definitive diagnosis. Over time, genetic testing will continue to become increasingly accessible, cost-effective, and sensitive, which will lead to even more utilization.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: While ultrasound assessment of cross-sectional area and echogenicity has gained popularity as a biomarker for various neuropathies, there is a scarcity of data regarding fascicle count and density in neuropathies or even healthy controls. The aim of this study was to determine whether fascicles within select lower limb nerves (common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves) can be counted in healthy individuals using ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS). METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent sonographic examination of the common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves on each lower limb using UHFUS with a 48 MHz linear transducer. Fascicle counts and density in each examined nerve were determined by a single rater. RESULTS: The mean fascicle number for each of the measured nerves included the following: common fibular nerve 9.85 (SD 2.29), superficial fibular nerve 5.35 (SD 1.59), and sural nerve 6.73 (SD 1.91). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between cross-sectional area and fascicle count for all three nerves. In addition, there was a significant association seen in the common fibular nerve between fascicle density and height, weight, and body mass index. Age and sex did not predict fascicle count or density (all p > .13). DISCUSSION: UHFUS enabled the identification and counting of fascicles and fascicle density in the common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves. Knowledge about normal values and normal peripheral nerve architecture is needed in order to further understand and identify pathological changes that may occur within each nerve in different disease states.