Background: The treatment of psoriasis in patients with a personal history of cancer is a matter of debate and limited evidence is available to guide clinicians. Objectives: To report a multicenter real-life experience of a group of patients with psoriasis undergoing treatment with guselkumab and a history of cancer. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective Spanish study enrolling patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and neoplasia being treated with guselkumab for their psoriasis. Results: Twenty patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and at least 12 weeks of ongoing treatment were included. For the analysis, a 52 week follow-up period was evaluated in terms of efficacy and safety. Most of the malignancies in these patients were solid tumors. The percentage of patients achieving psoriasis area and severity index ≤3 at week 12 and week 52 was 80% and 87.5%, respectively, whereas 68.8% of patients achieved psoriasis area and severity index ≤1. A 52-week survival rate of 100% in the study population was observed (n = 20), including those patients with concomitant active cancers (n = 14). No adverse effects or dropouts related to guselkumab safety profile were detected. Limitations: Modest sample size and the retrospective nature of the study. Conclusion: Guselkumab not only demonstrates high effectiveness in treating psoriasis but also exhibits a favorable safety profile in patients with neoplasms.
Methyl aminolevulinate daylight photodynamic therapy (MAL DL-PDT) is highly efficacious for the treatment of nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratosis (AK), even when partially performed at home. To evaluate the long-term effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of MAL DL-PDT performed completely by the patient in real life conditions. An open prospective study was conducted in Spain among patients diagnosed with at least five AK lesions on the face or the scalp. Patients received instruction and information in infographic format to perform MAL DL-PDT at home. All had been treated with 30% urea daily for 7 days before the day of MAL DL-PDT. Meteorological conditions on the day of the treatment and adverse effects were recorded. Patients underwent follow-up, and a second session of home-based MAL DL-PDT if deemed necessary, 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment session. The study population consisted of 22 patients (19 men and three women, mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 72.05 [6.96] years). A complete response was observed in 47.7% of AK lesions at 3 months (p < 0.001) and 65.9% (n = 199) at 12 months (p < 0.001). Olsen grade II lesions showed the highest rate of response (76.07% at 12 months). The mean (SD) actinic keratosis area and severity index score decreased significantly from 4.99 (2.43) at baseline to 2.33 (1.01) at 12 months (p = 0.0234). Adverse effects were mild and expected. A majority of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the treatment instruction provided (90.9%) and the treatment outcome (72.7%). MAL DL-PDT can be applied at home like any other topical treatment for AK. Our results indicate good long-term effectiveness, a high level of patient satisfaction, and no significant side effects.
Keratosis, Actinic , Photochemotherapy , Male , Humans , Female , Aged , Keratosis, Actinic/diagnosis , Keratosis, Actinic/drug therapy , Photochemotherapy/adverse effects , Photochemotherapy/methods , Scalp , Prospective Studies , Sunlight/adverse effects , Aminolevulinic Acid/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use
Objetivo: Revisar y discutir la evidencia actual del uso de la metformina como herramienta terapéutica en enfermedades cutáneas. Diseño. Artículo original. Investigación cualitativa. Revisión narrativa. Emplazamiento: Aragón y Murcia, España. Participantes: Médicos Internos Residentes de Dermatología Médico-Quirúrgica y Venereología y de Atención Primaria y Comunitaria. Métodos: Se ha realizado una revisión narrativa utilizando la base de datos bibliográfica PubMed con fecha de búsqueda el 27 de enero de 2022. Resultados: La metformina ha demostrado ser efectiva en el tratamiento de dermatosis inflamatorias tales como el acné, hidrosadenitis supurativa, psoriasis y dermatitis de contacto alérgica. También ha demostrado propiedades antitumorales frente al carcinoma basocelular, carcinoma espinocelular y melanoma. De forma adicional, se ha descrito efectos beneficiosos del tratamiento adyuvante con metformina en pacientes con carcinoma basocelular que reciben terapia fotodinámica. En pacientes con dermatosis relacionadas con endocrinopatías tales como el hirsutismo, la acantosis nigricans y los xantomas eruptivos, el tratamiento con metformina ha demostrado efectividad terapéutica. El tratamiento tópico con metformina ha demostrado ser eficaz en el tratamiento del melasma. Finalmente se ha propuesto como un fármaco con propiedades antienvejecimiento cutáneo y favorecedoras de la cicatrización. Para ninguna de las indicaciones previamente descritas se han objetivado efectos adversos graves. Conclusiones: La metformina es un tratamiento efectivo y seguro en el esquema terapéutico de dermatosis inflamatorias, neoplasias cutáneas, dermatosis relacionadas con endocrinopatías, melasma, envejecimiento cutáneo y cicatrización.(AU)
Objetive: To review and discuss the current evidence of the use of metformin as a therapeutic tool in frequent skin diseases. Design: Original article. Qualitative research. Narrative review. Location: Aragon and Murcia, Spain. Participants: Resident Physicians. Dermatology and Primary Health Care. Method: A narrative review has been carried out using the PubMed bibliographic database, being the search date the 27th of January of 2022. Results: Metformin has proven to be effective in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases such as acne, hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis and allergic contact dermatitis. It has also shown antitumor properties regarding basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. Additionally, beneficial effects of adjuvant treatment with metformin have been described in patients with basal cell carcinoma receiving photodynamic therapy. In patients with endocrinology-related dermatosis such as hirsutism, acanthosis nigricans and eruptive xanthomas, treatment with metformin has demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness. Topical treatment with metformin has also been useful in the treatment of melasma. Finally, it has been proposed as a drug with anti-aging and wound-healing promoting properties. Severe adverse effects have not been observed for any of the previously described indications, being this a well-tolerated treatment. Conclusions: Metformin is an effective and safe adjuvant in the therapeutic scheme of various inflammatory dermatoses, skin neoplasms, endocrinology-related dermatosis, melasma, skin aging and wound healing processes.(AU)
Humans , Male , Female , Metformin , Skin Diseases , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Skin Diseases/etiology , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Dermatology , Skin , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Primary Health Care
OBJETIVE: To review and discuss the current evidence of the use of metformin as a therapeutic tool in frequent skin diseases. DESIGN: Original article. Qualitative research. Narrative review. LOCATION: Aragon and Murcia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Resident Physicians. Dermatology and Primary Health Care. METHOD: A narrative review has been carried out using the PubMed bibliographic database, being the search date the 27th of January of 2022. RESULTS: Metformin has proven to be effective in the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases such as acne, hidradenitis suppurativa, psoriasis and allergic contact dermatitis. It has also shown antitumor properties regarding basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. Additionally, beneficial effects of adjuvant treatment with metformin have been described in patients with basal cell carcinoma receiving photodynamic therapy. In patients with endocrinology-related dermatosis such as hirsutism, acanthosis nigricans and eruptive xanthomas, treatment with metformin has demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness. Topical treatment with metformin has also been useful in the treatment of melasma. Finally, it has been proposed as a drug with anti-aging and wound-healing promoting properties. Severe adverse effects have not been observed for any of the previously described indications, being this a well-tolerated treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin is an effective and safe adjuvant in the therapeutic scheme of various inflammatory dermatoses, skin neoplasms, endocrinology-related dermatosis, melasma, skin aging and wound healing processes.
Dermatitis , Melanosis , Metformin , Skin Diseases , Humans , Melanosis/chemically induced , Melanosis/drug therapy , Metformin/therapeutic use , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Spain
BACKGROUND: The microbiological diagnosis of skin lesions related to COVID-19 is not well known. OBJECTIVE: Perform a microbiological diagnosis in COVID19-related cutaneous manifestations. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed with 64 patients with cutaneous manifestations associated with COVID-19 who underwent serological and nasopharyngeal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: Out of the 64 patients, 6 patients had positive RT-PCR, with all of them developing SARS-CoV-2 IgG and 4 of them had positive IgM + IgA. Of the 58 patients with negative RT-PCR, 8 cases had positive IgM + IgA and only one of them had IgG seroconversion. Therefore, the infection was demonstrated in 7 cases (10.9%) and was doubtful in 7 other cases (10.9%) who presented negative RT-PCR and presence of IgA + IgM without subsequent seroconversion of IgG. Fifty patients (78.1%) had negative serological tests. The most frequent cutaneous pattern was pseudo-chilblain (48.4%) followed by maculo-papular pattern (26.6%), urticarial lesions (10.9%), vesicular eruptions (6.3%) and livedoid pattern (4.7%). The maculo-papular pattern showed the highest positivity in RT-PCR (3 cases; 17.6%) and serologies (4 cases; 23.5%). Skin lesions developed after the systemic symptoms in most patients (19 cases; 61.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiological confirmation tests may not be an effective diagnostic technique for COVID-related cutaneous manifestations or that attributed lesions are not related to COVID-19. Confounding factors such as adverse drug reaction, serological cross-reactions with other viruses, the low production of antibodies in asymptomatic or mild forms of COVID-19 or its rapid disappearance, increase diagnostic uncertainty.
COVID-19 , Antibodies, Viral , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity
Abstract Granuloma annulare may be caused by multiple triggers. Among these are vaccinations, which have been described as an infrequent cause of granuloma annulare. The authors report the first case of generalized granuloma annulare associated with pneumococcal vaccination in a 57-year-old woman, who presented cutaneous lesions 12 days after vaccination.
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Vaccination/adverse effects , Granuloma Annulare/etiology
ABSTRACT: Flame figures represent a characteristic but nondiagnostic histological finding in eosinophilic dermatoses. Some bullous autoimmune diseases with a predominant eosinophilic infiltrate, such as bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, and pemphigus vegetans, may show them. However, it is rare to find them in predominant neutrophilic bullous dermatoses such as linear immunoglobulin A. We present a 60-year-old man with a history of chronic urticaria, which presented a bullous disease after an acute parvovirus B19 infection. The histological findings showed an exceptional linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis with an eosinophilic infiltrate in the dermis forming "flame figures." The clinical and histopathological findings for this entity may be identical to those of other dermatoses. For this reason, combining these findings with direct immunofluorescence analysis is essential for correct diagnosis of this bullous disease.
Eosinophils/immunology , Erythema Infectiosum/immunology , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis/immunology , Parvovirus B19, Human/immunology , Skin/immunology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Eosinophils/drug effects , Eosinophils/virology , Erythema Infectiosum/diagnosis , Erythema Infectiosum/virology , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis/drug therapy , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis/pathology , Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Parvovirus B19, Human/pathogenicity , Skin/drug effects , Skin/pathology , Skin/virology , Treatment Outcome
COVID-19/complications , Granuloma Annulare/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Biopsy , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Female , Fingers , Granuloma Annulare/immunology , Granuloma Annulare/pathology , Humans , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Skin/pathology
Granuloma annulare may be caused by multiple triggers. Among these are vaccinations, which have been described as an infrequent cause of granuloma annulare. The authors report the first case of generalized granuloma annulare associated with pneumococcal vaccination in a 57-year-old woman, who presented cutaneous lesions 12 days after vaccination.
Granuloma Annulare , Female , Granuloma Annulare/etiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Vaccination/adverse effects
