Outcomes of Patients with Preoperative Thrombocytosis After Hip Fracture Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Low platelet counts have clinically relevant effects on patient outcomes after hip fracture surgery; however, the relationship between abnormally high platelet counts and postoperative outcomes in this population is unknown. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2015 and 2019. Outcomes were compared between patients with normal platelet counts (150,000 to 450,000/µL) and thrombocytosis (>450,000/µL). RESULTS: Eighty-six thousand three hundred eleven hip fracture patients were identified, of which 1067 (1.2%) had preoperative thrombocytosis. Compared with patients with normal platelet counts, patients with preoperative thrombocytosis had increased rates of 30-day mortality (6.4% vs 4.5%, P = 0.004; OR 1.15 [95% CI 0.88 to 1.50], P = 0.322) as well as increased rates and odds of readmission (11.4% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001; OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.10 to 1.65], P = 0.004) and venous thromboembolic events (3.2% vs 1.7%, P < 0.001; OR 1.88 [95% CI 1.31 to 2.71], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hip fracture patients with preoperative thrombocytosis had increased rates of early mortality as well as increased odds of venous thromboembolic events and readmission. A patient with thrombocytosis may benefit from close postoperative surveillance and careful follow-up. Future prospective studies are needed to verify causation and investigate how to mitigate adverse outcomes in hip fracture patients with preoperative thrombocytosis.

3D Topographical Scanning for the Detection of Osteoporosis.

Objectives: Osteoporosis is associated with greater risk of fracture, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. DEXA scans are often inaccessible for patients, leaving many cases of osteoporosis undetected. A portable 3D topographical scan offers an easily accessible and inexpensive potential adjunct screening tool. We hypothesized that 3D scanning of arm and calf circumference and volume would correlate with DEXA T-scores. Methods: 96 female patients were enrolled. Patients were consented and completed a topographical scan of bilateral arms and lower legs with a mobile 3D scanner for arm and calf circumference and volume in clinic. Patient charts were then retrospectively reviewed for DEXA T-scores. Results: Forearm DEXA T-score was positively correlated with arm circumference (r = 0.49, p<0.01), arm volume (r=0.62, p<0.01), and calf volume (r=0.47, p<0.01). Femoral neck DEXA T-score was positively correlated with calf circumference (r=0.36, p<0.01) and calf volume (r=0.36, p<0.01). Conclusions: Our results showed significant correlations between DEXA T-scores and topographical measurements from mobile device acquired 3D scans, although these were in the "moderate" range. Mobile device-based 3D scanning may hold promise as an adjunct screening tool for osteoporosis when DEXA scanning is not available or feasible for patients, although further studies are needed to elucidate the full potential of its clinical utility. At a minimum, identifying a patient as high risk may promote earlier diagnostic DEXA scanning.

The use of hinged elbow orthosis following surgical management of terrible triad injuries of the elbow.

PURPOSE: To determine outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries in patients treated with and without a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) in the post-operative setting. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent surgical treatment of terrible triad injuries including radial head fracture, coronoid fracture, and ulnohumeral dislocation between 2008 and 2023 with at least 10-week follow-up. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated post-operatively without HEO, and 22 patients were treated with HEO. There were no differences in range of motion (ROM) between patients treated with and without HEO in final flexion-extension arc (118.4° no HEO, 114.6° HEO, p = 0.59) or pronation-supination arc (147.8° no HEO, 141.4° HEO, p = 0.27). Five patients treated without HEO and one patient treated with HEO returned to the operating room for stiffness (26%, 5%, p = 0.08). QuickDASH scores were similar between groups (p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference in post-operative ROM, complications, or QuickDASH scores in patients treated post-operatively with or without HEO. Based on these results, we cannot determine whether the use of HEO adds additional stability to the elbow while initiating ROM exercises post-operatively.

Range of motion measurements do not correlate with patient reported outcome measures in the early post-operative period following ankle fracture.

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization following ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) improves long-term patient functionality. Because of this, numerous resources have been spent to increase patient adherence to post-operative mobilization, with range of motion (ROM) measurements generally considered an important outcome in patient recovery. In this study we investigated how ankle ROM correlates to patient function, self-sufficiency in performing activities of daily living (ADLs), and pain in the early post-operative period. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study on patients undergoing ORIF of ankle fractures. We collected patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ROM measurements at the 2-week, 6-week, 12-week, and 6 month post-operative visit. We collected three PROMs: pain intensity (VAS), pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ-2), and foot and ankle ability measurement (FAAM). ROM of the ankle was measured by goniometer. ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests were used to examine statistical differences in PROMs over time. Pearson correlation tests were used to examine the association between ROM and PROMs. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-three participants enrolled in this study in the perioperative period. Pain intensity was higher at enrollment compared to week 6 (post-hoc p = 0.006), after which pain intensity did not differ significantly. FAAM scores for activities or daily living (ADL) were increased at all study visits compared to enrollment (post-hoc p < 0.001). FAAM-Sports scores were higher compared to enrollment at the week 12 and 6 month visits (post-hoc p < 0.001). No significant improvements in goniometer measurements were noted across any timepoints. There were no significant correlations between ROM and PROMs at any of the study visits. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of patients, there was no correlation between ROM and patient pain, self-efficacy or functionality in the early post-operative period following ankle ORIF. The lack of correlation between PROMs and ROM indicates that ROM may be both a poor indicator of patient improvement for physicians to guide post-operative treatment as well as a poor motivator for patient adherence to post-operative exercises. In the future, it is important to study reliable outcome measures in early recovery that can be utilized to track patient recovery from ankle ORIF.

Using machine-learning to decode postoperative hip mortality Trends: Actionable insights from an extensive clinical dataset.

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are one of the most common injuries experienced by the general population. Despite advances in surgical techniques, postoperative mortality rates remain high. identifying relevant clinical factors associated with mortality is essential to preoperative risk stratification and tailored post-surgical interventions to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this study aimed to identify preoperative risk factors and develop predictive models for increased hip fracture-related mortality within 30 days post-surgery, using one of the largest patient cohorts to date. METHODS: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, comprising 107,660 hip fracture patients treated with surgical fixation was used. A penalized regression approach, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was employed to develop two predictive models: one using preoperative factors and the second incorporating both preoperative and postoperative factors. RESULTS: The analysis identified 68 preoperative factor outcomes associated with 30-day mortality. The combined model revealed 84 relevant factors, showing strong predictive power for determining postoperative mortality, with an AUC of 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: The study's comprehensive methodology provides risk assessment tools for clinicians to identify high-risk patients and optimize patient-specific care.

Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating for Extreme Distal Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after retrograde intramedullary nailing (rIMN) versus locked plating (LP) of "extreme distal" periprosthetic femur fractures, defined as those that contact or extend distal to the anterior flange. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Eight academic level I trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures at or distal to the anterior flange (OTA/AO 33B-C[VB1]) treated with rIMN or LP. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was reoperation to promote healing or to treat infection (reoperation for elective removal of symptomatic hardware was excluded from this analysis). Secondary outcomes included nonunion, delayed union, fixation failure, infection, overall reoperation rate, distal femoral alignment, and ambulatory status at final follow-up. Outcomes were compared between patients treated with rIMN or LP. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients treated with rIMN and 224 patients treated with LP were included. The rIMN group had fewer points of fixation in the distal segment (rIMN: 3.5 ± 1.1 vs. LP: 6.0 ± 1.1, P < 0.001) and more patients who were allowed to weight-bear as tolerated immediately postoperatively (rIMN: 45%; LP: 9%, P < 0.01). Reoperation to promote union and/or treat infection was 8% in the rIMN group and 16% in the LP group ( P = 0.122). There were no significant differences in nonunion ( P > 0.999), delayed union ( P = 0.079), fixation failure ( P > 0.999), infection ( P = 0.084), or overall reoperation rate ( P > 0.999). Significantly more patients in the rIMN group were ambulatory without assistive devices at final follow-up (rIMN: 35%, LP: 18%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: rIMN of extreme distal periprosthetic femur fractures has similar complication rates compared with LP, with a possible advantage of earlier return to weight-bearing. Surgeons can consider this treatment strategy in all fractures with stable implants and amenable prosthesis geometry, even extreme distal fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures is at risk for under restoration of lateral femoral offset.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the restoration of hip biomechanics through lateral offset, leg length, and acetabular component position when comparing non-arthroplasty surgeons (NAS) to elective arthroplasty surgeons (EAS). METHODS: 131 patients, with a femoral neck fracture treated with a THA by 7 EAS and 20 NAS, were retrospectively reviewed. 2 blinded observers measured leg-length discrepancy, femoral offset, and acetabular component position. Multivariate logistic regression models examined the association between the surgeon groups and restoration of lateral femoral, acetabular offset, leg length discrepancy, acetabular anteversion, acetabular position, and component size, while adjusting for surgical approach and spinal pathology. RESULTS: NAS under-restored 4.8 mm of lateral femoral offset (43.9 ± 8.7 mm) after THA when compared to the uninjured side (48.7 ± 7.1 mm, p = 0.044). NAS were at risk for under-restoring lateral femoral offset when compared to EAS (p = 0.040). There was no association between lateral acetabular offset, leg length, acetabular position, or component size and surgeon type. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral femoral offset is at risk for under-restoration after THA for femoral neck fractures, when performed by surgeons that do not regularly perform elective THA. This indicates that lateral femoral offset is an under-appreciated contributor to hip instability when performing THA for a femoral neck fracture. Lateral femoral offset deserves as much attention and awareness as acetabular component position since a secondary analysis of our data reveal that preoperative templating and intraoperative imaging did not prevent under-restoration.

Limb position affects intraoperative assessment of condylar width.

PURPOSE: We sought to define how changes in position and rotation of fluoroscopic imaging may affect the assessment of condylar widening intraoperatively. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with tibial plateau fractures were prospectively identified and included in this study. Fluoroscopic images of the uninjured tibial plateau were obtained in (1) full extension and (2) slight flexion on foam ramp. Beginning with a plateau view, additional views of the tibial plateau were then obtained by rotating the fluoroscope around the knee in 5 degree increments up to 15 degrees in both internal and external rotation. Measurements of distal femoral condylar width (DFW), distal femoral articular width (FAW), proximal tibial articular width (TAW) and lateral plateau width (LPW) were performed. RESULTS: LPW was decreased in flexion compared to extension at all degrees of rotation (p = 0.04-0.00001). There was a trend toward increasing LPW with increasing degrees of internal rotation which reached significance at 15˚ of internal rotation when the knee was flexed. On ANOVA, there was a significant difference of LPW with increasing degree of internal rotation when the knee was in flexion (p = 0.008), but not in extension. There were no differences in DFW, FAW, TAW and DFW/TAW at any point though LPW was decreased in flexion at all degrees of rotation. The FAW/TAW ratio was increased in flexion at all degrees of rotation. DISCUSSION: The knee in flexion will underestimate the measurement of condylar width compared to the knee in full extension, by ~ 2 mm. Rotation of the knee, in comparison, did not have a significant effect on condylar width assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy may not protect against post-operative surgical site complications in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: To determine if incisional negative pressure wound therapy is protective against post-operative surgical site complications following definitive fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with an acute bicondylar tibial plateau fracture (AO/OTA 41-C) undergoing ORIF from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Patients received either a standard sterile dressing (SD) or incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT). Primary outcomes included surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, and wound dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included non-union and return to the operating room. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: 180 patients were included and 22% received iNPWT (n = 40) and 78% received standard dressings (n = 140). iNPWT was more common in active smokers (24.7% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.002) and the SD group was more likely to be lost to follow up (3.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.025). iNPWT was not protective against infection or surgical site complications, and in fact, was associated with higher odds of post-operative infection (OR: 8.96, p = 0.005) and surgical site complications (OR:4.874, p = 0.009) overall. Alcohol abuse (OR: 19, p = 0.005), tobacco use (OR: 4.67, p = 0.009), and time to definitive surgery (OR = 1.21, p = 0.033) were all independent risk factors for post-operative infection. CONCLUSION: In this series of operatively treated bicondylar tibial plateau fractures, iNPWT did not protect against post-operative surgical site complications compared to conventional dressings. Tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and time to definitive surgery, were independent risk factors for post-operative infection. Further studies are needed to determine if iNPWT offers a protective benefit in exclusively high-risk patients with relevant medical and social history.

Interaction of preoperative chemoprophylaxis and tranexamic acid use does not affect transfusion in acetabular fracture surgery.

PURPOSE: While the effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) use on transfusion rates after acetabular fracture surgery are unclear, previous evidence suggests that holding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) chemoprophylaxis may improve TXA efficacy. This study examines whether holding DVT chemoprophylaxis in patients receiving TXA affects intraoperative and postoperative transfusion rates in acetabular fracture surgery. METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records (EMR) of 305 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fractures (AO/OTA 62) and stratified patients per the following perioperative treatment: (1) no intraoperative TXA (noTXA), (2) intraoperative TXA and no preoperative DVT prophylaxis (opTXA/noDVTP), or (3) intraoperative TXA and preoperative DVT prophylaxis (opTXA/opDVTP). The primary outcomes were need for intraoperative or postoperative transfusion. Risk factors for each primary outcome were assessed using multivariable regression. RESULTS: Intraoperative or postoperative transfusion rates did not significantly differ between opTXA/opDVTP and opTXA/noDVTP groups (46.2% vs. 36%, p = 0.463; 15.4% vs. 28%, p = 0.181). Median units transfused did not differ between groups (2 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1, p = 0.515; 2 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 0, p = 0.099). There was no association between preoperative DVT chemoprophylaxis and TXA with intraoperative or postoperative transfusions. EBL, preoperative hematocrit, and IV fluids were associated with intraoperative transfusions; age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were associated with postoperative transfusions. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest holding DVT prophylaxis did not alter the effect of TXA on blood loss or need for transfusion.

Outcomes of Humerus Nonunion Surgery in Patients With Initial Operative Fracture Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe outcomes following humerus aseptic nonunion surgery in patients whose initial fracture was treated operatively and to identify risk factors for nonunion surgery failure in the same population. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Eight, academic, level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with aseptic humerus nonunion (OTA/AO 11 and 12) after the initial operative management between 1998 and 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Success rate of nonunion surgery. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included (56% female; median age 50 years; mean follow-up 21.2 months). Of 90 aseptic humerus nonunions, 71 (78.9%) united following nonunion surgery. Thirty patients (33.3%) experienced 1 or more postoperative complications, including infection, failure of fixation, and readmission. Multivariate analysis found that not performing revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery (n = 8; P = 0.002) and postoperative de novo infection (n = 9; P = 0.005) were associated with an increased risk of recalcitrant nonunion. Patient smoking status and the use of bone graft were not associated with differences in the nonunion repair success rate. CONCLUSIONS: This series of previously operated aseptic humerus nonunions found that more than 1 in 5 patients failed nonunion repair. De novo postoperative infection and failure to perform revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery were associated with recalcitrant nonunion. Smoking and use of bone graft did not influence the success rate of nonunion surgery. These findings can be used to give patients a realistic expectation of results and complications following humerus nonunion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Proximal Humerus Fractures: How to Achieve Best Outcomes.

The treatment of proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. Although treatment modalities may vary, the goal of obtaining the best outcomes for patients remains the same. Most proximal humerus fractures can be treated nonsurgically but should still be managed actively. Deciding on surgical management requires a good understanding of indications and options. Indications for open reduction and internal fixation include younger or active patients with displaced two-, three-, and four-part fractures as well as fracture-dislocations with head-split patterns. Obtaining ideal outcomes requires anatomic reduction with restoration of the medial calcar as well as optimal position of implants to favor biomechanical stability. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is indicated for patients with severe and displaced fractures in older or low-demand patients. Obtaining the best functional outcomes depends on implant position, tuberosity healing, and early surgical intervention. Regardless of the treatment modality, these fractures can be challenging, and proper patient rehabilitation must be implemented. Future research will focus on patient selection and improving surgical techniques to maximize outcomes.

Contextual Determinants of Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fracture.

Importance: Surgery within 24 hours after a hip fracture improves patient morbidity and mortality, which has led some hospitals to launch quality improvement programs (eg, targeted resource management, documented protocols) to address delays. However, these programs have had mixed results in terms of decreased time to surgery (TTS), identifying an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of interventions. Objective: To identify the contextual determinants (site-specific barriers and facilitators) of TTS for patients with hip fracture across diverse hospitals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative mixed-methods study used an exploratory sequential design that comprised 2 phases. In phase 1, qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with stakeholders involved in hip fracture care (orthopedic surgeons or residents, emergency medicine physicians, hospitalists, anesthesiologists, nurses, and clinical or support staff) at 4 hospitals with differing financial, operational, and educational structures. Interviews were completed between May and July 2021. In phase 2, a quantitative survey assessing contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours for adult patients with hip fracture was completed by orthopedic surgeon leaders representing 23 diverse hospitals across the US between May and July 2022. Data analysis was performed in August 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thematic analysis of the interviews identified themes of contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours for patients with hip fracture. The emergent contextual determinants were then measured across multiple hospitals, and frequency and distribution were used to assess associations between determinants and various hospital characteristics (eg, setting, number of beds). Results: A total of 34 stakeholders were interviewed in phase 1, and 23 surveys were completed in phase 2. More than half of respondents in both phases were men (19 [56%] and 18 [78%], respectively). The following 4 themes of contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours were identified: availability, care coordination, improvement climate, and incentive structure. Within these themes, the most commonly identified determinants across the various hospitals involved operating room availability, a formal comanagement system between orthopedics and medicine or geriatrics, the presence of a physician champion focused on timely surgery, and a program that facilitates improvement work. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, contextual determinants of TTS within 24 hours for patients with hip fracture varied across hospital sites and could not be generalized across various hospital contexts because no 2 sites had identical profiles. As such, these findings suggest that guidance on strategies for improving TTS should be based on the contextual determinants unique to each hospital.

Biomechanics of sacroiliac joint fixation using lag screws: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Iliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon's pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studies examining lag screw compression biomechanics across the SIJ. The objective of this biomechanical investigation was to quantify iliosacral implant compressive loads and to examine the insertion torque and compressive load profile over time. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric pelvic specimens underwent SIJ fixation at S1 and S2 using 11.5 and 10.0 mm iFuse-TORQ Lag implants, respectively, and standard 7.3 mm trauma lag screws. Load decay analysis was performed, and insertion and removal torques were measured. RESULTS: For both implants at S1 and S2 levels, the load relaxed 50% in approximately 67 min. Compressive load decay was approximately 70% on average occurring approximately 15 h post-insertion. Average insertion torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant at S1 was significantly greater than the trauma lag screw. Similarly, at S2, insertion torque of the 10.0 mm TORQ implant was greater than the trauma lag screw. At S1, removal torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant was higher than the trauma lag screw; there was no significant difference in the removal torque at S2. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that a novel posterior pelvic implant with a larger diameter, roughened surface, and dual pitch threads achieved improved insertion and removal torques compared to a standard screw. Load relaxation characteristics were similar between all implants.

Postoperative sepsis and septic shock after hip fracture surgery.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of research in the rates for sepsis and septic shock in the hip fracture population specifically, despite marked clinical and prognostic differences between these conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, risk factors, and mortality rates for sepsis and septic shock as well as evaluate potential infectious causes in the surgical hip fracture population. METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP (2015-2019) was queried for patients who underwent hip fracture surgery. A backward elimination multivariate regression model was used to identify risk factors for sepsis and septic shock. Multivariate regression that controlled for preoperative variables and comorbidities was used to calculate the odds of 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 86,438 patients included, 871 (1.0%) developed sepsis and 490 (0.6%) developed septic shock. Risk factors for both postoperative sepsis and septic shock were male gender, DM, COPD, dependent functional status, ASA class ≥3, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia. Unique risk factors for septic shock were CHF and ventilator dependence. The 30-day mortality rate was 4.8% in aseptic patients, 16.2% in patients with sepsis, and 40.8% in patients who developed septic shock (p < 0.001). Patients with sepsis (OR 2.87 [95% CI 2.37-3.48], p < 0.001) and septic shock (OR 11.27 [95% CI 9.26-13.72], p < 0.001) had increased odds of 30-day mortality compared to patients without postoperative septicemia. Infections that preceded a diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock included urinary tract infections (24.7%, 16.5%), pneumonia (17.6%, 30.8%), and surgical site infections (8.5%, 4.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of sepsis and septic shock after hip fracture surgery was 1.0% and 0.6%, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 16.2% in patients with sepsis and 40.8% in patients with septic shock. Potentially modifiable risk factors for both sepsis and septic shock were anemia and hypoalbuminemia. Urinary tract infections, pneumonia, and surgical site infections preceded the majority of cases of sepsis and septic shock. Prevention, early identification, and successful treatment of sepsis and septic shock are paramount to lowering mortality after hip fracture surgery.

Syndesmotic Suture Button Fixation Results in Higher Tegner Activity Scale Scores When Compared to Screw Fixation: A Multicenter Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Suture buttons and metal screws have been used and compared in biomechanical, radiographic, and clinical outcome studies for syndesmotic injuries, with neither implant demonstrating clear superiority. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of both implants. METHODS: Patients who underwent syndesmosis fixation at 2 separate academic centers from 2010 through 2017 were compared. Thirty-one patients treated with a suture button and 21 patients treated with screws were included. Patients in each group were matched by age, sex, and Orthopaedic Trauma Association fracture classification. Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), patient satisfaction score, surgical failure, and reoperation rates were compared. RESULTS: Patients who underwent suture button fixation had significantly higher TAS scores than those who underwent screw fixation (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in FAAM ADL scores between cohorts (p = 0.08). Symptomatic hardware removal rates were similar (3.2% suture button cohort vs 9.0% in screw cohort). One patient (4.5%) underwent revision surgery secondary to syndesmotic malreduction after screw fixation, for a reoperation rate of 13.5%. CONCLUSION: Patients with unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with suture button fixation had higher mean TAS scores compared to patients treated with screws. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and ADL scores in these cohorts were similar.Level of Evidence: Level 3 Retrospective Matched Case-Cohort.

Biomechanical Analysis of Combined Medial Calcar and Lateral Locked Plating Versus Isolated Lateral Locked Plating of Proximal Humerus Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Medial calcar buttress plating combined with lateral locked plating is biomechanically tested against isolated lateral locked plating in synthetic humeri models for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: Proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11-A2.1) were manufactured in 10 pairs of Sawbones humeri models (Sawbones, Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon Island, WA). Specimen were randomly assigned and instrumented with either medial calcar buttress plating combined with lateral locked plating (CP) or isolated lateral locked plating (LP). Nondestructive torsional and axial load tests were performed to evaluate construct stiffness. Large-cycle axial tests were conducted followed by destructive ramp-to-failure tests. Cyclic stiffness was compared in both nondestructive and ultimate failure loads. Failure displacement was recorded and compared between groups. RESULTS: The addition of medial calcar buttress plating to lateral locked plating constructs significantly increased the axial ( P < 0.01) and torsional ( P < 0.01) stiffness of the construct compared with isolated lateral locked plating by 95.56% and 37.46%, respectively. All models demonstrated greater axial stiffness ( P < 0.01) after 5000 cycles of axial compression, not dependent on the fixation method. During destructive testing, the CP construct withstood 45.35% larger load ( P < 0.01) and congruently exhibited 58% less humeral head displacement ( P = 0.02) before failure when compared with the LP construct. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the biomechanical superiority of medial calcar buttress plating when combined with lateral locked plating as compared with isolated lateral locked plating of OTA/AO type 11-A2.1 proximal humerus in synthetic humeri models.

Olecranon fractures : current treatment concepts.

Despite being one of the most common injuries around the elbow, the optimal treatment of olecranon fractures is far from established and stimulates debate among both general orthopaedic trauma surgeons and upper limb specialists. It is almost universally accepted that stable non-displaced fractures can be safely treated nonoperatively with minimal specialist input. Internal fixation is recommended for the vast majority of displaced fractures, with a range of techniques and implants to choose from. However, there is concern regarding the complication rates, largely related to symptomatic metalwork resulting in high rates of implant removal. As the number of elderly patients sustaining these injuries increases, we are becoming more aware of the issues associated with fixation in osteoporotic bone and the often fragile soft-tissue envelope in this group. Given this, there is evidence to support an increasing role for nonoperative management in this high-risk demographic group, even in those presenting with displaced and/or multifragmentary fracture patterns. This review summarizes the available literature to date, focusing predominantly on the management techniques and available implants for stable fractures of the olecranon. It also offers some insights into the potential avenues for future research, in the hope of addressing some of the pertinent questions that remain unanswered.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):112-123.

External Fixator Usage and Delayed MRI Scans: A National Survey Study.

OBJECTIVE: To report the current state of institutional protocols regarding the use of MRI in patients with external fixation devices (EFDs) in the United States. DESIGN: National Survey Study. PARTICIPANTS: Practicing orthopaedic surgeons frequenting the Orthopaedic Trauma Association website were invited to participate in this study. RESULTS: Sixty-two eligible orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey. No respondents reported any known harmful complications of MRI use with an EFD. Eight respondents (13%) reported at least one early scan termination because of mild warmth or vibration without any lasting complications. Fifty-six respondents (90%) reported delays to care related to MRI-EFD compatibility labeling, and 27 respondents (48%) reported delayed MRI scans in every patient with an EFD who needed one. Twenty-six surgeons (42%) had modified their practice in some way in response to these barriers. Examples include delaying EFD placement until after MRI, relying on CT arthrograms over MRI for surgical planning, and taking patients to the operating room to remove EFDs temporarily and then replace them. Nineteen respondents (31%) had developed formal protocols to address this issue, but having a written protocol was not associated with any decrease in delays ( P = 0.119). Eighty-nine percent of respondents thought there was a need for a national consensus guideline on this issue. CONCLUSION: Despite no previous reports of harmful complications, MRI utilization is frequently delayed or prevented in patients with EFDs in place. This is a pervasive problem nationally, which persists despite the implementation of written institutional protocols. Additional research is needed, potentially at the national level, to address this common issue. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.