Substantial clinical benefit values demonstrate a high degree of variability when stratified by time and geographic region.

Background: A Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) value is the amount of change in a patient-reported outcome measure required for a patient to feel they significantly improved from an intervention. Previously published SCB values are often cited by researchers when publishing outcomes data. Where these SCB values are set can have a large impact on the conclusions drawn from a study citing them. As such, the goal of this study was to determine the generalizability of SCB values for a procedure when stratified by time from surgery and geographic region. Methods: A nationwide outcomes database was utilized to obtain preoperative, one-year, and two-year postoperative outcome measurements for patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse TSA. The data were divided into three geographic regions: the South, the Midwest, and the West. An East region was not included due to its limited number of patients. SCB values were calculated for four outcomes measures: Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, American Shoulder Elbow Surgeons score, Visual Analog Scale, and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score. SCB values were calculated for each region, for each procedure, and at both one and two years postoperatively. To determine the variability of potential SCBs within each region, simulated datasets were created to determine a distribution of possible calculated SCBs. Results: A total of 380 anatomic TSA patients and 543 reverse TSA patients were included for analysis. There was a high degree of variability of SCB values when stratified by procedure, time, and region. While some simulated datasets did produce homogenous SCB distributions among regions, some outcome measures demonstrated a large heterogeneity in distribution among regions, with concomitant large distributions of values within individual regions. Conclusions: There is notable heterogeneity of SCB values when stratified by region or time. The current method of citing previously published SCB values for determining the efficacy of an intervention may be inappropriate. It is likely that this variability holds true in other areas of orthopedics.

Acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty in the previously irradiated pelvis: a review of basic science and clinical outcomes.

Radiation therapy is a common primary, adjuvant, or palliative treatment for many intrapelvic tumors, including primary gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematopoietic tumors, as well as metastatic disease to bone. Radiation has well documented microbiologic and clinical effects on bone ranging from radiation osteitis to early degenerative changes of the hip joint and avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Conventional total hip arthroplasty methods have demonstrated high rates of failure in this population, with historical data describing aseptic loosening rates as high as 44-52%, as radiation have been shown to preferentially diminish osteoblast and osteocyte number and function and limit capacity for both cement interdigitation and biologic bony ingrowth. A review of the clinical literature suggests that patients with prior pelvic irradiation are at higher risk for both septic and aseptic loosening of acetabular components, as well as lower postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) when compared to historical controls. With limited evidence, trabecular metal shells with multi-screw fixation and cemented polyethene liners, as well as cemented cup-cage constructs both appear to be durable acetabular fixation options, though the indications for each remains elusive. Further prospective data are needed to better characterize this difficult clinical problem.

Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability - a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery.

BACKGROUND: There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century. MAIN BODY: Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability. CONCLUSION: Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint.

The Role of the Innate Immune System in Wear Debris-Induced Inflammatory Peri-Implant Osteolysis in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic osteolysis remains a leading complication of total hip and knee arthroplasty, often resulting in aseptic loosening of the implant and necessitating revision surgery. Wear-induced particulate debris is the main cause initiating this destructive process. The purpose of this article is to review recent advances in understanding of how wear debris causes osteolysis, and emergent strategies for the avoidance and treatment of this disease. A strong activator of the peri-implant innate immune this debris-induced inflammatory cascade is dictated by macrophage secretion of TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8, and PGE2, leading to peri-implant bone resorption through activation of osteoclasts and inhibition of osteoblasts through several mechanisms, including the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway. Therapeutic agents against proinflammatory mediators, such as those targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF), osteoclasts, and sclerostin, have shown promise in reducing peri-implant osteolysis in vitro and in vivo; however, radiographic changes and clinical diagnosis often lag considerably behind the initiation of osteolysis, making timely treatment difficult. Considerable efforts are underway to develop such diagnostic tools, therapies, and identify novel targets for therapeutic intervention.

Bicortical suspensory button fixation yields greater ultimate load to failure over unicortical all-suture anchor fixation in distal biceps brachii tendon repair.

BACKGROUND: Various distal biceps tendon repair techniques exist, each with their own biomechanical profile. Recently, all-suture anchor fixation has recently become an intriguing option for distal biceps fixation, compared with the proven track record of the suspensory cortical button. In addition, intramedullary techniques have been utilized as a means to avoid complications such as nerve damage seen with extramedullary fixation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to perform a comparative biomechanical analysis of 4 unique distal biceps tendon fixation methods: Unicortical/intramedullary all-suture anchor fixation (UIAS), Bicortical/extramedullary all-suture anchor fixation (BEAS), Unicortical/intramedullary suspensory button fixation (UISB), and Bicortical/extramedullary suspensory button fixation (BESB). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled Laboratory study. METHODS: 24 fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were randomized into 4 groups providing data from 6 specimens, with each group undergoing a different repair technique. The specimens underwent 2 studies: Cyclic loading and Ultimate Load to failure (ULTF) testing. The repaired elbows were cycled 3000 times between 0 and 90 degrees of flexion, with displacement under cyclic loading at the repair site measured using a differential variable reductance transducer. ULTF test was performed with the elbow flexed at 90 degrees. The modes of failure were recorded. RESULTS: The mean cyclic displacements between the 4 groups were as follows: UIAS: 1.45 ± 1.04 mm; BEAS: 2.75 ± 1.32 mm; UISB: 1.45 ± .776 mm; BESB: 2.66 ± 1.18 mm (p= 0.077). Bicortical repairs displayed greater displacement after cyclic loading when compared with unicortical repairs regardless of anchor used (p= 0.007). The mean ULTF for each group was as follows: all-suture intramedullary: 200 N; all-suture extramedullary: 330 N; cortical-button intramedullary: 256 N; cortical-button extramedullary: 342 N). All-suture unicortical/intramedullary repair had a significantly lower ULTF (200 N) compared with cortical-button Bicortical/extramedullary repair (342 N) (p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Bicortical/extramedullary suspensory button fixation demonstrated a greater ultimate load to failure when compared with unicortical/intramedullary all-suture anchor fixation. These findings suggest that bicortical/extramedullary suspensory cortical button fixation is a biomechanically superior construct as compared to unicortical/intramedullary all-suture anchor fixation. However, there was no significant difference in ULTF between extra-medullary, Bicortical button or Bicortical, all-suture anchor fixation.

Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Augmentation With Bioinductive Scaffold: Surgical Technique and Indications.

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee; however, only a minority of cases require surgical intervention. Classically, isolated grade I and II MCL injuries are treated nonoperatively whereas isolated grade III injuries may be treated with surgery. High-grade MCL injuries are frequently associated with concomitant knee ligamentous injuries, particularly the anterior cruciate ligament. Nonetheless, MCL repair or reconstruction is generally reserved for patients with persistent valgus instability after failed nonoperative management. Synthetic and biological implants are increasing in popularity to augment repairs and reconstructions for biomechanical reinforcement and promotion of the native healing response to hasten rehabilitation. The BioBrace (Biorez, New Haven, CT) is a bioinductive scaffold composed of highly porous type I collagen and bioresorbable poly(L-lactide) microfilaments, providing an environment for soft-tissue regeneration and mechanical support. The purpose of this article is to describe the surgical technique and relative indications for the BioBrace in knee MCL ligament repairs and reconstructions.

Favorable Patient-Reported Outcomes and High Return to Sport Rates Following Hip Arthroscopy in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize the existing literature surrounding hip arthroscopy in the adolescent athlete population to determine patient-reported outcomes, return to sport rates, complications, and reoperations associated with this intervention. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, and Embase according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they were published in English with greater than 2 participants, contained patients aged 10-19 years old or classified as "high school athletes" or "middle school athletes," and reported postoperative patient-reported outcomes and return to sport. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and their associated P values were recorded. Finally, return-to-sport outcomes and sports played were also extracted from the included studies. Weighted kappa was used to assess inter-reviewer agreement. RESULTS: Eleven studies included in the final analysis, resulting in 344 patients and 408 hips were analyzed by this review. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were reported in all studies. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was used in all but 1 study. Six of the 11 studies reported a 100% return-to-sport rate, for a total of 98/98 athletes returning to sport. Fabricant et al. did note that a majority of athletes who returned to sport were able to do so at a subjective "nearly normal" level. Only 4 of the studies reported complications, with the majority being transient neuropraxias. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent athletes who undergo hip arthroscopy demonstrate favorable postoperative patient-reported outcome scores, high rates of return to sport, and an overall low complication rate. The heterogeneity in both surgical methodology and outcome measures used for evaluation and treatment leads to continued ambiguity with regard to the optimal method for managing adolescent athletes with hip pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, systematic review of Level II-V studies.

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty following failed superior capsular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) can be used for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in the absence of significant degenerative changes; however, those who fail an SCR may require reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). The effect of a previously performed SCR on outcomes following RSA remains unknown. METHODS: Subjects who underwent RSA from May 2015 to January 2021 at 2 separate institutions were retrospectively identified through prospectively collected databases. Patients who underwent RSA after failed SCR were matched to those who underwent RSA after failed rotator cuff repair (RCR) based on the number of previous ipsilateral shoulder procedures (n = 1, 2, ≥3) and secondarily by age within 5 years. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS) scores were compared between groups. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) thresholds were calculated to determine clinically relevant differences between groups. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included (32 RSA following RCR, 13 following SCR). There were more smokers (P = .001) and worker's compensation cases (P = .034) in the SCR group. The RCR cohort was older (P = .007) and had a greater incidence of mental health (P > .999) and somatic disorders (P = .698), although these did not reach statistical significance. The mean follow-up for the RCR and SCR groups were 24.2 ± 23.3 and 20.4 ± 14.9 months following RSA, respectively (P = .913). The time from index RCR or SCR to RSA were 94.4 ± 22.2 and 89.2 ± 5.3 months, respectively (P = .003). Pre- and postoperative range of motion were similar between groups, as was the overall change in forward flexion (P = .879), abduction (P = .971), and external rotation (P = .968) following RSA. The RCR group had lower postoperative VAS pain (P = .009), higher SANE (P = .015), higher ASES (P = .008), and higher WOOS (P = .018) scores. The percentage achieving the MCID (P = .676) and SCB (P > .999) were similar; however, 56.7% of the RCR group met the SANE PASS threshold compared with 0.0% in the SCR group (P = .005). There were no differences in postoperative complications (P = .698) or revision rates (P = .308) following RSA between cohorts. CONCLUSION: When matched for number of previous procedures to the ipsilateral extremity and age, patients who underwent RSA following failed SCR had worse clinical outcome scores than their RSA following failed RCR counterparts. No patient in the SCR group met the SANE PASS threshold, whereas more than half of the RCR group did.

Editorial Commentary: Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Vary Over Time.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores have considerable potential to both streamline the collection of outcome data and provide a common set of metrics to compare and benchmark patient-reported outcomes after orthopaedic procedures. An analysis of PROMIS scores collected at the preoperative clinical visit and the day of surgery found considerable changes in upper- and lower-extremity physical function, pain interference, and depression. These findings suggest that health status may vary between the day of operative consent and the day of surgery. Given the importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical research, quality assurance, and value-based health care, the potential for large changes in scores leading up to the procedure warrants attention toward the timing of PROMIS administration to ensure that the health status of the patient-and its variation-is accurately captured.

Transient Exertional Compressive Radial Neuropathy in a Collegiate Baseball Pitcher: A Case Report.

CASE: A 21-year-old collegiate baseball pitcher presented with transient lateral arm pain and wrist extension weakness after pitching more than 1 inning. Physical examination was unremarkable at rest. Ultrasound-guided injection of the radial nerve at the level of the lateral intramuscular septum improved his symptoms. After decompression of the radial nerve, the patient noted resolution of his symptoms while pitching. CONCLUSION: Atraumatic radial neuropathy is a rare but documented phenomenon. As far as we know, this is the first reported case of a transient exertional radial neuropathy in an athlete at the level of the lateral intermuscular septum.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biologically enhanced patch augmentation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this guide is to illustrate an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) with two techniques for biologically enhanced patch augmentation. INDICATIONS: Massive rotator cuff tears (> 5 cm) and revision RCR. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Active joint or systemic infection; severe fatty muscle atrophy; severe glenohumeral arthropathy; American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) IV. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Dermal allograft patch augmented with concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-poor plasma (PPP); or Regeneten patch augmented with bursa, PRP, PPP, and autologous thrombin. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: A 30° abduction sling for 6 weeks; unrestricted active-assisted external rotation and forward elevation after 12 weeks; focus on restoration of scapular stability and strength. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients received revision massive RCR using a dermal allograft patch enhanced with cBMA and PRP with a mean follow-up of 2.5 years (1.0-5.8 years). There was a significant improvement in the preoperative Simple Shoulder Test (SST). There was also a trend towards improved pain and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. In this cohort, 45% reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), 41% achieved substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and 32% had a patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the ASES score. Preliminary data using the Regeneten patch technique with bursa, PRP, PPP, and autologous thrombin was prospectively collected in five patients between 05/2020 and 03/2021 at the author's institution. Mean follow-up was 6.5 ± 1.3 (6-8 months). There was an improvement from preop to postop in pain, ASES, SANE, Constant-Murley (CM) score and active range of motion.

Glenohumeral Arthrodesis for Treatment of Unique Instability with Axillary Nerve Injury: A Case Report.

Introduction: Traumatic shoulder dislocations in elderly patients can result in significant shoulder pathology. Rotator cuff tears and recurrent instability are common complications follow a dislocation event, while axillary nerve injury is less common. While there have been rare cases of recurrent shoulder instability with concomitant axillary nerve injury, there have been no prior cases, in which concurrent fracture fragmentation resulted in the initial gross instability. Case Report: A 68-year-old male with painful gross instability presents following a traumatic dislocation. The patient sustained an axillary nerve injury to the ipsilateral side resulting in a non-functioning deltoid. Pre-operative X-rays showed recurrent chronic glenohumeral dislocation, computerized tomography imaging showed a greater tuberosity fracture, and magnetic resonance imaging showed a massive cuff tear with retraction and atrophy. Given the level of instability and deltoid dysfunction, the patient was treated with shoulder arthrodesis. Intraoperatively, a large fragment of greater tuberosity with ligamentous attachments was found adhered to the anterior glenoid. After arthrodesis, the patient's pain and function improved significantly. Conclusion: When treating elderly patients with gross instability following a traumatic dislocation, surgeons should keep in mind the high likelihood of concomitant avulsion fracture, and that migratory cortical fragments can be a nidus for a patient's instability. When selected for appropriately, these patients can be effectively treated with shoulder arthrodesis with excellent improvements of pain and functionality.