GIP-derived GIP receptor antagonists - a review of their role in GIP receptor pharmacology.

Surprisingly, agonists, as well as antagonists of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR), are currently being used or investigated as treatment options for type 2 diabetes and obesity - and both, when combined with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonism, enhance GLP-1-induced glycemia and weight loss further. This paradox raises several questions regarding not only the mechanisms of actions of GIP but also the processes engaged during the activation of both the GIP and GLP-1 receptors. Here, we provide an overview of studies of the properties and actions of peptide-derived GIPR antagonists, focusing on GIP(3-30)NH2, a naturally occurring N- and C-terminal truncation of GIP(1-42). GIP(3-30)NH2 was the first GIPR antagonist administered to humans. GIP(3-30)NH2 and a few additional antagonists, like Pro3-GIP, have been used in both in vitro and in vivo studies to elucidate the molecular and cellular consequences of GIPR inhibition, desensitization, and internalization and, at a larger scale, the role of the GIP system in health and disease. We provide an overview of these studies combined with recent knowledge regarding the effects of naturally occurring variants of the GIPR system and species differences within the GIP system to enhance our understanding of the GIPR as a drug target.

Biased GLP-2 agonist with strong G protein-coupling but impaired arrestin recruitment and receptor desensitization enhances intestinal growth in mice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) is secreted postprandially by enteroendocrine L-cells and stimulates growth of the gut and bone. One GLP-2 analogue is approved for short bowel syndrome (SBS). To improve therapeutic efficacy, we developed biased GLP-2 receptor (GLP-2R) agonists through N-terminal modifications. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Variants with Ala and Trp substitutions of the first seven positions of GLP-2(1-33) were studied in vitro for affinity, G protein activation (cAMP accumulation), recruitment of ß-arrestin 1 and 2, and internalization of the human and mouse GLP-2R. The intestinotrophic actions of the most efficacious (cAMP) biased variant were examined in mice. KEY RESULTS: Ala substitutions had more profound effects than Trp substitutions. For both, alterations at positions 1, 3 and 6 most severely impaired activity. ß-arrestin recruitment was more affected than cAMP accumulation. Among Ala substitutions, [H1A], [D3A] and [F6A] impaired potency (EC50 ) for cAMP-accumulation >20-fold and efficacy (Emax ) to 48%-87%, and were unable to recruit arrestins. The Trp substitutions, [A2W], [D3W] and [G4W] were partial agonists (Emax of 46%-59%) with 1.7-12-fold decreased potencies in cAMP and diminished ß-arrestin recruitment. The biased variants, [F6A], [F6W] and [S7W] induced less GLP-2R internalization compared with GLP-2, which induced internalization in a partly arrestin-independent manner. In mice, [S7W] enhanced gut trophic actions with increased weight of the small intestine, increased villus height and crypt depth compared with GLP-2. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: G protein-biased GLP-2R agonists with diminished receptor desensitization have superior intestinotrophic effects and may represent improved treatment of intestinal insufficiency including SBS.

Protocol for a 30-day randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority, controlled trial investigating the effects of discontinuing renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with and without COVID-19: the RASCOVID-19 trial.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the virus SARS-CoV has spread rapidly and caused damage worldwide. Data suggest a major overrepresentation of hypertension and diabetes among patients experiencing severe courses of COVID-19 including COVID-19-related deaths. Many of these patients receive renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibiting therapy, and evidence suggests that treatment with angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) could attenuate SARS-CoV-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome, and ACE inhibitors and ARBs have been suggested to alleviate COVID-19 pulmonary manifestations. This randomised clinical trial will address whether RAS inhibiting therapy should be continued or discontinued in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This trial is a 30-day randomised parallel-group non-inferiority clinical trial with an embedded mechanistic substudy. In the main trial, 215 patients treated with a RAS inhibitor will be included. The participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either discontinue or continue their RAS inhibiting therapy in addition to standard care. The patients are included during hospitalisation and followed for a period of 30 days. The primary end point is number of days alive and out of hospital within 14 days after recruitment. In a mechanistic substudy, 40 patients treated with RAS inhibition, who are not in hospital and not infected with COVID-19 will be randomly assigned to discontinue or continue their RAS inhibiting therapy with the primary end point of serum ACE2 activity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the Scientific-Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (identification no. H-20026484), the Danish Medicines Agency (identification no. 2020040883) and by the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2020-366). The results of this project will be compiled into one or more manuscripts for publication in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2020-001544-26; NCT04351581.

The Location of Missense Variants in the Human GIP Gene Is Indicative for Natural Selection.

The intestinal hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), is involved in important physiological functions, including postprandial blood glucose homeostasis, bone remodeling, and lipid metabolism. While mutations leading to physiological changes can be identified in large-scale sequencing, no systematic investigation of GIP missense variants has been performed. Here, we identified 168 naturally occurring missense variants in the human GIP genes from three independent cohorts comprising ~720,000 individuals. We examined amino acid changing variants scattered across the pre-pro-GIP peptide using in silico effect predictions, which revealed that the sequence of the fully processed GIP hormone is more protected against mutations than the rest of the precursor protein. Thus, we observed a highly species-orthologous and population-specific conservation of the GIP peptide sequence, suggestive of evolutionary constraints to preserve the GIP peptide sequence. Elucidating the mutational landscape of GIP variants and how they affect the structural and functional architecture of GIP can aid future biological characterization and clinical translation.

N-terminal alterations turn the gut hormone GLP-2 into an antagonist with gradual loss of GLP-2 receptor selectivity towards more GLP-1 receptor interaction.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To fully elucidate the regulatory role of the GLP-2 system in the gut and the bones, potent and selective GLP-2 receptor (GLP-2R) antagonists are needed. Searching for antagonist activity, we performed systematic N-terminal truncations of human GLP-2(1-33). EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: COS-7 cells were transfected with the human GLP-2R and assessed for cAMP accumulation or competition binding using 125 I-GLP-2(1-33)[M10Y]. To examine selectivity, COS-7 cells expressing human GLP-1 or GIP receptors were assessed for cAMP accumulation. KEY RESULTS: Affinity of the N-terminally truncated GLP-2 peptides for the GLP-2 receptor decreased with reduced N-terminal peptide length (Ki 6.5-871 nM), while increasing antagonism appeared with inhibitory potencies (IC50 ) values from 79 to 204 nM for truncation up to GLP-2(4-33) and then declined. In contrast, truncation-dependent increases in intrinsic activity were observed from an Emax of only 20% for GLP-(2-33) up to 46% for GLP-2(6-33) at 1 µM, followed by a decline. GLP-2(9-33) had the highest intrinsic efficacy (Emax 65%) and no antagonistic properties. Moreover, with truncations up to GLP-2(8-33), a gradual loss in selectivity for the GLP-2 receptor appeared with increasing GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) inhibition (up to 73% at 1 µM). Lipidation of the peptides improved antagonism (IC50 down to 7.9 nM) for both the GLP-2 and the GLP-1R. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The N-terminus of GLP-2 is crucial for GLP-2R activity and selectivity. Our observations form the basis for the development of tool compounds for further characterization of the GLP-2 system.

Worsening Postural Tachycardia Syndrome Is Associated With Increased Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Secretion.

BACKGROUND: Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is characterized by excessive upright tachycardia and disabling presyncopal symptoms, which are exacerbated after consuming a high-carbohydrate meal; it is unknown, however, what is the precise underlying mechanism. We seek to investigate the effect of glucose intake on orthostatic hemodynamic changes and gastrointestinal hormone secretion in POTS. METHODS: Prospective, case-control study, 12 women with POTS who reported a postprandial worsening of their POTS symptoms and 13 age-matched female controls received 75-g oral glucose and 20 mg/kg acetaminophen to assess nutrient absorption. Hemodynamic, gastrointestinal hormone and acetaminophen levels were measured for up to 120 minutes postingestion while supine and standing. RESULTS: Patients with POTS had significant orthostatic tachycardia, 48.7±11.2 versus 23.3±8.1 bpm, P=0.012 and elevated upright norepinephrine levels, 835.2±368.4 versus 356.9±156.7 pg/mL, P=0.004. After oral glucose, upright heart rate significantly increased in POTS, 21.2±11.9% versus 6.0±19.9%, P=0.033 with a concomitant decline in upright stroke volume, -10.3±11.90% versus 3.3±13.7%, P=0.027; total peripheral resistance, blood pressure and cardiac output remained unaltered. Acetaminophen rate of appearance was similar between groups (P=0.707), indicating comparable nutrient absorption rates. POTS had increased plasma levels of C-peptide (P=0.001), GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; P=0.001), peptide YY (P=0.016), and pancreatic polypeptide (P=0.04) following glucose consumption, but only GIP had a time-dependent association with the worsening upright tachycardia and stroke volume fall. CONCLUSIONS: The glucose-induced worsening orthostatic tachycardia in POTS was associated with a decline in SV; these changes occurred while GIP, a splanchnic vasodilator, was maximally elevated.

GIP and GLP-2 together improve bone turnover in humans supporting GIPR-GLP-2R co-agonists as future osteoporosis treatment.

The intestinal hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) are key regulators of postprandial bone turnover in humans. We hypothesized that GIP and GLP-2 co-administration would provide stronger effect on bone turnover than administration of the hormones separately, and tested this using subcutaneous injections of GIP and GLP-2 alone or in combination in humans. Guided by these findings, we designed series of GIPR-GLP-2R co-agonists as template for new osteoporosis treatment. The clinical experiment was a randomized cross-over design including 10 healthy men administered subcutaneous injections of GIP and GLP-2 alone or in combination. The GIPR-GLP-2R co-agonists were characterized in terms of binding and activation profiles on human and rodent GIP and GLP-2 receptors, and their pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles were improved by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 protection and site-directed lipidation. Co-administration of GIP and GLP-2 in humans resulted in an additive reduction in bone resorption superior to each hormone individually. The GIPR-GLP-2R co-agonists, designed by combining regions of importance for cognate receptor activation, obtained similar efficacies as the two native hormones and nanomolar potencies on both human receptors. The PK-improved co-agonists maintained receptor activity along with their prolonged half-lives. Finally, we found that the GIPR-GLP-2R co-agonists optimized toward the human receptors for bone remodeling are not feasible for use in rodent models. The successful development of potent and efficacious GIPR-GLP-2R co-agonists, combined with the improved effect on bone metabolism in humans by co-administration, support these co-agonists as a future osteoporosis treatment.

Loss of Function Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Receptor Variants Are Associated With Alterations in BMI, Bone Strength and Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and its receptor (GIPR) are involved in multiple physiological systems related to glucose metabolism, bone homeostasis and fat deposition. Recent research has surprisingly indicated that both agonists and antagonists of GIPR may be useful in the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes, as both result in weight loss when combined with GLP-1 receptor activation. To understand the receptor signaling related with weight loss, we examined the pharmacological properties of two rare missense GIPR variants, R190Q (rs139215588) and E288G (rs143430880) linked to lower body mass index (BMI) in carriers. At the molecular and cellular level, both variants displayed reduced G protein coupling, impaired arrestin recruitment and internalization, despite maintained high GIP affinity. The physiological phenotyping revealed an overall impaired bone strength, increased systolic blood pressure, altered lipid profile, altered fat distribution combined with increased body impedance in human carriers, thereby substantiating the role of GIP in these physiological processes.

Exendin(9-39)NH2 : Recommendations for clinical use based on a systematic literature review.

AIM: To present an overview of exendin(9-39)NH2 usage as a scientific tool in humans and provide recommendations for dosage and infusion regimes. METHODS: We systematically searched the literature on exendin(9-39)NH2 and included for review 44 clinical studies reporting use of exendin(9-39)NH2 in humans. RESULTS: Exendin(9-39)NH2 binds to the orthosteric binding site of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor with high affinity. The plasma elimination half-life of exendin(9-39)NH2 after intravenous administration is ~30 minutes, requiring ~2.5 hours of constant infusion before steady-state plasma concentrations can be expected. Studies utilizing infusions with exendin(9-39)NH2 in humans have applied varying regimens (priming with a bolus or constant infusion) and dosages (continuous infusion rate range 30-900 pmol/kg/min) with subsequent differences in effects. Administration of exendin(9-39)NH2 in healthy individuals, patients with diabetes, obese patients, and patients who have undergone bariatric surgery significantly increases fasting and postprandial levels of glucose and glucagon, but has inconsistent effects on circulating concentrations of insulin and C-peptide, gastric emptying, appetite sensations, and food intake. Importantly, exendin(9-39)NH2 induces secretion of all L cell products (ie, in addition to GLP-1, also peptide YY, glucagon-like peptide-2, oxyntomodulin, and glicentin) complicating use of exendin(9-39)NH2 as a tool to study the isolated effect of GLP-1. CONCLUSIONS: Exendin(9-39)NH2 is selective for the GLP-1 receptor, with numerous and complex whole-body effects. To obtain GLP-1 receptor blockade in humans, we recommend an initial high-dose infusion, followed by a continuous infusion rate aiming at a ratio of exendin(9-39)NH2 to GLP-1 of 2000:1. Highlights Exendin(9-39)NH2 is a competitive antagonist of the human GLP-1 receptor. Exendin(9-39)NH2 has been used as a tool to delineate human GLP-1 physiology since 1998. Exendin(9-39)NH2 induces secretion of GLP-1 and other L cell products. Reported effects of exendin(9-39)NH2 on insulin levels and food intake are inconsistent. Here, we provide recommendations for the use of exendin(9-39)NH2 in clinical studies.

The Role of Incretins on Insulin Function and Glucose Homeostasis.

The incretin effect-the amplification of insulin secretion after oral vs intravenous administration of glucose as a mean to improve glucose tolerance-was suspected even before insulin was discovered, and today we know that the effect is due to the secretion of 2 insulinotropic peptides, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). But how important is it? Physiological experiments have shown that, because of the incretin effect, we can ingest increasing amounts of amounts of glucose (carbohydrates) without increasing postprandial glucose excursions, which otherwise might have severe consequences. The mechanism behind this is incretin-stimulated insulin secretion. The availability of antagonists for GLP-1 and most recently also for GIP has made it possible to directly estimate the individual contributions to postprandial insulin secretion of a) glucose itself: 26%; b) GIP: 45%; and c) GLP-1: 29%. Thus, in healthy individuals, GIP is the champion. When the action of both incretins is prevented, glucose tolerance is pathologically impaired. Thus, after 100 years of research, we now know that insulinotropic hormones from the gut are indispensable for normal glucose tolerance. The loss of the incretin effect in type 2 diabetes, therefore, contributes greatly to the impaired postprandial glucose control.

Dose-dependent efficacy of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 on GIP actions in humans.

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) fragment GIP(3-30)NH2 is a selective, competitive GIP receptor antagonist, and doses of 800 to 1200 pmol/kg/min inhibit GIP-induced potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by >80% in humans. We evaluated the effects of GIP(3-30)NH2 across a wider dose range in eight healthy men undergoing six separate and randomized 10-mmol/L hyperglycaemic clamps (A-F) with concomitant intravenous infusion of GIP (1.5 pmol/kg/min; A-E) or saline (F). Clamps A to E involved double-blinded, infusions of saline (A) and GIP(3-30)NH2 at four rates: 2 (B), 20 (C), 200 (D) and 2000 pmol/kg/min (E), respectively. Mean plasma concentrations of glucose (A-F) and GIP (A-E) were similar. GIP-induced potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was reduced by 44 ± 10% and 84 ± 10% during clamps D and E, respectively. Correspondingly, the amounts of glucose required to maintain the clamp during D and E were not different from F. GIP-induced suppression of bone resorption and increase in heart rate were lowered by clamps D and E. In conclusion, GIP(3-30)NH2 provides extensive, dose-dependent inhibition of the GIP receptor in humans, with most pronounced effects of the doses 200 to 2000 pmol/kg/min within the tested range.

GIP(3-30)NH2 - a tool for the study of GIP physiology.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a gut hormone impacting glucose, lipid and bone metabolism through the GIP receptor (GIPR). The GIP system has key species differences complicating the translation of findings from rodent to human physiology. Furthermore, the effects of endogenous GIP in humans have been difficult to tease out due to the lack of a suitable GIPR antagonist. The naturally occurring GIP(3-30)NH2 has turned out to constitute a safe and efficacious GIPR antagonist for rodent and human use. To study GIP physiology, it is recommended to use the species-specific GIP(3-30)NH2 peptide sequence, and for human intravenous infusions, an antagonist:agonist ratio of a minimum of 600 with a 20min infusion time before the intervention of interest is recommended. Several studies using GIP(3-30)NH2 are coming, hopefully providing new insights into the physiology of GIP, the pathophysiologic involvement of GIP in several diseases and the therapeutic potential of the GIPR.

Molecular interactions of full-length and truncated GIP peptides with the GIP receptor - A comprehensive review.

Enzymatic cleavage of endogenous peptides is a commonly used principle to initiate, modulate and terminate action for instance among cytokines and peptide hormones. The incretin hormones, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and the related hormone glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) are all rapidly N-terminally truncated with severe loss of intrinsic activity. The most abundant circulating form of full length GIP(1-42) is GIP(3-42) (a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) product). GIP(1-30)NH2 is another active form resulting from prohormone convertase 2 (PC2) cleavage of proGIP. Like GIP(1-42), GIP(1-30)NH2 is a substrate for DPP-4 generating GIP(3-30)NH2 which, compared to GIP(3-42), binds with higher affinity and very efficiently inhibits GIP receptor (GIPR) activity with no intrinsic activity. Here, we review the action of these four and multiple other N- and C-terminally truncated forms of GIP with an emphasis on molecular pharmacology, i.e. ligand binding, subsequent receptor activation and desensitization. Our overall conclusion is that the N-terminus is essential for receptor activation as GIP N-terminal truncation leads to decreased/lost intrinsic activity and antagonism (similar to GLP-1 and GLP-2), whereas the C-terminal extension of GIP(1-42), as compared to GLP-1, GLP-2 and glucagon (29-33 amino acids), has no apparent impact on the GIPR in vitro, but may play a role for other properties such as stability and tissue distribution. A deeper understanding of the molecular interaction of naturally occurring and designed GIP-based peptides, and their impact in vivo, may contribute to a future therapeutic targeting of the GIP system - either with agonists or with antagonists, or both.

GIP and the gut-bone axis - Physiological, pathophysiological and potential therapeutic implications.

The influence by gut-derived hormones on bone remodelling appears increasingly important as research on the enteroendocrine-osseous axis accelerates. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is secreted from the gut and potentiates insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. GIP has, like the two other gut-derived hormones, glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucagon-like peptide 2, been shown to affect bone remodelling as part of the enteroendocrine-osseous axis. Observational studies have shown that a mutation in the GIP receptor causing reduced receptor signalling leads to lower bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. Rodent as well as human studies have shown that GIP causes serum levels of the bone resorption marker carboxy-terminal type 1 collagen crosslinks to decline. GIP may also increase bone formation indicating a potential uncoupling of bone resorption and formation. Here, we review past and recent discoveries elucidating the enteroendocrine-osseous axis with a special focus on GIP.

Increased Body Weight and Fat Mass After Subchronic GIP Receptor Antagonist, but Not GLP-2 Receptor Antagonist, Administration in Rats.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) are hormones secreted from the enteroendocrine cells after a meal. They exert their actions through activation of G protein-coupled receptors (R), the GIPR and GLP-2R, respectively. Both have been reported to influence metabolism. The purpose of the study was to investigate the role of the hormones in the regulation of lipid and bone homeostasis by subchronic treatment with novel GIPR and GLP-2R antagonists. Rats were injected once daily with vehicle, GIPR, or GLP-2R antagonists for 3 weeks. Body weight, food intake, body composition, plasma lipoprotein lipase (LPL), adipokines, triglycerides and the marker of bone resorption carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX), were examined. In rats, subchronic treatment with GIPR antagonist, rat GIP (3-30)NH2, did not modify food intake and bone resorption, but significantly increased body weight, body fat mass, triglycerides, LPL, and leptin levels compared with vehicle treated rats. Subchronic (Pro3)GIP (a partial GIPR agonist), GLP-2(11-33), and GLP-2(3-33) (GLP-2R antagonists) treatment did not affect any parameter. The present results would be consistent with a role for GIP, but not GLP-2, in the maintenance of lipid homeostasis in rats, while neither GIPR nor GLP-2R antagonism appeared to influence bone resorption in rats.

Separate and Combined Effects of GIP and GLP-1 Infusions on Bone Metabolism in Overweight Men Without Diabetes.

CONTEXT: The gut-derived incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) have been suggested to play a role in bone metabolism. Exogenous administration of GIP inhibits bone resorption, but the effect of GLP-1 is less clear. Furthermore, the combined effect of exogenous GIP and GLP-1 on bone metabolism is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of separate and combined infusions of the incretin hormones GIP and GLP-1 on bone resorption and formation. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study including five study days. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen overweight/obese men. INTERVENTIONS: On the first study day, a 50-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed. On the next four study days, isoglycemic IV glucose infusions (IIGI), mimicking the glucose excursions from the OGTT, were performed with concomitant infusions of GIP (4 pmol/kg/min), GLP-1 (1 pmol/kg/min), GIP+GLP-1 (4 and 1 pmol/kg/min, respectively), or placebo, respectively. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Changes in bone resorption assessed by measurements of carboxy-terminal type I collagen crosslinks (CTX) and in bone formation as assessed by procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) concentrations. RESULTS: During the OGTT, CTX was significantly lowered by 54 ± 13% from baseline (mean ± SD) compared with 28 ± 12% during IIGI + saline (P < 0.0001). During IIGI+GLP-1 and IIGI+GIP, CTX was lowered by 65 ± 16% and 74 ± 9%, respectively, from baseline, whereas IGII+GIP+GLP-1 lowered CTX by 84 ± 4% from baseline. P1NP levels were unaffected by the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that GLP-1, like GIP, may be involved in regulation of bone resorption and that GIP and GLP-1 together have partially additive inhibitory effects.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor antagonists as anti-diabetic agents.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an intestinal hormone with a broad range of physiological actions. In the postprandial state, the hormone stimulates insulin secretion and during eu- and hypoglycemia, it stimulates glucagon secretion. In addition, GIP increases triacylglycerol (TAG) uptake in adipose tissue and decreases bone resorption. However, the importance of these actions in humans are not clearly understood as a specific GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonist - an essential tool to study GIP physiology - has been missing. Several different GIPR antagonists have been identified comprising both peptides, vaccines against GIP, GIP antibodies or antibodies against the GIPR. However, most of these have only been tested in rodents. In vitro, N- and C-terminally truncated GIP variants are potent and efficacious GIPR antagonists. Recently, GIP(3-30)NH2, a naturally occurring peptide, was shown to block the GIPR in humans and decrease GIP-induced insulin secretion as well as adipose tissue blood flow and TAG uptake. So far, there are no studies with a GIPR antagonist in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but because the elevations in fasting plasma glucagon and paradoxical postprandial glucagon excursions, seen in patients with T2D, are aggravated by GIP, a GIPR antagonist could partly alleviate this and possibly improve the fasting and postprandial glycemia. Since the majority of patients with T2D are overweight, inhibition of GIP-induced fat deposition may be beneficial as well. Here we summarize the studies of GIPR antagonists and discuss the therapeutic potential of the GIP system in humans.

Human GIP(3-30)NH2 inhibits G protein-dependent as well as G protein-independent signaling and is selective for the GIP receptor with high-affinity binding to primate but not rodent GIP receptors.

GIP(3-30)NH2 is a high affinity antagonist of the GIP receptor (GIPR) in humans inhibiting insulin secretion via G protein-dependent pathways. However, its ability to inhibit G protein-independent signaling is unknown. Here we determine its action on arrestin-recruitment and receptor internalization in recombinant cells. As GIP is adipogenic, we evaluate the inhibitory actions of GIP(3-30)NH2 in human adipocytes. Finally, we determine the receptor selectivity of GIP(3-30)NH2 among other human and animal GPCRs. cAMP accumulation and ß-arrestin 1 and 2 recruitment were studied in transiently transfected HEK293 cells and real-time internalization in transiently transfected HEK293A and in HEK293A ß-arrestin 1 and 2 knockout cells. Furthermore, human subcutaneous adipocytes were assessed for cAMP accumulation following ligand stimulation. Competition binding was examined in transiently transfected COS-7 cells using human 125I-GIP(3-30)NH2. The selectivity of human GIP(3-30)NH2 was examined by testing for agonistic and antagonistic properties on 62 human GPCRs. Human GIP(3-30)NH2 inhibited GIP(1-42)-induced cAMP and ß-arrestin 1 and 2 recruitment on the human GIPR and Schild plot analysis showed competitive antagonism with a pA2 and Hill slope of 16.8 nM and 1.11 ±â€¯0.02 in cAMP, 10.6 nM and 1.15 ±â€¯0.05 in ß-arrestin 1 recruitment, and 10.2 nM and 1.06 ±â€¯0.05 in ß-arrestin 2 recruitment. Efficient internalization of the GIPR was dependent on the presence of either ß-arrestin 1 or 2. Moreover, GIP(3-30)NH2 inhibited GIP(1-42)-induced internalization in a concentration-dependent manner and notably also inhibited GIP-mediated signaling in human subcutaneous adipocytes. Finally, the antagonist was established as GIPR selective among 62 human GPCRs being species-specific with high affinity binding to the human and non-human primate (Macaca fascicularis) GIPRs, and low affinity binding to the rat and mouse GIPRs (Kd values of 2.0, 2.5, 31.6 and 100 nM, respectively). In conclusion, human GIP(3-30)NH2 is a selective and species-specific GIPR antagonist with broad inhibition of signaling and internalization in transfected cells as well as in human adipocytes.

The Combination of Fosfomycin, Metronidazole, and Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor is Stable in vitro and Has Maintained Antibacterial Activity.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of secondary peritonitis includes surgery and antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial agents are often administered intravenously, however, the alternative route intraperitoneal administration could be considered. Investigations must be conducted prior to clinical application. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the combination of fosfomycin, metronidazole, and recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor with regard to its chemical properties and the solution's stability. In addition, the antibacterial effect of the mixed drug solution was compared with the effect of the individual antibacterial agents. METHODS: The drugs were mixed to an aqueous solution. Basic chemical investigations of pH, precipitation, and calculated osmolarity of the drug combination were conducted. Fosfomycin and metronidazole's chemical stability was investigated using High Pressure Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Microbiological investigations using the agar cup method were carried out to measure the antibacterial effect of fosfomycin and metronidazole. RESULTS: The aqueous solution of the combination of the three drugs had a pH of 7.46-7.62, which was stable during 24 h, was without precipitation, and had a calculated osmolarity of 293 mOsm/l. High Pressure Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry found stable concentrations of fosfomycin and metronidazole both alone and in combination during 24 h. The antibacterial effect of the drug combination solution was similar to the antibacterial effects of fosfomycin and metronidazole alone. CONCLUSION: The drug combination had neutral and stable pH, was iso-osmotic, and had stable concentrations during 24 h of storage. The antibacterial effect of fosfomycin and metronidazole were not altered when the drugs were mixed.

[The dilemma of Danish Christmas lunches].

We investigated the impact of food ingestion, water intake, sleep and exercise on the elimination of ethanol, and self-assessed ability to drive a car. In a cross-over design, four fasted healthy participants each underwent one day of oral ethanol intake followed by one of the abovementioned interventions and one day of oral ethanol intake followed by bed rest (control day). The elimination rate of ethanol was minimally affected (numerically it was increased by food ingestion and water intake, reduced by exercise and unchanged by sleep) and self-assessed driving abilities were associated with great variability.