Anagrelide influences thrombotic risk, and prolongs progression-free and overall survival in essential thrombocythaemia vs hydroxyurea plus aspirin.

OBJECTIVE: We report an extension study of patients with essential thrombocythaemia (ET) in the Hungarian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (HUMYPRON) Registry, which demonstrated that over 6 years anagrelide significantly decreased the number of patients experiencing minor arterial and minor venous thrombotic events (TEs) vs hydroxyurea+aspirin. METHODS: Data on patients with ET were collected through completion of a questionnaire developed according to 2008 WHO diagnostic criteria and with regard to Landolfi, Tefferi and IPSET criteria for thrombotic risk. Data were entered into the registry from 14 haematological centres. TEs, secondary malignancies, disease progression and survival were compared between patients with ET treated with anagrelide (n = 116) and with hydroxyurea+aspirin (n = 121). RESULTS: Patients were followed for (median) 10 years. A between-group difference in the number of patients with TEs was observed (25.9% anagrelide vs 38.0% hydroxyurea+aspirin; P = .052). Minor arterial events were more frequently reported in the hydroxyurea+aspirin group (P < .001); there were marginally more reports of major arterial events in the anagrelide group (P = .049). TE prior to diagnosis was found to significantly influence TE incidence (P > .001). Progression-free survival (P = .004) and survival (P = .001) were significantly increased for the anagrelide group vs hydroxyurea+aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Anagrelide reduced TEs, and increased progression-free and overall survival vs hydroxyurea+aspirin over (median) 10 years.

The phase 3 DUO trial: duvelisib vs ofatumumab in relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL.

Duvelisib (also known as IPI-145) is an oral, dual inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ and γ (PI3K-δ,γ) being developed for treatment of hematologic malignancies. PI3K-δ,γ signaling can promote B-cell proliferation and survival in clonal B-cell malignancies, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). In a phase 1 study, duvelisib showed clinically meaningful activity and acceptable safety in CLL/SLL patients. We report here the results of DUO, a global phase 3 randomized study of duvelisib vs ofatumumab monotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL/SLL. Patients were randomized 1:1 to oral duvelisib 25 mg twice daily (n = 160) or ofatumumab IV (n = 159). The study met the primary study end point by significantly improving progression-free survival per independent review committee assessment compared with ofatumumab for all patients (median, 13.3 months vs 9.9 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52; P < .0001), including those with high-risk chromosome 17p13.1 deletions [del(17p)] and/or TP53 mutations (HR = 0.40; P = .0002). The overall response rate was significantly higher with duvelisib (74% vs 45%; P < .0001) regardless of del(17p) status. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, neutropenia, pyrexia, nausea, anemia, and cough on the duvelisib arm, and neutropenia and infusion reactions on the ofatumumab arm. The DUO trial data support duvelisib as a potentially effective treatment option for patients with RR CLL/SLL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02004522.

Efficacy and Tolerability of a 2-Year Rituximab Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Advanced Follicular Lymphoma after Induction of Response with Rituximab-Containing First Line-Regimens (HUSOM Study).

Follicular lymphoma is a lymphoid malignancy commonly showing slow progression which makes the treatment of the disease challenging. Rituximab monotherapy and rituximab added to standard chemotherapy has been proven to increase survival among patients with advanced stage of the disease. However, the benefit of a rituximab maintenance therapy after induction was still unclear at the time of the initiation of this study. HUSOM was a phase III open-label, single-arm, multi-centre study aimed to assess the efficacy and the safety of the 12 cycles of rituximab (375 mg/m2 every 8 weeks) maintenance therapy in patients had already presented partial or complete response to R-CVP or R-CHOP. Efficacy endpoints such as event-free survival and overall survival were estimated. Adverse events were recorded during the entire course of the study. A total number of 124 patients were enrolled by 15 Hungarian study sites. Out of these, 86 patients received 12 cycles of rituximab and 69 patients completed the 3-year follow-up phase as well. The probabilities of the event free survival and progression at 4.3 years were estimated to be 70.3% and 74.4%, respectively. The overall and the disease free survival at 4 years were estimated to be 90.7% and 87.9%, respectively. A total number of 85 adverse events were reported during the study out of which 5 AEs were considered to be related to the administration of rituximab. Analyses of the efficacy variables have revealed comparable results to those reported by controlled clinical trials (EORTC 20981, PRIMA) conducted in parallel with the HUSOM study.

[Complex analysis of prognostic factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia]. / Prognosztikai faktorok komplex vizsgálata krónikus lymphocytás leukémiában.

INTRODUCTION: Many new prognostic factors established in recent years in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. May help predicting survival. AIMS: The goal of the present study was to determine the frequency and the correlation of these novel prognostic factors in samples of 419 leukemia patients. METHODS: The mutation status of the IgH gene was evaluated in 160 cases. RESULTS: In 62% of cases, non-mutated IgH gene was found, the heavy chain family usage was different in mutated and non-mutated cases. The CD38 expression demonstrated 78% concordance with the mutation status, the ZAP-70 expression failed to show any correlation. Cytogenetic abnormalities were seen in 76% of cases, the most frequent were del(13q) (57%), trisomy 12 (15%), del(11q) (12%) and del(17p) (6%). 95% of cases with del(11q) harbored non-mutated, 74% of cases with del(13q) as the sole anomaly demonstrated mutated IgH genes. CONCLUSIONS: The parameters analysed are not independent of each other, utilization of them in the clinical routine needs careful planning.

[Cytogenetic and molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia]. / A krónikus myeloid leukaemia citogenetikai es molekuláris monitorozása.

The t(9;22) translocation, which results in a fusion protein with abnormal tyrosine-kinase activity, plays a central role in the pathogenesis of chronic myeloid leukemia. The selective inhibition of this chimeric protein with imatinib-mesylate is an efficient therapeutic option, haematologic and cytogenetic responses can be achieved in most of the patients. The primary goal of monitoring the disease is to assess the efficiency of the therapy, to highlight those patients, whose survival may be improved by modifying treatment. Three methods are widely used for the genetic monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia. With karyotyping, the proliferating bone marrow cells can be evaluated. The use of fluorescent in situ hybridization makes the cytogenetic analysis of each cell within the sample possible. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction is capable of quantifying residual leukemia far below the sensitivity of cytogenetics. The results of these three methods have different biological meanings, thus, for the interpretation of the results, the knowledge of the characteristics, the benefits and the draw-backs of the methods is required. The present study shows the most important characteristics of these methods based on the literature and data acquired from 1165 samples of 197 patients detected by the authors.

Periconceptional clinics: a medical health care infrastructure of new genetics.

The necessary paradigm shift of medical prevention and health promotion from general prevention to specific genetic-oriented prevention require two crucial points: the selection of the optimal time for the primary prevention of birth defects and predictive genetic testing and the establishment of the appropriate healthcare infrastructure. The optimal time for the primary prevention of birth defects (e.g. neural-tube defects) and predictive genetic testing is the preconceptional period, i.e. the preparatory time for the planned conception, particularly before the first pregnancy, and the most acceptable time for the concrete diagnosis of the expected serious genetic diseases is the early postconceptional period. Theoretically, preimplantation genetic diagnosis is the optimal option for offspring of couples at high risk including autosomal and X-linked recessive, dominant disorders and chromosomal aberrations. The pre- and early postconceptional health can be addressed jointly in a new type of the health care infrastructure entitled periconceptional clinic. Periconceptional clinics seem to be appropriate for the starting point for the primary prevention of common complex diseases as well.